Multielectrode array

Monroney label showing the EPA's fuel economy equivalent ratings for the 2011 Chevrolet Volt. The rating for all-electric mode (left) is expressed in miles per gallon gasoline equivalent.

Miles per gallon gasoline equivalent (MPGe or MPG_ge) is a measure of the average distance traveled per unit of energy consumed. MPGe is used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to compare energy consumption of alternative fuel vehicles, plug-in electric vehicles and other advanced technology vehicles with the fuel economy of conventional internal combustion vehicles expressed as miles per US gallon.

The MPGe metric was introduced in November 2010 by EPA in the Monroney label of the Nissan Leaf electric car and the Chevrolet Volt plug-in hybrid. The ratings are based on EPA's formula, in which 33.7 kilowatt hours of electricity is equivalent to one gallon of gasoline, and the energy consumption of each vehicle during EPA's five standard drive cycle tests simulating varying driving conditions. All new cars and light-duty trucks sold in the U.S. are required to have this label showing the EPA's estimate of fuel economy of the vehicle.

In a joint ruling issued in May 2011 the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and EPA established the new requirements for a fuel economy and environment label that is mandatory for all new passenger cars and trucks starting with model year 2013. This ruling uses miles per gallon gasoline equivalent for all fuel and advanced technology vehicles available in the U.S. market including plug-in hybrids, electric vehicles, flexible-fuel vehicles, hydrogen fuel cell vehicle, natural gas vehicles, diesel-powered vehicles, and gasoline-powered vehicles. In addition to being displayed on new vehicles, fuel economy ratings are used by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to publish the annual Fuel Economy Guide; the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) to administer the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) program; and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to collect gas guzzler taxes.

Fuel economy estimates for window stickers and CAFE standard compliance are different. The EPA MPGe rating shown in the Monroney label is based on the consumption of the on-board energy content stored in the fuel tank or in the vehicle's battery, or any other energy source, and only represents the tank-to-wheel energy consumption. CAFE estimates are based on a well-to-wheel basis and in the case of liquid fuels and electric drive vehicles also account for the energy consumed upstream to produce the fuel or electricity and deliver it to the vehicle. Fuel economy for CAFE purposes include an incentive adjustment for alternative fuel vehicles and plug-in electric vehicles which results in higher MPGe than those estimated for window stickers.

Background

1988: Alternative Motor Fuels Act

The Alternative Motor Fuels Act (AMFA) enacted in 1988 provides Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) incentives for the manufacture of vehicles that use ethanol, methanol, or natural gas fuels, either powered exclusively on these alternative fuels or in conjunction with gasoline or diesel fuel, such flexible-fuel vehicles. In order to provide incentives for the widespread use of these fuels and to promote the production of alternative fuel vehicles, AMFA allows manufacturers producing alternative fuel vehicles to gain CAFE credits by manufacturing these vehicles, which allows them to raise their overall fleet fuel economy levels to comply with the CAFE standards until the established cap level.

Beginning in 1993, manufacturers of qualified alternative fuel vehicles can benefit for their CAFE estimation, by computing the weighted average of the fuel economy of the produced alternative fuel vehicles by dividing the alcohol fuel economy by a factor of 0.15. As an example, a dedicated alternative fuel vehicle that would achieve 15 mpg fuel economy while operating on alcohol would have a CAFE calculated as follows:

FE = (1/0.15)(15) = 100 miles per gallon

For alternative dual-fuel vehicles, an assumption is made that the vehicles would operate 50% of the time on the alternative fuel and 50% of the time on conventional fuel, resulting in a fuel economy that is based on a harmonic average of alternative fuel and conventional fuel. For example, for an alternative dual-fuel model that achieves 15 miles per gallon operating on an alcohol fuel and 25 mpg on the conventional fuel, the resulting CAFE would be:

FE = 1 / [(0.5/25) + (0.5/100)] = 40 miles per gallon

Calculation of fuel economy for natural gas vehicles is similar. For the purposes of this calculation, the fuel economy is equal to the weighted average of the fuel economy while operating on natural gas and while operating on either gasoline or diesel fuel. AMFA specifies the energy equivalency of 100 cubic feet of natural gas to be equal to 0.823 gallons of gasoline, with the gallon equivalency of natural gas to be considered to have a fuel content, similar to that for alcohol fuels, equal to 0.15 gallons of fuel. For example, under this conversion and gallon equivalency, a dedicated natural gas vehicle that achieves 25 miles per 100 cubic feet of natural gas would have a CAFE value as follows:

FE = (25/100) x (100/0.823)(1/0.15) = 203 miles per gallon

The Energy Policy Act of 1992 expanded the definition of alternative fuel to include liquefied petroleum gas, hydrogen, liquid fuels derived from coal and biological materials, electricity and any other fuel that the Secretary of Transportation determines to be substantially non-petroleum based and has environmental and energy security benefits. Beginning in 1993, manufacturers of these other alternative fuel automobiles that meet the qualifying requirements can also benefit for special treatment in the calculation of their CAFE.

