Gain-field encoding

Earlier than you determine whether or not stainless steel cookware is value shopping for, lets first talk about what stainless steel cookware is. Chrome steel is made from an alloy, or a mix of metals. Mostly, fundamental iron with chromium, nickel or some other minor metals. The chromium supplies rust protection and provides your cookware sturdiness. The nickel provides rust safety as effectively, and provides a refined look. Most effectively made chrome steel cookware has copper or aluminum added to the underside of the pan or pot. This is finished to increases the ability of the pot or pan to conduct heat.
One of the best stainless-steel cookware is the principle category, however nonetheless it is divided into several subcategories based mostly on the quality and the price range. It may be confusing to decide on the very best stainless-steel cookware out of the categories that may meet your requirements. That is where we took a step forward to explain you all the knowledge that will likely be helpful so that you can understand how to decide on the best chrome steel cookware. The best stainless-steel cookware set is manufactured from low-cost to expensive and quality constructed pots and pans.
You will find magnetic stainless steel within the layer on the outside of some high quality pieces of stainless-steel. That is to make it compatible with induction stovetops, which involve using a rapidly charging electromagnetic subject to warmth cookware. High-high quality stainless steel, like All-Clad , uses three layers of steel—the austenite layer of metal on the within, ferrite steel on the outside, and a layer of aluminum sandwiched between the two for optimum heat conductivity (metal alone doesn't conduct warmth evenly). Lesser-high quality stainless-steel is usually only one layer of austenitic chrome steel.
Aesthetically talking, chrome steel is a wise alternative when you favor to show or hang pots or pans. The clean, crisp look of all chrome steel kitchenware can remodel a mishmash of cookware into a complicated décor statement. Chrome steel kettles, such because the Cuisinart Tea Kettle will combine individual kitchenware right into a cohesive and nice entity. Take into account buying stainless-steel utensils as well. Already acquired a gorgeous stainless steel cookware assortment? The Cuisinart Chef’s Collection stainless pot rack could be the crowning glory for a kitchen, liberating up space and making these pots and pans readily accessible. Get the stainless-steel cookware of your culinary goals at Macy’s!
Arduous-anodized aluminum cookware is among the most popular forms of material, despite the fact that many people do not fairly perceive the development. Hard-anodized aluminum is plain aluminum that has been processed in a series of chemical baths charged with an electrical present. The result's a fabric that has the same superior warmth conductivity as aluminum however is non-reactive with acidic meals, similar to tomatoes, and twice as hard as chrome steel. Two drawbacks to laborious-anodized cookware are that it's not dishwasher-secure and, because it isn't magnetic, it will not work with induction range tops.
The enamel over metal method creates a piece that has the heat distribution of carbon steel and a non-reactive, low-stick surface. In the event you loved this information and you desire to acquire details about best stainless steel cookware i implore you to pay a visit to our page. Such pots are a lot lighter than most different pots of comparable dimension, are cheaper to make than chrome steel pots, and would not have the rust and reactivity problems with forged iron or carbon steel. quotation needed Enamel over metal is right for large stockpots and for different giant pans used mostly for water-primarily based cooking. Because of its mild weight and simple cleanup, enamel over metal can also be standard for cookware used while tenting. Clad aluminium or copper edit
Unique specialty cookware items served a la carte to compliment any cookware set are constructed of a sturdy Stainless Steel with a brushed exterior finish. Designed with an impression bonded, aluminum disk encapsulated base which distributes warmth quickly and evenly to permit exact temperature management. Handles are riveted for durability and efficiency. The New Specialty Cookware is compatible for all vary sorts together with induction. Along with the multi use function, another unique characteristic is bottom to top interior quantity markings in each quarts and metric measurement; and each bit comes with a tempered glass lid, oven safe to 350°F.
Whether or not you are a cooking enthusiasts, knowledgeable chef or simply cooking for your family you know the importance of getting a totally stocked kitchen. Not solely do you want the fitting elements, but you also need the right instruments to get the job performed. In any sort of fundamental cooking coaching lesson, you will be taught that chrome steel is your new finest pal when it comes to kitchen cookware. What additionally, you will study is that quality cooking tools does not normally come at a reduced price. Because of this, you will need to take good care of your cookware! Listed here are some fundamentals for stainless steel care.
To combat the uneven heating downside, most stainless steel pans are laminations of aluminum or copper on the underside to spread the warmth around, and stainless-steel contained in the pan to provide a cooking floor that's impervious to whatever you might put inside. In my experience, this chrome steel floor continues to be too sticky to fry on, and when you ever burn it you get a permanent hassle spot. But, sometimes a stainless-steel cooking surface turns out to be useful when you can't use aluminum (see below) so I keep some round. Choose one thing with a fairly thick aluminum layer on the underside.
Well, until you’re a metals professional and go examine the factory where the steel is made to see whether or not their manufacturing course of creates a pure austenite without corrosive supplies shaped, you’re not going to know for sure whether or not the craftsmanship of your stainless is of the very best quality. I think your greatest wager is to simply buy high-quality chrome steel from the start, from a brand with a reputation for good quality. But, I believe I have found out one way that you would be able to decide if the stainless cookware you already have is probably reactive. Template:Multiple issues

