Hong–Ou–Mandel effect: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Changed visibility (link) to Interferometric visibility page instead of the general term visibility.
 
en>DParlevliet
→‎Classical wave description: needs reconsidering
Line 1: Line 1:
Today, there are several other types of web development and blogging software available to design and host your website blogs online and that too in minutes, if not hours. It is used by around 25% of all new websites, and there are more than 27 thousand plugins currently available. One really cool features about this amazing and free wp plugin is that the code it generates is completely portable. s and intelligently including a substantial amount of key words in the title tags, image links, etc. This particular wordpress plugin is essential for not only having the capability where you improve your position, but to enhance your organic searches for your website. <br><br>As you know today Word - Press has turn out to be a tremendously popular open source publishing and blogging display place. You may either choose to link only to the top-level category pages or the ones that contain information about your products and services. You are able to set them within your theme options and so they aid the search engine to get a suitable title and description for the pages that get indexed by Google. These four plugins will make this effort easier and the sites run effectively as well as make other widgets added to a site easier to configure. This can be done by using a popular layout format and your unique Word - Press design can be achieved in other elements of the blog. <br><br>Just ensure that you hire experienced Word - Press CMS developer who is experienced enough to perform the task of Word - Press customization to get optimum benefits of Word - Press CMS. It was also the very first year that the category of Martial Arts was included in the Parents - Connect nationwide online poll, allowing parents to vote for their favorite San Antonio Martial Arts Academy. I hope this short Plugin Dynamo Review will assist you to differentiate whether Plugin Dynamo is Scam or a Genuine. Enough automated blog posts plus a system keeps you and your clients happy. So, if you are looking online to hire dedicated Wordpress developers, India PHP Expert can give a hand you in each and every best possible way. <br><br>You can add keywords but it is best to leave this alone. Cameras with a pentaprism (as in comparison to pentamirror) ensure that little mild is lost before it strikes your eye, however these often increase the cost of the digital camera considerably. Some examples of its additional features include; code inserter (for use with adding Google Analytics, Adsense section targeting etc) Webmaster verification assistant, Link Mask Generator, Robots. It's now become a great place to sell it thanks to Woo - Commerce.  In case you loved this information and you want to receive much more information about [http://snipitfor.me/backup_plugin_8999094 wordpress dropbox backup] assure visit our own web page. Make sure you have the latest versions of all your plugins are updated. <br><br>He loves sharing information regarding wordpress, Majento, Drupal and Joomla development tips & tricks. Sanjeev Chuadhary is an expert writer who shares his knowledge about web development through their published articles and other resource. This allows updates to be sent anyone who wants them via an RSS reader or directly to their email. Extra investment in Drupal must be bypassed as value for money is what Drupal provides. Customers within a few seconds after visiting a site form their opinion about the site.
{{Cleanup|date=January 2010}}
 
A '''randomness extractor''', often simply called an "extractor", is a function, which being applied to output from a weakly random [[information entropy|entropy]] source, together with a short, uniformly random seed, generates a highly [[random]] output that appears [[Independent and identically distributed random variables|independent]] from the source and [[Uniform distribution (discrete)|uniformly distributed]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&id=796582 |title=Extracting randomness from sampleable distributions |publisher=Portal.acm.org |date= |accessdate=2012-06-12}}</ref>  Examples of weakly random sources include [[radioactive decay]] or [[thermal noise]]; the only restriction on possible sources is that there is no way they can be fully controlled, calculated or predicted, and that a lower bound on their entropy rate can be established.  For a given source, a randomness extractor can even be considered to be a true random number generator ([[TRNG]]); but there is no single extractor, which has been proven to produce truly random output from any type of weakly random source.
 
Sometimes the term "bias" is used to denote a weakly random source's departure from uniformity, and in older literature, some extractors are called '''unbiasing algorithms''',<ref>David K. Gifford, Natural Random Numbers, MIT/LCS/TM-371, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, August 1988.</ref> as they take the randomness from a so-called "biased" source and output a distribution that appears unbiased.  The weakly random source will always be longer than the extractor's output, but an efficient extractor is one that lowers this ratio of lengths as much as possible, while simultaneously keeping the seed length low. Intuitively, this means that as much randomness as possible has been "extracted" from the source.
 
