Turbofan: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Julesd
mNo edit summary
 
en>BilCat
Undid revision 575585773 by Altadena1 (talk) - unsourced - user has history of adding uncited information
Line 1: Line 1:
The use of ecigs can be a exercise that's becoming increasingly popular, and many people have taken up the utilization of e-cigs as a solution option to smoking. It is because e-cigs do not bring about ash, plus they do not cause a person’s property, garments, and auto stinking poor. One of the biggest parts of needs to employ e-cigs involves purchasing a starter kit, and there are a quantity of factors an individual should be aware of about purchasing a beginner kit. Including purchasing a marginally greater beginner kit, and there are always a handful of things someone needs to have a part of their starter kit.<br><br>Investing in a somewhat greater kit<br><br>One of the most typical blunders that persons create when first starting to smoke e-cigs is the fact that they tend to purchase the cheapest ecig that is available to them. This could cause a individual certainly not trying out the practice, and it also implies that an individual will never purchase a wonderful e cig when they do use up the practice. This is the reason it's recommended to purchase a better one, that looks just how a person want to buy to, and it's also a good good thought to purchase one which can be gradually improved with time.<br><br>What ought to be contained in the kit<br><br>A good starter-kit may have such things as a charger that is user friendly. The kit should also contain guidelines on how best to populate the e-cigarette with liquid, a rag to scrub it with, also it also needs to possess a some additional e-juice or capsules. Visit [http://ciglites.metroblog.com/ Read More On this page].
In [[abstract algebra]] and [[logic]], the '''distributive property''' of [[binary operation]]s generalizes the '''distributive law''' from [[elementary algebra]]. In [[propositional calculus|propositional logic]], '''distribution''' refers to two [[validity|valid]] [[rule of replacement|rules of replacement]]. The rules allow one to reformulate [[logical conjunction|conjunctions]] and [[logical disjunction|disjunctions]] within [[formal proof|logical proofs]].
 
For example, in [[arithmetic]]:
: 2 · (1 + 3) = (2 · 1) + (2 · 3), but 2 / (1 + 3) ≠ (2 / 1) + (2 / 3).
 
In the left-hand  side of the first equation, the 2 multiplies the sum of 1 and 3; on the right-hand side, it multiplies the 1 and the 3 individually, with the products added afterwards.
Because these give the same final answer (8), we say that multiplication by 2 ''distributes'' over addition of 1 and 3.
Since we could have put any [[real number]]s in place of 2, 1, and 3 above, and still have obtained a true equation, we say that [[multiplication]] of real numbers ''distributes'' over [[addition]] of real numbers.
 
==Definition==
 
Given a [[Set (mathematics)|set]] ''S'' and two [[binary operator]]s <math>*</math> and <math>+</math> on ''S'', we say that the operation <math>*</math>
 
* is ''left-distributive'' over <math>+</math> if, [[given any]] elements ''x'', ''y'', and ''z'' of ''S'',
::<math>x * (y + z) = (x * y) + (x * z)</math>
* is ''right-distributive'' over <math>+</math> if, [[given any]] elements ''x'', ''y'', and ''z'' of ''S'':
::<math>(y + z) * x = (y * x) + (z * x)</math>
* is ''distributive'' over <math>+</math> if it is left- and right-distributive.<ref>Ayres, [http://books.google.com/books?id=7r3bVWx2GHkC&pg=PA20&dq=%22binary+operation%22+%22Left+distributive%22#PPA20,M1 p. 20].</ref>
 
Notice that when <math>*</math> is [[commutative]], then the three above conditions are [[logical equivalence|logically equivalent]].
 
