Noisy-channel coding theorem

From formulasearchengine
Revision as of 12:01, 7 December 2013 by en>Welsh (Link repair: IEEE Communication Letters -> IEEE Communications Letters - You can help!)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

30 year-old Entertainer or Range Artist Wesley from Drumheller, really loves vehicle, property developers properties for sale in singapore singapore and horse racing. Finds inspiration by traveling to Works of Antoni Gaudí. The World Football Elo Ratings is a ranking system for men's national teams in association football. The method used to rank teams is based upon the Elo rating system method but modified to take various football-specific variables into account. These ratings should not be confused with the FIFA World Rankings, which is more prevalent because it is the official rating system used by the international governing body of football to rank national teams.

The ratings consider all international "A" matches for which results could be found. Ratings tend to converge on a team's true strength relative to its competitors after about 30 matches.[1] Ratings for teams with fewer than 30 matches should be considered provisional.

The FIFA Women's World Rankings system uses a modified version of the Elo formula whereas the FIFA men's ranking system uses a non-Elo formula.

Top 100 ranking

Current table, as of 24 January 2014, of the World Football Elo Ratings, compiled by the World Football Elo Ratings web site.

Each national team's FIFA World Rankings as of 19 December 2013.[2] Cell color indicates confederation.

Template:Col-begin Template:Col-2

Elo Rank Team Points Confederation FIFA Rank
1 Template:Fb 2110 CONMEBOL 10
2 Template:Fb 2082 UEFA 1
3 Template:Fb 2060 UEFA 2
4 Template:Fb 1994 CONMEBOL 3
5 Template:Fb 1979 UEFA 9
6 Template:Fb 1912 CONMEBOL 4
7 Template:Fb 1906 UEFA 13
8 Template:Fb 1905 UEFA 5
9 Template:Fb 1898 CONMEBOL 6
10 Template:Fb 1896 CONMEBOL 15
11 Template:Fb 1887 UEFA 7
12 Template:Fb 1855 UEFA 20
13 Template:Fb 1841 CONCACAF 14
14 Template:Fb 1822 UEFA 8
15 Template:Fb 1819 UEFA 22
16 Template:Fb 1816 CONMEBOL 23
17 Template:Fb 1813 UEFA 12
18 Template:Fb 1807 UEFA 11
19 Template:Fb 1806 UEFA 27
20 Template:Fb 1796 UEFA 18
21 Template:Fb 1786 CAF 17
22 Template:Fb 1784 CONCACAF 21
23 Template:Fb 1779 UEFA 16
24 Template:Fb 1758 UEFA 19
25 Template:Fb 1747 AFC 47
26 Template:Fb 1733 UEFA 28
27 Template:Fb 1729 UEFA 25
28 Template:Fb 1727 UEFA 30
29 Template:Fb 1719 AFC 33
30 Template:Fb 1718 CAF 37
31 Template:Fb 1711 CONCACAF 31
Template:Fb 1711 AFC 58
33 Template:Fb 1700 CAF 24
34 Template:Fb 1696 CONMEBOL 39
35 Template:Fb 1695 CAF 41
36 Template:Fb 1686 UEFA 43
Template:Fb 1686 UEFA 67
38 Template:Fb 1685 CONMEBOL 36
39 Template:Fb 1683 CONCACAF 38
40 Template:Fb 1681 CONMEBOL 51
41 Template:Fb 1680 UEFA 32
42 Template:Fb 1672 AFC 54
43 Template:Fb 1671 UEFA 34
44 Template:Fb 1664 CONCACAF 42
45 Template:Fb 1650 UEFA 44
46 Template:Fb 1646 UEFA 64
47 Template:Fb 1643 AFC 71
48 Template:Fb 1639 AFC 68
49 Template:Fb 1638 UEFA 46
50 Template:Fb 1633 UEFA 29

