# Indium gallium arsenide

{{ safesubst:#invoke:Unsubst||$N=Technical |date=__DATE__ |$B= {{#invoke:Message box|ambox}} }}

Indium gallium arsenide (InGaAs) (alternatively gallium indium arsenide) is a ternary alloy (chemical compound) of indium, gallium and arsenic. Indium and gallium are both from boron group (group III) of elements while arsenic is a pnictogen (group V) element. Thus alloys made of these chemical groups are referred to as "III-V" compounds. Because they are from the same group, indium and gallium have similar roles in chemical bonding. InGaAs is regarded as an alloy of gallium arsenide and indium arsenide with properties intermediate between the two depending on the proportion of gallium to indium. InGaAs is a semiconductor with applications in electronics and optoelectronics.

## Nomenclature

Indium gallium arsenide is a popular designation for gallium-indium arsenide (GaInAs). InGaAs is a direct bandgap, pseudo-binary alloy composed of two III-V semiconducting materials: (GaAs)X and (InAs)1-X. The alloy is miscible over the entire compositional range from GaAs (bandgap = 1.42 eV at 300 K) to InAs (bandgap = 0.34 eV at 300 K).[1]

According to IUPAC standards[2] the preferred nomenclature for the alloy is Template:Chem where the group-III elements appear in order of increasing atomic number, as in the related alloy system Template:Chem.

## Electronic and optical properties: measurements on polycrystalline samples

Fig.1 Energy gap versus gallium composition for GaInAs

InGaAs has a lattice parameter that increases linearly with the concentration of InAs in the alloy.[3] The liquid-solid phase diagram[4] shows that during solidification from a solution containing GaAs and InAs, GaAs is taken up at a much higher rate than InAs, depleting the solution of GaAs. During growth from solution, the composition of first material to solidify is rich in GaAs while the last material to solidify is richer in InAs. This feature has been exploited to produce ingots of InGaAs with graded composition along the length of the ingot. However, the strain introduced by the changing lattice constant causes the ingot to be polycrystalline and limits the characterization to a few parameters, with uncertainty due to the continuous compositional grading in the materials.

Fig.2 Lattice parameter of GaInAs vs GaAs alloy content

This approach was used to characterise the optical properties of a large number of III-V pseudo binary alloy systems. Although the polycrystalline nature of the samples used made them unsuitable for device applications, the experimental results and analysis do provide a comprehensive overview of the potential of III-V semiconductor alloys. While more precise measurements have been obtained on single-crystal samples, such as the case of epitaxial InGaAs grown lattice-matched on InP, these results represent the best data for alloy compositions that cannot by synthesized as single-crystal epitaxial films for lack of the appropriate substrate.

The optical and mechanical properties of InGaAs can be varied by changing the ratio of InAs and GaAs, Template:Chem.[5] The GaInAs device is normally grown on an indium phosphide (InP) substrate. In order to match the lattice constant of InP and avoid mechanical strain, Template:Chem is used. This composition has a cut-off wavelength of 1.68 μm at 295 K.

By increasing the mole fraction of InAs further compared to GaAs it is possible to extend the cut-off wavelength up to about 2.6 µm. In that case special measures have to be taken to avoid mechanical strain from differences in lattice constants.

GaAs is lattice mismatched to germanium (Ge) by 0.08%. With the addition of 1.5% In to the alloy, InGaAs becomes perfectly latticed matched to Ge. The complete elimination of film stress reduces the defect densities of the epi-InGaAs layer compared to straight GaAs.

Fig.3 Photoluminescence of n-type and p-type GaInAs[6]

## Properties of single crystal GaInAs

### Single crystal GaInAs

Single crystal epitaxial films of InGaAs can be deposited on a single crystal substrate of III-V semiconductor having a lattice parameter close to that of the specific gallium indium arsenide alloy to be synthesized. Three substrates can be used: GaAs, InAs and InP. A good match between the lattice constants of the film and substrate is required to maintain single crystal properties and this limitation permits small variations in composition on the order of a few per cent. Therefore the properties of epitaxial films of GaInAs alloys grown on GaAs are very similar to GaAs and those grown on InAs are very similar to InAs, because lattice mismatch strain does not generally permit significant deviation of the composition from the pure binary substrate.