1994: Gasoline gallon equivalent

In 1994 the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) introduced gasoline gallon equivalent (GGE) as a metric for fuel economy for natural gas vehicles. NIST defined a gasoline gallon equivalent (GGE) as 5.660 pounds of natural gas, and gasoline liter equivalent (GLE) as 0.678 kilograms of natural gas.

2000: Petroleum-equivalent fuel economy

Energy efficiency for selected electric cars leased in California between 1996–2003
Vehicle	Model year	Type of battery	Energy use (Wh/mi)
GM EV1	1997	Lead acid	164
GM EV1	1999	NiMH	179
Toyota RAV4 EV	1996	Lead acid	235
Toyota RAV4 EV	2000	NiMH	400
Ford Ranger EV	1998	Lead acid	337
Chevrolet S-10 EV	1997	Lead acid	292

During the late 1990s and early 2000s several electric cars were produced in limited quantities as a result of the California Air Resources Board (CARB) mandate for more fuel-efficient zero-emissions vehicles. Popular models available in California included the General Motors EV1 and the Toyota RAV4 EV. The US DoE and EPA rating for on board energy efficiency for these electric vehicles was expressed as kilowatt-hour/mile (KWh/mi), the most commonly known metric in science and engineering for measuring energy consumption, and used as the billing unit for energy delivered to consumers by electric utilities.

In order to address the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) regulations mandated by the US Congress in 1975, the U.S. Department of Energy established in July 2000 a methodology for calculating the petroleum-equivalent fuel economy of electric vehicles on a well-to-wheel basis. The methodology considers the upstream efficiency of the processes involved in the two fuel cycles, including efficiency factors for petroleum refining and distribution, as well as the national average efficiency for electricity generation and transmission. The formula also includes a fuel efficiency incentive factor of 1/0.15 to benefit electric vehicles. This reward factor is intended provide an incentive for vehicle manufactures to produce and sell electric vehicles, as a higher equivalent fuel economy for EVs improves the carmaker overall fleet fuel economy levels in complying with the CAFE standards, and Congress anticipated that such an incentive would help accelerate the commercialization of electric vehicles. The incentive factor chosen by DoE for EVs is the same 1/0.15 factor already applied in the regulatory treatment of other types of alternative fuel vehicles. When all factors are considered in DoE's formula, the energy efficiency or equivalent fuel economy of electric vehicles increases from 33,705 Wh/gallon (plug-to-wheel) to 82,049 Wh/gallon (well-to-wheel).

2007: X Prize

In April 2007, as part of Draft Competition Guidelines released at the New York Auto Show, MPGe was announced as the main merit metric for the Progressive Insurance Automotive X Prize, a competition developed by the X Prize Foundation for super-efficient vehicles that can achieve at least 100 MPGe. In February 2009, Consumer Reports announced that, as part of a partnership with the X Prize Foundation, they planned to report MPGe as one of several measures that will help consumers understand and compare vehicle efficiency for alternative fuel vehicles.

2010–2011: Miles per gallon equivalent

People are nonetheless rushing to buy properties in Singapore. A new residential condominium mission in Bedok had a long queue three days before its official launch and bought more than 350 units on the very first day. Nonetheless, there is a ‘development' that had emerged in 2011 that the majority have possibly overlooked.

In August, more than a hundred individuals across 16 states reportedly had been sickened with salmonella after consuming mangos In September, the Meals and Drug Administration detained mango imports from a Mexican packing house after the fruits had been linked to the sickenings Save Cash On Your Online Purchasing Make saving money when purchasing on-line a breeze with Bodge's favourite app, Invisible Hands. This helpful program does the price-checking analysis for you, and will warn you when a unique site has a better value - or let you realize that you have found the most effective deal. Watch Posted by Edison Foo September 29, 2013 HEARTH SALE!!! From only $9xx,000! We hope this listing will help launch your search for new properties in Singapore. It's unlawful to purchase ice cream after 6 pm, in Newark.

