Disjunction introduction

From formulasearchengine
Revision as of 12:06, 6 July 2013 by en>Graham87 (1 revision from nost:Disjunction introduction: import old edit from the Nostalgia Wikipedia, see User:Graham87/Import)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Transformation rules

Disjunction introduction or addition[1][2][3] is a simple valid argument form, an immediate inference and a rule of inference of propositional logic. The rule makes it possible to introduce disjunctions to logical proofs. It is the inference that if P is true, then P or Q must be true.

Socrates is a man.
Therefore, either Socrates is a man or pigs are flying in formation over the English Channel.

The rule can be expressed as:

PPQ

where the rule is that whenever instances of "P" appear on lines of a proof, "PQ" can be placed on a subsequent line.

Disjunction introduction is controversial in paraconsistent logic because in combination with other rules of logic, it leads to explosion (i.e. everything becomes provable). See Tradeoffs in Paraconsistent logic.

Formal notation

The disjunction introduction rule may be written in sequent notation:

P(PQ)

where is a metalogical symbol meaning that PQ is a syntactic consequence of P in some logical system;

and expressed as a truth-functional tautology or theorem of propositional logic:

P(PQ)

where P and Q are propositions expressed in some formal system.

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

  1. Hurley
  2. Moore and Parker
  3. Copi and Cohen