In electromagnetism, a branch of fundamental physics, the matrix representations of the Maxwell's equations are a formulation of Maxwell's equations using matrices, complex numbers, and vector calculus. These representations are for a homogeneous medium, an approximation in an inhomogeneous medium. A matrix representation for an inhomogeneous medium was presented using a pair of matrix equations. A single equation using 4 × 4 matrices is necessary and sufficient for any homogeneous medium. For an inhomogeneous medium it necessarily requires 8 × 8 matrices.

Introduction

Maxwell's equations in the standard vector calculus formalism, in an inhomogeneous medium with sources, are:

${\begin{aligned}&{\mathbf {\nabla } }\cdot {\mathbf {D} }\left({\mathbf {r} },t\right)=\rho \,,\\&{\mathbf {\nabla } }\times {\mathbf {H} }\left({\mathbf {r} },t\right)-{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}{\mathbf {D} }\left({\mathbf {r} },t\right)={\mathbf {J} }\,,\\&{\mathbf {\nabla } }\times {\mathbf {E} }\left({\mathbf {r} },t\right)+{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}{\mathbf {B} }\left({\mathbf {r} },t\right)=0\,,\\&{\mathbf {\nabla } }\cdot {\mathbf {B} }\left({\mathbf {r} },t\right)=0\,.\end{aligned}}$

The media is assumed to be linear, that is

${\mathbf {D} }=\epsilon {\mathbf {E} }\,,\quad {\mathbf {B} }=\mu {\mathbf {H} }$,

where ε = ε(r, t) is the permittivity of the medium and μ = μ(r, t) the permeability of the medium (see constitutive equation). For a homogeneous medium ε and μ are constants. The speed of light in the medium is given by

$v({\mathbf {r} },t)={\frac {1}{\sqrt {\epsilon ({\mathbf {r} },t)\mu ({\mathbf {r} },t)}}}$.

In vacuum, ε₀ = 8.85 × 10⁻¹² C²·N⁻¹·m⁻² and μ₀ = 4π × 10⁻⁷ H·m⁻¹

One possible way to obtain the required matrix representation is to use the Riemann-Silberstein vector given by

${\begin{aligned}{\mathbf {F} }^{+}\left({\mathbf {r} },t\right)&={\frac {1}{\sqrt {2}}}\left({\sqrt {\epsilon ({\mathbf {r} },t)}}{\mathbf {E} }\left({\mathbf {r} },t\right)+{\rm {i}}{\frac {1}{\sqrt {\mu ({\mathbf {r} },t)}}}{\mathbf {B} }\left({\mathbf {r} },t\right)\right)\\{\mathbf {F} }^{-}\left({\mathbf {r} },t\right)&={\frac {1}{\sqrt {2}}}\left({\sqrt {\epsilon ({\mathbf {r} },t)}}{\mathbf {E} }\left({\mathbf {r} },t\right)-{\rm {i}}{\frac {1}{\sqrt {\mu ({\mathbf {r} },t)}}}{\mathbf {B} }\left({\mathbf {r} },t\right)\right)\,.\end{aligned}}$

If for a certain medium ε = ε(r, t) and μ = μ(r, t) are constants (or can be treated as local constants under certain approximations), then the vectors F^± (r, t) satisfy