for a borrower with one or more excellent residential property loans3; and No SSD will be payable by the seller if the property is bought more than three years after it was bought. Non-extension of the Jan 2009 Funds assistance measures for the property market when the measures expire. Permitting up to 2 years of property tax deferral for land accepted for improvement. Lively secondary marketplace for easy exit of property investments. Curiosity on mortgage fee is tax deductible when the property is rented out. We've progressive property tax rates for residential properties- the higher the value of the residential property, the upper the tax charge. Why do I've to pay property tax on my house when I'm an onwer-occupier and not deriving rental earnings? Palacio Cluster Landed

After obtaining a Sale License (topic to authorities circumstances meant to guard individuals shopping for property in Singapore), he might www.rmmonline.com proceed to sell units in his growth. Funding in the property market of Singapore is likely one of the few investment choices the place utilizing the bank's cash could not be any easier. The power of expats, to make a down payment, leverage the capital and consequently improve total return on investment, is excessive in Singapore. PRs who own a HDB flat must sell their flat inside six months of buying a non-public residential property in Singapore. EVERLASTING residents (PRs) now face unprecedented limits on their skill to purchase property in Singapore. New Condo in 2013 March Foreigners are eligible for Singapore greenback mortgage loan. housing grant

Skilled property brokers in Singapore will assist the client and defend their interests throughout the acquisition, and will help safe the provide at the best possible price. The agents may even be sure that all paperwork are in order and that the vendor is the rightful proprietor of the property. Most of the property brokers share their databases with each other. Tuesday's measures come after the Monetary Authority of Singapore in June tightened rules on property loans, and closed loopholes that allowed some householders to circumvent loan restrictions and avoid paying levies when buying extra property. Contact us for a FREE housing loan analysis and to study concerning the newest mortgage to worth on Singapore housing loans. J Gateway Condominium (Bought Out) Oct, 2013

6. Completion of automotive park, roads and drains serving the housing project 5% 7. Notice of Vacant Possession (Upon obtaining Temporary Occupation Permit) The estimates given by SingaporeHousingLoan.SG's calculator are not quotations and are usually not binding in any way on SingaporeHousingLoan.sg or the consumer. The method of calculation does not exactly mirror that of which is being used by the individual monetary establishment and the data provided should be used as a information only. SingaporeHousingLoan.SG's calculator does not pre-qualify you for any housing loan from any monetary institution. Undercover Report Finds Unlawful Rat Meat Sold In London Market Unpasteurized Tempeh Linked To Salmonella Outbreak That Sickens 60 Hottest EC Launch in Sengkang!

BuyRentSingaporeProperty.com is dedicated in providing the newest residential launches, Developer's sales, new launches, resale, HIGH tasks and rental of properties in Singapore. Then there are new launch property condos in the mid-tier range. These are sometimes in the vicinity of the city fringe, in areas corresponding to Newton and Novena Tanjong Rhu. These new launch projects are popular due to their proximity to town heart, the place the enterprise and entertainment centers and all the amenities they provide, but they're usually cheaper than the City core region tasks. Why submit cheques to register for new property launches in Singapore? Riversails Apartment @ Higher Serangoon LakeVille @ Jurong Lakeside Condo by MCL Ferra Condo @ Leonie Hill

As required by the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA), with the introduction of advanced-technology vehicles in the U.S. new information should be incorporated in the Monroney label of new cars and light-duty trucks sold in the country, such as ratings on fuel economy, greenhouse gas emissions, and other air pollutants. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) have conducted a series of studies to determine the best way to redesign this label to provide consumers with simple energy and environmental comparisons across all vehicles types, including battery electric vehicles (BEV), plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV), and conventional internal combustion engine vehicles powered by gasoline and diesel, in order to help consumers choose more efficient and environmentally friendly vehicles. These changes are proposed to be introduced in new vehicles beginning with model year 2012.

As part of the research and redesign process, EPA conducted focus groups where participants were presented with several options to express the consumption of electricity for plug-in electric vehicles. The research showed that participants did not understand the concept of a kilowatt hour as a measure of electric energy use despite the use of this unit in their monthly electric bills. Instead, participants favored a miles per gallon equivalent, MPGe, as the metric to compare with the familiar miles per gallon used for gasoline vehicles. The research also concluded that the kW-hrs per 100 miles metric was more confusing to focus group participants compared to a miles per kW-hr. Based on these results, EPA decided to use the following fuel economy and fuel consumption metrics on the redesigned labels: MPG (city and highway, and combined); MPGe (city and highway, and combined); Gallons per 100 miles; kW-hrs per 100 miles.