Note that an extractor has some conceptual similarities with a [[pseudorandom generator]] (PRG), but the two concepts are not identical. Both are functions that take as input a small, uniformly random seed and produce a longer output that "looks" uniformly random. Some pseudorandom generators are, in fact, also extractors.  (When a PRG is based on the existence of [[hard-core predicate]]s, one can think of the weakly random source as a set of truth tables of such predicates and prove that the output is statistically close to uniform.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://theory.stanford.edu/~trevisan/pubs/extractor-full.pdf| title= Extractors and Pseudorandom Generators|author = Luca Trevisan| accessdate=2013-10-21}}</ref>) However, the general PRG definition does not specify that a weakly random source must be used, and while in the case of an extractor, the output should be [[statistically close]] to uniform, in a PRG it is only required to be [[computationally indistinguishable]] from uniform, a somewhat weaker concept.
 
[[NIST]] Special Publication 800-90B (draft) recommends several extractors, including the [[Secure Hash Algorithm|SHA]] hash family and states that if the amount of entropy input is twice the number of bits output from them, that output can be considered essentially fully random.<ref>[http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/drafts/800-90/draft-sp800-90b.pdf Recommendation for the Entropy Sources Used for Random Bit Generation (draft) NIST SP800-90B], Barker and Kelsey, August 2012, Section 6.4.2</ref>
 
==Formal definition of extractors==
The [[min-entropy]] of a distribution <math>X</math> (denoted <math>H_{\infty}(X)</math>), is the largest real number <math>k</math> such that <math>\Pr[X =x] \leq 2^{-k}</math> for every <math>x</math> in the range of <math>X</math>. In essence, this measures how likely <math>X</math> is to take its most likely value, giving a worst-case bound on how random <math>X</math> appears.  Letting <math>U_{\ell}</math> denote the uniform distribution over <math>\{0, 1 \}^{\ell}</math>, clearly  <math> H_{\infty}(U_{\ell}) = \ell</math>.
 
For an ''n''-bit distribution <math>X</math> with min-entropy ''k'', we say that <math>X</math> is an <math>(n, k)</math> distribution.
 
'''Definition (Extractor):'''  '''(''k'',&nbsp;''ε'')-extractor'''
 
Let <math>\text{Ext}: \{0,1\}^n \times \{0,1\}^d \to \{0,1\}^m</math>
be a function that takes as input a sample from an <math>(n, k)</math> distribution <math>X</math> and a ''d''-bit seed from <math>U_d</math>, and outputs an ''m''-bit string.
<math>\text{Ext}</math> is a '''(''k'',&nbsp;''ε'')-extractor''', if for all <math>(n, k)</math> distributions <math>X</math>, the output distribution of <math>\text{Ext}</math> is ''ε''-close to <math>U_m</math>.
 
In the above definition,  ''ε''-close refers to [[Total variation distance|statistical distance]].
 
Intuitively, an extractor takes a weakly random ''n''-bit input and a short, uniformly random seed and produces an ''m''-bit output that looks uniformly random.  The aim is to have a low <math>d</math> (i.e. to use as little uniform randomness as possible) and as high an <math>m</math> as possible (i.e. to get out as many close-to-random bits of output as we can).
 
===Strong extractors===
An extractor is strong if [[Concatenation|concatenating]] the seed with the extractor's output yields a distribution that is still close to uniform.
 
'''Definition (Strong Extractor):''' A <math>(k, \epsilon)</math>-strong extractor is a function
 
: <math> \text{Ext}: \{0,1\}^n \times \{0,1\}^d \rightarrow \{0,1\}^m \, </math>
 
such that for every <math>(n, k)</math> distribution <math>X</math> the distribution <math>U_d \circ \text{Ext}(X, U_d)</math> (the two copies of <math>U_d</math> denote the same random variable) is <math>\epsilon</math>-close to the uniform distribution on <math>\{0,1\}^{m+d}</math>.
 