== Propositional logic ==
{{Transformation rules}}
 
=== Rule of replacement ===
In standard truth-functional propositional logic, ''distribution''<ref>Moore and Parker</ref><ref>Copi and Cohen</ref><ref>Hurley</ref> are two valid rule of replacement. The rules allow one to distribute certain [[logical connective]]s within [[well-formed formula|logical expressions]] in logical proofs. The rules are:
 
:<math>(P \and (Q \or R)) \Leftrightarrow ((P \and Q) \or (P \and R))</math>
and
:<math>(P \or (Q \and R)) \Leftrightarrow ((P \or Q) \and (P \or R))</math>
 
where "<math>\Leftrightarrow</math>" is a [[metalogic]]al [[Symbol (formal)|symbol]] representing "can be replaced in a proof with."
 
=== Truth functional connectives ===
''Distributivity'' is a property of some logical connectives of truth-functional [[propositional logic]]. The following logical equivalences demonstrate that distributivity is a property of particular connectives. The following are truth-functional [[tautology (logic)|tautologies]].
 
'''Distribution of conjunction over conjunction'''
:<math>(P \and (Q \and R)) \leftrightarrow ((P \and Q) \and (P \and R))</math>
'''Distribution of conjunction over disjunction'''<ref>[[Bertrand Russell|Russell]] and [[Alfred Whitehead|Whitehead]], ''[[Principia Mathematica]]''</ref>
:<math>(P \and (Q \or R)) \leftrightarrow ((P \and Q) \or (P \and R))</math>
'''Distribution of disjunction over conjunction'''<ref>[[Bertrand Russell|Russell]] and [[Alfred Whitehead|Whitehead]], ''[[Principia Mathematica]]''</ref>
:<math>(P \or (Q \and R)) \leftrightarrow ((P \or Q) \and (P \or R))</math>
'''Distribution of disjunction over disjunction'''
:<math>(P \or (Q \or R)) \leftrightarrow ((P \or Q) \or (P \or R))</math>
'''Distribution of implication'''
:<math>(P \to (Q \to R)) \leftrightarrow ((P \to Q) \to (P \to R))</math>
'''Distribution of implication over equivalence'''
:<math>P \to (Q \leftrightarrow R) \leftrightarrow ((P \to Q) \leftrightarrow (P \to R))</math>
'''Distribution of disjunction over equivalence'''
:<math>(P \or (Q \leftrightarrow R)) \leftrightarrow ((P \or Q) \leftrightarrow (P \or R))</math>
'''Double distribution'''
:<math>\begin{align}
  ((P \and Q) \or (R \and S)) \leftrightarrow (((P \or R) \and (P \or S)) \and ((Q \or R) \and (Q \or S))) \\
  ((P \or Q) \and (R \or S)) \leftrightarrow (((P \and R) \or (P \and S)) \or ((Q \and R) \or (Q \and S)))
\end{align}</math>
 
==Examples==
 
# Multiplication of [[number]]s is distributive over addition of numbers, for a broad class of different kinds of numbers ranging from [[natural number]]s to [[complex number]]s and [[cardinal number]]s.
# [[Ordinal arithmetic#Multiplication|Multiplication]] of [[ordinal number]]s, in contrast, is only left-distributive, not right-distributive.
# The [[cross product]] is left- and right-distributive over [[vector addition]], though not commutative.
# [[matrix (mathematics)|Matrix]] [[Matrix multiplication|multiplication]] is distributive over [[matrix addition]], though also not commutative.
# The [[union (set theory)|union]] of sets is distributive over [[intersection (set theory)|intersection]], and intersection is distributive over union.
# Logical disjunction ("or") is distributive over logical conjunction ("and"), and conjunction is distributive over disjunction.
# For [[real number]]s (and for any [[totally ordered set]]), the maximum operation is distributive over the minimum operation, and vice-versa: max(''a'',min(''b'',''c'')) = min(max(''a'',''b''),max(''a'',''c'')) and min(''a'',max(''b'',''c'')) = max(min(''a'',''b''),min(''a'',''c'')).
# For [[integer]]s, the [[greatest common divisor]] is distributive over the [[least common multiple]], and vice-versa: gcd(''a'',lcm(''b'',''c'')) = lcm(gcd(''a'',''b''),gcd(''a'',''c'')) and lcm(''a'',gcd(''b'',''c'')) = gcd(lcm(''a'',''b''),lcm(''a'',''c'')).
# For real numbers, addition distributes over the maximum operation, and also over the minimum operation: ''a'' + max(''b'',''c'') = max(''a''+''b'',''a''+''c'') and ''a'' + min(''b'',''c'') = min(''a''+''b'',''a''+''c'').
 
