Parabolic induction

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Distinguish In algebraic geometry Chow's lemma, named after Wei-Liang Chow, roughly says that a proper morphism is fairly close to being a projective morphism. More precisely, a version of it states the following:[1]

If X is a scheme that is proper over a noetherian base S, then there exists a projective S-scheme X' and S-morphism that induces for some open dense subset U.

Chow's lemma is one of the foundational results in algebraic geometry.

Proof

The proof here is a standard one (cf. Template:Harvnb).

It is easy to reduce to the case when X is irreducible. X is noetherian since it is of finite type over a noetherian base. Thus, we can find a finite open affine cover . are quasi-projective over S; there are open immersions over S into some projective S-schemes . Put . U is nonempty since X is irreducible. Let

be given by 's restricted to over S. Let

be given by and over S. is then an immersion; thus, it factors as an open immersion followed by a closed immersion . Let be the immersion followed by the projection. We claim f induces ; for that, it is enough to show . But this means that is closed in . factorizes as . is separated over S and so the graph morphism is a closed immersion. This proves our contention.

It remains to show is projective over S. Let be the closed immersion followed by the projection. Showing that g is a closed immersion shows is projective over S. This can be checked locally. Identifying with its image in we suppress from our notation.

Let where . We claim are an open cover of . This would follow from as sets. This in turn follows from on as functions on the underlying topological space. Since X is separated over S and is dense, this is clear from looking at the relevant commutative diagram. Now, is closed since it is a base extension of the proper morphism . Thus, is a closed subscheme covered by and so it is enough to show for each i , denoted by , is a closed immersion.

Fix i. Let be the graph of . It is a closed subscheme of since is separated over S. Let be the projections. We claim factors through , which would imply is a closed immersion. But for we have:

The last equality holds and thus there is w that satisfies the first equality. This proves our claim.

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.