Standard normal table: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
I would like to introduce myself to you, I am Andrew and my wife doesn't like it at all. To perform lacross is something he would never give up. Alaska is the only location I've been residing in but now I'm considering other choices. I am an invoicing officer and I'll be promoted quickly.<br><br>my web-site ... online psychic ([http://www.article-galaxy.com/profile.php?a=143251 www.article-galaxy.com])
In [[number theory]], the law of [[quadratic reciprocity]], like the [[Pythagorean theorem]], has lent itself to an unusual number of [[mathematical proof|proofs]].  Several hundred '''proofs of the law of quadratic reciprocity''' have been found.
 
==Proofs that are accessible==
 
Of relatively elementary, combinatorial proofs, there are two which apply types of [[double counting (proof technique)|double counting]]. One by [[Gotthold Eisenstein]] counts [[lattice point]]s. Another applies [[Zolotarev's lemma]] to ''Z''/''pqZ'' expressed by the [[Chinese remainder theorem]] as ''Z''/''pZ''×''Z''/''qZ'', and calculates the [[signature of a permutation]].
 
== Eisenstein's proof ==
 
Eisenstein's proof of quadratic reciprocity is a simplification of Gauss's third proof. It is more geometrically intuitive and requires less technical manipulation.
 
The point of departure is "Eisenstein's lemma", which states that for distinct odd primes ''p'', ''q'',
: <math>\left(\frac qp\right) = (-1)^{\sum_u \left \lfloor qu/p \right \rfloor},</math>
where <math>\left \lfloor x \right \rfloor</math> denotes the [[floor function]] (the largest integer less than or equal to ''x''), and where the sum is taken over the ''even'' integers ''u'' = 2, 4, 6, ..., ''p''−1. For example,
: <math>\left(\frac 7{11}\right) = (-1)^{ \left \lfloor 14/11 \right \rfloor + \left \lfloor 28/11 \right \rfloor + \left \lfloor 42/11 \right \rfloor + \left \lfloor 56/11 \right \rfloor + \left \lfloor 70/11 \right \rfloor } = (-1)^{1 + 2 + 3 + 5 + 6} = (-1)^{17} = -1.</math>
This result is very similar to [[Gauss's lemma (number theory)|Gauss's lemma]], and can be proved in a similar fashion (proof given below).
 
Using this representation of (''q''/''p''), the main argument is quite elegant. The sum <math>\Sigma_u \left \lfloor qu/p \right \rfloor</math> counts the number of lattice points with even ''x''-coordinate in the interior of the triangle ABC in the following diagram:
 
{|
|  [[File:Eisenstein-quadratic-reciprocity-1.svg|300px|none|thumb|Lattice point diagram]]
|| [[File:Eisenstein-quadratic-reciprocity-2.svg|300px|none|thumb|Example showing lattice points inside ABC with even ''x''-coordinates, for ''p'' = 11 and ''q'' = 7]]
|}
 
Because each column has an even number of points (namely ''q''−1 points), the number of such lattice points in the region BCYX is the same ''modulo 2'' as the number of such points in the region CZY:
 
[[File:Eisenstein-quadratic-reciprocity-3.svg|300px|thumb|none|The number of points with even ''x''-coordinate inside BCYX (marked by O's) is equal modulo 2 to the number of such points in CZY (marked by X's)]]
 
Then by flipping the diagram in both axes, we see that the number of points with even ''x''-coordinate inside CZY is the same as the number of points inside AXY having ''odd'' ''x''-coordinates:
 
[[File:Eisenstein-quadratic-reciprocity-4.svg|300px|thumb|none|The number of points with even ''x''-coordinate inside CZY is equal to the number of points with ''odd'' ''x''-coordinate inside AXY]]
 
