Thomas–Fermi screening

From formulasearchengine
Revision as of 17:35, 17 September 2013 by en>Yobot (References: WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes / special characters in pagetitle using AWB (9485))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, there are many kinds of inequalities connected with matrices and linear operators on Hilbert spaces. This article reviews some of the most important operator inequalities connected with traces of matrices.

Useful references here are,.[1][2][3][4]

Basic definitions

Let Hn denote the space of Hermitian n×n matrices and Hn+ denote the set consisting of positive semi-definite n×n Hermitian matrices. For operators on an infinite dimensional Hilbert space we require that they be trace class and self-adjoint, in which case similar definitions apply, but we discuss only matrices, for simplicity.

For any real-valued function f on an interval I one can define a matrix function f(A) for any operator AHn with eigenvalues λ in I by defining it on the eigenvalues and corresponding projectors P as f(A)=jf(λj)Pj, with the spectral decomposition A=jλjPj.

Operator monotone

A function f:I defined on an interval I is said to be operator monotone if for all n, and all A,BHn with eigenvalues in I, the following holds:

ABf(A)f(B),

where the inequality AB means that the operator AB0 is positive semi-definite.

Operator convex

A function f:I is said to be operator convex if for all n and all A,BHn with eigenvalues in I, and 0<λ<1, the following holds

f(λA+(1λ)B)λf(A)+(1λ)f(B).

Note that the operator λA+(1λ)B has eigenvalues in I, since A and B have eigenvalues in I.

A function f is operator concave if f is operator convex, i.e. the inequality above for f is reversed.

Joint convexity

A function g:I×J, defined on intervals I,J is said to be jointly convex if for all n and all A1,A2Hn with eigenvalues in I and all B1,B2Hn with eigenvalues in J, and any 0λ1 the following holds

g(λA1+(1λ)A2,λB1+(1λ)B2)λg(A1,B1)+(1λ)g(A2,B2).

A function g is jointly concave if g is jointly convex, i.e. the inequality above for g is reversed.

Trace function

Given a function f:, the associated trace function on Hn is given by

ATrf(A)=jf(λj),

where A has eigenvalues λ and Tr stands for a trace of the operator.

Convexity and monotonicity of the trace function

Let f: be continuous, and let n be any integer.

Then if tf(t) is monotone increasing, so is ATrf(A) on Hn.

Likewise, if tf(t) is convex, so is ATrf(A) on Hn, and

it is strictly convex if f is strictly convex.

See proof and discussion in,[1] for example.

Löwner–Heinz theorem

For 1p0, the function f(t)=tp is operator monotone and operator concave.

For 0p1, the function f(t)=tp is operator monotone and operator concave.

For 1p2, the function f(t)=tp and operator convex.

Furthermore, f(t)=log(t) is operator concave and operator monotone, while f(t)=tlog(t) is operator convex.

The original proof of this theorem is due to K. Löwner,[5] where he gave a necessary and sufficient condition for f to be operator monotone. An elementary proof of the theorem is discussed in [1] and a more general version of it in [6]

Klein's inequality

For all Hermitian n×n matrices A and B and all differentiable convex functions f: with derivative f, or for all posotive-definite Hermitian n×n matrices A and B, and all differentiable convex functions f:(0,) the following inequality holds

Tr[f(A)f(B)(AB)f(B)]0.

In either case, if f is strictly convex, there is equality if and only if A=B.

Proof

Let C=AB so that for 0<t<1, B+tC=(1t)B+tA. Define ϕ(t)=Tr[f(B+tC)]. By convexity and monotonicity of trace functions, ϕ is convex, and so for all 0<t<1,

ϕ(1)=ϕ(0)ϕ(t)ϕ(0)t,

and in fact the right hand side is monotone decreasing in t. Taking the limit t0 yields Klein's inequality.

Note that if f is strictly convex and C0, then ϕ is strictly convex. The final assertion follows from this and the fact that ϕ(t)ϕ(0)t is monotone decreasing in t.

Golden–Thompson inequality

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church.

In 1965, S. Golden [7] and C.J. Thompson [8] independently discovered that

For any matrices A,BHn,

TreA+BTreAeB.