==Distributivity and rounding==
In practice, the distributive property of multiplication (and division) over addition may appear to be compromised or lost because of the limitations of [[arithmetic precision]]. For example, the identity ⅓ + ⅓ + ⅓ = (1 + 1 + 1) / 3  appears to fail if the addition is conducted in [[decimal arithmetic]]; however, if many [[significant digit]]s are used, the calculation will result in a closer approximation to the correct results.  For example, if the arithmetical calculation takes the form: 0.33333 + 0.33333 + 0.33333 = 0.99999 ≠ 1, this result is a closer approximation than if fewer significant digits had been used.  Even when fractional numbers can be represented exactly in arithmetical form, errors will be introduced if those arithmetical values are rounded or truncated.  For example, buying two books, each priced at £14.99 before a [[VAT|tax]] of 17.5%, in two separate transactions will actually save £0.01, over buying them together: £14.99 × 1.175 = £17.61 to the nearest £0.01, giving a total expenditure of £35.22, but £29.98 × 1.175 = £35.23.  Methods such as [[Rounding#Round half to even|banker's rounding]] may help in some cases, as may increasing the precision used, but ultimately some calculation errors are inevitable.
 
==Distributivity in rings==
Distributivity is most commonly found in [[ring (algebra)|ring]]s and [[distributive lattice]]s.
 
A ring has two binary operations (commonly called "+" and "*"), and one of the requirements of a ring is that * must distribute over +.
Most kinds of numbers (example 1) and matrices (example 4) form rings.
A [[lattice (order)|lattice]] is another kind of [[algebraic structure]] with two binary operations, ∧ and ∨.
If either of these operations (say ∧) distributes over the other (∨), then ∨ must also distribute over ∧, and the lattice is called distributive. See also the article on [[distributivity (order theory)]].
 
Examples 4 and 5 are [[Boolean algebra (structure)|Boolean algebra]]s, which can be interpreted either as a special kind of ring (a [[Boolean ring]]) or a special kind of distributive lattice (a [[Boolean lattice]]). Each interpretation is responsible for different distributive laws in the Boolean algebra. Examples 6 and 7 are distributive lattices which are not Boolean algebras.
 
Failure of one of the two distributive laws brings about [[near-ring]]s and [[near-field (mathematics)|near-field]]s instead of rings and [[division ring]]s respectively. The operations are usually configured to have the near-ring or near-field distributive on the right but not on the left.
 
Rings and distributive lattices are both special kinds of [[rig (algebra)|rig]]s, certain generalizations of rings.
Those numbers in example 1 that don't form rings at least form rigs.
[[Near-rig]]s are a further generalization of rigs that are left-distributive but not right-distributive; example 2 is a near-rig.
 
==Generalizations of distributivity==
 
In several mathematical areas, generalized distributivity laws are considered. This may involve the weakening of the above conditions or the extension to infinitary operations. Especially in [[order theory]] one finds numerous important variants of distributivity, some of which include infinitary operations, such as the [[infinite distributive law]]; others being defined in the presence of only ''one'' binary operation, such as the according definitions and their relations are given in the article [[distributivity (order theory)]]. This also includes the notion of a '''[[completely distributive lattice]]'''.
 
In the presence of an ordering relation, one can also weaken the above equalities by replacing = by either ≤ or ≥. Naturally, this will lead to meaningful concepts only in some situations. An application of this principle is the notion of '''sub-distributivity''' as explained in the article on [[interval arithmetic]].
 
