Cut (graph theory): Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>YFdyh-bot
 
en>Zaslav
(a) Rule out empty cutsets. (b) Move earlier the mention of "cut" to refer to the cutset.
Line 1: Line 1:
It is very common to have a dental emergency -- a fractured tooth, an abscess, or severe pain when chewing. Over-the-counter pain medication is just masking the problem. Seeing an emergency dentist is critical to getting the source of the problem diagnosed and corrected as soon as possible.<br><br>Here are some common dental emergencies:<br>Toothache: The most common dental emergency. This generally means a badly decayed tooth. As the pain affects the tooth's nerve, treatment involves gently removing any debris lodged in the cavity being careful not to poke deep as this will cause severe pain if the nerve is touched. Next rinse vigorously with warm water. Then soak a small piece of cotton in oil of cloves and insert it in the cavity. This will give temporary relief until a dentist can be reached.<br><br>At times the pain may have a more obscure location such as decay under an old filling. As this can be only corrected by a dentist there are two things you can do to help the pain. Administer a pain pill (aspirin or some other analgesic) internally or dissolve a tablet in a half glass (4 oz) of warm water holding it in the mouth for several minutes before spitting it out. DO NOT PLACE A WHOLE TABLET OR ANY PART OF IT IN THE TOOTH OR AGAINST THE SOFT GUM TISSUE AS IT WILL RESULT IN A NASTY BURN.<br><br>Swollen Jaw: This may be caused by several conditions the most probable being an abscessed tooth. In any case the treatment should be to reduce pain and swelling. An ice pack held on the outside of the jaw, (ten minutes on and ten minutes off) will take care of both. If this does not control the pain, an analgesic tablet can be given every four hours.<br><br>Other Oral Injuries: Broken teeth, cut lips, bitten tongue or lips if severe means a trip to a dentist as soon as possible. In the mean time rinse the mouth with warm water and place cold compression the face opposite the injury. If there is a lot of bleeding, apply direct pressure to the bleeding area. If bleeding does not stop get patient to the emergency room of a hospital as stitches may be necessary.<br><br>Prolonged Bleeding Following Extraction: Place a gauze pad or better still a moistened tea bag over the socket and have the patient bite down gently on it for 30 to 45 minutes. The tannic acid in the tea seeps into the tissues and often helps stop the bleeding. If bleeding continues after two hours, call the dentist or take patient to the emergency room of the nearest hospital.<br><br>Broken Jaw: If you suspect the patient's jaw is broken, bring the upper and lower teeth together. Put a necktie, handkerchief or towel under the chin, tying it over the head to immobilize the jaw until you can get the patient to a dentist or the emergency room of a hospital.<br><br>Painful Erupting Tooth: In young children teething pain can come from a loose baby tooth or from an erupting permanent tooth. Some relief can be given by crushing a little ice and wrapping it in gauze or a clean piece of cloth and putting it directly on the tooth or gum tissue where it hurts. The numbing effect of the cold, along with an appropriate dose of aspirin, usually provides temporary relief.<br><br>In young adults, an erupting 3rd molar (Wisdom tooth), especially if it is impacted, can cause the jaw to swell and be quite painful. Often the gum around the tooth will show signs of infection. Temporary relief can be had by giving aspirin or some other painkiller and by dissolving an aspirin in half a glass of warm water and holding this solution in the mouth over the sore gum. AGAIN DO NOT PLACE A TABLET DIRECTLY OVER THE GUM OR CHEEK OR USE THE ASPIRIN SOLUTION ANY STRONGER THAN RECOMMENDED TO PREVENT BURNING THE TISSUE. The swelling of the jaw can be reduced by using an ice pack on the outside of the face at intervals of ten minutes on and ten minutes off.<br><br>If you loved this informative article and you would love to receive more details relating to [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90z1mmiwNS8 dentist DC] generously visit our own web-site.
{{otheruses4|axioms for Euclidean geometry||Tarski–Grothendieck set theory}}
'''Tarski's axioms''', due to [[Alfred Tarski]], are an axiom set for the substantial fragment of [[Euclidean geometry]], called "[[elementary theory |elementary]]," that is formulable in [[first-order logic]] with [[identity (mathematics)|identity]], and requiring no [[set theory]] {{harv|Tarski|1959}}. Other modern axiomizations of Euclidean geometry are those by [[Hilbert's axioms|Hilbert]] and [[Birkhoff's axioms|George Birkhoff]].
 
==Overview==
Early in his career Tarski taught geometry and researched set theory. His coworker Steven Givant (1999) explained Tarski's take-off point:
:From Enriques, Tarski learned of the work of [[Mario Pieri]], an Italian geometer who was strongly influenced by Peano. Tarski preferred Pieri's system [of his ''Point and Sphere'' memoir], where the logical structure and the complexity of the axioms were more transparent.
Givant's then says "with typical thoroughness" Tarski devised his system:
:What was different about Tarski's approach to geometry? First of all, the axiom system was much simpler than any of the axiom systems that existed up to that time. In fact the length of all of Tarski's axioms together is not much more than just one of Pieri's 24 axioms. It was the first system of Euclidean geometry that was simple enough for all axioms to be expressed in terms of the [[primitive notion]]s only, without the help of defined notions. Of even greater importance, for the first time a clear distinction was made between full geometry and its elementary — that is, its first order — part.
 
Like other modern axiomatizations of Euclidean geometry, Tarski's employs a [[formal system]] consisting of symbol strings, called [[sentence (mathematical logic)|sentence]]s, whose construction respects formal [[syntax (logic)|syntactical rules]], and rules of proof that determine the allowed manipulations of the sentences. Unlike some other modern axiomatizations, such as [[Birkhoff's axioms|Birkhoff's]] and [[Hilbert's axioms|Hilbert's]], Tarski's axiomatization has no [[primitive object]]s other than ''points'', so a variable or constant cannot refer to a line or an angle. Because points are the only primitive objects, and because Tarski's system is a [[first-order theory]], it is not even possible to define lines as sets of points. The only primitive relations ([[predicate (mathematical logic)|predicate]]s) are "betweenness" and "congruence" among points.
 
