Point source: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>ClueBot NG
m Reverting possible vandalism by 206.176.115.38 to version by Melchoir. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot NG. (1077139) (Bot)
 
en>Kolbasz
homogenous in all directions => isotropic
Line 1: Line 1:
Alyson is what my spouse loves to contact me but I don't like when individuals use my complete name. Since I was  [http://gcjcteam.org/index.php?mid=etc_video&document_srl=696611&sort_index=regdate&order_type=desc tarot readings] 18 I've been operating as a bookkeeper but quickly my spouse and I will begin our own company. For a whilst I've been in Mississippi but now I'm considering other choices. The favorite hobby for him and his kids is to perform lacross and he would by no means give it up.<br><br>my homepage: online [http://www.herandkingscounty.com/content/information-and-facts-you-must-know-about-hobbies certified psychics] ([http://koreanyelp.com/index.php?document_srl=1798&mid=SchoolNews http://koreanyelp.com/index.php?document_srl=1798&mid=SchoolNews])
The '''tetralemma''' is a figure that features prominently in the classical logic of India. It states that with reference to any a logical proposition X, there are four possibilities:
 
: <math>X </math> (affirmation)
: <math>\neg X</math> (negation)
: <math>X \land \neg X</math> (both) equiv.
: <math>\neg (X \lor \neg X)</math> (neither)
 
==Catuskoti==
The history of fourfold negation, the [[Catuskoti]] (Sanskrit), is evident in the logico-epistemological tradition of India, given the categorical nomenclature '[[Indian logic]]' in Western discourse. Subsumed within the auspice of Indian logic, '[[Buddhist logic]]' has been particularly focused in its employment of the fourfold negation, as evidenced by the traditions of [[Nagarjuna]] and the [[Madhyamaka]], particularly the school of Madhyamaka given the retroactive nomenclature of [[Prasangika]] by the Tibetan Buddhist logico-epistemological tradition.
 
==See also==
* [[Paraconsistent logic]]
* [[Prasangika]]
* [[Two-truths doctrine]]
* [[Catuṣkoṭi]], a similar concept in Indian philosophy
 
==External links==
* [[wikt:tetralemma|Wiktionary definition of tetralemma]]
* [http://twelvelinks.blogspot.com/2006/01/notes-on-tetralemma.html Twelve links blog ''Notes on the tetralemma'']
 
{{Philosophy topics}}
[[Category:History of logic]]
[[Category:Logic]]
[[Category:Lemmas]]

Revision as of 17:42, 1 January 2014

The tetralemma is a figure that features prominently in the classical logic of India. It states that with reference to any a logical proposition X, there are four possibilities:

(affirmation)
(negation)
(both) equiv.
(neither)

Catuskoti

The history of fourfold negation, the Catuskoti (Sanskrit), is evident in the logico-epistemological tradition of India, given the categorical nomenclature 'Indian logic' in Western discourse. Subsumed within the auspice of Indian logic, 'Buddhist logic' has been particularly focused in its employment of the fourfold negation, as evidenced by the traditions of Nagarjuna and the Madhyamaka, particularly the school of Madhyamaka given the retroactive nomenclature of Prasangika by the Tibetan Buddhist logico-epistemological tradition.

See also

External links

Template:Philosophy topics