The conclusion is that
: <math>\left(\frac qp\right) = (-1)^\mu,</math>
where μ is the ''total'' number of lattice points in the interior of AYX. Switching ''p'' and ''q'', the same argument shows that
: <math>\left(\frac pq\right) = (-1)^\nu,</math>
where ν is the number of lattice points in the interior of WYA. Since there are no lattice points on the line AY itself (because ''p'' and ''q'' are [[relatively prime]]), and since the total number of points in the rectangle WYXA is
: <math>\left(\frac{p-1}2\right) \left(\frac{q-1}2\right),</math>
we obtain finally
: <math>\left(\frac qp\right) \left(\frac pq\right) = (-1)^{\mu + \nu} = (-1)^{(p-1)(q-1)/4}.</math>
 
=== Proof of Eisenstein's lemma ===
 
For an even integer ''u'' in the range 1 ≤ ''u'' ≤ ''p''−1, denote by ''r''(''u'') the least positive residue of ''qu'' modulo ''p''. (For example, for ''p'' = 11, ''q'' = 7, we allow ''u'' = 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and the corresponding values of ''r''(''u'') are 3, 6, 9, 1, 4.) The numbers (−1)<sup>''r''(''u'')</sup>''r''(''u''), again treated as least positive residues modulo ''p'', are all ''even'' (in our running example, they are 8, 6, 2, 10, 4.) Furthermore, they are all distinct, because if (−1)<sup>''r''(''u'')</sup>''r''(''u'') ≡ (−1)<sup>''r''(''t'')</sup>''r''(''t'') mod ''p'', then we may divide out by ''q'' to obtain ''u'' ≡ ±''t'' mod ''p''. This forces ''u'' ≡ ''t'' mod ''p'', because both ''u'' and ''t'' are ''even'', whereas ''p'' is odd. Since there exactly (''p''−1)/2 of them and they are distinct, they must be simply a rearrangement of the even integers 2, 4, ..., ''p''−1. Multiplying them together, we obtain
: <math>(-1)^{r(2)}2q \cdot (-1)^{r(4)}4q \cdot \cdots \cdot (-1)^{r(p-1)}(p-1)q \equiv 2 \cdot 4 \cdot \cdots \cdot (p-1)\text{ (mod }p).</math>
Dividing out successively by 2, 4, ..., ''p''−1 on both sides (which is permissible since none of them are divisible by ''p'') and rearranging, we have
: <math>q^{(p-1)/2} \equiv (-1)^{r(2) + r(4) + \cdots + r(p-1)}\text{ (mod }p).</math>
On the other hand, by the definition of ''r''(''u'') and the floor function,
: <math>\frac{qu}p = \left \lfloor \frac{qu}p\right \rfloor + \frac{r(u)}p,</math>
and so since ''p'' is odd and ''u'' is even, we see that <math>\left \lfloor qu/p \right \rfloor</math> and ''r''(''u'') are congruent modulo 2. Finally this shows that
: <math>q^{(p-1)/2} \equiv (-1)^{\sum_u \left \lfloor qu/p \right \rfloor} \text{ (mod }p).</math>
We are finished because the left hand side is just an [[Euler's criterion|alternative expression for (''q''/''p'')]].
 
== Proof using algebraic number theory ==
 
The proof presented here is by no means the simplest known; however, it is quite a deep one, in the sense that it motivates some of the ideas of [[Artin reciprocity]].
 
=== Cyclotomic field setup ===
 
Suppose that ''p'' is an odd prime. The action takes place inside the [[cyclotomic field]]
:<math>L = \mathbf Q(\zeta_p),</math>
where ζ<sub>p</sub> is a primitive ''p''<sup>th</sup> [[root of unity]]. The basic theory of cyclotomic fields informs us that there is a canonical isomorphism
:<math>G = \operatorname{Gal}(L/\mathbf Q) \cong (\Z/p\Z)^\times,</math>
which sends the automorphism σ<sub>''a''</sub> satisfying
:<math>\sigma_a(\zeta_p) = \zeta_p^a</math>
to the element
:<math>a \in (\Z/p\Z)^\times.</math>
 
(This is because the morphism of reduction from ''Z'' to ''Z/qZ'' is injective on the set of p-th roots of unity)
 
