Vortex generator: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Gaia Octavia Agrippa
m Reverted edits by 125.237.198.147 (talk) identified as spam (HG)
 
en>Monkbot
Line 1: Line 1:
I gained a lot of weight when I was expecting with my son, plus my body occurred to shop just about each ounce left over for the upcoming four years. It didn't feel advantageous knowing I hadn't reduction anything, and I'd had enough of feeling fat all of the time. After seeing how heavy I truly looked in my brother's wedding images, I decided to lose fat by setting a New Year's resolution!<br><br>People following the 3 day cardiac diet usually likely feel hunger pangs plus have lower energy levels. This is particularly true by the third day. However, keep inside mind that the diet is of limited duration and you should be fine unless we have endurance based bodily feats to do.<br><br>Some people think which it is wise to test and lose a limited pounds before computing for their body mass index. You need to remember that doing this kind of thing is synonymous to cheating throughout an exam at school. You want to measure a real fat in order to receive a well-defined pic of how unhealthy you actually are. If you try to lose fat before the computation, you might receive a lower body mass index which will effectively mask your real condition. This usually make you think which we don't have to go to the doctor or which you don't should lose weight at all.<br><br>There are a few drawbacks to the [http://safedietplansforwomen.com/bmi-calculator bmi calculator females] we should be aware of. Older persons and others who have lost muscle will receive a false reading, considering average muscle is factored into the equation. Athletes may get the mistaken idea which they are obese, whenever the fact is they have a greater amount of lean tissue because opposed to fatty tissue.<br><br>If you be enthusiastic to make changes in a lifestyle, invest a day recording all the calories we eat. What we imagine we eat will be a amazing deal less than what you really eat. If you never count, you do not learn. Always be certain to accurately record calories to the right part size. CalorieKing.com is a superb destination to look for any kind of caloric values not found on a dietary label. They have a book adaptation that I have constantly discovered to be quite handy.<br><br>This signifies which the question of the ideal weight range for athletic ladies inside their 40's is a tough nut to crack. The body is the body, regardless what age you're and regardless of what amount of bodily activity we do. Ladies, if you would like to have the body of a 21-year-old, you are able to do it.<br><br>So, this would require time administration. There are a great deal of exercise programs available even online for you to do plus accomplish. It's all up to youIf in case as of the moment you never have the time to do it, then possibly doing a small adjustment inside your daily escapades would be a wise begin.
In [[category theory]], the '''product''' of two (or more) objects in a category is a notion designed to capture the essence behind constructions in other areas of mathematics such as the [[cartesian product|cartesian product of sets]], the [[direct product of groups]], the [[direct product of rings]] and the [[product topology|product of topological spaces]]. Essentially, the product of a family of objects is the "most general" object which admits a [[morphism]] to each of the given objects.
 
==Definition==
Let <math>\mathcal C</math> be a category with some objects <math>X_1</math> and <math>X_2</math>. An object <math>X</math> is a product of <math>X_1</math> and <math>X_2</math>, denoted <math>X_1 \times X_2</math>, iff it satisfies this [[universal property]]:
: there exist morphisms <math>\pi_1 : X \to X_1, \pi_2 : X \to X_2</math> such that for every object <math>Y</math> and pair of morphisms <math>f_1 : Y \to X_1, f_2 : Y \to X_2</math> there exists a unique morphism <math>f : Y \to X</math> such that the following diagram [[commutative diagram|commutes]]:
 
[[Image:CategoricalProduct-03.svg|280px|center|Universal product of the product]]
 
The unique morphism <math>f</math> is called the '''product of morphisms''' <math>f_1</math> and <math>f_2</math> and is denoted <math>\langle f_1, f_2 \rangle</math>. The morphisms <math>\pi_1</math> and <math>\pi_2</math> are called the '''[[canonical projection]]s''' or '''projection morphisms'''.
 
Above we defined the '''binary product'''. Instead of two objects we can take an arbitrary [[indexed family|family]] of objects indexed by some set <math>I</math>. Then we obtain the definition of a '''product'''.
 
An object <math>X</math> is the product of a family <math>\{X\}_i</math> of objects iff there exist morphisms <math>\pi_i : X \to X_i</math>, such that for every object <math>Y</math> and a <math>I</math>-indexed family of morphisms <math>f_i : Y \to X_i</math> there exists a unique morphism <math>f : Y \to X</math> such that the following diagrams commute for all <math>i \in I</math>:
 
[[Image:CategoricalProduct-01.png|center|Universal product of the product]]
 
The product is denoted <math>\prod_{i\in I} X_i</math>; if <math>I = \{1,\ldots, n\}</math>, then denoted <math>X_1 \times \cdots \times  X_n</math> and the product of morphisms is denoted <math>\langle f_1, \ldots, f_n \rangle</math>.
 
