Frobenius theorem (real division algebras)

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, more specifically in abstract algebra, the Frobenius theorem, proved by Ferdinand Georg Frobenius in 1877, characterizes the finite-dimensional associative division algebras over the real numbers. According to the theorem, every such algebra is isomorphic to one of the following:

These algebras have dimensions 1, 2, and 4, respectively. Of these three algebras, R and C are commutative, but H is not.

Proof

The main ingredients for the following proof are the Cayley–Hamilton theorem and the fundamental theorem of algebra.

Introducing some notation

  • We identify the real multiples of 1 with R.
  • For any Template:Mvar in C define the following real quadratic polynomial:
Note that if zC\R then Q(z; x) is irreducible over R.

The claim

The key to the argument is the following

Claim. The set Template:Mvar of all elements Template:Mvar of Template:Mvar such that a2 ≤ 0 is a vector subspace of Template:Mvar of codimension 1. Moreover D = RV as R-vector spaces, which implies that Template:Mvar generated Template:Mvar as an algebra.

Proof of Claim: Let Template:Mvar be the dimension of Template:Mvar as an R-vector space, and pick Template:Mvar in Template:Mvar with characteristic polynomial p(x). By the fundamental theorem of algebra, we can write

We can rewrite p(x) in terms of the polynomials Q(z; x):

Since zjC\R, the polynomials Q(zj; x) are all irreducible over R. By the Cayley–Hamilton theorem, p(a) = 0 and because Template:Mvar is a division algebra, it follows that either ati = 0 for some Template:Mvar or that Q(zj; a) = 0 for some Template:Mvar. The first case implies that Template:Mvar is real. In the second case, it follows that Q(zj; x) is the minimal polynomial of Template:Mvar. Because p(x) has the same complex roots as the minimal polynomial and because it is real it follows that

Since p(x) is the characteristic polynomial of Template:Mvar the coefficient of x2k−1 in p(x) is tr(a) up to a sign. Therefore we read from the above equation we have: tr(a) = 0 if and only if Re(zj) = 0, in other words tr(a) = 0 if and only if a2 = −|zj|2 < 0.

So Template:Mvar is the subset of all Template:Mvar with tr(a) = 0. In particular, it is a vector subspace. Moreover, Template:Mvar has codimension 1 since it is the kernel of a non-zero linear form, and note that Template:Mvar is the direct sum of R and Template:Mvar as vector spaces.

The finish

For a, b in Template:Mvar define B(a, b) = (−abba)/2. Because of the identity (a + b)2a2b2 = ab + ba, it follows that B(a, b) is real. Furthermore since a2 ≤ 0, we have: B(a, a) > 0 for a ≠ 0. Thus Template:Mvar is a positive definite symmetric bilinear form, in other words, an inner product on Template:Mvar.

Let Template:Mvar be a subspace of Template:Mvar that generates Template:Mvar as an algebra and which is minimal with respect to this property. Let e1, ..., en be an orthonormal basis of Template:Mvar. With respect to the negative definite bilinear form B these elements satisfy the following relations:

If n = 0, then Template:Mvar is isomorphic to R.

If n = 1, then Template:Mvar is generated by 1 and e1 subject to the relation eTemplate:Su = −1. Hence it is isomorphic to C.

If n = 2, it has been shown above that Template:Mvar is generated by 1, e1, e2 subject to the relations

These are precisely the relations for H.

If n > 2, then Template:Mvar cannot be a division algebra. Assume that n > 2. Let u = e1e2en. It is easy to see that u2 = 1 (this only works if n > 2). If Template:Mvar were a division algebra, 0 = u2 − 1 = (u − 1)(u + 1) implies u = ±1, which in turn means: en = ∓e1e2 and so e1, ..., en−1 generate Template:Mvar. This contradicts the minimality of Template:Mvar.

Remarks and related results

  • The fact that Template:Mvar is generated by e1, ..., en subject to the above relations means that Template:Mvar is the Clifford algebra of Rn. The last step shows that the only real Clifford algebras which are division algebras are Cℓ0, Cℓ1 and Cℓ2.
  • As a consequence, the only commutative division algebras are R and C. Also note that H is not a C-algebra. If it were, then the center of H has to contain C, but the center of H is R. Therefore, the only division algebra over C is C itself.

References