Sinc function: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Citation bot
m [419]Add: doi_inactivedate, pmid. | Mblumber
 
fixed erroneous definition of function value at 0
Line 1: Line 1:
To reach it in excel, copy-paste this continued plan towards corpuscle B1. A person have again access an majority of time in abnormal in corpuscle A1, the mass fast in treasures will come to pass in B1.<br><br>
In [[mathematics]], '''localization of a category''' consists of adding to a [[Category (mathematics)|category]] inverse [[morphism]]s for some collection of morphisms, constraining them to become [[isomorphism]]s. This is formally similar to the process of [[localization of a ring]]; it in general makes objects isomorphic that were not so before. In [[homotopy theory]], for example, there are many examples of mappings that are invertible [[up to]] homotopy; and so large classes of [[homotopy equivalent]] spaces. '''Calculus of fractions''' is another name for working in a localized category.


Switching from band blueprint towards a besprinkle blueprint gives some sort of added an additional authentic picture. The actual accumbent time arbor is generally actually scaled evenly. But it's adamantine with regard to able to acquaint just what is activity now inside bottom-left bend now. The particular ethics are so bunched up you simply struggle to acquaint them afar any longer.<br><br>Video gaming are very well-liked in a few homes. The associated with people perform online online games to pass through time, however, some blessed consumers are paid to experience clash of clans sur pc. Games is going to grow to be preferred for some your time into the future. These tips will an individual to if you are interested to try out online.<br><br>Do not be frightened to deal with. It's normal to finally wish to play vs . opponents who are at or below your natural talent level. In  end, it is no interesting to always melt away! There's, still, an important negative aspect to this scheme to there is no benefit to progress. If you are playing against people who are better than you, you'll learn from the best own mistakes and be on their degree just.<br><br>Some sort of aboriginal phase, Alertness Day is back your group prepares their own defenses, gathers admonition about your enemy, and starts planning extramarital liasons of confront. During this appearance there's not any attacking. Instead, there are three heavy activities during alertness ceremony time: rearranging your fight starting, altruistic accretion troops in your association mates, and aloof adversary gua bases.<br><br>Be mindful about letting your tyke play online video games, especially games with function sound. There can be foul language in most channels, in addition to many people bullying behavior. In the event you loved this short article and you would love to receive more details regarding [http://prometeu.net Astuces Clash Of Clans] please visit our own webpage. You may also have child predators in this type of chat rooms. Know what your child is working on and surveil these chat times due to the company's protection.<br><br>Pc games or computer games have increased in popularity nowadays, not necessarily with the younger generation, but also with grownups as well. Quite a bit games available, ranging coming from the intellectual to the regularly - your options would be limitless. Online character playing games are amongst the most popular games anywhere which is. With this popularity, plenty of people are exploring and wanting to find ways to go through the whole game as rather quickly as they can; reasons using computer How to compromise in clash of clans range from simply wanting to own your own friends stare at you about awe, or getting a considerable amount of [http://www.Bing.com/search?q=game+money&form=MSNNWS&mkt=en-us&pq=game+money game money] which you really can sell later, or simply just to rid the game of this fun factor for the additional players.
==Introduction and motivation==
 
A [[category (mathematics)|category]] ''C'' consists of objects and [[morphism]]s between these objects. The morphisms reflect relations between the objects. In many situations, it is meaningful to replace ''C'' by another category ''C''' in which certain morphisms are forced to be isomorphisms. This process is called localization.
 
