User talk:199.8.99.254

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Lunch 22:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Draining and development of the Everglades has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Nsaa (talk) 19:20, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Draining and development of the Everglades constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 19:21, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

Dear 199.8.99.254,
Some of your edits on the page January 12 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

Law of sines

In law of sines you recently changed

${\displaystyle {\frac {a}{\sin A}}={\frac {b}{\sin B}}={\frac {c}{\sin C}}=2R}$

to

${\displaystyle {\frac {\sin A}{a}}={\frac {\sin B}{b}}={\frac {\sin C}{c}}=2R.}$

This would have been correct if it had said

${\displaystyle {\frac {\sin A}{a}}={\frac {\sin B}{b}}={\frac {\sin C}{c}}={\frac {1}{2R}},}$

and the version you found there initially was also correct. I have changed it to read as follows:

${\displaystyle \underbrace {{\frac {a}{\sin A}}={\frac {b}{\sin B}}={\frac {c}{\sin C}}} _{\text{Law of sines}}=2R}$

where R is the radius of the triangle's circumcircle. The law of sines is also sometimes stated as

${\displaystyle {\frac {\sin A}{a}}={\frac {\sin B}{b}}={\frac {\sin C}{c}}.}$

Michael Hardy (talk) 18:21, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

January 2009

Dear 199.8.99.254,
Some of your edits on the page April 16 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:47, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

The recent edit you made to Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Kyle1278 (talk) 02:17, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Marek.69 talk 02:20, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis was changed by 199.8.99.254 (u) (t) deleting 38545 characters on 2009-03-19T02:29:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:29, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text Template:Tlx below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 02:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Dear 199.8.99.254,
Some of your edits on the page April 16 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Members of the 111th United States Congress has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jdrewitt (talk) 01:11, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Spider. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. --Rrburke(talk) 01:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to 1992 Los Angeles riots has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 03:21, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

April 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Flint, Michigan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TomCat4680 (talk) 02:28, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Edit tests on Belle Gunness

Welcome and thank you for your contributions. This is a notice that your test on the page Belle Gunness has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. This is an automated message from 28bot. False positive? Please report it. 28bot (talk) 23:05, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.