The proposed design and final content for two options of the new sticker label that will be introduced in 2013 model year cars and trucks were consulted for 60 days with the public in 2010, and both include miles per gallon equivalent and kW-hrs per 100 miles as the fuel economy metrics for plug-in cars, but in one option MPGe and annual electricity cost are the two most prominent metrics. In November 2010, EPA introduced MPGe as comparison metric on its new sticker for fuel economy for the Nissan Leaf and the Chevrolet Volt.

Typical label for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles expressed in MPGe, mandatory starting with 2013 model year.

In May 2011, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and EPA issued a joint final rule establishing new requirements for a fuel economy and environment label that is mandatory for all new passenger cars and trucks starting with model year 2013. The ruling includes new labels for alternative fuel and alternative propulsion vehicles available in the US market, such as plug-in hybrids, electric vehicles, flexible-fuel vehicles, hydrogen fuel cell vehicle, and natural gas vehicles. The common fuel economy metric adopted to allow the comparison of alternative fuel and advanced technology vehicles with conventional internal combustion engine vehicles is miles per gallon of gasoline equivalent (MPGe). A gallon of gasoline equivalent means the number of kilowatt-hours of electricity, cubic feet of compressed natural gas (CNG), or kilograms of hydrogen that is equal to the energy in a gallon of gasoline.

The new labels also show for the first time an estimate of how much fuel or electricity it takes to drive Template:Convert, introducing to U.S. consumers with fuel consumption per distance traveled, the metric commonly used in many other countries. EPA explained that the objective is to avoid the traditional miles per gallon metric that can be potentially misleading when consumers compare fuel economy improvements, and known as the "MPG illusion.".

Description

The miles per gallon gasoline equivalent is based on the energy content of gasoline. The energy obtainable from burning one US gallon is Template:Convert. Thus one mile per gallon gasoline equivalent is equal to 115,000 BTU per mile. For alternative fuels, energy required to manufacture the fuel may also be considered. For electrical power, the energy of any fuels used to generate the electricity and the transmission efficiency must be considered.

To convert the mile per gallon rating into other units of distance per unit energy used, the mile per gallon value can be multiplied by one of the following factors to obtain other units:

1 MPGe	= 8.55 miles/ million BTU
	≈ 0.0292 miles/kW·h
	≈ Template:Convert/kW·h
	≈ 0.013 km/MJ

Conversion to MPGe

Template:Refimprove section MPGe is determined by converting the vehicle consumption per unit distance, as determined through computer modeling or completion of an actual driving cycle, from its native units into a gasoline energy equivalent. Examples of native units include W·h for electric vehicles, kg-H2 for hydrogen vehicles, gallons for biodiesel or liquefied natural gas vehicles, cubic feet for compressed natural gas vehicles, and pounds for propane or Liquefied petroleum gas vehicles. Special cases for specific alternative fuels are discussed below, but a general formula for MPGe is:

$MPGe={\frac {total~miles~driven}{\left[{\frac {total~energy~of~all~fuels~consumed}{energy~of~one~gallon~of~gasoline}}\right]}}={\frac {(total\ miles\ driven)\times (energy\ of\ one\ gallon\ of\ gasoline)}{total~energy~of~all~fuels~consumed}}$

For EPA, this considers the tank-to-wheel for liquids and wall-to-wheel energy consumption for electricity, i.e. it measures the energy for which the owner usually pays. For EVs the energy cost includes the conversions from AC to charge the battery. The EPA MPGe ratings displayed in window stickers do not account for the energy consumption upstream, which includes the energy or fuel required to generate the electricity or to extract and produce the liquid fuel; the energy losses due to power transmission; or the energy consumed for the transportation of the fuel from the well to the station.

Basic values for the energy content of various fuels are given by the defaults used in the Department of Energy GREET (Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy used in Transportation) model, as follows:

Note: 1 KWH is equivalent to 3,412 BTU

Fuel	Unit	Btu/Unit	KWH/Unit
gasoline	gallon	116,090	34.02
diesel	gallon	129,488	37.95
biodiesel	gallon	119,550	35.04
ethanol	gallon	76,330	22.37
E85	gallon	82,000	24.03
CNG	100 SCF	98,300	28.81
H2-Gas	100 SCF	28,900	8.47
H2-Liq	gallon	30,500	8.94
LPG	gallon	84,950	24.9
methanol	gallon	57,250	16.78

The energy content of a particular fuel can vary somewhat given its specific chemistry and production method. For example, in the new efficiency ratings that have been developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) – see below – the energy content of a gallon of gasoline is assumed to be 114,984 BTUs.Potter or Ceramic Artist Truman Bedell from Rexton, has interests which include ceramics, best property developers in singapore developers in singapore and scrabble. Was especially enthused after visiting Alejandro de Humboldt National Park.