Template:Chem is the alloy whose lattice parameter matches that of InP at 295 K. Yoshikazu Takeda was the first to grow epitaxial films of GaInAs lattice-matched on InP substrates.[7] Pearsall and Hopson determined the phase diagram and procedures for epitaxial growth of Template:Chem.[8]

GaInAs lattice-matched to InP is a semiconductor with properties quite different from GaAs, InAs or InP. It has an energy band gap of 0.75 eV, an electron effective mass of 0.041 and an electron mobility close to 10,000 cm2·V−1·s−1 at room temperature, all of which are more favorable for many electronic and photonic device applications when compared to GaAs, InP or even Si.[9]

Property Value at 295 K Reference
Lattice Parameter 5.869 Å [10]
Band Gap 0.75 eV [9]
Electron effective mass 0.041 [11]
Light-hole effective mass 0.051 [12]
Electron mobility 10,000 cm2·V−1·s−1 [13]
Hole mobility 250 cm2·V−1·s−1 [13]

### FCC lattice parameter

Like most materials, the lattice parameter of GaInAs is a function of temperature. The measured coefficient of thermal expansion (see ref. n°9)Template:Which is Template:Val K−1. This is significantly larger than the coefficient for InP which is Template:Val K−1. A film that is exactly lattice-matched to InP at room temperature is typically grown at 650 °C with a lattice mismatch of +Template:Val. Such a film has a mole fraction of GaAs = 0.47. To obtain lattice matching at the growth temperature, it is necessary to increase the GaAs mole fraction to 0.48.

### Bandgap energy

The bandgap energy of GaInAs can be determined from the peak in the photoluminescence spectrum, provided that the total impurity and defect concentration is less than Template:Valcm-3. The bandgap energy depends on temperature and increases as the temperature decreases, as can be seen in Fig. 3 for both n-type and p-type samples. The bandgap energy at room temperature is 0.75 eV and lies between that of Ge and Si. By coincidence the bandgap of GaInAs is perfectly placed for photodetector and laser applications for the long-wavelength transmission window, (the C-band and L-band) for fiber-optic communications.

### Effective mass

The electron effective mass of GaInAs m*/m° = 0.041 [11] is the smallest for any semiconductor material with an energy bandgap greater than 0.5 eV. The effective mass is determined from the curvature of the energy-momentum relationship: stronger curvature translates into lower effective mass and a larger radius of delocalization. In practical terms, a low effective mass leads directly to high carrier mobility, favoring higher speed of transport and current carrying capacity. A lower carrier effective mass also favors increased tunneling current, a direct result of delocalization.

The valence band has two types of charge carriers: light holes: m*/m° = 0.051 [12] and heavy holes: m*/m° = 0.2.[14] The electrical and optical properties of the valence band are dominated by the heavy holes, because the density of these states is much greater than that for light holes. This is also reflected in the mobility of holes at 295 K, which is a factor of 40 lower than that for electrons.

Fig.4 Electron and hole mobilities of GaInAs vs impurity concentration at 295 K.[13]

### Mobility of electrons and holes

Electron mobility and hole mobility are key parameters for design and performance of electronic devices. Measured carrier mobilities for electrons and holes are shown in Figure 4.

The mobility of carriers in Template:Chem is usual in two regards:

• The very high value of electron mobility
• The unusually large ratio of electron to hole mobility.

The room temperature electron mobility for reasonably pure samples of Template:Chem approaches Template:Val·V−1·s−1, which is the largest of any technologically important semiconductor, although significantly less than that for graphene.

The mobility is proportional to the carrier conductivity. As mobility increases, so does the current-carrying capacity of transistors. A higher mobility shortens the response time of photodetectors. A larger mobility reduces series resistance, and this improves device efficiency and reduces noise and power consumption.