===Explicit extractors===
Using the [[probabilistic method]], it can be shown that there exists a (''k'',&nbsp;''ε'')-extractor, i.e. that the construction is possible. However, it is usually not enough merely to show that an extractor exists.  An explicit construction is needed, which is given as follows:
 
'''Definition (Explicit Extractor):''' For functions ''k''(''n''), ''ε''(''n''), ''d''(''n''), ''m''(''n'') a family Ext&nbsp;=&nbsp;{Ext<sub>''n''</sub>} of functions
 
: <math>\text{Ext}_n : \{0,1\}^n \times \{0,1\}^{d(n)} \rightarrow \{0,1\}^{m(n)}</math>
 
is an explicit (''k'',&nbsp;''ε'')-extractor, if Ext(''x'',&nbsp;''y'') can be computed in [[polynomial time]] (in its input length) and for every ''n'', Ext<sub>''n''</sub> is a (''k''(''n''),&nbsp;''ε''(''n''))-extractor.
 
By the probabilistic method, it can be shown that there exists a (''k'',&nbsp;''ε'')-extractor with seed length
 
: <math>d = \log{(n-k)}+2\log \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) +O(1)</math>
 
and output length
 
: <math>m = k +d-2\log \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) - O(1)</math>.<ref>Ronen Shaltiel. Recent developments in explicit construction of extractors. P. 5.</ref>
 
===Dispersers===
Another variant of the randomness extractor is the [[disperser]].
 
==Randomness extractors in cryptography==
One of the most important aspects of [[cryptography]] is random [[key generation]].<ref>Jesse Kamp and David Zuckerman. Deterministic Extractors for Bit-Fixing Sources and Exposure-Resilient Cryptography.,SIAM J. Comput.,Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 1231–1247.</ref> It is often necessary to generate secret and random keys from sources that are semi-secret or which may be compromised to some degree. By taking a single, short (and secret) random key as a source, an extractor can be used to generate a longer pseudo-random key, which then can be used for public key encryption. More specifically, when a strong extractor is used its output will appear be uniformly random, even to someone who sees part (but not all) of the source.  For example, if the source is known but the seed is not known (or vice versa).  This property of extractors is particularly useful in what is commonly called '''Exposure-Resilient''' cryptography in which the desired extractor is used as an '''Exposure-Resilient Function''' (ERF).  Exposure-Resilient cryptography takes into account that the fact that it is difficult to keep secret the initial exchange of data which often takes place during the initialization of an [[encryption]] application e.g., the sender of encrypted information has to provide the receivers with information which is required for decryption.
 
The following paragraphs define and establish an important relationship between two kinds of ERF--'''''k''-ERF''' and '''''k''-APRF'''--which are useful in Exposure-Resilient cryptography. 
'''Definition (''k''-ERF):''' ''An adaptive k-ERF is a function'' <math>f</math> ''where, for a random input'' <math>r</math> '', when a computationally unbounded adversary'' <math>A</math> ''can adaptively read all of'' <math>r</math> ''except for''  <math>k</math> ''bits,''  <math>|\Pr\{A^{r}(f(r)) = 1\} - \Pr\{A^{r}(R) = 1\}| \leq \epsilon(n)</math> ''for some negligible function'' <math>\epsilon(n)</math> (defined below).
 
The goal is to construct an adaptive ERF whose output is highly random and uniformly distributed. But a stronger condition is often needed in which every output occurs with almost uniform probability. For this purpose '''Almost-Perfect Resilient Functions''' (APRF) are used.  The definition of an APRF is as follows:
 
'''Definition (k-APRF):''' ''A'' <math>k = k(n)</math> ''APRF is a function'' <math>f</math> ''where, for any setting of'' <math>n-k</math> ''bits of the input'' <math>r</math> ''to any fixed values, the probability vector'' <math>p</math> ''of the output''  <math>f(r)</math> ''over the random choices for the''  <math>k</math> ''remaining bits satisfies'' <math>|p_{i}-2^{-m}| < 2^{-m} \epsilon(n)</math> ''for all'' <math>i</math> ''and for some negligible function'' <math>\epsilon(n)</math>.
 