Template:Col-2

Elo Rank Team Points Confederation FIFA Rank
51 Template:Fb 1624 UEFA 76
52 Template:Fb 1618 UEFA 63
53 Template:Fb 1613 UEFA 74
54 Template:Fb 1603 CONMEBOL 70
55 Template:Fb 1593 CAF 50
56 Template:Fb 1603 UEFA 54
57 Template:Fb 1585 CAF 62
58 Template:Fb 1583 AFC 92
59 Template:Fb 1582 CAF 26
60 Template:Fb 1580 UEFA 60
61 Template:Fb 1577 AFC 138
62 Template:Fb 1570 CAF 65
63 Template:Fb 1566 UEFA 52
64 Template:Fb 1562 AFC 85
65 Template:Fb 1560 UEFA 81
Template:Fb 1560 OFC 90
67 Template:Fb 1558 CAF 45
Template:Fb 1558 UEFA 56
69 Template:Fb 1555 UEFA 35
70 Template:Fb 1552 CAF 59
71 Template:Fb 1551 CAF 53
72 Template:Fb 1549 AFC 105
73 Template:Fb 1544 AFC 65
74 Template:Fb 1529 CAF 73
75 Template:Fb 1519 AFC 87
76 Template:Fb 1518 CAF 61
77 Template:Fb 1516 CAF 86
78 Template:Fb 1508 CAF 39
Template:Fb 1508 CONCACAF 90
80 Template:Fb 1507 UEFA 49
81 Template:Fb 1506 AFC 110
82 Template:Fb 1504 CAF 48
83 Template:Fb 1501 CONCACAF 80
84 Template:Fb 1499 CONCACAF 78
85 Template:Fb 1494 AFC 103
86 Template:Fb 1488 UEFA 83
87 Template:Fb 1484 UEFA 57
88 Template:Fb 1480 CAF 77
89 Template:Fb 1477 CAF 69
90 Template:Fb 1473 CAF 72
91 Template:Fb 1465 UEFA 101
92 Template:Fb 1464 CONCACAF 112
93 Template:Fb 1460 CONCACAF 113
94 Template:Fb 1459 AFC 129
95 Template:Fb 1450 CAF 109
96 Template:Fb 1448 CAF 82
97 Template:Fb 1442 CAF 88
Template:Fb 1442 UEFA 94
99 Template:Fb 1437 AFC 110
100 Template:Fb 1433 UEFA 116

Template:Col-end

Strongest teams since the mid to late 1960s

Time averaged Elo or Elo-like scores are routinely used to compare chess player strengths.[3][4][5] The following is a list of the national teams with the highest average Elo score from 1 January 1970 to 1 January 2014. Before this time intercontinental play was fairly limited and many nations in Africa, North America, and Asia had played too few games yet to create a representative Elo score. Since Elo scores reflect past accomplishments, the table represents the relative strength of national teams since the mid to late 1960s.

Rank Country Avg Elo
1 Template:Fb 2012.1
2 Template:Fb[6] 1975.3
3 Template:Fb 1924.3
4 Template:Fb 1923.6
5 Template:Fb 1923.0
6 Template:Fb 1908.7
7 Template:Fb 1902.0
8 Template:Fb 1881.5
9 Template:Fb[7] 1852.8
10 Template:Fb[8] 1833.0
11 Template:Fb[9] 1817.5
12 Template:Fb 1816.9
13 Template:Fb 1798.9
14 Template:Fb 1781.9
15 Template:Fb 1774.5
16 Template:Fb 1773.4
17 Template:Fb 1771.3
18 Template:Fb 1761.1
Rank Country Avg Elo
19 Template:Fb 1757.1
20 Template:Fb 1739.3
21 Template:Fb 1727.3
22 Template:Fb 1721.1
23 Template:Fb 1716.0
24 Template:Fb 1709.4
25 Template:Fb 1696.4
26 Template:Fb 1689.1
27 Template:Fb 1686.0
28 Template:Fb 1685.4
29 Template:Fb 1681.2
30 Template:Fb 1676.0
31 Template:Fb 1666.3
32 Template:Fb 1654.8
33 Template:Fb 1654.4
34 Template:Fb 1654.2
35 Template:Fb 1653.8
Rank Country Avg Elo
36 Template:Fb 1645.6
37 Template:Fb 1644.5
38 Template:Fb 1643.8
39 Template:Fb 1638.3
40 Template:Fb 1637.5
41 Template:Fb 1637.3
42 Template:Fb 1633.8
43 Template:Fb 1611.3
44 Template:Fb 1609.6
45 Template:Fb 1603.5
46 Template:Fb 1602.2
47 Template:Fb 1595.9
48 Template:Fb 1595.8
49 Template:Fb 1589.5
50 Template:Fb 1580.8
51 Template:Fb 1569.6
52 Template:Fb 1561.3

