Circulation problem: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
…grammar
 
Line 1: Line 1:
In the study of [[metric spaces]] in [[mathematics]], there are various notions of two [[metric (mathematics)|metrics]] on the same underlying space being "the same", or '''equivalent'''.
Claude is her title and she  extended car [http://autos.jdpower.com/content/buying-tip/xa345A7/pros-and-cons-of-buying-an-extended-warranty-for-a-car.htm warranty totally] digs that title. I am a production and distribution officer. Her spouse and her selected to reside in Delaware but she requirements to transfer simply because of her family. Her [http://www.ag.state.Mn.us/consumer/cars/mncarlaws/mncarlaws_2.asp buddies] say it's not good  [https://www.epapyrus.com/xe/Purchase/5246873 extended auto warranty] car [http://Www.Angieslist.com/articles/what-does-and-doesnt-your-auto-warranty-cover.htm warranty] for her but what she loves doing is flower arranging and  auto warranty she is attempting to make it a occupation.<br><br>My site [http://changbai.newdrycleaning.com/photo/54180 extended auto warranty] car warranty ([http://Zocken-in-gesellschaft.de/index.php?mod=users&action=view&id=10093 simply click the next site])
 
In the following, <math>X</math> will denote a non-[[empty set]] and <math>d_{1}</math> and <math>d_{2}</math> will denote two metrics on <math>X</math>.
 
==Topological equivalence==
 
The two metrics <math>d_{1}</math> and <math>d_{2}</math> are said to be '''topologically equivalent''' if they generate the same [[topology]] on <math>X</math>. The adjective "topological" is often dropped.<ref>Bishop and Goldberg, p. 10.</ref> There are multiple ways of expressing this condition:
* a subset <math>A \subseteq X</math> is <math>d_{1}</math>-[[open set|open]] [[if and only if]] it is <math>d_{2}</math>-open;
* the [[open ball]]s "nest": for any point <math>x \in X</math> and any radius <math>r > 0</math>, there exist radii <math>r', r'' > 0</math> such that
:<math>B_{r'} (x; d_{1}) \subseteq B_{r} (x; d_{2})</math> and <math>B_{r''} (x; d_{2}) \subseteq B_{r} (x; d_{1}).</math>
* the [[identity function]] <math>I : X \to X</math> is both <math>(d_{1}, d_{2})</math>-[[continuous function|continuous]] and <math>(d_{2}, d_{1})</math>-continuous.
 
The following are sufficient but not necessary conditions for topological equivalence:
* there exists a strictly increasing, continuous, and [[subadditive]] <math>f:\mathbb{R}_{+} \to \mathbb{R}</math> such that <math>d_{2} = f \circ d_{1}</math>.<ref>Ok, p. 127, footnote 12.</ref>
* for each <math>x \in X</math>, there exist positive constants <math>\alpha</math> and <math>\beta</math> such that, for every point <math>y \in X</math>,
:<math>\alpha d_{1} (x, y) \leq d_{2} (x, y) \leq \beta d_{1} (x, y).</math>
 
==Strong equivalence==
 
Two metrics <math>d_{1}</math> and <math>d_{2}</math> are '''strongly equivalent''' if and only if there exist positive constants <math>\alpha</math> and <math>\beta</math> such that, for every <math>x,y\in X</math>,
:<math>\alpha d_{1}(x,y) \leq d_{2}(x,y) \leq \beta d_{1} (x, y).</math>
In contrast to the sufficient condition for topological equivalence listed above, strong equivalence requires that there is a single set of constants that holds for every pair of points in <math>X</math>, rather than potentially different constants associated with each point of <math>X</math>.
 
Strong equivalence of two metrics implies topological equivalence, but not vice versa. An intuitive reason why topological equivalence does not imply strong equivalence is that [[Bounded set#Metric space|bounded sets]] under one metric are also bounded under a strongly equivalent metric, but not necessarily under a topologically equivalent metric.
 
All metrics induced by the [[p-norm]], including the [[euclidean metric]], the [[taxicab metric]], and the [[Chebyshev distance]], are strongly equivalent.<ref>Ok, p. 138.</ref>
 
Even if two metrics are strongly equivalent, not all properties of the respective metric spaces are preserved. For instance, a function from the space to itself might be a [[contraction mapping]] under one metric, but not necessarily under a strongly equivalent one.<ref>Ok, p. 175.</ref>
 
==Properties preserved by equivalence==
* The [[continuous function|continuity]] of a function is preserved if either the domain or range is remetrized by an equivalent metric, but [[uniform continuity]] is preserved only by strongly equivalent metrics.<ref>Ok, p. 209.</ref>
* The [[differentiability]] of a function is preserved if either the domain or range is remetrized by a strongly equivalent metric.<ref>Cartan, p. 27.</ref>
 
==Notes==
{{reflist}}
 
==References==
{{refbegin}}
* {{cite book
  | authors = Richard L. Bishop, Samuel I. Goldberg
  | title = Tensor analysis on manifolds
  | year = 1980
  | publisher = Dover Publications
  | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=LAuN5-og4jwC
  }}
* {{cite book
  | author = Efe Ok
  | title = Real analysis with economics applications
  | year = 2007
  | publisher = Princeton University Press
  | isbn = 0-691-11768-3
  }}
* {{cite book
  | author = Henri Cartan
  | title = Differential Calculus
  | year = 1971
  | publisher = Kershaw Publishing Company LTD
  | isbn = 0-395-12033-0
  }}
{{refend}}
 
[[Category:Metric geometry]]

Latest revision as of 19:45, 26 October 2014

Claude is her title and she extended car warranty totally digs that title. I am a production and distribution officer. Her spouse and her selected to reside in Delaware but she requirements to transfer simply because of her family. Her buddies say it's not good extended auto warranty car warranty for her but what she loves doing is flower arranging and auto warranty she is attempting to make it a occupation.

My site extended auto warranty car warranty (simply click the next site)