In [[category theory]], if ''(S, μ, η)'' and ''(S', μ', η')'' are [[monad (category theory)|monad]]s on a [[category (mathematics)|category]] ''C'', a '''distributive law''' ''S.S' → S'.S'' is a [[natural transformation]] ''λ : S.S' → S'.S'' such that (''S' '', λ) is a [[lax map of monads]] ''S → S'' and (''S'', λ) is a [[colax map of monads]] ''S' → S' ''. This is exactly the data needed to define a monad structure on ''S'.S'': the multiplication map is ''S'μ.μ'S².S'λS'' and the unit map is ''η'S.η''. See: [[distributive law between monads]].
 
A [[generalized distributive law]] has also been proposed in the area of [[information theory]].
 
==Notes==
{{reflist}}
 
==References==
* Ayres, Frank, ''Schaum's Outline of Modern Abstract Algebra'', McGraw-Hill; 1st edition (June 1, 1965). ISBN 0-07-002655-6.
 
== External links ==
{{Wiktionary|distributivity}}
*[http://www.cut-the-knot.org/Curriculum/Arithmetic/DistributiveLaw.shtml A demonstration of the Distributive Law] for integer arithmetic (from [[cut-the-knot]])
 
[[Category:Abstract algebra]]
[[Category:Binary operations|*Distributivity]]
[[Category:Elementary algebra]]
[[Category:Rules of inference]]
[[Category:Theorems in propositional logic]]

Revision as of 18:38, 14 January 2014

In abstract algebra and logic, the distributive property of binary operations generalizes the distributive law from elementary algebra. In propositional logic, distribution refers to two valid rules of replacement. The rules allow one to reformulate conjunctions and disjunctions within logical proofs.

For example, in arithmetic:

2 · (1 + 3) = (2 · 1) + (2 · 3), but 2 / (1 + 3) ≠ (2 / 1) + (2 / 3).

In the left-hand side of the first equation, the 2 multiplies the sum of 1 and 3; on the right-hand side, it multiplies the 1 and the 3 individually, with the products added afterwards. Because these give the same final answer (8), we say that multiplication by 2 distributes over addition of 1 and 3. Since we could have put any real numbers in place of 2, 1, and 3 above, and still have obtained a true equation, we say that multiplication of real numbers distributes over addition of real numbers.

Definition

Given a set S and two binary operators and on S, we say that the operation

Notice that when is commutative, then the three above conditions are logically equivalent.

Propositional logic

Template:Transformation rules

Rule of replacement

In standard truth-functional propositional logic, distribution[2][3][4] are two valid rule of replacement. The rules allow one to distribute certain logical connectives within logical expressions in logical proofs. The rules are:

and

where "" is a metalogical symbol representing "can be replaced in a proof with."

Truth functional connectives

Distributivity is a property of some logical connectives of truth-functional propositional logic. The following logical equivalences demonstrate that distributivity is a property of particular connectives. The following are truth-functional tautologies.

Distribution of conjunction over conjunction

Distribution of conjunction over disjunction[5]

Distribution of disjunction over conjunction[6]

Distribution of disjunction over disjunction

Distribution of implication

Distribution of implication over equivalence

Distribution of disjunction over equivalence

Double distribution

Examples

  1. Multiplication of numbers is distributive over addition of numbers, for a broad class of different kinds of numbers ranging from natural numbers to complex numbers and cardinal numbers.
  2. Multiplication of ordinal numbers, in contrast, is only left-distributive, not right-distributive.
  3. The cross product is left- and right-distributive over vector addition, though not commutative.
  4. Matrix multiplication is distributive over matrix addition, though also not commutative.
  5. The union of sets is distributive over intersection, and intersection is distributive over union.
  6. Logical disjunction ("or") is distributive over logical conjunction ("and"), and conjunction is distributive over disjunction.
  7. For real numbers (and for any totally ordered set), the maximum operation is distributive over the minimum operation, and vice-versa: max(a,min(b,c)) = min(max(a,b),max(a,c)) and min(a,max(b,c)) = max(min(a,b),min(a,c)).
  8. For integers, the greatest common divisor is distributive over the least common multiple, and vice-versa: gcd(a,lcm(b,c)) = lcm(gcd(a,b),gcd(a,c)) and lcm(a,gcd(b,c)) = gcd(lcm(a,b),lcm(a,c)).
  9. For real numbers, addition distributes over the maximum operation, and also over the minimum operation: a + max(b,c) = max(a+b,a+c) and a + min(b,c) = min(a+b,a+c).