The minority carrier diffusion constant is directly proportional to carrier mobility. The room temperature diffusion constant for electrons at Template:Val·s−1 is significantly larger than that of Si, GaAs, Ge or InP, and determines the ultra-fast response of Template:Chem photodetectors.

The ratio of electron to hole mobility is the largest of currently-used semiconductors. This ratio determines the gain of photoconductive detectors.

The gain-bandwidth product depends on electron mobility alone.[15] The relatively large gain-bandwidth product in tandem with the spectral response in the near infra-red positions Template:Chem provides an ideal material for night vision imaging components.

## Applications

Fig.5 upper: Ge photodiode lower: GaInAs photodiode in the wavelength range 1 µm to 2 µm.[16]

### Photodetectors

The principal application of GaInAs is as an infrared detector. The spectral response of a GaInAs photodiode is shown in Figure 5. GaInAs photodiodes are the preferred choice in the wavelength range of 1.1 µm to 1.7 µm. For example compared to photodiodes made from Ge, GaInAs photodiodes have faster time response, higher quantum efficiency and lower dark current for the same sensor area.[17] GaInAs photodiodes were invented in 1977 by Pearsall.[18]

Avalanche photodiodes offer the advantage of additional gain at the expense of response time. These devices are especially useful for detection of single photons in applications such as quantum key distribution where response time is not critical. Avalanche photodetectors require a special structure to reduce reverse leakage current due to tunnelling. The first practical avalanche photodiodes were designed and demonstrated in 1979.[19]

In 1980, Pearsall developed a photodiode design that exploits the uniquely short diffusion time of high mobility of electrons in GaInAs, leading to an ultrafast response time.[20][21] Fifteen years later in 1998, this structure was further developed and named the UTC, or uni-travelling carrier photodiode.[22]

Other important innovations include the integrated photodiode – FET receiver[23] and the engineering of GaInAs focal-plane arrays.[24]

### Transistors

HEMT devices using InGaAs channels are one of the fastest types of transistor.[25]

GaInAs is used in triple-junction photovoltaics and also for thermophotovoltaic power generation. GaInAs can be used as a laser medium. Devices have been constructed that operate at wavelengths of 905 nm, 980 nm, 1060 nm, and 1300 nm. InGaAs quantum dots on GaAs have also been studied as lasers.Template:Cn

Template:Chem can be used as an intermediate band-gap junction in multi-junction photovoltaic cells with a perfect lattice match to Ge. The perfect lattice match to Ge reduces defect density, improving cell efficiency.Template:Cn

MIT researchers created the smallest transistor ever built from a material other than silicon. The Metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) is 22 nanometers long.[26]

Researchers at Penn State’s Electrical Engineering Department developed a novel devise prototype designed to test nanowires made of compound semiconductors such as InGaAs. The goal of this device was to see if a compound material would retain its superior mobility at nanoscale dimensions in a FinFET device configuration. The results of this test sparked more research, by the same research team, into transistors made of InGaAs which showed that in terms of on current at lower supply voltage, InGaAs performed very well compared to existing silicon devices.[27]

## Safety and toxicity

The synthesis of GaInAs, like that of GaAs, most often involves the use of arsine (Template:Chem), an extremely toxic gas. Synthesis of InP likewise most often involves phosphine (Template:Chem). Inhalation of these gases neutralizes oxygen absorption by the bloodstream and can be fatal within a few minutes if toxic dose levels are exceeded. Safe handling involves using a sensitive toxic gas detection system and self-contained breathing apparatus.[28]

Once GaInAs is deposited as a thin film on a substrate, it is basically inert and is resistant to abrasion, sublimation or dissolution by common solvents such as water, alcohols or acetones. In device form the volume of the GaInAs is usually less than Template:Val, and can be neglected compared to the volume of the supporting substrate, InP or GaAs.

The National Institutes of Health studied these materials and found:[29]

• No evidence of carcinogenic activity of gallium arsenide in male F344/N rats exposed to 0.01, 0.1, or Template:Val
• Carcinogenic activity in female F344/N rats
• No evidence of carcinogenic activity in male or female B6C3F1 mice exposed to 0.1, 0.5, or Template:Val.