${\begin{aligned}{\rm {i}}{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}{\mathbf {F} }^{\pm }\left({\mathbf {r} },t\right)&=\pm v{\mathbf {\nabla } }\times {\mathbf {F} }^{\pm }\left({\mathbf {r} },t\right)-{\frac {1}{\sqrt {2\epsilon }}}({\rm {i}}{\mathbf {J} })\\{\mathbf {\nabla } }\cdot {\mathbf {F} }^{\pm }\left({\mathbf {r} },t\right)&={\frac {1}{\sqrt {2\epsilon }}}(\rho )\,.\end{aligned}}$

Thus by using the Riemann-Silberstein vector, it is possible to reexpress the Maxwell's equations for a medium with constant ε = ε(r, t) and μ = μ(r, t) as a pair of equations.

Homogeneous medium

In order to obtain a single matrix equation instead of a pair, the following new functions are constructed using the components of the Riemann-Silberstein vector

${\begin{aligned}\Psi ^{+}({\mathbf {r} },t)&=\left[{\begin{array}{c}-F_{x}^{+}+{\rm {i}}F_{y}^{+}\\F_{z}^{+}\\F_{z}^{+}\\F_{x}^{+}+{\rm {i}}F_{y}^{+}\end{array}}\right]\,,\quad \Psi ^{-}({\mathbf {r} },t)=\left[{\begin{array}{c}-F_{x}^{-}-{\rm {i}}F_{y}^{-}\\F_{z}^{-}\\F_{z}^{-}\\F_{x}^{-}-{\rm {i}}F_{y}^{-}\end{array}}\right]\,.\end{aligned}}$

The vectors for the sources are

${\begin{aligned}W^{+}&=\left({\frac {1}{\sqrt {2\epsilon }}}\right)\left[{\begin{array}{c}-J_{x}+{\rm {i}}J_{y}\\J_{z}-v\rho \\J_{z}+v\rho \\J_{x}+{\rm {i}}J_{y}\end{array}}\right]\,,\quad W^{-}=\left({\frac {1}{\sqrt {2\epsilon }}}\right)\left[{\begin{array}{c}-J_{x}-{\rm {i}}J_{y}\\J_{z}-v\rho \\J_{z}+v\rho \\J_{x}-{\rm {i}}J_{y}\end{array}}\right]\,.\end{aligned}}$

Then,

${\begin{aligned}{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}\Psi ^{+}&=-v\left\{{\mathbf {M} }\cdot {\mathbf {\nabla } }\right\}\Psi ^{+}-W^{+}\,\\{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}\Psi ^{-}&=-v\left\{{\mathbf {M} }^{*}\cdot {\mathbf {\nabla } }\right\}\Psi ^{-}-W^{-}\,,\end{aligned}}$

where * denotes complex conjugation and the triplet, M = (M_x, M_y, M_z) is expressed in terms of

$\Omega ={\begin{pmatrix}{\mathbf {0} }&-{\mathbf {l} }\\{\mathbf {l} }&{\mathbf {0} }\end{pmatrix}}\,,\qquad \beta ={\begin{pmatrix}{\mathbf {l} }&{\mathbf {0} }\\{\mathbf {0} }&-{\mathbf {l} }\end{pmatrix}}\,,\qquad {\mathbf {l} }={\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&1\end{pmatrix}}\,.$

Alternately, one may use the matrix J = −Ω. Both differ by a sign. For our purpose it is fine to use either Ω or J. However, they have a different meaning: J is contravariant and Ω is covariant. The matrix Ω corresponds to the Lagrange brackets of classical mechanics and J corresponds to the Poisson brackets. An important relation is Ω = J⁻¹. The M-matrices are

$M_{x}={\begin{bmatrix}0&0&1&0\\0&0&0&1\\1&0&0&0\\0&1&0&0\end{bmatrix}}=-\beta \Omega \,,$

$M_{y}={\begin{bmatrix}0&0&-{\rm {i}}&0\\0&0&0&-{\rm {i}}\\{\rm {i}}&0&0&0\\0&{\rm {i}}&0&0\end{bmatrix}}={\rm {i}}\Omega \,,$

$M_{z}={\begin{bmatrix}1&0&0&0\\0&1&0&0\\0&0&-1&0\\0&0&0&-1\end{bmatrix}}=\beta \,.$

Each of the four Maxwell's equations are obtained from the matrix representation. This is done by taking the sums and differences of row-I with row-IV and row-II with row-III respectively. The first three give the y, x and z components of the curl and the last one gives the divergence conditions.

