Objectivity (frame invariance): Difference between revisions
en>Helpful Pixie Bot m ISBNs (Build KH) |
en>Rhododendrites m clean up using AWB |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[mathematics]], especially in the area of [[abstract algebra|algebra]] known as [[module theory]], '''Schanuel's lemma''', named after [[Stephen Schanuel]], allows one to compare how far modules depart from being [[projective module|projective]]. It is useful in defining the Heller operator in the stable category, and in giving elementary descriptions of [[projective dimension|dimension shifting]]. | |||
==Statement== | |||
'''Schanuel's lemma''' is the following statement: | |||
If 0 → ''K'' → ''P'' → ''M'' → 0 and 0 → ''K''' → ''P'' ' → ''M'' → 0 are [[short exact sequence]]s of ''R''-modules and ''P'' and ''P'' ' are projective, then ''K'' ⊕ ''P'' ' is [[Isomorphism|isomorphic]] to ''K'' ' ⊕ ''P.'' | |||
==Proof== | |||
Define the following [[submodule]] of ''P'' ⊕ ''P'' ', where φ : ''P'' → ''M'' and φ' : ''P'' ' → ''M'': | |||
:<math> X = \{ (p,q) \in P \oplus P^\prime : \phi(p) = \phi^\prime(q) \}. </math> | |||
The map π : ''X'' → ''P'', where π is defined as the projection of the first coordinate of ''X'' into ''P'', is surjective. Since φ' is surjective, for any ''p'' <math>\in</math> ''P'', one may find a ''q'' <math>\in</math> ''P'' ' such that φ(''p'') = φ '(''q''). This gives (''p'',''q'') <math>\in</math> ''X'' with π (''p'',''q'') = ''p''. Now examine the [[kernel (algebra)|kernel]] of the map π : | |||
<math> | |||
\begin{align} | |||
\text{ker} \; \pi &= \{ (0,q): (0,q) \in X \} \\ | |||
& = \{ (0,q): \phi^\prime(q) =0 \} \\ | |||
& \cong \; \text{ker} \; \phi^\prime \cong K^\prime. | |||
\end{align} </math> | |||
We may conclude that there is a short exact sequence | |||
:<math> 0 \rightarrow K^\prime \rightarrow X \rightarrow P \rightarrow 0. </math> | |||
Since ''P'' is projective this sequence splits, so ''X'' ≅ ''K'' ' ⊕ ''P'' . Similarly, we can write another map π : ''X'' → ''P'' ', and the same argument as above shows that there is another short exact sequence | |||
:<math> 0 \rightarrow K \rightarrow X \rightarrow P^\prime \rightarrow 0, </math> | |||
and so ''X'' ≅ ''P'' ' ⊕ ''K''. Combining the two equivalences for ''X'' gives the desired result. | |||
==Long exact sequences== | |||
The above argument may also be generalized to [[long exact sequence]]s.<ref>{{cite book | author = Lam, T.Y. | title = Lectures on Modules and Rings | publisher = Springer | year = 1999 | id = ISBN 0-387-98428-3}} pgs. 165–167.</ref> | |||
==Origins== | |||
[[Stephen Schanuel]] discovered the argument in [[Irving Kaplansky]]'s [[homological algebra]] course at the [[University of Chicago]] in Autumn of 1958. Kaplansky writes: | |||
:''Early in the course I formed a one-step projective resolution of a module, and remarked that if the kernel was projective in one resolution it was projective in all. I added that, although the statement was so simple and straightforward, it would be a while before we proved it. Steve Shanuel spoke up and told me and the class that it was quite easy, and thereupon sketched what has come to be known as "Schanuel's lemma." '' <ref>{{cite book | author = Kaplansky, Irving. | title = Fields and Rings | publisher = University Of Chicago Press | year = 1972 | id = ISBN 0-226-42451-0}} pgs. 165–168.</ref> | |||
==Notes== | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
[[Category:Homological algebra]] | |||
[[Category:Module theory]] |
Revision as of 05:37, 20 December 2013
In mathematics, especially in the area of algebra known as module theory, Schanuel's lemma, named after Stephen Schanuel, allows one to compare how far modules depart from being projective. It is useful in defining the Heller operator in the stable category, and in giving elementary descriptions of dimension shifting.
Statement
Schanuel's lemma is the following statement:
If 0 → K → P → M → 0 and 0 → K' → P ' → M → 0 are short exact sequences of R-modules and P and P ' are projective, then K ⊕ P ' is isomorphic to K ' ⊕ P.
Proof
Define the following submodule of P ⊕ P ', where φ : P → M and φ' : P ' → M:
The map π : X → P, where π is defined as the projection of the first coordinate of X into P, is surjective. Since φ' is surjective, for any p P, one may find a q P ' such that φ(p) = φ '(q). This gives (p,q) X with π (p,q) = p. Now examine the kernel of the map π :
We may conclude that there is a short exact sequence
Since P is projective this sequence splits, so X ≅ K ' ⊕ P . Similarly, we can write another map π : X → P ', and the same argument as above shows that there is another short exact sequence
and so X ≅ P ' ⊕ K. Combining the two equivalences for X gives the desired result.
Long exact sequences
The above argument may also be generalized to long exact sequences.[1]
Origins
Stephen Schanuel discovered the argument in Irving Kaplansky's homological algebra course at the University of Chicago in Autumn of 1958. Kaplansky writes:
- Early in the course I formed a one-step projective resolution of a module, and remarked that if the kernel was projective in one resolution it was projective in all. I added that, although the statement was so simple and straightforward, it would be a while before we proved it. Steve Shanuel spoke up and told me and the class that it was quite easy, and thereupon sketched what has come to be known as "Schanuel's lemma." [2]
Notes
43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.
- ↑ 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534 pgs. 165–167. - ↑ 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534 pgs. 165–168.