Now consider the subgroup ''H'' of ''squares'' of elements of ''G''. Since ''G'' is cyclic, ''H'' has [[Index of a subgroup|index]] 2 in ''G'', so the subfield corresponding to ''H'' under the Galois correspondence must be a ''quadratic'' extension of '''Q'''. (In fact it is the ''unique'' quadratic extension of '''Q''' contained in ''L''.) The [[Gaussian period]] theory determines which one; it turns out to be
:<math>\mathbf Q(\sqrt{p^*}),</math>
where
:<math>p^* = \begin{cases} p & \mbox{if } p = 1 \text{ (mod }4), \\ -p & \mbox{if } p = 3 \text{ (mod }4). \end{cases}</math>
 
At this point we start to see a hint of quadratic reciprocity emerging from our framework. On one hand, the image of ''H'' in
:<math>(\mathbf Z/p\mathbf Z)^\times</math>
consists precisely of the (nonzero) ''quadratic residues modulo p''. On the other hand, ''H'' is related to an attempt to take the ''square root of p'' (or possibly of −''p''). In other words, if now ''q'' is an odd prime (different from ''p''), we have so far shown that
:<math>\left(\frac qp\right) =1 \quad \iff \quad \sigma_q \in H \quad \iff \quad \sigma_q \mbox{ fixes } \mathbf Q(\sqrt{p^*}).</math>
 
=== The Frobenius automorphism ===
 
Choose any prime ideal β of the ring of integers ''O''<sub>''L''</sub> lying over ''q'', which is unramified, and let
:<math>\phi \in \operatorname{Gal}(L/\mathbf Q)</math>
be the [[Frobenius automorphism]] associated to β; the characteristic property of <math>\phi</math> is that
:<math>\phi(x) \equiv x^q \text{ (mod }\beta) \,\!</math>
for any ''x'' in ''O''<sub>''L''</sub>. (The existence of such a Frobenius element depends on quite a bit of algebraic number theory machinery.)
 
The key fact about <math>\phi</math> that we need is that for any subfield ''K'' of ''L'',
:<math>\phi \mbox{ fixes } K \quad \iff \quad q \mbox{ splits completely in } K.</math>
Indeed, let δ be any ideal of ''O''<sub>''K''</sub> below β (and hence above ''q''). Then, since
:<math>\phi(x) \equiv x^q \text{ (mod }\delta) \,\!</math>
for any ''x'' in ''O''<sub>''K''</sub>, we see that
:<math>\phi\vert_K \in \operatorname{Gal}(K/\mathbf Q)</math>
is a Frobenius for δ. A standard result concerning <math>\phi</math> is that its order is equal to the corresponding inertial degree; that is,
:<math>\operatorname{ord}(\phi\vert_K) = [O_K/\delta O_K : \mathbf Z/q\mathbf Z].</math>
The left hand side is equal to 1 if and only if φ fixes ''K'', and the right hand side is equal to one if and only ''q'' splits completely in ''K'', so we are done.
 
Now, since the ''p''<sup>th</sub> roots of unity are distinct modulo β (i.e. the polynomial ''X''<sup>p</sup> − 1 is separable in characteristic ''q''), we must have
:<math>\phi(\zeta_p) = \zeta_p^q;</math>
that is, <math>\phi</math> coincides with the automorphism σ<sub>''q''</sub> defined earlier. Taking ''K'' to be the quadratic field in which we are interested, we obtain the equivalence
:<math>\left(\frac qp\right) =1 \quad \iff \quad q \mbox{ splits completely in } \mathbf Q(\sqrt{p^*}).</math>
 
=== Completing the proof ===
 
Finally we must show that
:<math>q \mbox{ splits completely in } \mathbf Q(\sqrt{p^*}) \quad \iff \quad \left(\frac{p^*}q\right) = 1.</math>
Once we have done this, the law of quadratic reciprocity falls out immediately since
:<math>\left(\frac{p^*}q\right) = \left(\frac pq\right)</math>
if ''p'' = 1 mod 4, and
:<math>\left(\frac{p^*}q\right) = \left(\frac{-p}q\right) = \left(\frac{-1}q\right)\left(\frac pq\right) = \begin{cases} +\left(\frac pq \right) & \mbox{if } q = 1 \text{ (mod }4), \\ -\left(\frac pq\right) & \mbox{if } q = 3 \text{ (mod }4)\end{cases}</math>
if ''p'' = 3 mod 4.
 