List of number one teams

The following is the list of nations who have achieved the number one position on the World Football Elo Ratings since 2000: Template:Col-begin Template:Col-3

Start Date Nation # of days
5 Jun 1999 Template:Fb 389
28 Jun 2000 Template:Fb 708
6 Jun 2002 Template:Fb 1
7 Jun 2002 Template:Fb 4
11 Jun 2002 Template:Fb 1
12 Jun 2002 Template:Fb 4
16 Jun 2002 Template:Fb 5
21 Jun 2002 Template:Fb 351
7 Jun 2003 Template:Fb 4
11 Jun 2003 Template:Fb 8
19 Jun 2003 Template:Fb 83
10 Sep 2003 Template:Fb 291
27 Jun 2004 Template:Fb 4
1 Jul 2004 Template:Fb 10

Template:Col-3

Start Date Nation # of days
11 Jul 2004 Template:Fb 3
14 Jul 2004 Template:Fb 35
18 Aug 2004 Template:Fb 290
4 Jun 2005 Template:Fb 4
8 Jun 2005 Template:Fb 21
29 Jun 2005 Template:Fb 102
9 Oct 2005 Template:Fb 3
12 Oct 2005 Template:Fb 265
4 Jul 2006 Template:Fb 43
16 Aug 2006 Template:Fb 52
7 Oct 2006 Template:Fb 122
6 Feb 2007 Template:Fb 1
7 Feb 2007 Template:Fb 140

Template:Col-3

Start Date Nation # of days
27 Jun 2007 Template:Fb 14
11 Jul 2007 Template:Fb 4
15 Jul 2007 Template:Fb 334
13 Jun 2008 Template:Fb / Template:Fb 2
15 Jun 2008 Template:Fb 6
21 Jun 2008 Template:Fb 368
24 Jun 2009 Template:Fb 373
2 Jul 2010 Template:Fb 1
3 Jul 2010 Template:Fb / Template:Fb 3
6 Jul 2010 Template:Fb 1
7 Jul 2010 Template:Fb 1089
30 Jun 2013 Template:Fb 45
14 Aug 2013 Template:Fb 59
12 Oct 2013 Template:Fb Template:Age in days

Template:Col-end

Ranking by days as leader since 1 January 2000

Nation # of days Last Date as Leader
Template:Fb 2204 Current
Template:Fb 1523 12 October 2013
Template:Fb 1115 10 July 2007
Template:Fb 316 14 July 2007
Template:Fb 109 6 July 2010
Template:Fb 43 15 August 2006
Template:Fb 8 7 June 2005

All-time highest ratings

The following is a list of national football teams ranked by their highest Elo score ever reached. Template:Col-begin Template:Col-2