Kamp and Zuckerman<ref name="David Zuckerman 1242">Jesse Kamp and David Zuckerman. Deterministic Extractors for Bit-Fixing Sources and Exposure-Resilient Cryptography. P. 1242.</ref> have proved a theorem stating that if a function <math>f</math> is a ''k''-APRF, then <math>f</math> is also a ''k''-ERF. More specifically, ''any'' extractor having sufficiently small error and taking as input an ''oblivious'', bit-fixing source is also an APRF and therefore also a ''k''-ERF. A more specific extractor is expressed in this lemma:
 
'''Lemma:''' ''Any'' <math>2^{-m} \epsilon(n)</math>''-extractor'' <math>f: \{0,1\}^{n} \rightarrow \{0,1\}^m</math> ''for the set of'' <math>(n,k)</math> ''oblivious bit-fixing sources, where'' <math>\epsilon(n)</math> ''is negligible, is also a k-APRF.''
 
This lemma is proved by Kamp and Zuckerman.<ref name="David Zuckerman 1242"/> The lemma is proved by examining the distance from uniform of the output, which in a <math>2^{-m} \epsilon(n)</math>-extractor obviously is at most<math>2^{-m} \epsilon(n)</math>, which satisfies the condition of the APRF.
 
The lemma leads to the following theorem, stating that there in fact exists a ''k''-APRF function as described:
 
'''Theorem (existence):''' ''For any positive constant'' <math>\gamma \leq \frac{1}{2}</math>'', there exists an explicit k-APRF'' <math>f: \{0,1\}^{n} \rightarrow \{0,1\}^{m}</math>'', computable in a linear number of arithmetic operations on'' <math>m</math>''-bit strings, with'' <math>m = \Omega(n^{2\gamma})</math> ''and'' <math>k = n^{\frac{1}{2}+\gamma}</math>.
 
'''Definition (negligible function):''' In the proof of this theorem, we need a definition of a [[negligible function]]. A function <math>\epsilon(n)</math> is defined as being negligible if  <math>\epsilon(n) = O(\frac{1}{n^{c}})</math> for all constants <math>c</math>.
 
'''Proof:'''
Consider the following <math>\epsilon</math>-extractor: The function <math>f</math> is an extractor for the set of <math>(n,\delta n)</math> oblivious bit-fixing source: <math>f: \{0,1\}^{n} \rightarrow \{0,1\}^{m}</math>. <math>f</math> has <math>m = \Omega(\delta^{2}n)</math>, <math>\epsilon = 2^{-cm}</math> and <math>c > 1</math>.
 
The proof of this extractor's existence with <math>\delta \leq 1</math>, as well as the fact that it is computable in linear computing time on the length of <math>m</math> can be found in the paper by Jesse Kamp and David Zuckerman (p.&nbsp;1240).
 
That this extractor fulfills the criteria of the lemma is trivially true as <math>\epsilon = 2^{-cm}</math> is a negligible function.
 
The size of <math>m</math> is:
   
: <math>m = \Omega(\delta^{2}n) = \Omega(n) \geq \Omega(n^{2\gamma})</math>
 
Since we know <math>\delta \leq 1</math> then the lower bound on <math>m</math> is dominated by <math>n</math>. In the last step we use the fact that <math>\gamma \leq \frac{1}{2}</math> which means that the power of <math>n</math> is at most <math>1</math>. And since <math>n</math> is a positive integer we know that <math>n^{2\gamma}</math> is at most <math>n</math>.
 
The value of <math>k</math> is calculated by using the definition of the extractor, where we know:
 
: <math>(n,k) = (n, \delta n) \Rightarrow k = \delta n</math>
 
and by using the value of <math>m</math> we have:
 
: <math>m = \delta^{2}n = n^{2\gamma}</math>
 
Using this value of <math>m</math> we account for the worst case, where <math>k</math> is on its lower bound. Now by algebraic calculations we get:
 
: <math>\delta^{2}n = n^{2\gamma}</math>
 
: <math>\Rightarrow \delta^2 = n^{2\gamma -1}</math>
 
: <math>\Rightarrow \delta = n^{\gamma -\frac{1}{2}}</math>
 
Which inserted in the value of <math>k</math> gives
 
: <math>k = \delta n = n^{\gamma -\frac{1}{2}}n = n^{\gamma +\frac{1}{2}}</math>,
 
which proves that there exists an explicit k-APRF extractor with the given properties. <math>\Box</math>
 