This inequality can be generalized for three operators:[9] for non-negative operators A,B,CHn+,

TrelnAlnB+lnC0dtTrA(B+t)1C(B+t)1.

Peierls–Bogoliubov inequality

Let R,FHn be such that TreR=1. Define f=TrFeR, then

TreFeRTreF+Ref.

The proof of this inequality follows from Klein's inequality. Take f(x)=ex, A=R+F and B=R+fI.[10]

Gibbs variational principle

Let H be a self-adjoint operator such that eH is trace class. Then for any γ0 with Trγ=1,

TrγH+TrγlnγlnTreH,

with equality if and only if γ=exp(H)/Trexp(H).

Lieb's concavity theorem

The following theorem was proved by E. H. Lieb in.[9] It proves and generalizes a conjecture of E. P. Wigner, M. M. Yanase and F. J. Dyson.[11] Six years later other proofs were given by T. Ando [12] and B. Simon,[3] and several more have been given since then.

For all m×n matrices K, and all q and r such that 0q1 and 0r1, with q+r1 the real valued map on Hm+×Hn+ given by

F(A,B,K)=Tr(K*AqKBr)
  • is jointly concave in (A,B)
  • is convex in K.

Here K* stands for the adjoint operator of K.

Lieb's theorem

For a fixed Hermitian matrix LHn, the function

f(A)=Trexp{L+lnA}

is concave on Hn+.

The theorem and proof are due to E. H. Lieb,[9] Thm 6, where he obtains this theorem as a corollary of Lieb's concavity Theorem. The most direct proof is due to H. Epstein;[13] see M.B. Ruskai papers,[14][15] for a review of this argument.

Ando's convexity theorem

T. Ando's proof [12] of Lieb's concavity theorem led to the following significant complement to it:

For all m×n matrices K, and all 1q2 and 0r1 with qr1, the real valued map on Hm+×Hn+ given by

(A,B)Tr(K*AqKBr)

is convex.

Joint convexity of relative entropy

For two operators A,BHn+ define the following map

R(AB):=Tr(AlogA)Tr(AlogB).

For density matrices ρ and σ, the map R(ρσ)=S(ρσ) is the Umegaki's quantum relative entropy.

Note that the non-negativity of R(AB) follows from Klein's inequality with f(x)=xlogx.

Statement

The map R(AB):Hn+×Hn+R is jointly convex.

Proof

For all 0<p<1, (A,B)Tr(B1pAp) is jointly concave, by Lieb's concavity theorem, and thus

(A,B)1p1(Tr(B1pAp)TrA)

is convex. But

limp11p1(Tr(B1pAp)TrA)=R(AB),

and convexity is preserved in the limit.

The proof is due to G. Lindblad.[16]

Jensen's operator and trace inequalities

The operator version of Jensen's inequality is due to C. Davis.[17]

A continuous, real function f on an interval I satisfies Jensen's Operator Inequality if the following holds

f(kAk*XkAk)kAk*f(Xk)Ak,

for operators {Ak}k with kAk*Ak=1 and for self-adjoint operators {Xk}k with spectrum on I.

See,[17][18] for the proof of the following two theorems.

Jensen's trace inequality

Let f be a continuous function defined on an interval I and let m and n be natural numbers. If f is convex we then have the inequality

Tr(f(k=1nAk*XkAk))Tr(k=1nAk*f(Xk)Ak),

for all (X1,,Xn) self-adjoint m×m matrices with spectra contained in I and all (A1,,An) of m×m matrices with k=1nAk*Ak=1.

Conversely, if the above inequality is satisfied for some n and m, where n>1, then f is convex.

Jensen's operator inequality

For a continuous function f defined on an interval I the following conditions are equivalent:

  • f is operator convex.
  • For each natural number n we have the inequality
f(k=1nAk*XkAk)k=1nAk*f(Xk)Ak,

for all (X1,,Xn) bounded, self-adjoint operators on an arbitrary Hilbert space with spectra contained in I and all (A1,,An) on with k=1nAk*Ak=1.

every self-adjoint operator X with spectrum in I.