Distributivity and rounding

In practice, the distributive property of multiplication (and division) over addition may appear to be compromised or lost because of the limitations of arithmetic precision. For example, the identity ⅓ + ⅓ + ⅓ = (1 + 1 + 1) / 3 appears to fail if the addition is conducted in decimal arithmetic; however, if many significant digits are used, the calculation will result in a closer approximation to the correct results. For example, if the arithmetical calculation takes the form: 0.33333 + 0.33333 + 0.33333 = 0.99999 ≠ 1, this result is a closer approximation than if fewer significant digits had been used. Even when fractional numbers can be represented exactly in arithmetical form, errors will be introduced if those arithmetical values are rounded or truncated. For example, buying two books, each priced at £14.99 before a tax of 17.5%, in two separate transactions will actually save £0.01, over buying them together: £14.99 × 1.175 = £17.61 to the nearest £0.01, giving a total expenditure of £35.22, but £29.98 × 1.175 = £35.23. Methods such as banker's rounding may help in some cases, as may increasing the precision used, but ultimately some calculation errors are inevitable.

Distributivity in rings

Distributivity is most commonly found in rings and distributive lattices.

A ring has two binary operations (commonly called "+" and "*"), and one of the requirements of a ring is that * must distribute over +. Most kinds of numbers (example 1) and matrices (example 4) form rings. A lattice is another kind of algebraic structure with two binary operations, ∧ and ∨. If either of these operations (say ∧) distributes over the other (∨), then ∨ must also distribute over ∧, and the lattice is called distributive. See also the article on distributivity (order theory).

Examples 4 and 5 are Boolean algebras, which can be interpreted either as a special kind of ring (a Boolean ring) or a special kind of distributive lattice (a Boolean lattice). Each interpretation is responsible for different distributive laws in the Boolean algebra. Examples 6 and 7 are distributive lattices which are not Boolean algebras.

Failure of one of the two distributive laws brings about near-rings and near-fields instead of rings and division rings respectively. The operations are usually configured to have the near-ring or near-field distributive on the right but not on the left.

Rings and distributive lattices are both special kinds of rigs, certain generalizations of rings. Those numbers in example 1 that don't form rings at least form rigs. Near-rigs are a further generalization of rigs that are left-distributive but not right-distributive; example 2 is a near-rig.

Generalizations of distributivity

In several mathematical areas, generalized distributivity laws are considered. This may involve the weakening of the above conditions or the extension to infinitary operations. Especially in order theory one finds numerous important variants of distributivity, some of which include infinitary operations, such as the infinite distributive law; others being defined in the presence of only one binary operation, such as the according definitions and their relations are given in the article distributivity (order theory). This also includes the notion of a completely distributive lattice.

In the presence of an ordering relation, one can also weaken the above equalities by replacing = by either ≤ or ≥. Naturally, this will lead to meaningful concepts only in some situations. An application of this principle is the notion of sub-distributivity as explained in the article on interval arithmetic.

In category theory, if (S, μ, η) and (S', μ', η') are monads on a category C, a distributive law S.S' → S'.S is a natural transformation λ : S.S' → S'.S such that (S' , λ) is a lax map of monads S → S and (S, λ) is a colax map of monads S' → S' . This is exactly the data needed to define a monad structure on S'.S: the multiplication map is S'μ.μ'S².S'λS and the unit map is η'S.η. See: distributive law between monads.

A generalized distributive law has also been proposed in the area of information theory.