==Examples==
 
===Von Neumann extractor===
{{details|Bernoulli sequence}}
Perhaps the earliest example is due to [[John von Neumann]]. His extractor took successive pairs of consecutive bits (non-overlapping) from the input stream. If the two bits matched, no output was generated. If the bits differed, the value of the first bit was output. The Von Neumann extractor can be shown to produce a uniform output even if the distribution of input bits is not uniform so long as each bit has the same probability of being one and there is no [[correlation]] between successive bits.<ref>John von Neumann. Various techniques used in connection with random digits. Applied
Math Series, 12:36–38, 1951.</ref>
 
Thus, it takes as input a [[Bernoulli sequence]] with ''p'' not necessarily equal to 1/2, and outputs a Bernoulli sequence with <math>p = 1/2.</math>
More generally, it applies to any [[exchangeable random variables|exchangeable sequence]] – it only relies on the fact that for any pair, 01 and 10 are ''equally'' likely: for independent trials, these have probabilities <math>p\cdot q = q\cdot p</math>, while for an exchangeable sequence the probability may be more complicated, but both are equally likely.
 
===Cryptographic hash===
Another approach is to fill a buffer with bits from the input stream and then apply a [[cryptographic hash]] to the buffer and use its output. This approach generally depends on assumed properties of the hash function.
 
==Applications==
 
Randomness extractors are used widely in cryptographic applications, whereby a [[cryptographic hash]] function is applied to a high-entropy, but non-uniform source, such as disk drive timing information or keyboard delays, to yield a uniformly random result.
 
Randomness extractors have played a part in recent developments in [[quantum cryptography]], where photons are used by the randomness extractor to generate secure random bits.[http://newsroom.spie.org/x4741.xml?highlight=x535]
 
Randomness extraction is also used in some branches of [[computational complexity theory]].
 
Random extraction is also used to convert data to a simple random sample, which is normally distributed, and independent, which is desired by statistics.
 
==See also==
* [[Decorrelation]]
* [[Hardware random number generator]]
* [[Fuzzy extractor]]
 
==References==
{{reflist}}
*[http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/anuprao/pubs/thesis.pdf Randomness Extractors for Independent Sources and Applications], Anup Rao
*[http://www.cs.haifa.ac.il/~ronen/online_papers/survey.ps Recent developments in explicit constructions of extractors], Ronen Shaltiel
*[http://people.csail.mit.edu/dodis/ps/hmac.ps Randomness Extraction and Key Derivation Using the CBC, Cascade and HMAC Modes], Yevgeniy Dodis et al.
*[http://eprint.iacr.org/2005/061.pdf Key Derivation and Randomness Extraction], Olivier Chevassut et al.
*[http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/diz/pubs/erf.pdf Deterministic Extractors for Bit-Fixing Sources and Exposure-Resilient Cryptography],  Jesse Kamp and David Zuckerman
*[http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~michaelm/coinflipext.pdf Tossing a Biased Coin (and the optimality of advanced multi-level strategy) (lecture notes)], Michael Mitzenmacher
 
[[Category:Randomness]]
[[Category:Computational complexity theory]]
[[Category:Cryptographic algorithms]]
[[Category:Random number generation]]

Revision as of 15:57, 2 February 2014

Template:Cleanup

A randomness extractor, often simply called an "extractor", is a function, which being applied to output from a weakly random entropy source, together with a short, uniformly random seed, generates a highly random output that appears independent from the source and uniformly distributed.[1] Examples of weakly random sources include radioactive decay or thermal noise; the only restriction on possible sources is that there is no way they can be fully controlled, calculated or predicted, and that a lower bound on their entropy rate can be established. For a given source, a randomness extractor can even be considered to be a true random number generator (TRNG); but there is no single extractor, which has been proven to produce truly random output from any type of weakly random source.