Tarski's axiomatization is shorter than its rivals, in a sense Tarski and Givant (1999) make explicit. It is more concise than Pieri's because Pieri had only two primitive notions while Tarski introduced three: point, betweenness, and congruence. Such economy of primitive and defined notions means that Tarski's system is not very convenient for ''doing'' Euclidian geometry. Rather, Tarski designed his system to facilitate its analysis via the tools of [[mathematical logic]], i.e., to facilitate deriving its metamathematical properties. Tarski's system has the unusual property that all sentences can be written in universal-existential form, a special case of the [[prenex normal form]]. This form has all [[Universal quantification|universal quantifiers]] preceding any [[Existential quantification|existential quantifiers]], so that all sentences can be recast in the form <math>\forall u \forall v \ldots\exists a \exists b\dots.</math> This fact allowed Tarski to prove that Euclidean geometry is [[Decidability (logic)|decidable]]: there exists an [[algorithm]] which can determine the truth or falsity of any sentence. Tarski's axiomatization is also [[Completeness|complete]]. This does not contradict [[Gödel's first incompleteness theorem]], because Tarski's theory lacks the expressive power needed to interpret [[Robinson arithmetic]] {{harv|Franzén|2005|pp=25–26}}.
 
== The axioms ==
 
[[Alfred Tarski]] worked on the axiomatization and metamathematics of [[Euclidean geometry]] intermittently from 1926 until his death in 1983, with Tarski (1959) heralding his mature interest in the subject. The work of Tarski and his students on Euclidean geometry culminated in the monograph Schwabhäuser, Szmielew, and Tarski (1983), which set out the 10 [[axiom]]s and one [[axiom schema]] shown below, the associated [[metamathematics]], and a fair bit of the subject. Gupta (1965) made important contributions, and Tarski and Givant (1999) discuss the history.
 
=== Fundamental relations ===
 
These axioms are a more elegant version of a set Tarski devised in the 1920s as part of his investigation of the metamathematical properties of [[Euclidean plane geometry]]. This objective required reformulating that geometry as a [[first-order logic|first-order theory]]. Tarski did so by positing a [[universe (mathematics)|universe]] of [[point (geometry)|point]]s, with lower case letters denoting variables ranging over that universe.  [[Equality (mathematics)|Equality]] is provided by the underlying logic (see [[First-order logic#Equality and its axioms]]).<ref>Tarski and Givant, 1999, page 177</ref> Tarski then posited two primitive relations:
* ''Betweenness'', a [[triadic relation]]. The [[atomic sentence]] ''Bxyz'' denotes that ''y'' is "between" ''x'' and ''z'', in other words, that ''y'' is a point on the [[line segment]] ''xz''.  (This relation is interpreted inclusively, so that ''Bxyz'' is trivially true whenever ''x=y'' or ''y=z'').
* ''[[congruence (geometry)|Congruence]]'' (or "equidistance"), a [[polyadic relation|tetradic relation]]. The [[atomic sentence]] ''wx'' ≡ ''yz'' can be interpreted as ''wx'' is [[congruence (geometry)|congruent]] to ''yz'', in other words, that the [[distance|length]] of the line segment ''wx'' is equal to the length of the line segment ''yz''.
 
Betweenness captures the [[affine geometry|affine]] aspect of Euclidean geometry; congruence, its [[metric space|metric]] aspect. The background logic includes [[identity (mathematics)|identity]], a [[binary relation]]. The axioms invoke identity (or its negation) on five occasions.
 
The axioms below are grouped by the types of relation they invoke, then sorted, first by the number of existential quantifiers, then by the number of atomic sentences. The axioms should be read as [[universal closure]]s; hence any [[free variable]]s should be taken as tacitly [[universal quantifier|universally quantified]].
 
=== Congruence axioms ===
 
; Reflexivity of Congruence:
: <math>xy \equiv yx\,.</math>
 
; Identity of Congruence:
: <math>xy \equiv zz \rightarrow x=y.</math>
 
; [[Transitive relation|Transitivity]] of Congruence:
: <math>(xy \equiv zu \and xy \equiv vw) \rightarrow zu \equiv vw.</math>
 
====Commentary====
While the congruence relation <math>xy \equiv zw</math> is, formally, a 4-way relation among points, it may also be thought of, informally, as a binary relation between two line segments <math>xy</math> and <math>zw</math>.  The "Reflexivity" and "Transitivity" axioms above, combined, prove both:
* that this binary relation is in fact an [[equivalence relation]]
** it is reflexive: <math>xy \equiv xy\,</math>.
** it is symmetric <math>xy \equiv zw \rightarrow zw \equiv xy\,</math>.
** it is transitive <math>(xy \equiv zu \and zu \equiv vw) \rightarrow xy \equiv vw\,</math>.
* and that the order in which the points of a line segment are specified is irrelevant.
** <math>xy \equiv zw \rightarrow xy \equiv wz\,</math>.
** <math>xy \equiv zw \rightarrow yx \equiv zw\,</math>.
** <math>xy \equiv zw \rightarrow yx \equiv wz\,</math>.
 
Interestingly, the "Transitivity" axiom asserts that congruence is [[Euclidean relation|Euclidean]], in that it respects the first of [[Euclid's elements|Euclid's]] "[[Euclid's axioms#Axiomatic approach|common notions]]".
 
The "Identity of Congruence" axiom states, intuitively, that if ''xy'' is congruent with a segment that begins and ends at the same point,''x'' and ''y'' are the same point. This is closely related to the notion of [[reflexive relation|reflexivity]] for [[binary relation]]s.
 