To show the last equivalence, suppose first that
:<math>\left(\frac{p^*}q\right) = 1.</math>
In this case, there is some integer ''x'' (not divisible by ''q'') such that
:<math> x^2 \equiv p^* \text{ (mod }q), \,\!</math>
say
:<math> x^2 - p^* = cq \,\!</math>
for some integer ''c''. Let
:<math>K = \mathbf Q(\sqrt{p^*}),</math>
and consider the ideal
:<math>(x-\sqrt{p^*},q)</math>
of ''K''. It certainly divides the principal ideal (''q''). It cannot be equal to (''q''), since
:<math>x-\sqrt{p^*}</math>
is not divisible by ''q''. It cannot be the unit ideal, because then
:<math>(x+\sqrt{p^*}) = (x+\sqrt{p^*})(x-\sqrt{p^*},q) = (cq, q(x+\sqrt{p^*}))</math>
is divisible by ''q'', which is again impossible. Therefore (''q'') must split in ''K''.
 
Conversely, suppose that (''q'') splits, and let β be a prime of ''K'' above ''q''. Then
:<math>(q) \subsetneq \beta,</math>
so we may choose some
:<math>a+b\sqrt{p^*} \in \beta\setminus(q),</math>
where ''a'' and ''b'' are in '''Q'''. Actually, since
:<math>p^* = 1 \text{ (mod }4),</math>
elementary theory of quadratic fields implies that the ring of integers of ''K'' is precisely
:<math>\mathbf Z\left[\frac{1+\sqrt{p^*}}2\right],</math>
so the denominators of ''a'' and ''b'' are at worst equal to 2. Since ''q'' ≠ 2, we may safely multiply ''a'' and ''b'' by 2, and assume that
:<math>a+b\sqrt{p^*} \in \beta\setminus(q),</math>
where now ''a'' and ''b'' are in '''Z'''. In this case we have
:<math>(a+b\sqrt{p^*})(a-b\sqrt{p^*}) = a^2 - b^2p^* \in \beta \cap \mathbf Z = (q),</math>
so
:<math>q \mid a^2 - b^2p^*.\,\!</math>
However, ''q'' cannot divide ''b'', since then also ''q'' divides ''a'', which contradicts our choice of
:<math>a+b\sqrt{p^*}.</math>
Therefore, we may divide by ''b'' modulo ''q'', to obtain
:<math>p^* = (ab^{-1})^2 \text{ (mod }q)\,\!</math>
as desired.
 
== References ==
 
Every textbook on [[Number theory#Elementary number theory|elementary number theory]] (and quite a few on [[algebraic number theory]]) has a proof of quadratic reciprocity. Two are especially noteworthy:
 
Franz Lemmermeyer's ''Reciprocity Laws: From Euler to Eisenstein'' has many proofs (some in exercises) of both quadratic and higher-power reciprocity laws and a discussion of their history. Its immense bibliography includes literature citations for 196 different published proofs.
 
Kenneth Ireland and Michael Rosen's ''A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory'' also has many proofs of quadratic reciprocity (and many exercises), and covers the cubic and biquadratic cases as well. Exercise 13.26 (p 202) says it all
:<blockquote>'''Count the number of proofs to the law of quadratic reciprocity given thus far in this book and devise another one.'''</blockquote>
 
*{{citation
  | last1 = Lemmermeyer  | first1 = Franz
  | title = Reciprocity Laws: from Euler to Eisenstein
  | publisher = [[Springer Science+Business Media|Springer]]
  | location = Berlin
  | date = 2000
  | isbn = 3-540-66957-4}}
 
*{{citation
  | last1 = Ireland  | first1 = Kenneth
  | last2 = Rosen  | first2 = Michael
  | title = A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory (second edition)
  | publisher = [[Springer Science+Business Media|Springer]]
  | location = New York
  | date = 1990
  | isbn = 0-387-97329-X}}
 
* G. Rousseau. "On the Quadratic Reciprocity Law", ''J. Austral. Math. Soc. (Series A)'', v51, 1991, 423–425. ([http://anziamj.austms.org.au/JAMSA/V51/Part3/Rousseau.html online])
 
* L. Washington. ''Introduction to Cyclotomic Fields'', 2nd ed.
 