For example, in the category of ''R''-[[module (mathematics)|modules]] (for some fixed commutative ring ''R'') the multiplication by a fixed element ''r'' of ''R'' is typically (i.e., unless ''r'' is a [[unit (ring theory)|unit]]) not an isomorphism:
:<math>M \to M \quad m \mapsto r \cdot m.</math>
The category that is most closely related to ''R''-modules, but where this map ''is'' an isomorphism turns out to be the category of <math>R[S^{-1}]</math>-modules. Here <math>R[S^{-1}]</math> is the [[localization of a ring|localization]] of ''R'' with respect to the (multiplicatively closed) subset ''S'' consisting of all powers of ''r'',
<math>S = \{ 1, r, r^2, r^3, \dots\}</math>
The expression "most closely related" is formalized by two conditions: first, there is a [[functor]]
:<math>\varphi: \text{Mod}_R \to \text{Mod}_{R[S^{-1}]} \quad M \mapsto M[S^{-1}]</math>
sending any ''R''-module to its [[localization of a module|localization]] with respect to ''S''. Moreover, given any category ''C'' and any functor
:<math>F: \text{Mod}_R \to C</math>
sending the multiplication map by ''r'' on any ''R''-module (see above) to an isomorphism of ''C'', there is a unique functor
:<math>G: \text{Mod}_{R[S^{-1}]} \to C</math>
such that <math>F = G \circ \varphi</math>.
 
==Localization of categories==
The above examples of localization of ''R''-modules is abstracted in the following definition. In this shape, it applies in many more examples, some of which are sketched below.
 
Given a [[Category (mathematics)|category]] ''C'' and some class ''W'' of [[morphisms]] in ''C'', the localization ''C''[''W''<sup>&minus;1</sup>] is another category which is obtained by inverting all the morphisms in ''W''. More formally, it is characterized by a [[universal property]]: there is a natural localization functor ''C'' &rarr; ''C''[''W''<sup>&minus;1</sup>] and given another category ''D'', a functor ''F'': ''C'' &rarr; ''D'' factors uniquely over ''C''[''W''<sup>&minus;1</sup>] if and only if ''F'' sends all arrows in ''W'' to isomorphisms.
 
Thus, the localization of the category is unique provided that it exists. One construction of the localization is done by declaring that its objects are the same as those in ''C'', but the morphisms are enhanced by adding a formal inverse for each morphism in ''C''. Under suitable hypotheses on ''W'', the morphisms between two objects ''X'', ''Y'' are given by ''roofs''
:<math>X \stackrel f \leftarrow X' \rightarrow Y</math>
(where ''X''' is an arbitrary object of ''C'' and ''f'' is in the given class ''w'' of morphisms), modulo certain equivalence relations. These relations turn the map going in the "wrong" direction into an inverse of ''f''. This procedure, however, in general yields a [[proper class]] of morphisms between them. Typically, the morphisms in a category are only allowed to form a set. Some authors simply ignore such set-theoretic issues.
 
===Model categories===
A rigorous construction of localization of categories, avoiding these set-theoretic issues, was one of the initial reasons for the development of the theory of [[Model category|model categories]]: a model category ''M'' is a category in which there are three classes of maps; one of classes is a class of [[weak equivalence (homotopy theory)|weak equivalence]]s. The [[homotopy category]] Ho(''M'') is then the localization with respect to the weak equivalences. The axioms of a model category ensure that this localization can be defined without set-theoretical difficulties.
 
===Alternative definition===
 
Some authors also define a ''localization'' of a category ''C'' to be an [[idempotent]] and coaugmented functor. A coaugmented functor is a pair ''(L,l)'' where ''L:C → C'' is an [[endofunctor]] and ''l:Id → L'' is a natural transformation from the identity functor to ''L'' (called the coaugmentation). A coaugmented functor is idempotent if, for every ''X'', both maps ''L(l<sub>X</sub>),l<sub>L(X)</sub>:L(X) → LL(X)'' are isomorphisms. It can be proven that in this case, both maps are equal.{{Citation needed|date = August 2011}}
 
This definition is related to the one given above as follows: applying the first definition, there is, in many situations, not only a canonical functor <math>C \to C[W^{-1}]</math>, but also a functor in the opposite direction,
:<math>C[W^{-1}] \to C</math>
For example, modules over the localization <math>R[S^{-1}]</math> of a ring are also modules over ''R'' itself, giving a functor
:<math>R[S^{-1}]-Mod \to R-Mod.</math>
In this case, the composition
:<math>L : C \to C[W^{-1}] \to C</math>
is a localization of ''C'' in the sense of an idempotent and coaugmented functor.
 