=== Betweenness axioms ===
[[File:Tarski's formulation of Pasch's axiom.svg|right|thumb|Pasch's axiom]]
; Identity of Betweenness
: <math>Bxyx \rightarrow x=y.</math>
The only point on the line segment <math>xx</math> is <math>x</math> itself.
 
<!--
; Transitivity of betweenness
: <math>(wxy \and xyz) \rArr wxz</math>
If ''x'' is between ''w'' and ''y'', and if ''y'' is between ''x'' and ''z'', then ''x'' must be between ''w'' and ''z''.
 
; Connectivity of betweenness
: <math>(xyz \and xyw \and x \ne y) \rArr (xzw \or xwz).</math>
If ''y'' is between ''x'' and ''z'' and between ''x'' and ''w'', ''w'' and ''z'' must both be on the same side of ''x''. Connectivity and Transitivity order the points.-->
 
; [[Axiom of Pasch]]
: <math>(Bxuz \and Byvz) \rightarrow \exists a\, (Buay \and Bvax).</math>
The two diagonals of the [[quadrilateral]] <math>xuvy</math> must intersect at some point.
 
[[File:Tarski's continuity axiom.svg|right|thumb|Continuity: φ and ψ divide the ray into two halves and the axiom asserts the existence of a point b dividing those two halves]]
; [[Axiom schema]] of Continuity
Let φ(''x'') and ψ(''y'') be [[first order logic|first-order formulae]] containing no [[free variable|free instances]] of either ''a'' or ''b''. Let there also be no free instances of ''x'' in ψ(''y'') or of ''y'' in φ(''x''). Then all instances of the following schema are axioms:
: <math>\exists a \,\forall x\, \forall y\,[(\phi(x) \and \psi(y)) \rightarrow Baxy] \rightarrow \exists b\, \forall x\, \forall y\,[(\phi(x) \and \psi(y)) \rightarrow Bxby].</math>
Let ''r'' be a ray with endpoint ''a''. Let the first order formulae φ and ψ define subsets ''X'' and ''Y'' of ''r'', such that every point in ''Y'' is to the right of every point of ''X'' (with respect to ''a''). Then there exists a point ''b'' in ''r'' lying between ''X'' and ''Y''. This is essentially the [[Dedekind cut]] construction, carried out in a way that avoids quantification over sets.
 
; Lower [[Dimension]]
: <math>\exists a \, \exists b\, \exists c\, [\neg Babc \and \neg Bbca \and \neg Bcab].</math>
There exist three noncollinear points.  Without this axiom, the theory could be [[model theory|modeled]] by the one-dimensional [[real line]], a single point, or even the empty set.
 
=== Congruence and betweenness ===
 
[[File:Points in a plane equidistant to two given points lie on a line.svg|right|thumb|Upper dimension]]
; Upper [[Dimension]]
: <math>(xu \equiv xv \and yu \equiv yv \and zu \equiv zv \and u \ne v) \rightarrow (Bxyz \or Byzx \or Bzxy).</math>
Three points equidistant from two distinct points form a line. Without this axiom, the theory could be modeled by [[three-dimensional space|three-dimensional]] or higher-dimensional space.
 
; Axiom of Euclid
Each of the three variants of this axiom, all equivalent over the remaining Tarski's axioms to Euclid's [[parallel postulate]], has an advantage over the others:
* '''A''' dispenses with [[existential quantifier]]s;
* '''B''' has the fewest variables and [[atomic sentence]]s;
* '''C''' requires but one primitive notion, betweenness. This variant is the usual one given in the literature.
 
: '''A''': <math>((Bxyw \and xy \equiv yw ) \and (Bxuv \and xu \equiv uv) \and (Byuz \and yu \equiv zu)) \rightarrow yz \equiv vw.</math>
Let a line segment join the midpoint of two sides of a given [[triangle]]. That line segment will be half as long as the third side. This is equivalent to the [[interior angle]]s of any triangle summing to two [[right angles]].
 
: '''B''': <math>Bxyz \or Byzx \or Bzxy \or \exists a\, (xa \equiv ya \and xa \equiv za).</math>
Given any [[triangle]], there exists a [[circle]] that includes all of its vertices.
 
[[File:Tarski's axiom of Euclid C.svg|thumb|right|Axiom of Euclid: C]]
: '''C''': <math>(Bxuv \and Byuz \and x \ne u) \rightarrow \exists a\, \exists b\,(Bxya \and Bxzb \and Bavb).</math>
Given any [[angle]] and any point ''v'' in its interior, there exists a line segment including ''v'', with an endpoint on each side of the angle.
 
; Five Segment
[[File:Five segment.svg|thumb|right|Five segment]]
:<math>{(x \ne y  \and  Bxyz  \and  Bx'y'z'  \and xy \equiv x'y' \and yz \equiv y'z' \and xu \equiv x'u' \and yu \equiv y'u')} \rightarrow zu \equiv z'u'.</math>
Begin with two [[triangle]]s, ''xuz'' and ''x'u'z'.'' Draw the line segments ''yu'' and ''y'u','' connecting a vertex of each triangle to a point on the side opposite to the vertex. The result is two divided triangles, each made up of five segments. If four segments of one triangle are each [[congruence (geometry)|congruent]] to a segment in the other triangle, then the fifth segments in both triangles must be congruent.
 
; Segment Construction
: <math> \exists z\, [Bxyz \and yz \equiv ab].</math>
For any point ''y'', it is possible to draw in some direction (determined by ''x'') a line congruent to any segment ''ab''.
 
