Rössler attractor: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Mark viking
Added wl
en>Monkbot
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Unreferenced stub|auto=yes|date=December 2009}}
Nice to meet you, I am Marvella Shryock. To gather cash is a factor that I'm completely addicted to. For years he's been living in North Dakota and his family members loves it. Hiring is my occupation.<br><br>Feel free to surf to my site - [http://www.hamcass.org/index.php?document_srl=268708&mid=gido std testing at home]
In [[quantum field theory]], the [[Wightman distribution]]s can be [[Analytic continuation|analytically continued]] to analytic functions in [[Euclidean space]] with the [[Domain (mathematics)|domain]] restricted to the ordered set of points in Euclidean space with no coinciding points. These functions are called the '''Schwinger functions,''' named after [[Julian Schwinger]], and they are analytic, symmetric under the permutation of arguments (antisymmetric for [[fermionic field]]s), Euclidean covariant and satisfy a property known as '''reflection positivity'''.
 
Pick any arbitrary coordinate τ and pick a [[test function]] ''f''<sub>''N''</sub> with ''N'' points as its arguments. Assume ''f''<sub>''N''</sub> has its [[Support (mathematics)|support]] in the "time-ordered" subset of ''N'' points with 0 < τ<sub>1</sub> < ... < τ<sub>''N''</sub>. Choose one such ''f''<sub>''N''</sub> for each positive ''N'', with the f's being zero for all ''N'' larger than some integer ''M''. Given a point ''x'', let <math>\scriptstyle \bar{x}</math> be the reflected point about the τ = 0 [[hyperplane]]. Then,
 
:<math>\sum_{m,n}\int d^dx_1 \cdots d^dx_m\, d^dy_1 \cdots d^dy_n S_{m+n}(x_1,\dots,x_m,y_1,\dots,y_n)f_m(\bar{x}_1,\dots,\bar{x}_m)^* f_n(y_1,\dots,y_n)\geq 0</math>
 
where * represents [[complex conjugation]].
 
The '''Osterwalder–Schrader theorem''' states that Schwinger functions which satisfy these properties can be analytically continued into a [[quantum field theory]].
 
Euclidean [[functional integration|path integral]]s satisfy reflection positivity formally. Pick any polynomial [[functional (mathematics)|functional]] ''F'' of the field φ which doesn't depend upon the value of φ(''x'') for those points ''x'' whose τ coordinates are nonpositive.
 
Then,
 
:<math>\int \mathcal{D}\phi F[\phi(x)]F[\phi(\bar{x})]^* e^{-S[\phi]}=\int \mathcal{D}\phi_0 \int_{\phi_+(\tau=0)=\phi_0} \mathcal{D}\phi_+ F[\phi_+]e^{-S_+[\phi_+]}\int_{\phi_-(\tau=0)=\phi_0} \mathcal{D}\phi_- F[\bar{\phi}_-]^* e^{-S_-[\phi_-]}.</math>
 
Since the action ''S'' is real and can be split into ''S''<sub>+</sub> which only depends on φ on the positive half-space and ''S''<sub>&minus;</sub> which only depends upon φ on the negative half-space, if ''S'' also happens to be invariant under the combined action of taking a reflection and complex conjugating all the fields, then the previous quantity has to be nonnegative.
 
==See also==
*[[Wick rotation]]
*[[Konrad Osterwalder]]
 
{{Statistical mechanics topics}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Schwinger Function}}
[[Category:Statistical field theories]]
 
 
{{Quantum-stub}}

Latest revision as of 07:21, 24 July 2014

Nice to meet you, I am Marvella Shryock. To gather cash is a factor that I'm completely addicted to. For years he's been living in North Dakota and his family members loves it. Hiring is my occupation.

Feel free to surf to my site - std testing at home