Notes

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

References

  • Ayres, Frank, Schaum's Outline of Modern Abstract Algebra, McGraw-Hill; 1st edition (June 1, 1965). ISBN 0-07-002655-6.

External links

Property Brokers and Team Managers – Looking for good Actual Estate Agency to join or contemplating which is the Finest Property Agency to join in Singapore? Join Leon Low in OrangeTee Singapore! In OrangeTee, we've much more attractive commission structure than before, enrichment courses, 10 most vital components to hitch OrangeTee and 1 motive to join Leon Low and his Workforce. 1. Conducive working environment

Via PropNex International, we continually construct on our fame in the international property enviornment. Click here for more of our abroad initiatives. Instances have modified. We don't see those unlawful hawkers anymore. Instead, nicely dressed property brokers were seen reaching out to people visiting the market in the morning. Real estate can be a lonely enterprise and it is straightforward to really feel demoralised, especially when there are no enquiries despite your greatest effort in advertising your shopper's property. That is the place having the fitting assist from fellow associates is essential. Our firm offers administration services for condominiums and apartments. With a crew of qualified folks, we assist to make your estate a nicer place to stay in. HDB Flat for Hire 2 Rooms

Achievers are all the time the first to check new technologies & providers that can help them enhance their sales. When property guru first began, many brokers didn't consider in it until they began listening to other colleagues getting unbelievable outcomes. Most brokers needs to see proof first, before they dare to take the first step in attempting. These are often the late comers or late adopters. There is a purpose why top achievers are heading the wave or heading the best way. Just because they try new properties in singapore issues ahead of others. The rest just observe after!

Firstly, a Fraudulent Misrepresentation is one that is made knowingly by the Representor that it was false or if it was made without belief in its fact or made recklessly without concerning whether or not it is true or false. For instance estate agent A told the potential consumers that the tenure of a landed property they are considering is freehold when it is really one with a ninety nine-yr leasehold! A is responsible of constructing a fraudulent misrepresentation if he is aware of that the tenure is the truth is a ninety nine-yr leasehold instead of it being freehold or he didn't consider that the tenure of the house was freehold or he had made the assertion with out caring whether or not the tenure of the topic property is in fact freehold.

I such as you to be, am a brand new projects specialist. You've got the conception that new tasks personnel should be showflat certain. Should you're eager, let me train you the right way to master the entire show flats island vast as a substitute of getting to stay just at 1 place. Is that attainable you may ask, well, I've achieved it in 6 months, you can too. Which company is well-recognized and is actually dedicated for developing rookie within the industry in venture sales market with success? Can a rookie join the company's core group from day one? I wish to propose a third class, which I have been grooming my agents in the direction of, and that is as a Huttons agent, you will be able to market and have knowledge of ALL Huttons projects, and if essential, projects exterior of Huttons as properly.

GPS has assembled a high workforce of personnel who are additionally well-known figures in the native actual property scene to pioneer this up-and-coming organization. At GPS Alliance, WE LEAD THE WAY! Many people have asked me how I managed to earn S$114,000 from my sales job (my third job) at age 24. The reply is easy. After graduation from NUS with a Historical past diploma, my first job was in actual estate. Within the ultimate part of this series, I interview one of the top agents in ERA Horizon Group and share with you the secrets to his success! Learn it RIGHT HERE

Notice that the application must be submitted by the appointed Key Government Officer (KEO) such as the CEO, COO, or MD. Once the KEO has submitted the mandatory paperwork and assuming all documents are in order, an email notification shall be sent stating that the applying is permitted. No hardcopy of the license might be issued. A delicate-copy could be downloaded and printed by logging into the CEA website. It takes roughly four-6 weeks to course of an utility.

  1. Ayres, p. 20.
  2. Moore and Parker
  3. Copi and Cohen
  4. Hurley
  5. Russell and Whitehead, Principia Mathematica
  6. Russell and Whitehead, Principia Mathematica