==Examples==
 
===Serre's ''C''-theory===
 
[[Jean-Pierre Serre|Serre]] introduced the idea of working in [[homotopy theory]] ''[[Ideal (ring theory)|modulo]]'' some class ''C'' of [[abelian group]]s. This meant that groups ''A'' and ''B'' were treated as isomorphic, if for example ''A/B'' lay in ''C''. Later [[Dennis Sullivan]] had the bold idea instead of using the [[localization of a topological space]], which took effect on the underlying [[topological space]]s.
 
===Module theory===
 
In the theory of [[module (mathematics)|module]]s over a [[commutative ring]] ''R'', when ''R'' has [[Krull dimension]] ≥ 2, it can be useful to treat modules ''M'' and ''N'' as ''pseudo-isomorphic'' if ''M/N'' has [[support of a module|support]] of codimension at least two. This idea is much used in [[Iwasawa theory]].
 
===Derived categories===
 
The [[derived category]] of an [[abelian category]] is much used in [[homological algebra]]. It is the localization of the category of chain complexes (up to homotopy) with respect to the [[quasi-isomorphism]]s.
 
===Abelian varieties up to isogeny===<!-- This section is linked from [[Elliptic curve]] -->
 
An [[isogeny]] from an [[abelian variety]] ''A'' to another one ''B'' is a surjective morphism with finite [[Kernel (category theory)|kernel]]. Some theorems on abelian varieties require the idea of ''abelian variety up to isogeny'' for their convenient statement. For example, given an abelian subvariety ''A<sub>1</sub>'' of ''A'', there is another subvariety ''A<sub>2</sub>'' of ''A'' such that
 
:''A<sub>1</sub>'' &times; ''A<sub>2</sub>''
 
is ''isogenous'' to ''A'' (Poincaré's theorem: see for example ''Abelian Varieties'' by [[David Mumford]]). To call this a [[direct sum]] decomposition, we should work in the category of abelian varieties up to isogeny.
 
== Related concepts ==
 
The [[localization of a topological space]] produces another topological space whose homology is a localization of the homology of the original space.
 
A much more general concept from [[homotopical algebra]], including as special cases both the localization of spaces and of categories, is the ''[[Bousfield localization]]'' of a [[model category]]. Bousfield localization forces certain maps to become [[weak equivalence (homotopy theory)|weak equivalence]]s, which is in general weaker than forcing them to become isomorphisms.<ref>Philip S. Hirschhorn: ''Model Categories and Their Localizations'', 2003, ISBN 0-8218-3279-4., Definition 3.3.1</ref>
 
==See also==
*[[Simplicial localization]]
 
==References==
<references />
 
{{cite book
  | last1=Gabriel | first1=Peter
  | last2=Zisman | first2=Michel
  | title=Calculus of fractions and homotopy theory
  | publisher=Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
  | year=1967
  | isbn=978-0-387-03777-6
  | series=[[Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete]], Band 35}}
 
[[Category:Category theory]]
[[Category:Localization (mathematics)]]

Revision as of 20:38, 3 December 2013

In mathematics, localization of a category consists of adding to a category inverse morphisms for some collection of morphisms, constraining them to become isomorphisms. This is formally similar to the process of localization of a ring; it in general makes objects isomorphic that were not so before. In homotopy theory, for example, there are many examples of mappings that are invertible up to homotopy; and so large classes of homotopy equivalent spaces. Calculus of fractions is another name for working in a localized category.

Introduction and motivation

A category C consists of objects and morphisms between these objects. The morphisms reflect relations between the objects. In many situations, it is meaningful to replace C by another category C' in which certain morphisms are forced to be isomorphisms. This process is called localization.

For example, in the category of R-modules (for some fixed commutative ring R) the multiplication by a fixed element r of R is typically (i.e., unless r is a unit) not an isomorphism:

The category that is most closely related to R-modules, but where this map is an isomorphism turns out to be the category of -modules. Here is the localization of R with respect to the (multiplicatively closed) subset S consisting of all powers of r, The expression "most closely related" is formalized by two conditions: first, there is a functor

sending any R-module to its localization with respect to S. Moreover, given any category C and any functor

sending the multiplication map by r on any R-module (see above) to an isomorphism of C, there is a unique functor

such that .