===Equational definition===
 
Alternatively, the product may be defined through equations. So, for example, for the binary product:
* Existence of <math>f</math> is guaranteed by the operation <math>\lang -,- \rang</math>.
* Commutativity of the diagrams above is guaranteed by the equality <math>\forall f_1, \forall f_2, \forall i \in \{1,2\},\ \pi_i \circ \langle f_1, f_2\rangle = f_i</math>.
* Uniqueness of <math>f</math> is guaranteed by the equality <math>\forall f,\ \langle \pi_1 \circ f,\pi_2 \circ f \rangle = f</math>.<ref>{{cite book
| author = Lambek J., Scott P. J.
| title = Introduction to Higher-Order Categorical Logic
| publisher = Cambridge University Press
| year = 1988
| page = 304
}}</ref>
 
===As a limit===
 
The product is a special case of a [[limit (category theory)|limit]]. This may be seen by using a [[discrete category]] (a family of objects without any morphisms, other than their identity morphisms) as the [[Diagram (category theory)|diagram]] required for the definition of the limit. The discrete objects will serve as the index of the components and projections. If we regard this diagram as a functor, it is a functor from the index set <math>I</math> considered as a discrete category. The definition of the product then coincides with the definition of the limit, <math>\{f\}_i</math> being a [[cone (category theory)|cone]] and projections being the limit (limiting cone).
 
===Universal property===
 
Just as the limit is a special case of the [[universal construction]], so is the product. Starting with the definition given for the [[Limit_(category_theory)#Universal_property|universal property of limits]], take <math>J</math> as the discrete category with two objects, so that <math>{\mathcal C}^{\mathcal J}</math> is simply the [[product category]] <math>\mathcal C \times \mathcal C</math>. The [[diagonal functor]] <math>\Delta : \mathcal C \to \mathcal C \times \mathcal C</math> assigns to each object <math>X</math> the [[ordered pair]] <math>(X,X)</math> and to each morphism <math>f</math> the pair <math>(f,f)</math>. The product <math>X_1 \times X_2</math> in <math>\mathcal C</math> is given by a [[universal morphism]] from the functor <math>\Delta</math> to the object <math>(X_1,X_2)</math> in <math>\mathcal C \times \mathcal C</math>. This universal morphism consists of an object <math>X</math> of <math>
\mathcal C</math> and a morphism <math>(X,X) \to (X_1,X_2)</math> which contains projections.
 
== Examples ==
In the [[category of sets]], the product (in the category theoretic sense) is the [[cartesian product]]. Given a family of sets ''X<sub>i</sub>'' the product is defined as
:<math>\prod_{i \in I} X_i := \{(x_i)_{i \in I} | x_i \in X_i \, \forall i \in I\}</math>
with the canonical projections
:<math>\pi_j : \prod_{i \in I} X_i \to X_j \mathrm{ , } \quad \pi_j((x_i)_{i \in I}) := x_j</math>
{{anchor|Product function}}
Given any set ''Y'' with a family of functions
:<math>f_i : Y \to X_i</math>
the universal arrow ''f'' is defined as
:<math>f:Y \to \prod_{i \in I} X_i \mathrm{ , } \quad f(y) := (f_i(y))_{i \in I}</math>
 
Other examples:
* In the [[category of topological spaces]], the product is the space whose underlying set is the cartesian product and which carries the [[product topology]]. The product topology is the [[coarsest topology]] for which all the projections are [[continuous function (topology)|continuous]].
* In the [[category of modules]] over some ring R, the product is the cartesian product with addition defined componentwise and distributive multiplication.
* In the [[category of groups]], the product is the [[direct product of groups]] given by the cartesian product with multiplication defined componentwise.
* In the [[category of relations]] ('''Rel'''), the product is given by the [[disjoint union]]. (This may come as a bit of a surprise given that the category of sets ('''Set''') is a [[subcategory]] of '''Rel'''.)
* In the category of [[algebraic variety|algebraic varieties]], the categorical product is given by the [[Segre embedding]].
* In the category of [[Trace monoid|semi-abelian monoid]]s, the categorical product is given by the [[history monoid]].
* A [[partially ordered set]] can be treated as a category, using the order relation as the morphisms.  In this case the products and [[coproduct]]s correspond to greatest lower bounds ([[Meet (mathematics)|meets]]) and least upper bounds ([[Join (mathematics)|joins]]).
 
