Octave Boudouard

From formulasearchengine
Revision as of 13:12, 1 January 2014 by en>Waacstats (References: Add persondata short description using AWB)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Multiple issues

Non-extensive self-consistent thermodynamics

The non-extensive self-consistent thermodynamical theory keeps the concept of fireball for high-energy particle collisions at the same time that uses the Tsallis non-extensive thermodynamics.[1] Fireballs lead naturally to the bootstrap-idea, or self-consistency principle, just as it happens in the case of the Boltzmann statistics used by Hagedorn.[2] Assuming that the distribution function gets modifications due to possible symmetrical change, Abdel Nasser Tawfik applied the non-extensive concepts on high-energy particle production.[3][4]

The motivation to use the non-extensive statistics from Tsallis[5] comes from the results obtained by Bediaga et al.,[6] who showed that with the substitution of the Boltzmann factor which appears in the Hagedorn's theory by the q-exponential function, it was possible to recover the good agreement between calculation and experiment, even at energies as high as those achieved at LHC, with q>1.

Non-extensive entropy for ideal quantum gas

The starting point for the theory is entropy for a non-extensive quantum gas of bosons and fermions, as proposed by Conroy, Miller and Plastino,[7] which is given by Sq=SqFD+SqBE where SqFD is the non-extensive version of the Fermi-Dirac entropy and SqBE is the non-extensive version of the Bose-Einstein entropy.

As shown by Conroy, Miller and Plastino[8] and also by Cleymans and Worku,[9] the entropy just defined leads to occupation numbers formulaes that reduces to the one used by Bediaga et al. and by C. Beck,[10] and shows the power-like tails present in the distributions found in High Energy Physics experiments.

Non-extensive partition function for ideal quantum gas

Using the entropy defined above, the partition function results to be

ln[1+Zq(Vo,T)]=Vo2π2n=11n0dm0dpp2ρ(n;m)[1+(q1)βp2+m2]nq(q1).

Since experiments have shown that q>1, this restriction is adopted.

Another way to write the non-extensive partition function for a fireball is

Zq(Vo,T)=0σ(E)[1+(q1)βE]q(q1)dE,

where σ(E) is the density of states of the fireballs.

Self-consistency principle

The self-consistency implies that both forms of partition functions must be asymptotically equivalent and that the mass spectrum and the density of states must be related to each other by

log[ρ(m)]=log[σ(E)],

in the limit of m,E sufficiently large.

The self-consistency can be asymptotically achieved by choosing[11]

m3/2ρ(m)=γm[1+(qo1)βom]1qo1=γm[1+(q'o1)m]βoq'o1

and

σ(E)=bEa[1+(q'o1)E]βoq'o1,

where γ is a constant and q'o1=βo(qo1). Here, a,b,γ are arbitrary constants. For q1 the two expressions above approach the corresponding expressions in the Hagedorn's theory.

Main results

With the mass spectrum and density of states given above, the asymptotic form of the partition function results to be

Zq(Vo,T)(1ββo)α

where

α=γVo2π2β3/2,

with

a+1=α=γVo2π2β3/2.

One immediate consequence of the expression for the partition function is the existence of a limiting temperature To=1/βo. This result is equivalent to the important result obtained by Hagedorn.[12] With these results it is expected that at sufficiently high energy collisions the fireball will present not only a constant temperature, but also constant entropic factor.

Experimental evidences

Experimental evidences of the existence of a limiting temperature and of a limiting entropic index can be found in the papers by J. Cleymans and collaborators,[13][14] by Isaac Sena and A. Deppman.[15][16]

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

  1. A. Deppman, Physica A 391 (2012) 6380.
  2. R. Hagedorn, Suppl. Al Nuovo Cimento 3 (1965) 147.
  3. A. Tawfik, Int. J. Theor. Phys, 51, 1396-1407 (2012); arXiv:1011.6622 [hep-ph].
  4. A. Tawfik, Prog. Theor. Phys. 126, 279-292 (2011)
  5. C. Tsallis, J Stat Phys 52, 479-487, 1988.
  6. I. Bediaga, E.M.F. Curado and J.M. de Miranda, Physica A 286 (2000) 156.
  7. J.M. Conroy, H.G. Miller, A.R. Plastino, Phys. Lett. A 374 (2010) 4581–4584.
  8. J.M. Conroy, H.G. Miller and A.R. Plastino, Physics Letters A 374 (2010) 4581–4584.
  9. J. Cleymans and D. Worku, J. Phys. G 39 (2012) 025006.
  10. C. Beck, Physica A 286 (2000) 164–180.
  11. A. Deppman, Physica A 391 (2012) 6380.
  12. R. Hagedorn, Suppl. Al Nuovo Cimento 3 (1965) 147.
  13. J. Cleymans and D. Worku, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 39 (2012) 025006.
  14. J. Cleymans, G.I. Lykasov, A.S. Parvan, A.S. Sorin, O.V. Teryaev and D. Worku, arXiv:1302.1970 (2013).
  15. I. Sena and A. Deppman, Eur. Phys. J. A 49 (2013) 17.
  16. I. Sena and A. Deppman, AIP Conf. Proc. 1520, 172 (2013) - arXiv:1208.2952v1.