Sometimes the term "bias" is used to denote a weakly random source's departure from uniformity, and in older literature, some extractors are called unbiasing algorithms,[2] as they take the randomness from a so-called "biased" source and output a distribution that appears unbiased. The weakly random source will always be longer than the extractor's output, but an efficient extractor is one that lowers this ratio of lengths as much as possible, while simultaneously keeping the seed length low. Intuitively, this means that as much randomness as possible has been "extracted" from the source.

Note that an extractor has some conceptual similarities with a pseudorandom generator (PRG), but the two concepts are not identical. Both are functions that take as input a small, uniformly random seed and produce a longer output that "looks" uniformly random. Some pseudorandom generators are, in fact, also extractors. (When a PRG is based on the existence of hard-core predicates, one can think of the weakly random source as a set of truth tables of such predicates and prove that the output is statistically close to uniform.[3]) However, the general PRG definition does not specify that a weakly random source must be used, and while in the case of an extractor, the output should be statistically close to uniform, in a PRG it is only required to be computationally indistinguishable from uniform, a somewhat weaker concept.

NIST Special Publication 800-90B (draft) recommends several extractors, including the SHA hash family and states that if the amount of entropy input is twice the number of bits output from them, that output can be considered essentially fully random.[4]

Formal definition of extractors

The min-entropy of a distribution (denoted ), is the largest real number such that for every in the range of . In essence, this measures how likely is to take its most likely value, giving a worst-case bound on how random appears. Letting denote the uniform distribution over , clearly .

For an n-bit distribution with min-entropy k, we say that is an distribution.

Definition (Extractor): (kε)-extractor

Let be a function that takes as input a sample from an distribution and a d-bit seed from , and outputs an m-bit string. is a (kε)-extractor, if for all distributions , the output distribution of is ε-close to .

In the above definition, ε-close refers to statistical distance.

Intuitively, an extractor takes a weakly random n-bit input and a short, uniformly random seed and produces an m-bit output that looks uniformly random. The aim is to have a low (i.e. to use as little uniform randomness as possible) and as high an as possible (i.e. to get out as many close-to-random bits of output as we can).

Strong extractors

An extractor is strong if concatenating the seed with the extractor's output yields a distribution that is still close to uniform.

Definition (Strong Extractor): A -strong extractor is a function

such that for every distribution the distribution (the two copies of denote the same random variable) is -close to the uniform distribution on .

Explicit extractors

Using the probabilistic method, it can be shown that there exists a (kε)-extractor, i.e. that the construction is possible. However, it is usually not enough merely to show that an extractor exists. An explicit construction is needed, which is given as follows:

Definition (Explicit Extractor): For functions k(n), ε(n), d(n), m(n) a family Ext = {Extn} of functions

is an explicit (kε)-extractor, if Ext(xy) can be computed in polynomial time (in its input length) and for every n, Extn is a (k(n), ε(n))-extractor.

By the probabilistic method, it can be shown that there exists a (kε)-extractor with seed length

and output length

.[5]

Dispersers

Another variant of the randomness extractor is the disperser.

Randomness extractors in cryptography

One of the most important aspects of cryptography is random key generation.[6] It is often necessary to generate secret and random keys from sources that are semi-secret or which may be compromised to some degree. By taking a single, short (and secret) random key as a source, an extractor can be used to generate a longer pseudo-random key, which then can be used for public key encryption. More specifically, when a strong extractor is used its output will appear be uniformly random, even to someone who sees part (but not all) of the source. For example, if the source is known but the seed is not known (or vice versa). This property of extractors is particularly useful in what is commonly called Exposure-Resilient cryptography in which the desired extractor is used as an Exposure-Resilient Function (ERF). Exposure-Resilient cryptography takes into account that the fact that it is difficult to keep secret the initial exchange of data which often takes place during the initialization of an encryption application e.g., the sender of encrypted information has to provide the receivers with information which is required for decryption.

The following paragraphs define and establish an important relationship between two kinds of ERF--k-ERF and k-APRF--which are useful in Exposure-Resilient cryptography.

Definition (k-ERF): An adaptive k-ERF is a function where, for a random input , when a computationally unbounded adversary can adaptively read all of except for bits, for some negligible function (defined below).