The World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer's review of the NIH toxicology study concluded:[30]

• There is inadequate evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of gallium arsenide.
• There is limited evidence in experimental animals for the carcinogenicity of gallium arsenide.
• The gallium moiety may be responsible for lung cancers observed in female rats

REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) is a European initiative to classify and regulate materials that are used, or produced (even as waste) in manufacturing. REACH considers three toxic classes: carcinogenic, reproductive, and mutagenic capacities.

The REACH classification procedure consists of two basic phases. In phase one the hazards intrinsic to the material are determined, without any consideration of how the material might be used or encountered in the work place or by a consumer. In phase two the risk of harmful exposure is considered along with procedures that can mitigate exposure. Both GaAs and InP are in phase 1 evaluation. The principal exposure risk occurs during substrate preparation where grinding and polishing generate micron-size particles of GaAs and InP. Similar concerns apply to wafer dicing to make individual devices. This particle dust can be absorbed by breathing or ingestion. The increased ratio of surface area to volume for such particles increases their chemical reactivity.

Toxicology studies are based on rat and mice experiments. No comparable studies test the effects of ingesting GaAs or InP dust in a liquid slurry.

The REACH procedure, acting under the precautionary principle, interprets "inadequate evidence for carcenogenicity" as "possible carcinogen". As a result, the European Chemicals Agency classified InP in 2010 as a carcinogen and reproductive toxin:[31]

• Classification & labelling in accordance with Directive 67/548/EEC
• Classification: Carc. Cat. 2; R45
• Repr. Cat. 3; R62

and ECHA classified GaAs in 2010 as a carcinogen and reproductive toxin:

• Classification & labelling in accordance with Directive 67/548/EEC:
• Classification3: Carc. Cat. 1; R45
• Repro. Cat. 2; R60

## References

1. Template:Cite web
2. Template:Cite web
3. Template:Cite web
4. Template:Cite web
5. T.P. Pearsall, L. Eaves and J.C. Portal, "Photoluminescence and Impurity Concentration in GaInAsP Lattice-matched to InP", J. Appl. Phys. 52 pp.1037-1047 (1983).
6. Template:Cite web
7. Template:Cite web
8. Template:Cite web
9. T.P. Pearsall, R. Bisaro, R. Ansel and P. Merenda, Appl. Phys. Lett. 32, pp. 497-9 (1978)
10. R.J. Nicholas, J.C. Portal, C.Houlbert, P.Perrier and T.P. Pearsall, Appl. Phys. Lett 34, pp. 492-4 (1979)
11. Claudine Hermann and T.P. Pearsall, Appl. Phys. Lett 38, pp. 450-2 (1981)
12. T.P. Pearsall and J.P. Hirtz, J. Cryst. Growth 54, pp. 127-131 (1981)
13. Template:Cite doi
14. Thomas P. Pearsall Photonics Essentials, 2nd Edition: McGraw-Hill, New York; NY 2010, ISBN 978-0-07-162935-5
15. T.P. Pearsall, "InGaAs Photodetectors" in Properties of Lattice-Matched and Strained Indium Gallium Arsenide, ed P.Bhattacharya, (London, IEE Press, 1993) pp267-77.
16. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=book }}
17. T.P. Pearsall and R.W. Hopson, Jr, Electronic Materials Conference, Cornell University, 1977, published in J. Electron. Mat. 7, pp.133-146, (1978)
18. Template:Cite doi
19. Template:Cite doi
20. T.P. Pearsall, R.A. Logan C.G. Bethea, Electron Lett, 19, pp 611-612 1983
21. Template:Cite doi
22. Template:Cite doi
23. Template:Cite web
24. Template:Cite web
25. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
26. The environment, health and safety aspects of indium gallium arsenide sources (such as trimethylgallium, trimethylindium and arsine) and industrial hygiene monitoring studies of standard MOVPE have been reviewed. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
27. Template:Cite web
28. Template:Cite web
29. Template:Cite web