Electric and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles

Monroney label showing the EPA's fuel economy equivalent ratings for the 2011 Smart ED electric car.

Between 2008 and 2010 several major automakers began commercializing battery electric vehicles (BEVs), which are powered exclusively on electricity, and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), which use electricity together with a liquid fuel stored in an on-board fuel tank, usually gasoline, but it might be also powered by diesel, ethanol, or flex-fuel engines.

For battery electric vehicles, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencys formula to calculate the battery-to wheel MPGe is based on energy standards established by the U.S. Department of Energy in 2000:

$MPGe={\frac {E_{G}}{E_{M}*E_{E}}}={\frac {33,705}{E_{M}}}$

where

$MPGe$ is expressed as miles per gallon gasoline equivalent (as shown in the Monroney label)

$E_{G}=$ energy content per gallon of gasoline = 115,000 BTUs/gallon, as set by U.S. DoE and reported by the Alternative Fuel Data Center.

$E_{M}=$ wall-to-wheel electrical energy consumed per mile (Wh/mi) as measured through EPA's five standard drive cycle tests for electric cars and SAE test procedures

$E_{E}=$ energy per KWatt-hour of electricity (BTU/Wh) = 3.412

The formula employed by the EPA for calculating their rated MPGe does not account for any fuel or energy consumed upstream such as the generation and transmission of electrical power, or well-to-wheel life cycle, as EPA's comparison with internal combustion vehicles is made on a tank-to-wheel versus battery-to wheel basis.

The California Air Resources Board uses a different dynamometer testing than EPA, and considers reformulated gasoline sold in that state. For CARB estimates the formula becomes:

$MPGe={\frac {E_{G}}{E_{M}*E_{E}}}={\frac {32,600}{E_{M}}}$

The new SAE J1711 standard for measuring the exhaust emissions and fuel economy of hybrid electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids was approved in July 2010. The recommended procedures for PHEVs were revised at Argonne National Laboratory, and EPA's new regulation to define PHEV fuel economy reporting protocol is expected to be based on SAE J1711. In November 2010 EPA decided to rate electric mode and gasoline only mode separately, and these are the two figures prominently displayed in the window sticker of the 2011 Chevrolet Volt. In electric mode the Volt's rating is estimated with the same formula as an electric car. The overall or composite fuel economy rating combining electricity and gasoline powered are displayed in the Monroney label in a much smaller type, and as part of the comparison of the Volt's fuel economy among all vehicles and within compact cars. EPA has considered several methodologies for rating the overall fuel economy of PHEVs, but as of February 2011 EPA has not announced the final methodology that will be applied for the purposes of estimating the new manufacture's 2012-2016 Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) credits for plug-in hybrids.

Examples

In November 2010 the EPA began including "MPGe" in its new sticker for fuel economy and environmental comparisons. The EPA rated the Nissan Leaf electric car with a combined fuel economy of 99 MPGe, and rated the Chevrolet Volt plug-in hybrid with a combined fuel economy of 93 MPGe in all-electric mode, 37 MPG when operating with gasoline only, and an overall fuel economy rating of 60 mpg-US (3.9 L/100 km) combining power from electricity and gasoline. For both vehicles EPA calculated the MPGe rating under its five-cycle tests using the formula displayed earlier with a conversion factor of 33.7 kW-hr of electricity being the energy equivalent of a gallon of gasoline.

All-electric cars

The following table compares EPA's fuel economy expressed in miles per gallon gasoline equivalent (MPGe) and out-of-pocket fuel costs for 14 series production all-electric cars for model years 2011-14 rated by the EPA by April 2013, versus EPA rated most fuel efficient plug-in hybrid, the Chevrolet Volt, and the most efficient gasoline-electric hybrid car, the Toyota Prius third generation. The table also shows, when available the fuel efficiency expressed as KW-hrs/100 mile, the metric used by EPA to rate electric cars before November 2010.