It is to be noted that the matrices M are all non-singular and all are Hermitian. Moreover, they satisfy the usual algebra of the Dirac matrices, including,

${\begin{aligned}M_{x}\beta =-\beta M_{x}\,,\\M_{y}\beta =-\beta M_{y}\,,\\M_{x}^{2}=M_{y}^{2}=M_{z}^{2}=I\,,\\M_{x}M_{y}=-M_{y}M_{x}={\rm {i}}M_{z}\,,\\M_{y}M_{z}=-M_{z}M_{y}={\rm {i}}M_{x}\,,\\M_{z}M_{x}=-M_{x}M_{z}={\rm {i}}M_{y}\,.\end{aligned}}$

It is to be noted that the (Ψ^±, M) are not unique. Different choices of Ψ^± would give rise to different M, such that the triplet M continues to satisfy the algebra of the Dirac matrices. The Ψ^± via the Riemann-Silberstein vector has certain advantages over the other possible choices. The Riemann-Silberstein vector is well known in classical electrodynamics and has certain interesting properties and uses.

In deriving the above 4 × 4 matrix representation of the Maxwell's equations, the spatial and temporal derivatives of ε(r, t) and μ(r, t) in the first two of the Maxwell's equations have been ignored. The ε and μ have been treated as local constants.

Inhomogeneous medium

In an inhomogeneous medium, the spatial and temporal variations of ε = ε(r, t) and μ = μ(r, t) are not zero. That is they are no longer local constant. Instead of using ε = ε(r, t) and μ = μ(r, t), it is advantageous to use the two derived laboratory functions namely the resistance function and the velocity function

${\begin{aligned}{\text{ Velocity function:}}\,v({\mathbf {r} },t)&={\frac {1}{\sqrt {\epsilon ({\mathbf {r} },t)\mu ({\mathbf {r} },t)}}}\\{\text{Resistance function:}}\,h({\mathbf {r} },t)&={\sqrt {\frac {\mu ({\mathbf {r} },t)}{\epsilon ({\mathbf {r} },t)}}}\,.\end{aligned}}$

In terms of these functions:

$\varepsilon ={\frac {1}{vh}}\,,\quad \mu ={\frac {h}{v}}$.

These functions occur in the matrix representation through their logarithmic derivatives;

${\begin{aligned}{\mathbf {u} }({\mathbf {r} },t)&={\frac {1}{2v({\mathbf {r} },t)}}{\mathbf {\nabla } }v({\mathbf {r} },t)={\frac {1}{2}}{\mathbf {\nabla } }\left\{\ln v({\mathbf {r} },t)\right\}=-{\frac {1}{2}}{\mathbf {\nabla } }\left\{\ln n({\mathbf {r} },t)\right\}\\{\mathbf {w} }({\mathbf {r} },t)&={\frac {1}{2h({\mathbf {r} },t)}}{\mathbf {\nabla } }h({\mathbf {r} },t)={\frac {1}{2}}{\mathbf {\nabla } }\left\{\ln h({\mathbf {r} },t)\right\}\,,\end{aligned}}$

where

$n({\mathbf {r} },t)={\frac {c}{v({\mathbf {r} },t)}}$

is the refractive index of the medium.

The following matrices naturally arise in the exact matrix representation of the Maxwell's equation in a medium

${\begin{aligned}{\mathbf {\Sigma } }=\left[{\begin{array}{cc}{\mathbf {\sigma } }&{\mathbf {0} }\\{\mathbf {0} }&{\mathbf {\sigma } }\end{array}}\right]\,,\qquad {\mathbf {\alpha } }=\left[{\begin{array}{cc}{\mathbf {0} }&{\mathbf {\sigma } }\\{\mathbf {\sigma } }&{\mathbf {0} }\end{array}}\right]\,,\qquad {\mathbf {I} }=\left[{\begin{array}{cc}{\mathbf {1} }&{\mathbf {0} }\\{\mathbf {0} }&{\mathbf {1} }\end{array}}\right]\,,\end{aligned}}$

where Σ are the Dirac spin matrices and α are the matrices used in the Dirac equation, and σ is the triplet of the Pauli matrices