==Discussion==
Starting from two primitive [[Relation (mathematics)|relations]] whose fields are a [[density|dense]] [[universe (mathematics)|universe]] of [[point (geometry)|point]]s, Tarski built a geometry of [[line segment]]s. According to Tarski and Givant (1999: 192-93), none of the above [[axiom]]s is fundamentally new. The first four axioms establish some elementary properties of the two primitive relations. For instance, Reflexivity and Transitivity of Congruence establish that congruence is an [[equivalence relation]] over line segments. The Identity of Congruence and of Betweenness govern the trivial case when those relations are applied to nondistinct points. The theorem ''xy''≡''zz'' ↔ ''x''=''y'' ↔ ''Bxyx'' extends these Identity axioms.
 
A number of other properties of Betweenness are derivable as theorems including:
*[[Reflexive relation|Reflexivity]]: ''Bxxy'' ;
*[[Symmetry]]: ''Bxyz'' → ''Bzyx'' ;
*[[Transitive relation|Transitivity]]: (''Bxyw'' ∧ ''Byzw'') → ''Bxyz'' ;
*[[Connection (mathematics)|Connectivity]]: (''Bxyw'' ∧ ''Bxzw'') → (''Bxyz'' ∨ ''Bxzy'').
The last two properties [[total order|totally order]] the points making up a line segment.
 
Upper and Lower Dimension together require that any model of these axioms have a specific finite [[dimension]]ality. Suitable changes in these axioms yield axiom sets for [[Euclidean geometry]] for [[dimension]]s 0, 1, and greater than 2 (Tarski and Givant 1999: Axioms 8<sup>(1)</sup>, 8<sup>(n)</sup>, 9<sup>(0)</sup>, 9<sup>(1)</sup>, 9<sup>(n)</sup> ). Note that [[solid geometry]] requires no new axioms, unlike the case with [[Hilbert's axioms]]. Moreover, Lower Dimension for ''n'' dimensions is simply the negation of Upper Dimension for ''n'' - 1 dimensions.
 
When dimension > 1, Betweenness can be defined in terms of [[congruence relation|congruence]] (Tarski and Givant, 1999). First define the relation "≤" (where <math>ab \leq cd</math> is interpreted "the length of line segment <math>ab</math> is less than or equal to the length of line segment <math>cd</math>"):
:<math>xy \le zu \leftrightarrow \forall v ( zv \equiv uv \rightarrow \exists w ( xw \equiv yw \and yw \equiv uv ) ).</math>
In the case of two dimensions, the intuition is as follows:  For any line segment ''xy'', consider the possible range of lengths of ''xv'', where ''v'' is any point on the perpendicular bisector of ''xy''.  It is apparent that while there is no upper bound to the length of ''xv'', there is a lower bound, which occurs when ''v'' is the midpoint of ''xy''.  So if ''xy'' is shorter than or equal to ''zu'', then the range of possible lengths of ''xv'' will be a superset of the range of possible lengths of ''zw'', where ''w'' is any point on the perpendicular bisector of ''zu''.
 
Betweenness can than be defined by using the intuition that the shortest distance between any two points is a straight line:
:<math>Bxyz \leftrightarrow \forall u ( ( ux \le xy \and uz \le zy ) \rightarrow u = y ).</math>
 
The Axiom Schema of Continuity assures that the ordering of points on a line is [[Dedekind complete|complete]] (with respect to first-order definable properties). The Axioms of [[Pasch's axiom|Pasch]] and Euclid are well known. Remarkably, Euclidean geometry requires just the following further axioms:
* ''Segment Construction''. This axiom makes [[measurement]] and the [[Cartesian coordinate system]] possible&mdash;simply assign the value of 1 to some arbitrary non-empty line segment;{{clarify|date=December 2011}}<!-- what would this axiom look like? -->
<!-- Already included above * ''Five Segments''. This bears on the [[congruence (geometry)|congruence]] of [[triangle]]s.{{Contradict|date=May 2012}}-->
 
Let ''wff'' stand for a [[well-formed formula]] (or syntactically correct formula) of elementary geometry. Tarski and Givant (1999: 175) proved that elementary geometry is:
*[[consistency|Consistent]]: There is no wff such that it and its negation are both theorems;
*[[complete theory|Complete]]: Every sentence or its negation is a theorem provable from the axioms;
*[[Decidability (logic)|Decidable]]: There exists an [[algorithm]] that assigns a [[truth value]] to every sentence. This follows from Tarski's:
** [[Decision procedure]] for the [[real closed field]], which he found by [[quantifier elimination]];
**Axioms admitting of a (multi-dimensional) faithful [[interpretability|interpretation]] as a [[real closed field]].
Gupta (1965) proved the above axioms independent, ''Pasch'' and ''Reflexivity of Congruence'' excepted.
 
Negating the Axiom of Euclid yields [[hyperbolic geometry]], while eliminating it outright yields [[absolute geometry]]. Full (as opposed to elementary) Euclidean geometry requires giving up a first order axiomatization: replace φ(''x'') and ψ(''y'') in the axiom schema of Continuity with ''x'' ∈ ''A'' and ''y'' ∈ ''B'', where ''A'' and ''B'' are universally quantified variables ranging over sets of points.
 
==Comparison with Hilbert==
[[Hilbert's axioms]] for plane geometry number 16, and include Transitivity of Congruence and a variant of the Axiom of Pasch. The only notion from intuitive geometry invoked in the remarks to Tarski's axioms is [[triangle]]. (Versions '''B''' and '''C''' of the Axiom of Euclid refer to '"circle" and "angle," respectively.) Hilbert's axioms also require "ray," "angle," and the notion of a triangle "including" an angle. In addition to betweenness and congruence, Hilbert's axioms require a primitive [[binary relation]] "on," linking a point and a line. The [[Axiom schema]] of Continuity plays a role similar to Hilbert's two axioms of Continuity. This schema is indispensable; Euclidean geometry in Tarski's (or equivalent) language cannot be finitely axiomatized as a [[first-order logic|first-order theory]]. Hilbert's axioms do not constitute a first-order theory because his continuity axioms require [[second-order logic]].
 
