Z-transform
{{#invoke:Hatnote|hatnote}}
In mathematics and signal processing, the Z-transform converts a discrete-time signal, which is a sequence of real or complex numbers, into a complex frequency domain representation.
It can be considered as a discrete-time equivalent of the Laplace transform. This similarity is explored in the theory of time scale calculus.
History
The basic idea now known as the Z-transform was known to Laplace, and re-introduced in 1947 by W. Hurewicz as a tractable way to solve linear, constant-coefficient difference equations.^{[1]} It was later dubbed "the z-transform" by Ragazzini and Zadeh in the sampled-data control group at Columbia University in 1952.^{[2]}^{[3]}
The modified or advanced Z-transform was later developed and popularized by E. I. Jury.^{[4]}^{[5]}
The idea contained within the Z-transform is also known in mathematical literature as the method of generating functions which can be traced back as early as 1730 when it was introduced by de Moivre in conjunction with probability theory.^{[6]} From a mathematical view the Z-transform can also be viewed as a Laurent series where one views the sequence of numbers under consideration as the (Laurent) expansion of an analytic function.
Definition
The Z-transform, like many integral transforms, can be defined as either a one-sided or two-sided transform.
Bilateral Z-transform
The bilateral or two-sided Z-transform of a discrete-time signal x[n] is the formal power series X(z) defined as
where n is an integer and z is, in general, a complex number:
where A is the magnitude of z, j is the imaginary unit, and ɸ is the complex argument (also referred to as angle or phase) in radians.
Unilateral Z-transform
Alternatively, in cases where x[n] is defined only for n ≥ 0, the single-sided or unilateral Z-transform is defined as
In signal processing, this definition can be used to evaluate the Z-transform of the unit impulse response of a discrete-time causal system.
An important example of the unilateral Z-transform is the probability-generating function, where the component x[n] is the probability that a discrete random variable takes the value n, and the function X(z) is usually written as X(s), in terms of s = z^{−1}. The properties of Z-transforms (below) have useful interpretations in the context of probability theory.
Geophysical definition
In geophysics, the usual definition for the Z-transform is a power series in z as opposed to z^{−1}. This convention is used, for example, by Robinson and Treitel^{[7]} and by Kanasewich.^{[8]} The geophysical definition is:
The two definitions are equivalent; however, the difference results in a number of changes. For example, the location of zeros and poles move from inside the unit circle using one definition, to outside the unit circle using the other definition.^{[7]}^{[8]} Thus, care is required to note which definition is being used by a particular author.
Inverse Z-transform
The inverse Z-transform is
where C is a counterclockwise closed path encircling the origin and entirely in the region of convergence (ROC). In the case where the ROC is causal (see Example 2), this means the path C must encircle all of the poles of X(z).
A special case of this contour integral occurs when C is the unit circle (and can be used when the ROC includes the unit circle which is always guaranteed when X(z) is stable, i.e. all the poles are within the unit circle). The inverse Z-transform simplifies to the inverse discrete-time Fourier transform:
The Z-transform with a finite range of n and a finite number of uniformly spaced z values can be computed efficiently via Bluestein's FFT algorithm. The discrete-time Fourier transform (DTFT)—not to be confused with the discrete Fourier transform (DFT)—is a special case of such a Z-transform obtained by restricting z to lie on the unit circle.
Region of convergence
The region of convergence (ROC) is the set of points in the complex plane for which the Z-transform summation converges.
Example 1 (no ROC)
Let x[n] = (0.5)^{n}. Expanding x[n] on the interval (−∞, ∞) it becomes
Looking at the sum
Therefore, there are no values of z that satisfy this condition.
Example 2 (causal ROC)
Let (where u is the Heaviside step function). Expanding x[n] on the interval (−∞, ∞) it becomes
Looking at the sum
The last equality arises from the infinite geometric series and the equality only holds if |0.5z^{−1}| < 1 which can be rewritten in terms of z as |z| > 0.5. Thus, the ROC is |z| > 0.5. In this case the ROC is the complex plane with a disc of radius 0.5 at the origin "punched out".
Example 3 (anticausal ROC)
Let (where u is the Heaviside step function). Expanding x[n] on the interval (−∞, ∞) it becomes
Looking at the sum
Using the infinite geometric series, again, the equality only holds if |0.5^{−1}z| < 1 which can be rewritten in terms of z as |z| < 0.5. Thus, the ROC is |z| < 0.5. In this case the ROC is a disc centered at the origin and of radius 0.5.