${\mathbf {\sigma } }=(\sigma _{x},\sigma _{y},\sigma _{z})=\left[{\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\1&0\end{pmatrix}},{\begin{pmatrix}0&-{\rm {i}}\\{\rm {i}}&0\end{pmatrix}},{\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{pmatrix}}\right]$

Finally, the matrix representation is

${\begin{aligned}&{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}\left[{\begin{array}{cc}{\mathbf {I} }&{\mathbf {0} }\\{\mathbf {0} }&{\mathbf {I} }\end{array}}\right]\left[{\begin{array}{cc}\Psi ^{+}\\\Psi ^{-}\end{array}}\right]-{\frac {{\dot {v}}({\mathbf {r} },t)}{2v({\mathbf {r} },t)}}\left[{\begin{array}{cc}{\mathbf {I} }&{\mathbf {0} }\\{\mathbf {0} }&{\mathbf {I} }\end{array}}\right]\left[{\begin{array}{cc}\Psi ^{+}\\\Psi ^{-}\end{array}}\right]+{\frac {{\dot {h}}({\mathbf {r} },t)}{2h({\mathbf {r} },t)}}\left[{\begin{array}{cc}{\mathbf {0} }&{\rm {i}}\beta \alpha _{y}\\{\rm {i}}\beta \alpha _{y}&{\mathbf {0} }\end{array}}\right]\left[{\begin{array}{cc}\Psi ^{+}\\\Psi ^{-}\end{array}}\right]\\&=-v({\mathbf {r} },t)\left[{\begin{array}{ccc}\left\{{\mathbf {M} }\cdot {\mathbf {\nabla } }+{\mathbf {\Sigma } }\cdot {\mathbf {u} }\right\}&&-{\rm {i}}\beta \left({\mathbf {\Sigma } }\cdot {\mathbf {w} }\right)\alpha _{y}\\-{\rm {i}}\beta \left({\mathbf {\Sigma } }^{*}\cdot {\mathbf {w} }\right)\alpha _{y}&\left\{{\mathbf {M} }^{*}\cdot {\mathbf {\nabla } }+{\mathbf {\Sigma } }^{*}\cdot {\mathbf {u} }\right\}\end{array}}\right]\left[{\begin{array}{cc}\Psi ^{+}\\\Psi ^{-}\end{array}}\right]-\left[{\begin{array}{cc}{\mathbf {I} }&{\mathbf {0} }\\{\mathbf {0} }&{\mathbf {I} }\end{array}}\right]\left[{\begin{array}{c}W^{+}\\W^{-}\end{array}}\right]\,,\end{aligned}}$

The above representation contains thirteen 8 × 8 matrices. Ten of these are Hermitian. The exceptional ones are the ones that contain the three components of w(r, t), the logarithmic gradient of the resistance function. These three matrices, for the resistance function are antihermitian.

The Maxwell's equations have been expressed in a matrix form for a medium with varying permittivity ε = ε(r, t) and permeability μ = μ(r, t), in presence of sources. This representation uses a single matrix equation, instead of a pair of matrix equations. In this representation, using 8 × 8 matrices, it has been possible to separate the dependence of the coupling between the upper components (Ψ⁺) and the lower components (Ψ⁻) through the two laboratory functions. Moreover the exact matrix representation has an algebraic structure very similar to the Dirac equation. It is interesting to note that the Maxwell's equations can be derived from the Fermat's principle of geometrical optics by the process of "wavization"Template:Clarify analogous to the quantization of classical mechanics.

Applications

One of the early uses of the matrix forms of the Maxwell's equations was to study certain symmetries, and the similarities with the Dirac equation.

The matrix form of the Maxwell's equations is used as a candidate for the Photon Wavefunction.

Historically, the geometrical optics is based on the Fermat’s principle of least time. Geometrical optics can be completely derived from the Maxwell's equations. This is traditionally done using the Helmholtz equation. It is to be noted that the derivation of the Helmholtz equation from the Maxwell’s equations is an approximation as one neglects the spatial and temporal derivatives of the permittivity and permeability of the medium. A new formalism of light beam optics has been developed, starting with the Maxwell’s equations in a matrix form: a single entity containing all the four Maxwell’s equations. Such a prescription is sure to provide a deeper understanding of beam-optics and polarization in a unified manner. The beam-optical Hamiltonian derived from this matrix representation has an algebraic structure very similar to the Dirac equation, making it emnable to the Foldy-Wouthuysen technique. This approach is very similar to one developed for the quantum theory of charged-particle beam optics.