The first four groups of axioms of [[Hilbert's axioms]] for plane geometry can be proved using Tarski's axioms.
 
==Notes==
<references/>
 
==References==
*{{citation
| last1=Franzén
| first1=Torkel
| author1-link=Torkel Franzén
| year = 2005
| title =Gödel's Theorem: An Incomplete Guide to Its Use and Abuse
| publisher= A K Peters
| isbn=1-56881-238-8
}}
*Givant, Steven (1999) "Unifying threads in Alfred Tarski's Work", [[Mathematical Intelligencer]] 21:47&ndash;58.
*Gupta, H. N. (1965) ''Contributions to the Axiomatic Foundations of Geometry''. Ph.D. thesis, University of California-Berkeley.
*{{Citation
| last1=Tarski
| first1=Alfred
| author1-link=Alfred Tarski
| editor1-last=Leon Henkin, Patrick Suppes and Alfred Tarski
| title=The axiomatic method. With special reference to geometry and physics. Proceedings of an International Symposium held at the Univ. of Calif., Berkeley, Dec. 26, 1957-Jan. 4, 1958
| publisher=North-Holland
| location=Amsterdam
| series=Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics
| id={{MathSciNet | id = 0106185}}
| year=1959
| chapter=What is elementary geometry?
| pages=16–29}}. Available as a 2007 [http://books.google.com/books?id=eVVKtnKzfnUC&pg=PA16 reprint], Brouwer Press, ISBN 1-4437-2812-8
*{{Citation
| doi=10.2307/421089
| last1=Tarski
| first1=Alfred
| author1-link=Alfred Tarski
| last2=Givant
| first2=Steven
| title=Tarski's system of geometry
| url=http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.27.9012
| id={{MathSciNet | id = 1791303}}
| year=1999
| journal=The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic
| issn=1079-8986
| volume=5
| issue=2
| pages=175–214
| jstor=421089}}
*Schwabhäuser, W., Szmielew, W., and [[Alfred Tarski]], 1983. ''Metamathematische Methoden in der Geometrie''. Springer-Verlag.
*Szczerba, L. W., 1986, "Tarski and Geometry," ''Journal of Symbolic Logic'' 51: 907-12.
 
[[Category:Elementary geometry]]
[[Category:Axiomatics of Euclidean geometry]]
[[Category:Mathematical axioms]]

Revision as of 21:16, 22 September 2013

Template:Otheruses4 Tarski's axioms, due to Alfred Tarski, are an axiom set for the substantial fragment of Euclidean geometry, called "elementary," that is formulable in first-order logic with identity, and requiring no set theory Template:Harv. Other modern axiomizations of Euclidean geometry are those by Hilbert and George Birkhoff.

Overview

Early in his career Tarski taught geometry and researched set theory. His coworker Steven Givant (1999) explained Tarski's take-off point:

From Enriques, Tarski learned of the work of Mario Pieri, an Italian geometer who was strongly influenced by Peano. Tarski preferred Pieri's system [of his Point and Sphere memoir], where the logical structure and the complexity of the axioms were more transparent.

Givant's then says "with typical thoroughness" Tarski devised his system:

What was different about Tarski's approach to geometry? First of all, the axiom system was much simpler than any of the axiom systems that existed up to that time. In fact the length of all of Tarski's axioms together is not much more than just one of Pieri's 24 axioms. It was the first system of Euclidean geometry that was simple enough for all axioms to be expressed in terms of the primitive notions only, without the help of defined notions. Of even greater importance, for the first time a clear distinction was made between full geometry and its elementary — that is, its first order — part.

Like other modern axiomatizations of Euclidean geometry, Tarski's employs a formal system consisting of symbol strings, called sentences, whose construction respects formal syntactical rules, and rules of proof that determine the allowed manipulations of the sentences. Unlike some other modern axiomatizations, such as Birkhoff's and Hilbert's, Tarski's axiomatization has no primitive objects other than points, so a variable or constant cannot refer to a line or an angle. Because points are the only primitive objects, and because Tarski's system is a first-order theory, it is not even possible to define lines as sets of points. The only primitive relations (predicates) are "betweenness" and "congruence" among points.

Tarski's axiomatization is shorter than its rivals, in a sense Tarski and Givant (1999) make explicit. It is more concise than Pieri's because Pieri had only two primitive notions while Tarski introduced three: point, betweenness, and congruence. Such economy of primitive and defined notions means that Tarski's system is not very convenient for doing Euclidian geometry. Rather, Tarski designed his system to facilitate its analysis via the tools of mathematical logic, i.e., to facilitate deriving its metamathematical properties. Tarski's system has the unusual property that all sentences can be written in universal-existential form, a special case of the prenex normal form. This form has all universal quantifiers preceding any existential quantifiers, so that all sentences can be recast in the form This fact allowed Tarski to prove that Euclidean geometry is decidable: there exists an algorithm which can determine the truth or falsity of any sentence. Tarski's axiomatization is also complete. This does not contradict Gödel's first incompleteness theorem, because Tarski's theory lacks the expressive power needed to interpret Robinson arithmetic Template:Harv.

The axioms

Alfred Tarski worked on the axiomatization and metamathematics of Euclidean geometry intermittently from 1926 until his death in 1983, with Tarski (1959) heralding his mature interest in the subject. The work of Tarski and his students on Euclidean geometry culminated in the monograph Schwabhäuser, Szmielew, and Tarski (1983), which set out the 10 axioms and one axiom schema shown below, the associated metamathematics, and a fair bit of the subject. Gupta (1965) made important contributions, and Tarski and Givant (1999) discuss the history.