== Discussion ==
 
The product does not necessarily exist. For example, an [[empty product]] (i.e. <math>I</math> is the [[empty set]]) is the same as a [[terminal object]], and some categories, such as the category of infinite groups, do not have a terminal object: given any infinite group <math>G</math> there are infinitely many morphisms <math>\mathbb{Z} \to G</math>, so <math>G</math> cannot be terminal.  
 
If <math>I</math> is a set such that all products for families indexed with <math>I</math> exist, then it is possible to choose the products in a compatible fashion so that the product turns into a [[functor]] <math>{\mathcal C}^I \to \mathcal C</math>. How this functor maps objects is obvious. Mapping of morphisms is subtle, because product of morphisms defined above does not fit. First, consider binary product functor, which is a [[bifunctor]]. For <math>f_1:X_1\to Y_1, f_2:X_2\to Y_2</math> we should find a morphism <math>X_1\times X_2 \to Y_1\times Y_2</math>. We choose <math>\langle f_1 \circ \pi_1, f_2 \circ \pi_2 \rangle</math>. This operation on morphisms is called '''cartesian product of morphisms'''.<ref name="esslli">{{cite book
| author = Michael Barr, Charles Wells
| title = Category Theory - Lecture Notes for ESSLLI
| year = 1999
| url = http://www.let.uu.nl/esslli/Courses/barr/barrwells.ps
| page = 62
}}</ref> Second, consider product functor. For families <math>\{X\}_i, \{Y\}_i, f_i : X_i \to Y_i</math> we should find a morphism <math>\prod_{i\in I}X_i \to \prod_{i\in I}Y_i</math>. We choose the product of morphisms <math>\{f_i \circ \pi_i\}_i</math>.
 
A category where every finite set of objects has a product is sometimes called a '''cartesian category'''<ref name="esslli"/>
(although some authors use this phrase to mean "a category with all finite limits").
 
The product is associative. Suppose <math>\mathcal C</math> is a cartesian category, product functors have been chosen as above, and <math>1</math> denotes the terminal object of <math>\mathcal C</math>. We then have [[natural isomorphism]]s
:<math>X\times (Y \times Z)\simeq (X\times Y)\times Z\simeq X\times Y\times Z</math>
:<math>X\times 1 \simeq 1\times X \simeq X</math>
:<math>X\times Y \simeq Y\times X</math>
These properties are formally similar to those of a commutative [[monoid]]; a category with its finite products constitutes a [[symmetric monoidal category|symmetric]] [[monoidal category]].
 
== Distributivity ==
 
In a category with finite products and coproducts, there is a canonical morphism ''X''×''Y''+''X''×''Z'' → ''X''×(''Y''+''Z''), where the plus sign here denotes the [[coproduct]].  To see this, note that we have various canonical projections and injections which fill out the diagram
 
[[File:Product-Coproduct Distributivity.png|center]]
 
The universal property for ''X''×(''Y''+''Z'')  then guarantees a unique morphism ''X''×''Y''+''X''×''Z'' → ''X''×(''Y''+''Z'').  A [[distributive category]] is one in which this morphism is actually an isomorphismThus in a distributive category, one has the canonical isomorphism
:<math>X\times (Y + Z)\simeq (X\times Y)+ (X \times Z).</math>
 
==See also==
* [[Coproduct]] &ndash; the [[Dual (category theory)|dual]] of the product
* [[Diagonal functor]] &ndash; the [[left adjoint]] of the product functor.
* [[Limit (category theory)|Limit and colimits]]
* [[Equaliser (mathematics)|Equalizer]]
* [[Inverse limit]]
* [[Cartesian closed category]]
* [[Categorical pullback]]
 
== References ==
<references/>
*{{cite book | last = Adámek | first = Jiří | coauthors = Horst Herrlich, and George E. Strecker | year = 1990 | url = http://katmat.math.uni-bremen.de/acc/acc.pdf | title = Abstract and Concrete Categories|publisher = John Wiley & Sons | isbn = 0-471-60922-6}}
*{{cite book | last = Barr | first =  Michael | coauthors = Charles Wells | title = Category Theory for Computing Science | year =  1999 | publisher =  [http://www.crm.umontreal.ca/pub/Ventes/CatalogueEng.html Les Publications CRM Montreal] (publication PM023)}} Chapter 5.
*{{cite book | first = Saunders | last = Mac Lane | authorlink = Saunders Mac Lane | year = 1998 | title = [[Categories for the Working Mathematician]] | series = Graduate Texts in Mathematics '''5''' | edition = 2nd ed. | publisher = Springer | isbn = 0-387-98403-8}}
 