Rank Nation Points Date
1 Template:Fb 2166 30 June 1954
2 Template:Fb 2153 17 June 1962
3 Template:Fb 2142 23 June 2013
4 Template:Fb 2117 3 April 1957
5 Template:Fb 2106 15 August 2001
6 Template:Fb 2101 6 July 2010
7 Template:Fb 2099 4 September 1974 (as West Germany)
8 Template:Fb 2079 20 July 1939
9 Template:Fb 2047 1 September 1974
10 Template:Fb 2041 22 October 1966
11 Template:Fb 2035 13 June 1928
12 Template:Fb 2023 9 October 1983 (as Soviet Union)
13 Template:Fb 1999 27 June 2004
14 Template:Fb 1998 31 May 1934
15 Template:Fb 1983 15 November 2000
16 Template:Fb 1967 11 July 1998
17 Template:Fb 1961 25 June 1998 (as FR Yugoslavia)
18 Template:Fb 1960 13 June 1986
19 Template:Fb 1953 10 March 1888
20 Template:Fb 1950 25 June 1950
Template:Fb 1950 22 June 1974
22 Template:Fb 1936 19 June 2005
23 Template:Fb 1932 21 February 1954
24 Template:Fb 1919 12 July 2011
25 Template:Fb 1916 9 September 1981

Template:Col-2

Rank Nation Points Date
26 Template:Fb 1913 13 June 2000
27 Template:Fb 1912 5 June 1994
28 Template:Fb 1909 9 June 1990
29 Template:Fb 1896 18 August 2004
30 Template:Fb 1889 21 August 2002
31 Template:Fb 1881 26 January 2013
32 Template:Fb 1876 22 June 1994
33 Template:Fb 1871 8 July 2009
34 Template:Fb 1867 14 December 1997
Template:Fb 1867 15 August 2001
Template:Fb 1867 19 June 2003
37 Template:Fb 1862 26 March 2013
38 Template:Fb 1859 20 May 1981
39 Template:Fb 1856 15 June 1969
Template:Fb 1856 11 June 1978
41 Template:Fb 1849 26 June 2003
42 Template:Fb 1835 31 January 2010
43 Template:Fb 1824 8 June 2005
44 Template:Fb 1820 15 November 2013
45 Template:Fb 1818 22 June 2002
46 Template:Fb 1816 5 June 2004
47 Template:Fb 1809 23 April 1986
48 Template:Fb 1803 16 June 2002
49 Template:Fb 1800 10 March 1960
50 Template:Fb 1799 3 February 2008

Template:Col-end

Averages by decade

The table below shows the teams with the best average Elo score per decade (Jan 1 19X0 - Dec 31 19X9). Because the Elö scores take into account past achievements with an inercy of months, the averaging over a decade is more representative of the teams' strengths for a decade starting a few years earlier and ending with the latest results of the decade relatively underweighted. For instance, this partially explains England claiming #3 spot despite missing two WCs in the 70s, boosted by results legacy from the late 60s. Or conversely the surging of France in the late 90s and Spain in the late 00s not being fully reflected in that decade but rather on the subsequent one.