Comparison of fuel efficiency and economics for all-electric cars rated by the EPA for the U.S. market against EPA rated most fuel efficient plug-in hybrid and hybrid electric vehicle in the U.S. for model years 2011-14 (Fuel economy and operating costs as displayed in the Monroney label and the U.S. Department of Energy and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's fueleconomy.gov website)
Vehicle	Model year	Type of powertrain	Operating mode	EPA rated Combined fuel economy	EPA rated City fuel economy	EPA rated Highway fuel economy	Cost to drive 25 miles	Annual fuel cost	Notes
Scion iQ EV	2013	Electric car	All-electric	121 mpg-e (28 kW-hrs/100 mi)	138 mpg-e (24 kW-hrs/100 mi)	105 mpg-e (32 kW-hrs/100 mi)	$0.84	$500	See (1) The 2013 iQ EV is the most fuel efficient EPA-certified vehicle of all fuel types considered in all years.
Chevrolet Spark EV	2014	Electric car	All-electric	119 mpg-e (28 kW-hrs/100 mi)	128 mpg-e	109 mpg-e	n.a.	$500	See (1)
Honda Fit EV	2013	Electric car	All-electric	118 mpg-e (29 kW-hrs/100 mi)	132 mpg-e (26 kW-hrs/100 mi)	105 mpg-e (32 kW-hrs/100 mi)	$0.87	$500	See (1)
Fiat 500e	2013	Electric car	All-electric	116 mpg-e (29 kW-hrs/100 mi)	122 mpg-e	108 mpg-e	$0.87	$500	See (1)
Nissan Leaf	2013	Electric car	All-electric	115 mpg-e (29 kW-hrs/100 mi)	129 mpg-e	102 mpg-e	$0.87	$500	See (1)
Mitsubishi i	2012-13	Electric car	All-electric	112 mpg-e (30 kW-hrs/100 mi)	126 mpg-e (27 kW-hrs/100 mi)	99 mpg-e (34 kW-hrs/100 mi)	$0.90	$550	See (1)
Smart electric drive	2013	Electric car	All-electric	107 mpg-e (32 kW-hrs/100 mi)	122 mpg-e (28 kW-hrs/100 mi)	93 mpg-e (36 kW-hrs/100 mi)	$0.96	$600	See (1) Ratings correspond to both convertible and coupe models.
Ford Focus Electric	2012-13	Electric car	All-electric	105 mpg-e (32 kW-hrs/100 mi)	110 mpg-e (31 kW-hrs/100 mi)	99 mpg-e (34 kW-hrs/100 mi)	$0.96	$600	See (1)
BMW ActiveE	2011	Electric car	All-electric	102 mpg-e (33 kW-hrs/100 mi)	107 mpg-e	96 mpg-e	$0.99	$600	See (1)
Nissan Leaf	2011-12	Electric car	All-electric	99 mpg-e (34 kW-hrs/100 mi)	106 mpg-e (32 kW-hrs/100 mi)	92 mpg-e (37 kW-hrs/100 mi)	$1.02	$600	See (1)
Tesla Model S	2013	Electric car	All-electric	95 mpg-e (35 kW-hrs/100 mi)	94 mpg-e	97 mpg-e	$1.05	$650	See (1) Model with 60kWh battery pack
Tesla Model S	2012	Electric car	All-electric	89 mpg-e (38 kW-hrs/100 mi)	88 mpg-e (38 kW-hrs/100 mi)	90 mpg-e (37 kW-hrs/100 mi)	$1.14	$700	See (1) Model with 85kWh battery pack
Toyota RAV4 EV	2012	Electric SUV	All-electric	76 mpg-e (44 kW-hrs/100 mi)	78 mpg-e (43 kW-hrs/100 mi)	74 mpg-e (46 kW-hrs/100 mi)	$1.32	$850	See (1)
Coda	2012-13	Electric car	All-electric	73 mpg-e (46 kW-hrs/100 mi)	77 mpg-e (44 kW-hrs/100 mi)	68 mpg-e (50 kW-hrs/100 mi)	$1.38	$850	See (1)
BYD e6	2012	Electric car	All-electric	62 mpg-e (54 kW-hrs/100 mi)	60 mpg-e (56 kW-hrs/100 mi)	64 mpg-e (52 kW-hrs/100 mi)	$1.62	$950	See (1)
Chevrolet Volt	2013	Plug-in electric vehicle w/Range Extender	Electricity only	98 mpg-e (35 kW-hrs/100 mi)	-	-	$1.05	$900	See (1) and (2) Most fuel efficient Pi-EV with Range Extender with a gasoline/electricity combined rating of 62 mpg-e.
			Gasoline only	37 mpg	35 mpg	40 mpg	$2.57
Toyota Prius	2010-13	Hybrid electric vehicle	Gasoline-electric hybrid	50 mpg	51 mpg	48 mpg	$1.74	$1,050	See (2) Most fuel efficient HEV, together with the Prius c.
Notes: All estimated fuel costs based on 15,000 miles annual driving, 45% highway and 55% city. (1) Values rounded to the nearest $50. Electricity cost of $0.12/kw-hr (as of November 30, 2012). Conversion 1 gallon of gasoline=33.7 kW-hr. (2) Premium gasoline price of Template:USD per gallon (used by the Volt), and regular gasoline price of Template:USD per gallon (as of November 30, 2012).