What differentiates this example from the previous example is only the ROC. This is intentional to demonstrate that the transform result alone is insufficient.
Examples conclusion
Examples 2 & 3 clearly show that the Z-transform X(z) of x[n] is unique when and only when specifying the ROC. Creating the pole–zero plot for the causal and anticausal case show that the ROC for either case does not include the pole that is at 0.5. This extends to cases with multiple poles: the ROC will never contain poles.
In example 2, the causal system yields an ROC that includes |z| = ∞ while the anticausal system in example 3 yields an ROC that includes |z| = 0.
In systems with multiple poles it is possible to have an ROC that includes neither |z| = ∞ nor |z| = 0. The ROC creates a circular band. For example,
has poles at 0.5 and 0.75. The ROC will be 0.5 < |z| < 0.75, which includes neither the origin nor infinity. Such a system is called a mixed-causality system as it contains a causal term (0.5)^{n}u[n] and an anticausal term −(0.75)^{n}u[−n−1].
The stability of a system can also be determined by knowing the ROC alone. If the ROC contains the unit circle (i.e., |z| = 1) then the system is stable. In the above systems the causal system (Example 2) is stable because |z| > 0.5 contains the unit circle.
If you are provided a Z-transform of a system without an ROC (i.e., an ambiguous x[n]) you can determine a unique x[n] provided you desire the following:
- Stability
- Causality
If you need stability then the ROC must contain the unit circle. If you need a causal system then the ROC must contain infinity and the system function will be a right-sided sequence. If you need an anticausal system then the ROC must contain the origin and the system function will be a left-sided sequence. If you need both, stability and causality, all the poles of the system function must be inside the unit circle.
The unique x[n] can then be found.
Properties
Time domain | Z-domain | Proof | ROC | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Notation | ||||
Linearity | Contains ROC_{1} ∩ ROC_{2} | |||
Time expansion |
r: integer |
|||
Decimation | ohio-state.edu or ee.ic.ac.uk | |||
Time shifting | ROC, except z = 0 if k > 0 and z = ∞ if k < 0 | |||
Scaling in
the z-domain |
||||
Time reversal | ||||
Complex conjugation | ||||
Real part | ||||
Imaginary part | ||||
Differentiation | ||||
Convolution | Contains ROC_{1} ∩ ROC_{2} | |||
Cross-correlation | Contains the intersection of ROC of and | |||
First difference | Contains the intersection of ROC of X_{1}(z) and z ≠ 0 | |||
Accumulation | ||||
Multiplication | - |
Initial value theorem: If x[n] is causal, then
Final value theorem: If the poles of (z−1)X(z) are inside the unit circle, then
Table of common Z-transform pairs
Here:
is the unit (or Heaviside) step function and
is the discrete-time (or Dirac delta) unit impulse function. Both are usually not considered as true functions but as distributions due to their discontinuity (their value on n = 0 usually does not really matter, except when working in discrete time, in which case they become degenerate discrete series ; in this section they are chosen to take the value 1 on n = 0, both for the continuous and discrete time domains, otherwise the content of the ROC column below would not apply). The two "functions" are chosen together so that the unit step function is the integral of the unit impulse function (in the continuous time domain), or the summation of the unit impulse function is the unit step function (in the discrete time domain), hence the choice of making their value on n = 0 fixed here to 1.
Signal, | Z-transform, | ROC | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | all z | |
2 | |||
3 | |||
4 | |||
5 | |||
6 | |||
7 | |||
8 | |||
9 | |||
10 | |||
11 | |||
12 | |||
13 | |||
14 | |||
15 | |||
16 | |||
17 | |||
18 | |||
19 | |||
20 | |||
21 |
Relationship to Fourier series and Fourier transform
For values of z in the region |z|=1, known as the unit circle, we can express the transform as a function of a single, real variable, ω, by defining z=e^{jω}. And the bi-lateral transform reduces to a Fourier series:
which is also known as the discrete-time Fourier transform (DTFT) of the x[n] sequence. This 2π-periodic function is the periodic summation of a Fourier transform, which makes it a widely used analysis tool. To understand this, let X(f) be the Fourier transform of any function, x(t), whose samples at some interval, T, equal the x[n] sequence. Then the DTFT of the x[n] sequence can be written as:
When T has units of seconds, has units of hertz. Comparison of the two series reveals that is a normalized frequency with units of radians per sample. The value ω=2π corresponds to Hz. And now, with the substitution