The goal is to construct an adaptive ERF whose output is highly random and uniformly distributed. But a stronger condition is often needed in which every output occurs with almost uniform probability. For this purpose Almost-Perfect Resilient Functions (APRF) are used. The definition of an APRF is as follows:

Definition (k-APRF): A APRF is a function where, for any setting of bits of the input to any fixed values, the probability vector of the output over the random choices for the remaining bits satisfies for all and for some negligible function .

Kamp and Zuckerman[7] have proved a theorem stating that if a function is a k-APRF, then is also a k-ERF. More specifically, any extractor having sufficiently small error and taking as input an oblivious, bit-fixing source is also an APRF and therefore also a k-ERF. A more specific extractor is expressed in this lemma:

Lemma: Any -extractor for the set of oblivious bit-fixing sources, where is negligible, is also a k-APRF.

This lemma is proved by Kamp and Zuckerman.[7] The lemma is proved by examining the distance from uniform of the output, which in a -extractor obviously is at most, which satisfies the condition of the APRF.

The lemma leads to the following theorem, stating that there in fact exists a k-APRF function as described:

Theorem (existence): For any positive constant , there exists an explicit k-APRF , computable in a linear number of arithmetic operations on -bit strings, with and .

Definition (negligible function): In the proof of this theorem, we need a definition of a negligible function. A function is defined as being negligible if for all constants .

Proof: Consider the following -extractor: The function is an extractor for the set of oblivious bit-fixing source: . has , and .

The proof of this extractor's existence with , as well as the fact that it is computable in linear computing time on the length of can be found in the paper by Jesse Kamp and David Zuckerman (p. 1240).

That this extractor fulfills the criteria of the lemma is trivially true as is a negligible function.

The size of is:

Since we know then the lower bound on is dominated by . In the last step we use the fact that which means that the power of is at most . And since is a positive integer we know that is at most .

The value of is calculated by using the definition of the extractor, where we know:

and by using the value of we have:

Using this value of we account for the worst case, where is on its lower bound. Now by algebraic calculations we get:

Which inserted in the value of gives

,

which proves that there exists an explicit k-APRF extractor with the given properties.

Examples

Von Neumann extractor

DTZ gives a comprehensive integrated property and services administration resolution for buyers, corporate house for sale In singapore owners, management firms and occupiers of property whatever their needs with the only goal of optimising and enhancing the investment worth of their property. We at the moment make use of a staff of more than 70 skilled staffs who are well-trained and dedicated to collectively achieving our purchasers' objectives.

Actual estate agency specialising in non-public condos and landed properties island vast. 10 Winstedt Highway, District 10, #01-thirteen, Singapore 227977. Property providers for enterprise relocation. Situated at 371 Beach Street, #19-10 KeyPoint, Singapore 199597. Property agents for homes, town houses, landed property, residences and condominium for sales and rentals of properties. Administration letting services for property homeowners. is there a single authority in singapore who regulates real property agents that i can file a complaint with for unethical behaviour? or is CASE is simply route? The 188 pages of Secrets and techniques of Singapore Property Gurus are full of professional knowledge and life altering wisdom. Asian industrial property market outlook Property Listing Supervisor Property Advertising Services

Should sellers go along with an agent who claims to specialize in your space? His experience might turn out to be useful, but he is probably additionally advertising a number of models within the neighbourhood – and so they're all your rivals. Within the worst-case state of affairs, your house may be used as a "showflat" as house owner YS Liang found. "Weekend after weekend, our agent would convey a stream of individuals to speed-go to our apartment, leaving within minutes. She did not even try to promote our condominium. It felt like we were just one of the many tour stops for her clients," he complains.

Step one in direction of conducting enterprise as an actual property company in Singapore is to include an organization, or if you happen to're going the partnership or sole-proprietorship route, register your Limited Legal responsibility Partnership or sole-proprietorship with the ACRA (Accounting and Company Regulatory Authority of Singapore) Whether or not you might be considering to promote, let, hire or buy a new industrial property, we're right here to assist. Search and browse our commercial property section. Possess not less than 3 years of working expertise below a Singapore licensed real-property agency; Sale, letting and property administration and taxation companies. three Shenton Means, #10-08 Shenton Home, Singapore 068805. Real property agents for purchasing, promoting, leasing, and renting property. Caveat Search

Firstly, the events might take into account to rescind the sale and buy agreement altogether. This avenue places the contracting events to a position as if the contract didn't happen. It's as if the contract was terminated from the start and events are put back into place that they were before the contract. Any items or monies handed are returned to the respective original house owners. As the worldwide real property market turns into extra refined and worldwide real property investments will increase, the ERA real estate network is well equipped to offer professional recommendation and guidance to our shoppers in making critical actual estate decisions. Relocationg, leasing and sales of properties for housing, food and beverage, retail and workplace wants.