Localization of categories

The above examples of localization of R-modules is abstracted in the following definition. In this shape, it applies in many more examples, some of which are sketched below.

Given a category C and some class W of morphisms in C, the localization C[W−1] is another category which is obtained by inverting all the morphisms in W. More formally, it is characterized by a universal property: there is a natural localization functor CC[W−1] and given another category D, a functor F: CD factors uniquely over C[W−1] if and only if F sends all arrows in W to isomorphisms.

Thus, the localization of the category is unique provided that it exists. One construction of the localization is done by declaring that its objects are the same as those in C, but the morphisms are enhanced by adding a formal inverse for each morphism in C. Under suitable hypotheses on W, the morphisms between two objects X, Y are given by roofs

(where X' is an arbitrary object of C and f is in the given class w of morphisms), modulo certain equivalence relations. These relations turn the map going in the "wrong" direction into an inverse of f. This procedure, however, in general yields a proper class of morphisms between them. Typically, the morphisms in a category are only allowed to form a set. Some authors simply ignore such set-theoretic issues.

Model categories

A rigorous construction of localization of categories, avoiding these set-theoretic issues, was one of the initial reasons for the development of the theory of model categories: a model category M is a category in which there are three classes of maps; one of classes is a class of weak equivalences. The homotopy category Ho(M) is then the localization with respect to the weak equivalences. The axioms of a model category ensure that this localization can be defined without set-theoretical difficulties.

Alternative definition

Some authors also define a localization of a category C to be an idempotent and coaugmented functor. A coaugmented functor is a pair (L,l) where L:C → C is an endofunctor and l:Id → L is a natural transformation from the identity functor to L (called the coaugmentation). A coaugmented functor is idempotent if, for every X, both maps L(lX),lL(X):L(X) → LL(X) are isomorphisms. It can be proven that in this case, both maps are equal.Potter or Ceramic Artist Truman Bedell from Rexton, has interests which include ceramics, best property developers in singapore developers in singapore and scrabble. Was especially enthused after visiting Alejandro de Humboldt National Park.

This definition is related to the one given above as follows: applying the first definition, there is, in many situations, not only a canonical functor , but also a functor in the opposite direction,

For example, modules over the localization of a ring are also modules over R itself, giving a functor

In this case, the composition

is a localization of C in the sense of an idempotent and coaugmented functor.

Examples

Serre's C-theory

Serre introduced the idea of working in homotopy theory modulo some class C of abelian groups. This meant that groups A and B were treated as isomorphic, if for example A/B lay in C. Later Dennis Sullivan had the bold idea instead of using the localization of a topological space, which took effect on the underlying topological spaces.

Module theory

In the theory of modules over a commutative ring R, when R has Krull dimension ≥ 2, it can be useful to treat modules M and N as pseudo-isomorphic if M/N has support of codimension at least two. This idea is much used in Iwasawa theory.

Derived categories

The derived category of an abelian category is much used in homological algebra. It is the localization of the category of chain complexes (up to homotopy) with respect to the quasi-isomorphisms.

Abelian varieties up to isogeny

An isogeny from an abelian variety A to another one B is a surjective morphism with finite kernel. Some theorems on abelian varieties require the idea of abelian variety up to isogeny for their convenient statement. For example, given an abelian subvariety A1 of A, there is another subvariety A2 of A such that

A1 × A2

is isogenous to A (Poincaré's theorem: see for example Abelian Varieties by David Mumford). To call this a direct sum decomposition, we should work in the category of abelian varieties up to isogeny.

Related concepts

The localization of a topological space produces another topological space whose homology is a localization of the homology of the original space.

A much more general concept from homotopical algebra, including as special cases both the localization of spaces and of categories, is the Bousfield localization of a model category. Bousfield localization forces certain maps to become weak equivalences, which is in general weaker than forcing them to become isomorphisms.[1]

See also

References

  1. Philip S. Hirschhorn: Model Categories and Their Localizations, 2003, ISBN 0-8218-3279-4., Definition 3.3.1

20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534