Fundamental relations

These axioms are a more elegant version of a set Tarski devised in the 1920s as part of his investigation of the metamathematical properties of Euclidean plane geometry. This objective required reformulating that geometry as a first-order theory. Tarski did so by positing a universe of points, with lower case letters denoting variables ranging over that universe. Equality is provided by the underlying logic (see First-order logic#Equality and its axioms).[1] Tarski then posited two primitive relations:

Betweenness captures the affine aspect of Euclidean geometry; congruence, its metric aspect. The background logic includes identity, a binary relation. The axioms invoke identity (or its negation) on five occasions.

The axioms below are grouped by the types of relation they invoke, then sorted, first by the number of existential quantifiers, then by the number of atomic sentences. The axioms should be read as universal closures; hence any free variables should be taken as tacitly universally quantified.

Congruence axioms

Reflexivity of Congruence
Identity of Congruence
Transitivity of Congruence

Commentary

While the congruence relation is, formally, a 4-way relation among points, it may also be thought of, informally, as a binary relation between two line segments and . The "Reflexivity" and "Transitivity" axioms above, combined, prove both:

Interestingly, the "Transitivity" axiom asserts that congruence is Euclidean, in that it respects the first of Euclid's "common notions".

The "Identity of Congruence" axiom states, intuitively, that if xy is congruent with a segment that begins and ends at the same point,x and y are the same point. This is closely related to the notion of reflexivity for binary relations.

Betweenness axioms

Pasch's axiom
Identity of Betweenness

The only point on the line segment is itself.


Axiom of Pasch

The two diagonals of the quadrilateral must intersect at some point.

Continuity: φ and ψ divide the ray into two halves and the axiom asserts the existence of a point b dividing those two halves
Axiom schema of Continuity

Let φ(x) and ψ(y) be first-order formulae containing no free instances of either a or b. Let there also be no free instances of x in ψ(y) or of y in φ(x). Then all instances of the following schema are axioms:

Let r be a ray with endpoint a. Let the first order formulae φ and ψ define subsets X and Y of r, such that every point in Y is to the right of every point of X (with respect to a). Then there exists a point b in r lying between X and Y. This is essentially the Dedekind cut construction, carried out in a way that avoids quantification over sets.

Lower Dimension

There exist three noncollinear points. Without this axiom, the theory could be modeled by the one-dimensional real line, a single point, or even the empty set.

Congruence and betweenness

Upper dimension
Upper Dimension

Three points equidistant from two distinct points form a line. Without this axiom, the theory could be modeled by three-dimensional or higher-dimensional space.

Axiom of Euclid

Each of the three variants of this axiom, all equivalent over the remaining Tarski's axioms to Euclid's parallel postulate, has an advantage over the others:

  • A dispenses with existential quantifiers;
  • B has the fewest variables and atomic sentences;
  • C requires but one primitive notion, betweenness. This variant is the usual one given in the literature.
A:

Let a line segment join the midpoint of two sides of a given triangle. That line segment will be half as long as the third side. This is equivalent to the interior angles of any triangle summing to two right angles.

B:

Given any triangle, there exists a circle that includes all of its vertices.

Axiom of Euclid: C
C:

Given any angle and any point v in its interior, there exists a line segment including v, with an endpoint on each side of the angle.

Five Segment
Five segment

Begin with two triangles, xuz and x'u'z'. Draw the line segments yu and y'u', connecting a vertex of each triangle to a point on the side opposite to the vertex. The result is two divided triangles, each made up of five segments. If four segments of one triangle are each congruent to a segment in the other triangle, then the fifth segments in both triangles must be congruent.

Segment Construction

For any point y, it is possible to draw in some direction (determined by x) a line congruent to any segment ab.

Discussion

Starting from two primitive relations whose fields are a dense universe of points, Tarski built a geometry of line segments. According to Tarski and Givant (1999: 192-93), none of the above axioms is fundamentally new. The first four axioms establish some elementary properties of the two primitive relations. For instance, Reflexivity and Transitivity of Congruence establish that congruence is an equivalence relation over line segments. The Identity of Congruence and of Betweenness govern the trivial case when those relations are applied to nondistinct points. The theorem xyzzx=yBxyx extends these Identity axioms.

A number of other properties of Betweenness are derivable as theorems including:

The last two properties totally order the points making up a line segment.

Upper and Lower Dimension together require that any model of these axioms have a specific finite dimensionality. Suitable changes in these axioms yield axiom sets for Euclidean geometry for dimensions 0, 1, and greater than 2 (Tarski and Givant 1999: Axioms 8(1), 8(n), 9(0), 9(1), 9(n) ). Note that solid geometry requires no new axioms, unlike the case with Hilbert's axioms. Moreover, Lower Dimension for n dimensions is simply the negation of Upper Dimension for n - 1 dimensions.

When dimension > 1, Betweenness can be defined in terms of congruence (Tarski and Givant, 1999). First define the relation "≤" (where is interpreted "the length of line segment is less than or equal to the length of line segment "):

In the case of two dimensions, the intuition is as follows: For any line segment xy, consider the possible range of lengths of xv, where v is any point on the perpendicular bisector of xy. It is apparent that while there is no upper bound to the length of xv, there is a lower bound, which occurs when v is the midpoint of xy. So if xy is shorter than or equal to zu, then the range of possible lengths of xv will be a superset of the range of possible lengths of zw, where w is any point on the perpendicular bisector of zu.

Betweenness can than be defined by using the intuition that the shortest distance between any two points is a straight line:

The Axiom Schema of Continuity assures that the ordering of points on a line is complete (with respect to first-order definable properties). The Axioms of Pasch and Euclid are well known. Remarkably, Euclidean geometry requires just the following further axioms:

Let wff stand for a well-formed formula (or syntactically correct formula) of elementary geometry. Tarski and Givant (1999: 175) proved that elementary geometry is:

Gupta (1965) proved the above axioms independent, Pasch and Reflexivity of Congruence excepted.