== External links ==
*[http://www.j-paine.org/cgi-bin/webcats/webcats.php Interactive Web page ] which generates examples of products in the category of finite sets. Written by [http://www.j-paine.org/ Jocelyn Paine].
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Product (Category Theory)}}
[[Category:Limits (category theory)]]

Revision as of 17:36, 31 January 2014

In category theory, the product of two (or more) objects in a category is a notion designed to capture the essence behind constructions in other areas of mathematics such as the cartesian product of sets, the direct product of groups, the direct product of rings and the product of topological spaces. Essentially, the product of a family of objects is the "most general" object which admits a morphism to each of the given objects.

Definition

Let be a category with some objects and . An object is a product of and , denoted , iff it satisfies this universal property:

there exist morphisms such that for every object and pair of morphisms there exists a unique morphism such that the following diagram commutes:
Universal product of the product
Universal product of the product

The unique morphism is called the product of morphisms and and is denoted . The morphisms and are called the canonical projections or projection morphisms.

Above we defined the binary product. Instead of two objects we can take an arbitrary family of objects indexed by some set . Then we obtain the definition of a product.

An object is the product of a family of objects iff there exist morphisms , such that for every object and a -indexed family of morphisms there exists a unique morphism such that the following diagrams commute for all :

Universal product of the product
Universal product of the product

The product is denoted ; if , then denoted and the product of morphisms is denoted .

Equational definition

Alternatively, the product may be defined through equations. So, for example, for the binary product:

As a limit

The product is a special case of a limit. This may be seen by using a discrete category (a family of objects without any morphisms, other than their identity morphisms) as the diagram required for the definition of the limit. The discrete objects will serve as the index of the components and projections. If we regard this diagram as a functor, it is a functor from the index set considered as a discrete category. The definition of the product then coincides with the definition of the limit, being a cone and projections being the limit (limiting cone).

Universal property

Just as the limit is a special case of the universal construction, so is the product. Starting with the definition given for the universal property of limits, take as the discrete category with two objects, so that is simply the product category . The diagonal functor assigns to each object the ordered pair and to each morphism the pair . The product in is given by a universal morphism from the functor to the object in . This universal morphism consists of an object of and a morphism which contains projections.

Examples

In the category of sets, the product (in the category theoretic sense) is the cartesian product. Given a family of sets Xi the product is defined as

with the canonical projections

<Product function>...</Product function> Given any set Y with a family of functions

the universal arrow f is defined as

Other examples:

Discussion

The product does not necessarily exist. For example, an empty product (i.e. is the empty set) is the same as a terminal object, and some categories, such as the category of infinite groups, do not have a terminal object: given any infinite group there are infinitely many morphisms , so cannot be terminal.

If is a set such that all products for families indexed with exist, then it is possible to choose the products in a compatible fashion so that the product turns into a functor . How this functor maps objects is obvious. Mapping of morphisms is subtle, because product of morphisms defined above does not fit. First, consider binary product functor, which is a bifunctor. For we should find a morphism . We choose . This operation on morphisms is called cartesian product of morphisms.[2] Second, consider product functor. For families we should find a morphism . We choose the product of morphisms .

A category where every finite set of objects has a product is sometimes called a cartesian category[2] (although some authors use this phrase to mean "a category with all finite limits").

The product is associative. Suppose is a cartesian category, product functors have been chosen as above, and denotes the terminal object of . We then have natural isomorphisms

These properties are formally similar to those of a commutative monoid; a category with its finite products constitutes a symmetric monoidal category.

Distributivity

In a category with finite products and coproducts, there is a canonical morphism X×Y+X×ZX×(Y+Z), where the plus sign here denotes the coproduct. To see this, note that we have various canonical projections and injections which fill out the diagram

The universal property for X×(Y+Z) then guarantees a unique morphism X×Y+X×ZX×(Y+Z). A distributive category is one in which this morphism is actually an isomorphism. Thus in a distributive category, one has the canonical isomorphism

See also

References

  1. 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  2. 2.0 2.1 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534 Chapter 5.
  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534

External links