References

Notes

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

Others

• Bialynicki-Birula, I. (1994). On the wave function of the photon. Acta Physica Polonica A, 86, 97-116.

• Bialynicki-Birula, I. (1996a). The Photon Wave Function. In Coherence and Quantum Optics VII. Eberly, J. H., Mandel, L. and Emil Wolf (ed.), Plenum Press, New York, 313.

• Bialynicki-Birula, I. (1996b). Photon wave function. in Progress in Optics, Vol. XXXVI, Emil Wolf. (ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 245-294.

• Jackson, J. D. (1998). Classical Electrodynamics, Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons.
• Jagannathan, R., (1990). Quantum theory of electron lenses based on the Dirac equation. Physical Review A, 42, 6674-6689.
• Jagannathan, R. and Khan, S. A. (1996). Quantum theory of the optics of charged particles. In Hawkes Peter, W. (ed.), Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics, Vol. 97, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 257–358.
• Jagannathan, R., Simon, R., Sudarshan, E. C. G. and Mukunda, N. (1989). Quantum theory of magnetic electron lenses based on the Dirac equation. Physics Letters A 134, 457-464.
• Khan, S. A. (1997). Quantum Theory of Charged-Particle Beam Optics, Ph.D Thesis, University of Madras, Chennai, India. (complete thesis available from Dspace of IMSc Library, The Institute of Mathematical Sciences, where the doctoral research was done).
• Sameen Ahmed Khan. (2002). Maxwell Optics: I. An exact matrix representation of the Maxwell equations in a medium. E-Print: http://arXiv.org/abs/physics/0205083/.
• Sameen Ahmed Khan. (2005). An Exact Matrix Representation of Maxwell's Equations. Physica Scripta, 71(5), 440-442.
• Sameen Ahmed Khan. (2006a). The Foldy-Wouthuysen Transformation Technique in Optics. Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics. 117(10), pp. 481–488 http://www.elsevier-deutschland.de/ijleo/.
• Sameen Ahmed Khan. (2006b). Wavelength-Dependent Effects in Light Optics. in New Topics in Quantum Physics Research, Editors: Volodymyr Krasnoholovets and Frank Columbus, Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp. 163–204. (ISBN 1600210287 and ISBN 978-1600210280).
• Sameen Ahmed Khan. (2008). The Foldy-Wouthuysen Transformation Technique in Optics, In Hawkes Peter, W. (ed.), Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics, Vol. 152, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 49–78. (ISBN 0123742196 and ISBN 978-0-12-374219-3).
• Sameen Ahmed Khan. (2010). Maxwell Optics of Quasiparaxial Beams, Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 121(5), 408-416. (http://www.elsevier-deutschland.de/ijleo/).

• Laporte, O., and Uhlenbeck, G. E. (1931). Applications of spinor analysis to the Maxwell and Dirac Equations. Physical Review, 37, 1380-1397.

• Majorana, E. (1974). (unpublished notes), quoted after Mignani, R., Recami, E., and Baldo, M. About a Dirac­like Equation for the Photon, According to Ettore Majorana. Lett. Nuovo Cimento, 11, 568-572.

• Moses, E. (1959).Solutions of Maxwell's equations in terms of a spinor notation: the direct and inverse problems. Physical Review, 113(6), 1670-1679.

• Panofsky, W. K. H., and Phillips, M. (1962). Classical Electricity and Magnetics, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts, USA.
• Pradhan, T. (1987). Maxwell's Equations From Geometrical Optics. IP/BBSR/87-15; Physics Letters A 122(8), 397-398.

• Ludwig Silberstein. (1907a). Elektromagnetische Grundgleichungen in bivektorieller Behandlung, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig), 22, 579-586.

• Ludwig Silberstein. (1907b). Nachtrag zur Abhandlung ber Elektromagnetische Grundgleichungen in bivektorieller Behandlung. Ann. Phys. (Leipzig), 24, 783-784.