Negating the Axiom of Euclid yields hyperbolic geometry, while eliminating it outright yields absolute geometry. Full (as opposed to elementary) Euclidean geometry requires giving up a first order axiomatization: replace φ(x) and ψ(y) in the axiom schema of Continuity with xA and yB, where A and B are universally quantified variables ranging over sets of points.

Comparison with Hilbert

Hilbert's axioms for plane geometry number 16, and include Transitivity of Congruence and a variant of the Axiom of Pasch. The only notion from intuitive geometry invoked in the remarks to Tarski's axioms is triangle. (Versions B and C of the Axiom of Euclid refer to '"circle" and "angle," respectively.) Hilbert's axioms also require "ray," "angle," and the notion of a triangle "including" an angle. In addition to betweenness and congruence, Hilbert's axioms require a primitive binary relation "on," linking a point and a line. The Axiom schema of Continuity plays a role similar to Hilbert's two axioms of Continuity. This schema is indispensable; Euclidean geometry in Tarski's (or equivalent) language cannot be finitely axiomatized as a first-order theory. Hilbert's axioms do not constitute a first-order theory because his continuity axioms require second-order logic.

The first four groups of axioms of Hilbert's axioms for plane geometry can be proved using Tarski's axioms.

Notes

  1. Tarski and Givant, 1999, page 177

References

  • Many property agents need to declare for the PIC grant in Singapore. However, not all of them know find out how to do the correct process for getting this PIC scheme from the IRAS. There are a number of steps that you need to do before your software can be approved.

    Naturally, you will have to pay a safety deposit and that is usually one month rent for annually of the settlement. That is the place your good religion deposit will likely be taken into account and will kind part or all of your security deposit. Anticipate to have a proportionate amount deducted out of your deposit if something is discovered to be damaged if you move out. It's best to you'll want to test the inventory drawn up by the owner, which can detail all objects in the property and their condition. If you happen to fail to notice any harm not already mentioned within the inventory before transferring in, you danger having to pay for it yourself.

    In case you are in search of an actual estate or Singapore property agent on-line, you simply should belief your intuition. It's because you do not know which agent is nice and which agent will not be. Carry out research on several brokers by looking out the internet. As soon as if you end up positive that a selected agent is dependable and reliable, you can choose to utilize his partnerise in finding you a home in Singapore. Most of the time, a property agent is taken into account to be good if he or she locations the contact data on his website. This may mean that the agent does not mind you calling them and asking them any questions relating to new properties in singapore in Singapore. After chatting with them you too can see them in their office after taking an appointment.

    Have handed an trade examination i.e Widespread Examination for House Brokers (CEHA) or Actual Property Agency (REA) examination, or equal; Exclusive brokers are extra keen to share listing information thus making certain the widest doable coverage inside the real estate community via Multiple Listings and Networking. Accepting a severe provide is simpler since your agent is totally conscious of all advertising activity related with your property. This reduces your having to check with a number of agents for some other offers. Price control is easily achieved. Paint work in good restore-discuss with your Property Marketing consultant if main works are still to be done. Softening in residential property prices proceed, led by 2.8 per cent decline within the index for Remainder of Central Region

    Once you place down the one per cent choice price to carry down a non-public property, it's important to accept its situation as it is whenever you move in – faulty air-con, choked rest room and all. Get round this by asking your agent to incorporate a ultimate inspection clause within the possibility-to-buy letter. HDB flat patrons routinely take pleasure in this security net. "There's a ultimate inspection of the property two days before the completion of all HDB transactions. If the air-con is defective, you can request the seller to repair it," says Kelvin.

    15.6.1 As the agent is an intermediary, generally, as soon as the principal and third party are introduced right into a contractual relationship, the agent drops out of the image, subject to any problems with remuneration or indemnification that he could have against the principal, and extra exceptionally, against the third occasion. Generally, agents are entitled to be indemnified for all liabilities reasonably incurred within the execution of the brokers´ authority.

    To achieve the very best outcomes, you must be always updated on market situations, including past transaction information and reliable projections. You could review and examine comparable homes that are currently available in the market, especially these which have been sold or not bought up to now six months. You'll be able to see a pattern of such report by clicking here It's essential to defend yourself in opposition to unscrupulous patrons. They are often very skilled in using highly unethical and manipulative techniques to try and lure you into a lure. That you must also protect your self, your loved ones, and personal belongings as you'll be serving many strangers in your home. Sign a listing itemizing of all of the objects provided by the proprietor, together with their situation. HSR Prime Recruiter 2010
  • Givant, Steven (1999) "Unifying threads in Alfred Tarski's Work", Mathematical Intelligencer 21:47–58.
  • Gupta, H. N. (1965) Contributions to the Axiomatic Foundations of Geometry. Ph.D. thesis, University of California-Berkeley.
  • Many property agents need to declare for the PIC grant in Singapore. However, not all of them know find out how to do the correct process for getting this PIC scheme from the IRAS. There are a number of steps that you need to do before your software can be approved.

    Naturally, you will have to pay a safety deposit and that is usually one month rent for annually of the settlement. That is the place your good religion deposit will likely be taken into account and will kind part or all of your security deposit. Anticipate to have a proportionate amount deducted out of your deposit if something is discovered to be damaged if you move out. It's best to you'll want to test the inventory drawn up by the owner, which can detail all objects in the property and their condition. If you happen to fail to notice any harm not already mentioned within the inventory before transferring in, you danger having to pay for it yourself.

