Settling time: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Kvng
Reverted good faith edits by 64.28.140.34 (talk): Not enough improvement to merit altering cited quote. (TW)
en>Materialscientist
m Reverted edits by 203.91.196.239 (talk) to last version by 35.2.77.241
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[propositional calculus|propositional logic]], the '''commutativity of conjunction''' is a [[validity|valid]] [[argument form]] and truth-functional [[tautology (logic)|tautology]]. It is considered to be a law of [[classical logic]]. It is the principle that the conjuncts of a [[logical conjunction]] may switch places with each other, while preserving the [[truth-value]] of the resulting proposition.<ref>{{cite book|title=Introduction to Mathematical Logic|author=Elliott Mendelson|year=1997|publisher=CRC Press|isbn=0-412-80830-7}}</ref>
std home test Hello and welcome. My title is Numbers  [http://theoffshoremanual.com/?testimonial=know-facing-candida-albicans at home std test] Wunder. She is a librarian but  [http://nxnn.info/blog/284637 nxnn.info] she's usually needed her  home std test personal company. One of the very very best things in the globe for him is to gather badges but he is struggling to find time for it. Minnesota has usually been his home but his wife wants them to move.<br><br>Visit my web page - over the [http://www.Aafp.org/afp/2000/0315/p1708.html counter std] test ([http://www.egitimpark.net/siir/groups/clear-up-a-candida-with-these-tips/ click through the following article])
 
== Formal notation ==
 
''Commutativity of conjunction'' can be expressed in [[sequent]] notation as:
 
: <math>(P \and Q) \vdash (Q \and P)</math>
 
and
 
: <math>(Q \and P) \vdash (P \and Q)</math>
 
where <math>\vdash</math> is a [[metalogic]]al symbol meaning that <math>(Q \and P)</math> is a [[logical consequence|syntactic consequence]] of <math>(P \and Q)</math>, in the one case, and <math>(P \and Q)</math> is a syntactic consequence of <math>(Q \and P)</math> in the other, in some [[formal system|logical system]];
 
or in [[rule of inference|rule form]]:
 
:<math>\frac{P \and Q}{\therefore Q \and P}</math>
 
and
 
:<math>\frac{Q \and P}{\therefore P \and Q}</math>
 
where the rule is that wherever an instance of "<math>(P \and Q)</math>" appears on a line of a proof, it can be replaced with "<math>(Q \and P)</math>" and wherever an instance of "<math>(Q \and P)</math>" appears on a line of a proof, it can be replaced with "<math>(P \and Q)</math>";
 
or as the statement of a truth-functional tautology or [[theorem]] of propositional logic:
 
:<math>(P \and Q) \to (Q \and P)</math>
 
and
 
:<math>(Q \and P) \to (P \and Q)</math>
 
where <math>P</math> and <math>Q</math> are [[proposition]]s expressed in some formal system.
 
== Generalized principle ==
For any propositions H<sub>1</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>, ... H<sub>''n''</sub>, and permutation σ(n) of the numbers 1 through n, it is the case that:
:H<sub>1</sub> <math>\land</math>  H<sub>2</sub> <math>\land</math> ... <math>\land</math> H<sub>n</sub>
 
is equivalent to
 
:H<sub>σ(1)</sub> <math>\land</math> H<sub>σ(2)</sub> <math>\land</math> H<sub>σ(n)</sub>.
 
For example, if H<sub>1</sub> is
:''It is raining''
 
H<sub>2</sub> is
:''[[Socrates]] is mortal''
 
and H<sub>3</sub> is
:''2+2=4''
 
then
 
''It is raining and Socrates is mortal and 2+2=4''
 
is equivalent to
 
''Socrates is mortal and 2+2=4 and it is raining''
 
and the other orderings of the predicates.
 
==References==
{{reflist}}
 
[[Category:Classical logic]]
[[Category:Rules of inference]]
[[Category:Theorems in propositional logic]]

Revision as of 06:55, 27 February 2014

std home test Hello and welcome. My title is Numbers at home std test Wunder. She is a librarian but nxnn.info she's usually needed her home std test personal company. One of the very very best things in the globe for him is to gather badges but he is struggling to find time for it. Minnesota has usually been his home but his wife wants them to move.

Visit my web page - over the counter std test (click through the following article)