==External links==
 
* [http://www.rzuser.uni-heidelberg.de/~hb3/fchrono.html Chronology of Proofs of the Quadratic Reciprocity Law] (233 proofs!)
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Quadratic reciprocity, Proofs of}}
[[Category:Algebraic number theory]]
[[Category:Article proofs]]

Revision as of 20:19, 26 January 2014

In number theory, the law of quadratic reciprocity, like the Pythagorean theorem, has lent itself to an unusual number of proofs. Several hundred proofs of the law of quadratic reciprocity have been found.

Proofs that are accessible

Of relatively elementary, combinatorial proofs, there are two which apply types of double counting. One by Gotthold Eisenstein counts lattice points. Another applies Zolotarev's lemma to Z/pqZ expressed by the Chinese remainder theorem as Z/pZ×Z/qZ, and calculates the signature of a permutation.

Eisenstein's proof

Eisenstein's proof of quadratic reciprocity is a simplification of Gauss's third proof. It is more geometrically intuitive and requires less technical manipulation.

The point of departure is "Eisenstein's lemma", which states that for distinct odd primes p, q,

(qp)=(1)uqu/p,

where x denotes the floor function (the largest integer less than or equal to x), and where the sum is taken over the even integers u = 2, 4, 6, ..., p−1. For example,

(711)=(1)14/11+28/11+42/11+56/11+70/11=(1)1+2+3+5+6=(1)17=1.

This result is very similar to Gauss's lemma, and can be proved in a similar fashion (proof given below).

Using this representation of (q/p), the main argument is quite elegant. The sum Σuqu/p counts the number of lattice points with even x-coordinate in the interior of the triangle ABC in the following diagram:

Lattice point diagram
Example showing lattice points inside ABC with even x-coordinates, for p = 11 and q = 7

Because each column has an even number of points (namely q−1 points), the number of such lattice points in the region BCYX is the same modulo 2 as the number of such points in the region CZY:

The number of points with even x-coordinate inside BCYX (marked by O's) is equal modulo 2 to the number of such points in CZY (marked by X's)

Then by flipping the diagram in both axes, we see that the number of points with even x-coordinate inside CZY is the same as the number of points inside AXY having odd x-coordinates:

The number of points with even x-coordinate inside CZY is equal to the number of points with odd x-coordinate inside AXY

The conclusion is that

(qp)=(1)μ,

where μ is the total number of lattice points in the interior of AYX. Switching p and q, the same argument shows that

(pq)=(1)ν,

where ν is the number of lattice points in the interior of WYA. Since there are no lattice points on the line AY itself (because p and q are relatively prime), and since the total number of points in the rectangle WYXA is

(p12)(q12),

we obtain finally

(qp)(pq)=(1)μ+ν=(1)(p1)(q1)/4.

Proof of Eisenstein's lemma

For an even integer u in the range 1 ≤ up−1, denote by r(u) the least positive residue of qu modulo p. (For example, for p = 11, q = 7, we allow u = 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and the corresponding values of r(u) are 3, 6, 9, 1, 4.) The numbers (−1)r(u)r(u), again treated as least positive residues modulo p, are all even (in our running example, they are 8, 6, 2, 10, 4.) Furthermore, they are all distinct, because if (−1)r(u)r(u) ≡ (−1)r(t)r(t) mod p, then we may divide out by q to obtain u ≡ ±t mod p. This forces ut mod p, because both u and t are even, whereas p is odd. Since there exactly (p−1)/2 of them and they are distinct, they must be simply a rearrangement of the even integers 2, 4, ..., p−1. Multiplying them together, we obtain

(1)r(2)2q(1)r(4)4q(1)r(p1)(p1)q24(p1) (mod p).