Pasir Panjang, Singapore - $5,000-6,000 per 30 days By likelihood one among our buddies here in Singapore is an agent and we made contact for her to help us locate an residence, which she did. days from the date of execution if the doc is signed in Singapore; Be a Singapore Citizen or PR (Permanent Resident); The regulations also prohibit property agents from referring their shoppers to moneylenders, to discourage irresponsible shopping for. Brokers are additionally prohibited from holding or dealing with money on behalf of any party in relation to the sale or purchase of any property situated in Singapore, and the lease of HDB property. - Negotiate To Close A Sale together with sale and lease of HDB and private properties) Preparing your house for sale FEATURED COMMERCIAL AGENTS Property Guides

i) registered as a patent agent or its equal in any nation or territory, or by a patent workplace, specified within the Fourth Schedule; The business-specific tips for the true property agency and telecommunication sectors have been crafted to address considerations about scenarios that particularly apply to the two sectors, the PDPC stated. Mr Steven Tan, Managing Director of OrangeTee real property company, nonetheless, felt that it was a matter of "practising until it becomes part of our knowledge". "After a while, the agents ought to know the spirit behind the (Act)," he stated. Rising office sector leads real property market efficiency, while prime retail and enterprise park segments moderate and residential sector continues in decline Please choose an attendee for donation. Perhaps the earliest example is due to John von Neumann. His extractor took successive pairs of consecutive bits (non-overlapping) from the input stream. If the two bits matched, no output was generated. If the bits differed, the value of the first bit was output. The Von Neumann extractor can be shown to produce a uniform output even if the distribution of input bits is not uniform so long as each bit has the same probability of being one and there is no correlation between successive bits.[8]

Thus, it takes as input a Bernoulli sequence with p not necessarily equal to 1/2, and outputs a Bernoulli sequence with More generally, it applies to any exchangeable sequence – it only relies on the fact that for any pair, 01 and 10 are equally likely: for independent trials, these have probabilities , while for an exchangeable sequence the probability may be more complicated, but both are equally likely.

Cryptographic hash

Another approach is to fill a buffer with bits from the input stream and then apply a cryptographic hash to the buffer and use its output. This approach generally depends on assumed properties of the hash function.

Applications

Randomness extractors are used widely in cryptographic applications, whereby a cryptographic hash function is applied to a high-entropy, but non-uniform source, such as disk drive timing information or keyboard delays, to yield a uniformly random result.

Randomness extractors have played a part in recent developments in quantum cryptography, where photons are used by the randomness extractor to generate secure random bits.[1]

Randomness extraction is also used in some branches of computational complexity theory.

Random extraction is also used to convert data to a simple random sample, which is normally distributed, and independent, which is desired by statistics.

See also

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

  1. Template:Cite web
  2. David K. Gifford, Natural Random Numbers, MIT/LCS/TM-371, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, August 1988.
  3. Template:Cite web
  4. Recommendation for the Entropy Sources Used for Random Bit Generation (draft) NIST SP800-90B, Barker and Kelsey, August 2012, Section 6.4.2
  5. Ronen Shaltiel. Recent developments in explicit construction of extractors. P. 5.
  6. Jesse Kamp and David Zuckerman. Deterministic Extractors for Bit-Fixing Sources and Exposure-Resilient Cryptography.,SIAM J. Comput.,Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 1231–1247.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Jesse Kamp and David Zuckerman. Deterministic Extractors for Bit-Fixing Sources and Exposure-Resilient Cryptography. P. 1242.
  8. John von Neumann. Various techniques used in connection with random digits. Applied Math Series, 12:36–38, 1951.