    In case you are in search of an actual estate or Singapore property agent on-line, you simply should belief your intuition. It's because you do not know which agent is nice and which agent will not be. Carry out research on several brokers by looking out the internet. As soon as if you end up positive that a selected agent is dependable and reliable, you can choose to utilize his partnerise in finding you a home in Singapore. Most of the time, a property agent is taken into account to be good if he or she locations the contact data on his website. This may mean that the agent does not mind you calling them and asking them any questions relating to new properties in singapore in Singapore. After chatting with them you too can see them in their office after taking an appointment.

    Have handed an trade examination i.e Widespread Examination for House Brokers (CEHA) or Actual Property Agency (REA) examination, or equal; Exclusive brokers are extra keen to share listing information thus making certain the widest doable coverage inside the real estate community via Multiple Listings and Networking. Accepting a severe provide is simpler since your agent is totally conscious of all advertising activity related with your property. This reduces your having to check with a number of agents for some other offers. Price control is easily achieved. Paint work in good restore-discuss with your Property Marketing consultant if main works are still to be done. Softening in residential property prices proceed, led by 2.8 per cent decline within the index for Remainder of Central Region

    Once you place down the one per cent choice price to carry down a non-public property, it's important to accept its situation as it is whenever you move in – faulty air-con, choked rest room and all. Get round this by asking your agent to incorporate a ultimate inspection clause within the possibility-to-buy letter. HDB flat patrons routinely take pleasure in this security net. "There's a ultimate inspection of the property two days before the completion of all HDB transactions. If the air-con is defective, you can request the seller to repair it," says Kelvin.

    15.6.1 As the agent is an intermediary, generally, as soon as the principal and third party are introduced right into a contractual relationship, the agent drops out of the image, subject to any problems with remuneration or indemnification that he could have against the principal, and extra exceptionally, against the third occasion. Generally, agents are entitled to be indemnified for all liabilities reasonably incurred within the execution of the brokers´ authority.

    To achieve the very best outcomes, you must be always updated on market situations, including past transaction information and reliable projections. You could review and examine comparable homes that are currently available in the market, especially these which have been sold or not bought up to now six months. You'll be able to see a pattern of such report by clicking here It's essential to defend yourself in opposition to unscrupulous patrons. They are often very skilled in using highly unethical and manipulative techniques to try and lure you into a lure. That you must also protect your self, your loved ones, and personal belongings as you'll be serving many strangers in your home. Sign a listing itemizing of all of the objects provided by the proprietor, together with their situation. HSR Prime Recruiter 2010. Available as a 2007 reprint, Brouwer Press, ISBN 1-4437-2812-8
  • Many property agents need to declare for the PIC grant in Singapore. However, not all of them know find out how to do the correct process for getting this PIC scheme from the IRAS. There are a number of steps that you need to do before your software can be approved.

    Naturally, you will have to pay a safety deposit and that is usually one month rent for annually of the settlement. That is the place your good religion deposit will likely be taken into account and will kind part or all of your security deposit. Anticipate to have a proportionate amount deducted out of your deposit if something is discovered to be damaged if you move out. It's best to you'll want to test the inventory drawn up by the owner, which can detail all objects in the property and their condition. If you happen to fail to notice any harm not already mentioned within the inventory before transferring in, you danger having to pay for it yourself.

    In case you are in search of an actual estate or Singapore property agent on-line, you simply should belief your intuition. It's because you do not know which agent is nice and which agent will not be. Carry out research on several brokers by looking out the internet. As soon as if you end up positive that a selected agent is dependable and reliable, you can choose to utilize his partnerise in finding you a home in Singapore. Most of the time, a property agent is taken into account to be good if he or she locations the contact data on his website. This may mean that the agent does not mind you calling them and asking them any questions relating to new properties in singapore in Singapore. After chatting with them you too can see them in their office after taking an appointment.

    Have handed an trade examination i.e Widespread Examination for House Brokers (CEHA) or Actual Property Agency (REA) examination, or equal; Exclusive brokers are extra keen to share listing information thus making certain the widest doable coverage inside the real estate community via Multiple Listings and Networking. Accepting a severe provide is simpler since your agent is totally conscious of all advertising activity related with your property. This reduces your having to check with a number of agents for some other offers. Price control is easily achieved. Paint work in good restore-discuss with your Property Marketing consultant if main works are still to be done. Softening in residential property prices proceed, led by 2.8 per cent decline within the index for Remainder of Central Region

    Once you place down the one per cent choice price to carry down a non-public property, it's important to accept its situation as it is whenever you move in – faulty air-con, choked rest room and all. Get round this by asking your agent to incorporate a ultimate inspection clause within the possibility-to-buy letter. HDB flat patrons routinely take pleasure in this security net. "There's a ultimate inspection of the property two days before the completion of all HDB transactions. If the air-con is defective, you can request the seller to repair it," says Kelvin.

    15.6.1 As the agent is an intermediary, generally, as soon as the principal and third party are introduced right into a contractual relationship, the agent drops out of the image, subject to any problems with remuneration or indemnification that he could have against the principal, and extra exceptionally, against the third occasion. Generally, agents are entitled to be indemnified for all liabilities reasonably incurred within the execution of the brokers´ authority.

    To achieve the very best outcomes, you must be always updated on market situations, including past transaction information and reliable projections. You could review and examine comparable homes that are currently available in the market, especially these which have been sold or not bought up to now six months. You'll be able to see a pattern of such report by clicking here It's essential to defend yourself in opposition to unscrupulous patrons. They are often very skilled in using highly unethical and manipulative techniques to try and lure you into a lure. That you must also protect your self, your loved ones, and personal belongings as you'll be serving many strangers in your home. Sign a listing itemizing of all of the objects provided by the proprietor, together with their situation. HSR Prime Recruiter 2010
  • Schwabhäuser, W., Szmielew, W., and Alfred Tarski, 1983. Metamathematische Methoden in der Geometrie. Springer-Verlag.
  • Szczerba, L. W., 1986, "Tarski and Geometry," Journal of Symbolic Logic 51: 907-12.