Plug-in hybrids

The following table compares EPA's estimated out-of-pocket fuel costs and fuel economy ratings of seven serial production plug-in hybrid electric vehicles rated by EPA by January 2013 versus the most fuel efficient gasoline-electric hybrid car, the 2010-13 Toyota Prius third generation, and EPA's average new 2013 vehicle, which has a fuel economy of Template:Convert. The table also shows the fuel efficiency for plug-in hybrids in all-electric mode expressed as KW-hrs/100 mile, the metric used by EPA to rate electric cars before November 2010.

Comparison of out-of-pocket fuel costs and fuel economy for plug-in hybrid electric cars rated by EPA with MPGe and conventional MPG(1) (as displayed in the Monroney label and the US DoE fueleconomy.gov website)
Vehicle	Year model	Operating mode (EV range)	EPA rated Combined fuel economy	EPA rated city fuel economy	EPA rated highway fuel economy	Fuel cost to drive 25 miles	Annual fuel cost(1) (15,000 mi)	Notes
Honda Accord Plug-in Hybrid	2014	Electricity(13 miles)	115mpg-e	-	-	-	-
		Electricity and gasoline	46 mpg	47 mpg	46 mpg	-
Ford Fusion Energi	2013	Electricity and gasoline (21 miles)	100 mpg-e (34 kW-hrs/100 miles)	108 mpg-e	92 mpg-e	$1.17	$950	The Energi did not use any gasoline for the first 21 miles in EPA tests, but depending on the driving style, the car may use both gasoline and electricity during EV mode.
		Gasoline only	43 mpg	44 mpg	41 mpg	$2.03
Ford C-Max Energi	2013	Electricity and gasoline (21 miles)	100 mpg-e (34 kW-hrs/100 miles)	108 mpg-e	92 mpg-e	$1.17	$950	The Energi did not use any gasoline for the first 21 miles in EPA tests, but depending on the driving style, the car may use both gasoline and electricity during EV mode.
		Gasoline only	43 mpg	44 mpg	41 mpg	$2.03
Chevrolet Volt	2013	Electricity only (38 miles)	98 mpg-e (35 kW-hrs/100 miles)	-	-	$1.05	$900	The 2013 Volt is the most fuel efficient plug-in hybrid car with a combined gasoline/electricity rating of 62 mpg-e.
		Gasoline only	37 mpg	35 mpg	40 mpg	$2.57
Toyota Prius PHV	2013	Electricity and gasoline (11 miles)	95 mpg-e (29 kW-hrs/100 miles plus 0.2 gallons/100 mi)	-	-	$1.44	$950	After the first 11 miles the car functions like a regular Prius hybrid
		Gasoline only	50 mpg	51 mpg	49 mpg	$1.74
Chevrolet Volt	2012	Electricity only	94 mpg-e (36 kW-hrs/100 miles)	95 mpg-e (36 kW-hrs/100 miles)	93 mpg-e (37 kW-hrs/100 miles)	$1.08	$1,000
		Gasoline only	37 mpg	35 mpg	40 mpg	$2.57
Fisker Karma	2012	Electricity only (33 miles)	54 mpg-e (62 kW-hrs/100 miles)	-	-	$1.87	$1,750
		Gasoline only	20 mpg	20 mpg	21 mpg	$4.76
Toyota Prius	2013	Gasoline-electric hybrid	50 mpg	51 mpg	48 mpg	$1.74	$1,050	Most fuel efficient hybrid electric car, together with the Prius c.
Ford Taurus FWD (Average new car)	2013	Gasoline only	23 mpg	19 mpg	29 mpg	$3.79	$2,300	Other 2013 models achieving 23 mpg include the Chrysler 200, Toyota Venza, and Hyundai Santa Fe Sport 2WD.
Notes: (1) Based on 45% highway and 55% city driving. Electricity cost of Template:USD/kw-hr, premium gasoline price of Template:USD per gallon (used by the Volt and Karma), and regular gasoline price of Template:USD per gallon (as of November 30, 2012). Conversion 1 gallon of gasoline=33.7 kW-hr.

Conversion using GGE

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church. The same method can be applied to any other alternative fuel vehicle when that vehicle's energy consumption is known. Generally the energy consumption of the vehicle is expressed in units other than W·h/mile, or Btu/mile so additional arithmetic is required to convert to a gasoline gallon equivalent (GGE) of 115,000 BTU/mile.Potter or Ceramic Artist Truman Bedell from Rexton, has interests which include ceramics, best property developers in singapore developers in singapore and scrabble. Was especially enthused after visiting Alejandro de Humboldt National Park.