Rank 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s
1 1911

Template:Fb

1976

Template:Fb

2036

Template:Fb

2025

Template:Fb

1962

Template:Fb

2 1873

Template:Fb

1970

Template:Fb

2018

Template:Fb

1997

Template:Fb

1928

Template:Fb

3 1859

Template:Fb

1899

Template:Fb

1892

Template:Fb

1996

Template:Fb

1924

Template:Fb

4 1843

Template:Fb

1868

Template:Fb

1876

Template:Fb

1917

Template:Fb

1923

Template:Fb

5 1820

Template:Fb

1866

Template:Fb

1858

Template:Fb

1870

Template:Fb

1917

Template:Fb

6 1795

Template:Fb

1859

Template:Fb

1852

Template:Fb

1856

Template:Fb

1887

Template:Fb

7 1771

Template:Fb

1841

Template:Fb

1841

Template:Fb

1853

Template:Fb

1867

Template:Fb

8 1768

Template:Fb

1814

Template:Fb

1832

Template:Fb

1850

Template:Fb

1852

Template:Fb

9 1761

Template:Fb

1810

Template:Fb

1814

Template:Fb

1817

Template:Fb

1843

Template:Fb

10 1760

Template:Fb

1785

Template:Fb

1768

Template:Fb

1815

Template:Fb

1840

Template:Fb

11 1739

Template:Fb

1759

Template:Fb

1766

Template:Fb

1799

Template:Fb

1810

Template:Fb

12 1712

Template:Fb

1685

Template:Fb

1746

Template:Fb

1796

Template:Fb

1800

Template:Fb

13 1734

Template:Fb

1790

Template:Fb

1796

Template:Fb

14 1753

Template:Fb

1783

Template:Fb

15 1728

Template:Fb

1741

Template:Fb


Rank 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s [10]
1 2060

Template:Fb

1975

Template:Fb

1998

Template:Fb

1998

Template:Fb

2104

Template:Fb

2 2040

Template:Fb

1964

Template:Fb

1988

Template:Fb

1984

Template:Fb

2057

Template:Fb

3 1948

Template:Fb

1951

Template:Fb

1952

Template:Fb

1966

Template:Fb

2023

Template:Fb

4 1933

Template:Fb

1927

Template:Fb

1928

Template:Fb

1964

Template:Fb

2023

Template:Fb

5 1888

Template:Fb

1897

Template:Fb

1920

Template:Fb

1955

Template:Fb

1946

Template:Fb

6 1883

Template:Fb

1890

Template:Fb

1904

Template:Fb

1941

Template:Fb

1924

Template:Fb

7 1877

Template:Fb

1884

Template:Fb

1901

Template:Fb[11]

1916

Template:Fb

1876

Template:Fb

8 1869

Template:Fb

1884

Template:Fb

1901

Template:Fb

1891

Template:Fb

1871

Template:Fb

9 1861

Template:Fb

1847

Template:Fb

1869

Template:Fb

1887

Template:Fb

1869

Template:Fb

10 1851

Template:Fb

1839

Template:Fb

1869

Template:Fb

1872

Template:Fb

1858

Template:Fb

11 1838

Template:Fb

1820

Template:Fb

1842

Template:Fb[12]

1838

Template:Fb

1852

Template:Fb

12 1831

Template:Fb

1819

Template:Fb

1834

Template:Fb

1825

Template:Fb

1846

Template:Fb

13 1830

Template:Fb

1818

Template:Fb

1828

Template:Fb

1821

Template:Fb

1822

Template:Fb

14 1809

Template:Fb

1803

Template:Fb

1825

Template:Fb[13]

1807

Template:Fb

1820

Template:Fb

15 1803

Template:Fb

1785

Template:Fb

1825

Template:Fb

1799

Template:Fb

1816

Template:Fb

16 1793

Template:Fb

1784

Template:Fb

1813

Template:Fb

1790

Template:Fb

1794

Template:Fb

17 1771

Template:Fb

1784

Template:Fb

1810

Template:Fb

1786

Template:Fb

1793

Template:Fb

18 1766

Template:Fb

1776

Template:Fb

1784

Template:Fb

1785

Template:Fb

1775

Template:Fb

19 1766

Template:Fb

1775

Template:Fb

1776

Template:Fb

1782

Template:Fb

1769

Template:Fb

20 1755

Template:Fb

1773

Template:Fb

1773

Template:Fb

1774

Template:Fb

1758

Template:Fb

Highest rated matches

A list of the 10 matches between teams with the highest combined Elo ratings (the nation's points before the matches are given).