Dividing out successively by 2, 4, ..., p−1 on both sides (which is permissible since none of them are divisible by p) and rearranging, we have

q(p1)/2(1)r(2)+r(4)++r(p1) (mod p).

On the other hand, by the definition of r(u) and the floor function,

qup=qup+r(u)p,

and so since p is odd and u is even, we see that qu/p and r(u) are congruent modulo 2. Finally this shows that

q(p1)/2(1)uqu/p (mod p).

We are finished because the left hand side is just an alternative expression for (q/p).

Proof using algebraic number theory

The proof presented here is by no means the simplest known; however, it is quite a deep one, in the sense that it motivates some of the ideas of Artin reciprocity.

Cyclotomic field setup

Suppose that p is an odd prime. The action takes place inside the cyclotomic field

L=𝐐(ζp),

where ζp is a primitive pth root of unity. The basic theory of cyclotomic fields informs us that there is a canonical isomorphism

G=Gal(L/𝐐)(/p)×,

which sends the automorphism σa satisfying

σa(ζp)=ζpa

to the element

a(/p)×.

(This is because the morphism of reduction from Z to Z/qZ is injective on the set of p-th roots of unity)

Now consider the subgroup H of squares of elements of G. Since G is cyclic, H has index 2 in G, so the subfield corresponding to H under the Galois correspondence must be a quadratic extension of Q. (In fact it is the unique quadratic extension of Q contained in L.) The Gaussian period theory determines which one; it turns out to be

𝐐(p),

where

p={pif p=1 (mod 4),pif p=3 (mod 4).

At this point we start to see a hint of quadratic reciprocity emerging from our framework. On one hand, the image of H in

(𝐙/p𝐙)×

consists precisely of the (nonzero) quadratic residues modulo p. On the other hand, H is related to an attempt to take the square root of p (or possibly of −p). In other words, if now q is an odd prime (different from p), we have so far shown that

(qp)=1σqHσq fixes 𝐐(p).

The Frobenius automorphism

Choose any prime ideal β of the ring of integers OL lying over q, which is unramified, and let

ϕGal(L/𝐐)

be the Frobenius automorphism associated to β; the characteristic property of ϕ is that

ϕ(x)xq (mod β)

for any x in OL. (The existence of such a Frobenius element depends on quite a bit of algebraic number theory machinery.)

The key fact about ϕ that we need is that for any subfield K of L,

ϕ fixes Kq splits completely in K.

Indeed, let δ be any ideal of OK below β (and hence above q). Then, since

ϕ(x)xq (mod δ)

for any x in OK, we see that

ϕ|KGal(K/𝐐)

is a Frobenius for δ. A standard result concerning ϕ is that its order is equal to the corresponding inertial degree; that is,

ord(ϕ|K)=[OK/δOK:𝐙/q𝐙].

The left hand side is equal to 1 if and only if φ fixes K, and the right hand side is equal to one if and only q splits completely in K, so we are done.

Now, since the pth roots of unity are distinct modulo β (i.e. the polynomial Xp − 1 is separable in characteristic q), we must have

ϕ(ζp)=ζpq;

that is, ϕ coincides with the automorphism σq defined earlier. Taking K to be the quadratic field in which we are interested, we obtain the equivalence

(qp)=1q splits completely in 𝐐(p).

Completing the proof

Finally we must show that

q splits completely in 𝐐(p)(pq)=1.

Once we have done this, the law of quadratic reciprocity falls out immediately since

(pq)=(pq)

if p = 1 mod 4, and

(pq)=(pq)=(1q)(pq)={+(pq)if q=1 (mod 4),(pq)if q=3 (mod 4)

if p = 3 mod 4.

To show the last equivalence, suppose first that

(pq)=1.

In this case, there is some integer x (not divisible by q) such that

x2p (mod q),

say

x2p=cq

for some integer c. Let

K=𝐐(p),

and consider the ideal

(xp,q)

of K. It certainly divides the principal ideal (q). It cannot be equal to (q), since

xp

is not divisible by q. It cannot be the unit ideal, because then

(x+p)=(x+p)(xp,q)=(cq,q(x+p))

is divisible by q, which is again impossible. Therefore (q) must split in K.

