# Separable algebra

In mathematics, a **separable algebra** is a kind of semisimple algebra. It is a generalization to associative algebras of the notion of a separable field extension.

## Definition and First Properties

Let *K* be a field. An associative *K*-algebra *A* is said to be **separable** if for every field extension the algebra is semisimple.

There is a classification theorem for separable algebras: separable algebras are the same as finite products of matrix algebras over division algebras whose centers are finite dimensional separable field extensions of the field *K*. If *K* is a perfect field --- for example a field of characteristic zero, or a finite field, or an algebraically closed field --- then every extension of *K* is separable. As a result, if *K* is a perfect field, separable algebras are the same as finite products of matrix algebras over division algebras whose centers are finite-dimensional field extensions of the field *K*. In other words, if *K* is a perfect field, there is no difference between a separable algebra over *K* and a finite-dimensional semisimple algebra over *K*.

There are a several equivalent characterizations of separable algebras. First, an algebra *A* is separable if and only if there exists an element

in the *enveloping algebra*^{[1]} such that

and *ap* = *pa* for all *a* in *A*. Such an element *p* is called a **separability idempotent**, since it satisfies . A generalized theorem of Maschke shows these this characterization of separable algebras is equivalent to the definition given above.

Second, an algebra *A* is separable if and only if it is projective when considered as a left module of in the usual way.^{[2]}

Third, an algebra *A* is separable if and only if it is flat when considered as a right module of in the usual (but perhaps not quite standard) way. See Aguiar's note below for more details.

Furthermore, a result of Eilenberg and Nakayama has that any separable algebra can be given the structure of a symmetric Frobenius algebra. Since the underlying vector space of a Frobenius algebra is isomorphic to its dual, any Frobenius algebra is necessarily finite dimensional, and so the same is true for separable algebras.

A separable algebra is said to be **strongly separable** if there exists a separability idempotent that is **symmetric**, meaning

An algebra is strongly separable if and only if its trace form is nondegenerate, thus making the algebra into a special Frobenius algebra.

## Commutative separable algebras

If is a field extension, then *L* is separable as an associative *K*-algebra if and only if the extension of field is separable.
If L/K has primitive element a with irreducible polynomial , then a separability idempotent is given by . The tensorands are dual bases for the trace map: if are the distinct K-monomorphisms of L into an algebraic closure of K, the trace mapping Tr of L into K is defined by Tr(x) = . The trace map and its dual bases make explicit L as a Frobenius algebra over K.

## Examples

If *K* is a field and *G* is a finite group such that the order of *G* is invertible in *K*, then the group ring *K*[*G*] is a separable *K*-algebra.
A separability idempotent is given by .

## Separable extensions for noncommutative rings

Let R be an associative ring with unit 1, and S a subring of R containing 1. Notice that an R-R-bimodule (see module theory and homological algebra) restricts to an S-S-bimodule. The ring extension R over S is said to be a separable extension if all short exact sequences of R-R-bimodules that are split as R-S-bimodules also split as R-R-bimodules. For example, the multiplication mapping m : given by is an R-R-bimodule epimorphism, which is split as an R-S-bimodule epi by the right inverse mapping given by . If R is a separable extension over S, then the multiplication mapping is split as an R-R-bimodule epi, so there is a right inverse s of m satisfying for s(1) := e, re = er for all r in R, and m(e) = 1. Conversely, if such an element (called a separability element in the tensor-square) exists, one shows by a judicious use of this element (like Maschke, applying its components within and without the splitting maps) that R is a separable extension of S.

Equivalently, the relative Hochschild cohomology groups of (R,S) in any coefficient bimodule M is zero for n > 0. Examples of separable extensions are many including first separable algebras where R = separable algebra and S = 1 times the ground field. More interestingly, any ring R with elements a and b satisfying ab = 1, but ba different from 1, is a separable extension over the subring S generated by 1 and bRa.

An interesting theorem in the area is that of J. Cuadra that a separable Hopf-Galois extension R | S has finitely generated natural S-module R. A fundamental fact about a separable extension R | S is that it is left or right semisimple extension: a short exact sequence of left or right R-modules that is split as S-modules, is split as R-modules. In terms of G. Hochschild's relative homological algebra, one says that all R-modules are relative (R,S)-projective. Usually relative properties of subrings or ring extensions, such as the notion of separable extension, serve to promote theorems that say that the over-ring shares a property of the subring. For example, a separable extension R of a semisimple algebra S has R semisimple, which follows from the preceding discussion.

There is the celebrated Jans theorem that a finite group algebra A over a field of
characteristic p is of finite representation type if and only if its Sylow p-subgroup is cyclic: the clearest proof is to note this fact for p-groups, then note that the group algebra is a separable extension of its Sylow p-subgroup algebra B as the index is coprime to the characteristic. The separability condition above will imply every finitely generated A-module M is isomorphic to a direct summand
in its restricted, induced module. But if B has finite representation type, the restricted module
is uniquely a direct sum of multiples of finitely many indecomposables, which induce to a finite number of constituent indecomposable modules of which M is a direct sum. Hence A is of finite representation type if B is. The converse if proven by a similar argument noting that every subgroup algebra B is a B-bimodule direct summand of a group algebra A.

## References

- Marcelo Aguiar, A note on strongly separable algebras, Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias (Córdoba, Argentina), special issue in honor of Orlando Villamayor, 65 (2000) 51-60.
- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=book }}

- Samuel Eilenberg and Tadasi Nakayama, On the dimension of modules and algebras. II. Frobenius algebras and quasi-Frobenius rings, Nagoya Math. J. Volume 9 (1955), 1-16.
- K. Hirata and K. Sugano, On semisimple and separable extensions of noncommutative rings, J. Math. Soc. Japan 18 (1966), 360-373.
- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=book }}