Hydrogen example with GGE

The 2008 Honda FCX Clarity is advertised to have a vehicle consumption of 72 mi/kg-Template:Chem. Hydrogen has an energy density of 120 MJ/kg (113,738 BTU/kg), by converting this energy density to a GGE, it is found that 1.012 kg of hydrogen is needed to meet the equivalent energy of one gallon of gasoline. This conversion factor can now be used to calculate the MPGe for this vehicle.

$MPGe=vehicle\ efficiency\times {GGE}$,

$MPGe=72{\frac {mi}{kg-H_{2}}}\times {1.012{\frac {kg-H_{2}}{gallon\ gasoline}}}=72.8$

Life cycle assessment

Pump/Well-to-wheel

EPA's miles per gallon equivalent metric shown in the window sticker does not measure a vehicle's full cycle energy efficiency or well-to-wheel life cycle. Rather, the EPA presents MPGe in the same manner as MPG for conventional internal combustion engine vehicles as displayed in the Monroney sticker, and in both cases the rating only considers the pump-to-wheel or wall-to-wheel energy consumption, i.e. it measures the energy for which the owner usually pays. For EVs the energy cost includes the conversions from AC from the wall used to charge the battery The EPA ratings displayed in window stickers do not account for the energy consumption upstream, which includes the energy or fuel required to generate the electricity or to extract and produce the liquid fuel; the energy losses due to power transmission; or the energy consumed for the transportation of the fuel from the well to the station.

Petroleum-equivalency factor (PEF) — a CAFE metric

In 2000 the United States Department of Energy (DOE) established the methodology for calculating the petroleum-equivalent fuel economy of electric vehicles based on the well-to-wheel (WTW) gasoline-equivalent energy content of electricity (Eg). The methodology considers the upstream efficiency of the processes involved in the two fuel cycles, and considers the national average electricity generation and transmission efficiencies because a battery electric vehicle burns its fuel (mainly fossil fuels) off-board at the power generation plant. This methodology is used by carmakers to estimate credits into their overall Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) for manufacturing electric drive vehicles.

The equations for determining the petroleum equivalent fuel economy of electric vehicles are the following:

PEF = Eg * 1/0.15 * AF * DPF

where:

PEF = Petroleum-equivalent fuel economy

Eg = Gasoline-equivalent energy content of electricity factor

1/0.15 = "Fuel content" factor or incentive factor. DoE selected this value to keep consistency with existing regulatory and statutory procedures, and to provide a similar treatment to manufacturers of all types of alternative fuel vehicles

AF = Petroleum-fueled accessory factor

DPF = Driving pattern factor

The gasoline-equivalent energy content of electricity factor, abbreviated as Template:Not a typo, is defined as:

Eg = gasoline-equivalent energy content of electricity = (Tg * Tt * C) / Tp

where:

Tg = U.S. average fossil-fuel electricity generation efficiency = 0.328

Tt = U.S. average electricity transmission efficiency = 0.924

Tp = Petroleum refining and distribution efficiency = 0.830

C = Watt-hours of energy per gallon of gasoline conversion factor = 33,705 Wh/gal

Eg = (0.328 * 0.924 * 33705)/0.830 = 12,307 Wh/gal

PEF = Eg * 1/0.15 * AF * DPF = 12,307 Wh/gal/0.15 * AF * DPF

PEF = 82,049 Wh/gal * AF * DPF

The petroleum-fueled accessory factor, AF, is equal to 1 if the electric drive vehicle does not have petroleum-powered accessories installed, and 0.90 if it does.

The driving pattern factor, DPF, is equal to 1, as DoE considered that electric vehicles eligible for inclusion in CAFE will offer capabilities, perhaps excepting driving range, similar to those of conventional vehicles.

In the example provided by the US DoE in its final rule, an electric car with an energy consumption of 265 Watt-hour per mile in urban driving, and 220 Watt-hour per mile in highway driving, resulted in a petroleum-equivalent fuel economy of 335.24 miles per gallon, based on a driving schedule factor of 55 percent urban, and 45 percent highway, and using a petroleum equivalency factor of 82,049 Watt-hours per gallon.

See also

• Alternative propulsion
• Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE)
• Energy conversion efficiency
• Energy density
• Fuel efficiency in transportation
• Gasoline gallon equivalent (GGE)

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

External links

• eGallon Calculator: Compare the costs of driving with electricity, U.S. Department of Energy