Conversely, suppose that (q) splits, and let β be a prime of K above q. Then

(q)β,

so we may choose some

a+bpβ(q),

where a and b are in Q. Actually, since

p=1 (mod 4),

elementary theory of quadratic fields implies that the ring of integers of K is precisely

𝐙[1+p2],

so the denominators of a and b are at worst equal to 2. Since q ≠ 2, we may safely multiply a and b by 2, and assume that

a+bpβ(q),

where now a and b are in Z. In this case we have

(a+bp)(abp)=a2b2pβ𝐙=(q),

so

qa2b2p.

However, q cannot divide b, since then also q divides a, which contradicts our choice of

a+bp.

Therefore, we may divide by b modulo q, to obtain

p=(ab1)2 (mod q)

as desired.

References

Every textbook on elementary number theory (and quite a few on algebraic number theory) has a proof of quadratic reciprocity. Two are especially noteworthy:

Franz Lemmermeyer's Reciprocity Laws: From Euler to Eisenstein has many proofs (some in exercises) of both quadratic and higher-power reciprocity laws and a discussion of their history. Its immense bibliography includes literature citations for 196 different published proofs.

Kenneth Ireland and Michael Rosen's A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory also has many proofs of quadratic reciprocity (and many exercises), and covers the cubic and biquadratic cases as well. Exercise 13.26 (p 202) says it all

Count the number of proofs to the law of quadratic reciprocity given thus far in this book and devise another one.

  • Many property agents need to declare for the PIC grant in Singapore. However, not all of them know find out how to do the correct process for getting this PIC scheme from the IRAS. There are a number of steps that you need to do before your software can be approved.

    Naturally, you will have to pay a safety deposit and that is usually one month rent for annually of the settlement. That is the place your good religion deposit will likely be taken into account and will kind part or all of your security deposit. Anticipate to have a proportionate amount deducted out of your deposit if something is discovered to be damaged if you move out. It's best to you'll want to test the inventory drawn up by the owner, which can detail all objects in the property and their condition. If you happen to fail to notice any harm not already mentioned within the inventory before transferring in, you danger having to pay for it yourself.

    In case you are in search of an actual estate or Singapore property agent on-line, you simply should belief your intuition. It's because you do not know which agent is nice and which agent will not be. Carry out research on several brokers by looking out the internet. As soon as if you end up positive that a selected agent is dependable and reliable, you can choose to utilize his partnerise in finding you a home in Singapore. Most of the time, a property agent is taken into account to be good if he or she locations the contact data on his website. This may mean that the agent does not mind you calling them and asking them any questions relating to new properties in singapore in Singapore. After chatting with them you too can see them in their office after taking an appointment.

    Have handed an trade examination i.e Widespread Examination for House Brokers (CEHA) or Actual Property Agency (REA) examination, or equal; Exclusive brokers are extra keen to share listing information thus making certain the widest doable coverage inside the real estate community via Multiple Listings and Networking. Accepting a severe provide is simpler since your agent is totally conscious of all advertising activity related with your property. This reduces your having to check with a number of agents for some other offers. Price control is easily achieved. Paint work in good restore-discuss with your Property Marketing consultant if main works are still to be done. Softening in residential property prices proceed, led by 2.8 per cent decline within the index for Remainder of Central Region

    Once you place down the one per cent choice price to carry down a non-public property, it's important to accept its situation as it is whenever you move in – faulty air-con, choked rest room and all. Get round this by asking your agent to incorporate a ultimate inspection clause within the possibility-to-buy letter. HDB flat patrons routinely take pleasure in this security net. "There's a ultimate inspection of the property two days before the completion of all HDB transactions. If the air-con is defective, you can request the seller to repair it," says Kelvin.

    15.6.1 As the agent is an intermediary, generally, as soon as the principal and third party are introduced right into a contractual relationship, the agent drops out of the image, subject to any problems with remuneration or indemnification that he could have against the principal, and extra exceptionally, against the third occasion. Generally, agents are entitled to be indemnified for all liabilities reasonably incurred within the execution of the brokers´ authority.