Araki-Lieb-Thirring inequality

E. H. Lieb and W. E. Thirring proved the following inequality in [19] in 1976: For any A0, B0 and r1,

Tr(B1/2A1/2B1/2)rTrBr/2Ar/2Br/2.

In 1990 [20] H. Araki generalized the above inequality to the following one: For any A0, B0 and q0,

Tr(B1/2AB1/2)rqTr(Br/2ArBr/2)q, for r1,

and

Tr(Br/2ArBr/2)qTr(B1/2AB1/2)rq, for 0r1.

Effros's theorem

E. Effros in [21] proved the following theorem.

If f(x) is an operator convex function, and L and R are commuting bounded linear operators, i.e. the commutator [L,R]=LRRL=0, the perspective

g(L,R):=f(LR1)R

is jointly convex, i.e. if L=λL1+(1λ)L2 and R=λR1+(1λ)R2 with [Li,Ri]=0 (i=1,2), 0λ1,

g(L,R)λg(L1,R1)+(1λ)g(L2,R2).

See also

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 E. Carlen, Trace Inequalities and Quantum Entropy: An Introductory Course, Contemp. Math. 529 (2009).
  2. R. Bhatia, Matrix Analysis, Springer, (1997).
  3. 3.0 3.1 B. Simon, Trace Ideals and their Applications, Cambridge Univ. Press, (1979); Second edition. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, (2005).
  4. M. Ohya, D. Petz, Quantum Entropy and Its Use, Springer, (1993).
  5. K. Löwner, "Uber monotone Matrix funktionen", Math. Z. 38, 177–216, (1934).
  6. W.F. Donoghue, Jr., Monotone Matrix Functions and Analytic Continuation, Springer, (1974).
  7. S. Golden, Lower Bounds for Helmholtz Functions, Phys. Rev. 137, B 1127–1128 (1965)
  8. C.J. Thompson, Inequality with Applications in Statistical Mechanics, J. Math. Phys. 6, 1812–1813, (1965).
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 E. H. Lieb, Convex Trace Functions and the Wigner–Yanase–Dyson Conjecture, Advances in Math. 11, 267–288 (1973).
  10. D. Ruelle, Statistical Mechanics: Rigorous Results, World Scient. (1969).
  11. E. P. Wigner, M. M. Yanase, On the Positive Semi-Definite Nature of a Certain Matrix Expression, Can. J. Math. 16, 397–406, (1964).
  12. 12.0 12.1 . Ando, Convexity of Certain Maps on Positive Definite Matrices and Applications to Hadamard Products, Lin. Alg. Appl. 26, 203–241 (1979).
  13. H. Epstein, Remarks on Two Theorems of E. Lieb, Comm. Math. Phys., 31:317–325, (1973).
  14. M. B. Ruskai, Inequalities for Quantum Entropy: A Review With Conditions for Equality, J. Math. Phys., 43(9):4358–4375, (2002).
  15. M. B. Ruskai, Another Short and Elementary Proof of Strong Subadditivity of Quantum Entropy, Reports Math. Phys. 60, 1–12 (2007).
  16. G. Lindblad, Expectations and Entropyy Inequalities, Commun. Math. Phys. 39, 111–119 (1974).
  17. 17.0 17.1 C. Davis, A Schwarz inequality for convex operator functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 8, 42–44, (1957).
  18. F. Hansen, G. K. Pedersen, Jensen's Operator Inequality, Bull. London Math. Soc. 35 (4): 553–564, (2003).
  19. E. H. Lieb, W. E. Thirring, Inequalities for the Moments of the Eigenvalues of the Schrödinger Hamiltonian and Their Relation to Sobolev Inequalities, in Studies in Mathematical Physics, edited E. Lieb, B. Simon, and A. Wightman, Princeton University Press, 269-303 (1976).
  20. H. Araki, On an Inequality of Lieb and Thirring, Lett. Math. Phys. 19, 167-170 (1990).
  21. E. Effros, A Matrix Convexity Approach to Some Celebrated Quantum Inequalities, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, n.4, 1006–1008 (2009).