Diversification (finance): Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
en>AaCBrown
m Added link to David Kabiller
Line 1: Line 1:
Hello and welcome. My name is Irwin and I totally dig that title. One of the extremely very best issues in the globe for him is to gather badges but he is having difficulties to discover time for it. Managing individuals has been his day job for a whilst. Puerto Rico is exactly where he and his spouse reside.<br><br>Feel free to surf to my page: [http://www.buzzbit.net/user/AFilson home std test kit]
A '''double [[auction]]''' is a process of buying and selling goods when potential buyers submit their bids and potential sellers  simultaneously submit their ask prices to an auctioneer, and then an auctioneer chooses some price ''p'' that clears the market: all the sellers who asked less than p sell and all buyers who bid more than ''p'' buy at this price ''p''. As well as their direct interest, double auctions are reminiscent of [[Walrasian tâtonnement]] and have been used as a tool to study the determination of prices in ordinary markets.
 
== Game theory approach to modelling double auctions ==
 
A double auction can be analyzed as a game. Players are buyers and sellers. They have some valuations of a good that is traded in an auction. Their strategies are bids for buyers and ask prices for sellers (that depend on the valuations of buyers and sellers). Payoffs depend on the price of the transaction and the valuation of a player.
 
=== Equilibrium strategies of simple double auction ===
 
Consider a double auction with a single buyer and a single seller. Suppose that the valuation of a buyer is ''v'' and the valuation of a seller is ''c'' (e.g. the cost of producing the product). And ''v, c'' <math> \in [0,1]</math>.Submitted bid of a seller is <math>b_1</math>, and bid of a buyer is <math>b_2</math>. <math> b_1,b_2 \in [0,1].</math> Let <math>v>c</math>.
 
Suppose an auctioneer sets the price:
 
<math>p= \frac{(b_1+b_2)}{2}</math> if  <math>b_1</math> ≤ <math>b_2</math>. And if <math>b_1 > b_2</math> trade does not occur.
 
Consumer surplus of buyer is
<math>u_1=v-p </math> if <math>b_1</math> ≤ <math>b_2</math> and 0 if <math>b_1 > b_2</math>
 
Producer surplus of a seller is
<math> {u_2}=p-c</math> if <math>b_1</math> ≤ <math>b_2</math> and 0 if <math>b_1 > b_2</math>
 
In a ''complete information'' (symmetric information) case  when the valuations are common knowledge it can be shown that the continuum of pure strategy efficient [[Nash equilibrium]]s exists with <math>b_1=b_2=p \in [c,v].</math>
 
In an ''incomplete information'' (asymmetric information) case a buyer and a seller know only their own valuations. Suppose that these valuations are uniformly distributed over the same interval. Then it can be shown that such a game has a [[Bayesian game|Bayesian Nash equilibrium]] with linear strategies. That is there is an equilibrium when both players' bids are some linear functions of their valuations. It is also the equilibrium that brings the highest expected gains for the players than any other Bayesian Nash equilibrium<ref>Myerson, Roger B.; Mark A. Satterthwaite (1983). "Efficient Mechanisms for Bilateral Trading". Journal of Economic Theory 29: 265–281.</ref>
 
==See also==
* Other topics:
** [[Game theory]]
** [[Auction Theory]]
** [[Sealed first-price auction]]
** [[Vickrey auction]]
 
==References==
*Fudenberg, Drew; Tirole, Jean (1991), Game theory, MIT Press, ISBN 978-0-262-06141-4
*Gibbons, Robert D. (1992), Game theory for applied economists, Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-00395-5
 
== Footnotes ==
<references/>
 
[[Category:Game theory]]
[[Category:Auctioneering]]
[[Category:Auction theory]]

Revision as of 00:06, 18 January 2014

A double auction is a process of buying and selling goods when potential buyers submit their bids and potential sellers simultaneously submit their ask prices to an auctioneer, and then an auctioneer chooses some price p that clears the market: all the sellers who asked less than p sell and all buyers who bid more than p buy at this price p. As well as their direct interest, double auctions are reminiscent of Walrasian tâtonnement and have been used as a tool to study the determination of prices in ordinary markets.

Game theory approach to modelling double auctions

A double auction can be analyzed as a game. Players are buyers and sellers. They have some valuations of a good that is traded in an auction. Their strategies are bids for buyers and ask prices for sellers (that depend on the valuations of buyers and sellers). Payoffs depend on the price of the transaction and the valuation of a player.

Equilibrium strategies of simple double auction

Consider a double auction with a single buyer and a single seller. Suppose that the valuation of a buyer is v and the valuation of a seller is c (e.g. the cost of producing the product). And v, c .Submitted bid of a seller is , and bid of a buyer is . Let .

Suppose an auctioneer sets the price:

if . And if trade does not occur.

Consumer surplus of buyer is if and 0 if

Producer surplus of a seller is if and 0 if

In a complete information (symmetric information) case when the valuations are common knowledge it can be shown that the continuum of pure strategy efficient Nash equilibriums exists with

In an incomplete information (asymmetric information) case a buyer and a seller know only their own valuations. Suppose that these valuations are uniformly distributed over the same interval. Then it can be shown that such a game has a Bayesian Nash equilibrium with linear strategies. That is there is an equilibrium when both players' bids are some linear functions of their valuations. It is also the equilibrium that brings the highest expected gains for the players than any other Bayesian Nash equilibrium[1]

See also

References

  • Fudenberg, Drew; Tirole, Jean (1991), Game theory, MIT Press, ISBN 978-0-262-06141-4
  • Gibbons, Robert D. (1992), Game theory for applied economists, Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-00395-5

Footnotes

  1. Myerson, Roger B.; Mark A. Satterthwaite (1983). "Efficient Mechanisms for Bilateral Trading". Journal of Economic Theory 29: 265–281.