    To achieve the very best outcomes, you must be always updated on market situations, including past transaction information and reliable projections. You could review and examine comparable homes that are currently available in the market, especially these which have been sold or not bought up to now six months. You'll be able to see a pattern of such report by clicking here It's essential to defend yourself in opposition to unscrupulous patrons. They are often very skilled in using highly unethical and manipulative techniques to try and lure you into a lure. That you must also protect your self, your loved ones, and personal belongings as you'll be serving many strangers in your home. Sign a listing itemizing of all of the objects provided by the proprietor, together with their situation. HSR Prime Recruiter 2010
  • Many property agents need to declare for the PIC grant in Singapore. However, not all of them know find out how to do the correct process for getting this PIC scheme from the IRAS. There are a number of steps that you need to do before your software can be approved.

    Naturally, you will have to pay a safety deposit and that is usually one month rent for annually of the settlement. That is the place your good religion deposit will likely be taken into account and will kind part or all of your security deposit. Anticipate to have a proportionate amount deducted out of your deposit if something is discovered to be damaged if you move out. It's best to you'll want to test the inventory drawn up by the owner, which can detail all objects in the property and their condition. If you happen to fail to notice any harm not already mentioned within the inventory before transferring in, you danger having to pay for it yourself.

    In case you are in search of an actual estate or Singapore property agent on-line, you simply should belief your intuition. It's because you do not know which agent is nice and which agent will not be. Carry out research on several brokers by looking out the internet. As soon as if you end up positive that a selected agent is dependable and reliable, you can choose to utilize his partnerise in finding you a home in Singapore. Most of the time, a property agent is taken into account to be good if he or she locations the contact data on his website. This may mean that the agent does not mind you calling them and asking them any questions relating to new properties in singapore in Singapore. After chatting with them you too can see them in their office after taking an appointment.

    Have handed an trade examination i.e Widespread Examination for House Brokers (CEHA) or Actual Property Agency (REA) examination, or equal; Exclusive brokers are extra keen to share listing information thus making certain the widest doable coverage inside the real estate community via Multiple Listings and Networking. Accepting a severe provide is simpler since your agent is totally conscious of all advertising activity related with your property. This reduces your having to check with a number of agents for some other offers. Price control is easily achieved. Paint work in good restore-discuss with your Property Marketing consultant if main works are still to be done. Softening in residential property prices proceed, led by 2.8 per cent decline within the index for Remainder of Central Region

    Once you place down the one per cent choice price to carry down a non-public property, it's important to accept its situation as it is whenever you move in – faulty air-con, choked rest room and all. Get round this by asking your agent to incorporate a ultimate inspection clause within the possibility-to-buy letter. HDB flat patrons routinely take pleasure in this security net. "There's a ultimate inspection of the property two days before the completion of all HDB transactions. If the air-con is defective, you can request the seller to repair it," says Kelvin.

    15.6.1 As the agent is an intermediary, generally, as soon as the principal and third party are introduced right into a contractual relationship, the agent drops out of the image, subject to any problems with remuneration or indemnification that he could have against the principal, and extra exceptionally, against the third occasion. Generally, agents are entitled to be indemnified for all liabilities reasonably incurred within the execution of the brokers´ authority.

    To achieve the very best outcomes, you must be always updated on market situations, including past transaction information and reliable projections. You could review and examine comparable homes that are currently available in the market, especially these which have been sold or not bought up to now six months. You'll be able to see a pattern of such report by clicking here It's essential to defend yourself in opposition to unscrupulous patrons. They are often very skilled in using highly unethical and manipulative techniques to try and lure you into a lure. That you must also protect your self, your loved ones, and personal belongings as you'll be serving many strangers in your home. Sign a listing itemizing of all of the objects provided by the proprietor, together with their situation. HSR Prime Recruiter 2010
  • G. Rousseau. "On the Quadratic Reciprocity Law", J. Austral. Math. Soc. (Series A), v51, 1991, 423–425. (online)
  • L. Washington. Introduction to Cyclotomic Fields, 2nd ed.