Rank Combined
points
Nation 1 Elo 1 Nation 2 Elo 2 Score Date Occasion Location
1 4212 Template:Fb 2101 Template:Fb 2111 0 : 1 aet 2010-07-10 World Cup F 41 yr old Film, Tv, Radio and Stage Owners Anton Lester from Lively, has many hobbies which include guitar, property developers in singapore apartment for sale and rowing. Recalls what an attractive place it had been having gone to San Marino Historic Centre and Mount Titano. Johannesburg
2 4190 Template:Fb 2063 Template:Fb 2127 3 : 0 2013-06-30 Confederations Cup F 41 yr old Film, Tv, Radio and Stage Owners Anton Lester from Lively, has many hobbies which include guitar, property developers in singapore apartment for sale and rowing. Recalls what an attractive place it had been having gone to San Marino Historic Centre and Mount Titano. Rio de Janeiro
3 4161 Template:Fb 1995 Template:Fb 2166 3 : 2 1954-07-04 World Cup F 41 yr old Film, Tv, Radio and Stage Owners Anton Lester from Lively, has many hobbies which include guitar, property developers in singapore apartment for sale and rowing. Recalls what an attractive place it had been having gone to San Marino Historic Centre and Mount Titano. Bern
4 4159 Template:Fb 2051 Template:Fb 2108 2 : 1 2010-07-02 World Cup QF 41 yr old Film, Tv, Radio and Stage Owners Anton Lester from Lively, has many hobbies which include guitar, property developers in singapore apartment for sale and rowing. Recalls what an attractive place it had been having gone to San Marino Historic Centre and Mount Titano. Port Elizabeth
5 4151 Template:Fb 2061 Template:Fb 2090 0 : 0 2011-06-04 Friendly 41 yr old Film, Tv, Radio and Stage Owners Anton Lester from Lively, has many hobbies which include guitar, property developers in singapore apartment for sale and rowing. Recalls what an attractive place it had been having gone to San Marino Historic Centre and Mount Titano. Goiânia
6 4149 Template:Fb 2068 Template:Fb 2081 0 : 1 1973-06-16 Friendly 41 yr old Film, Tv, Radio and Stage Owners Anton Lester from Lively, has many hobbies which include guitar, property developers in singapore apartment for sale and rowing. Recalls what an attractive place it had been having gone to San Marino Historic Centre and Mount Titano. Berlin
7 4129 Template:Fb 2085 Template:Fb 2044 1 : 0 2010-07-07 World Cup SF 41 yr old Film, Tv, Radio and Stage Owners Anton Lester from Lively, has many hobbies which include guitar, property developers in singapore apartment for sale and rowing. Recalls what an attractive place it had been having gone to San Marino Historic Centre and Mount Titano. Durban
8 4120 Template:Fb 2051 Template:Fb 2069 1 : 0 1982-03-21 Friendly 41 yr old Film, Tv, Radio and Stage Owners Anton Lester from Lively, has many hobbies which include guitar, property developers in singapore apartment for sale and rowing. Recalls what an attractive place it had been having gone to San Marino Historic Centre and Mount Titano. Rio de Janeiro
9 4118 Template:Fb 2108 Template:Fb 2010 4 : 2 1954-06-27 World Cup QF 41 yr old Film, Tv, Radio and Stage Owners Anton Lester from Lively, has many hobbies which include guitar, property developers in singapore apartment for sale and rowing. Recalls what an attractive place it had been having gone to San Marino Historic Centre and Mount Titano. Bern
10 4116 Template:Fb 2141 Template:Fb 1975 4 : 2 1954-06-30 World Cup SF 41 yr old Film, Tv, Radio and Stage Owners Anton Lester from Lively, has many hobbies which include guitar, property developers in singapore apartment for sale and rowing. Recalls what an attractive place it had been having gone to San Marino Historic Centre and Mount Titano. Lausanne

History

This system, developed by Hungarian-American mathematician Dr. Árpád Élő, is used by FIDE, the international chess federation, to rate chess players, and by the European Go Federation, to rate Go players. In 1997 Bob Runyan adapted the Elo rating system to international football and posted the results on the Internet. He was also the first maintainer of the World Football Elo Ratings web site, now maintained by Kirill Bulygin.

Overview

The Elo system was adapted for football by adding a weighting for the kind of match, an adjustment for the home team advantage, and an adjustment for goal difference in the match result.

The factors taken into consideration when calculating a team's new rating are:

  • The team's old rating
  • The considered weight of the tournament
  • The goal difference of the match
  • The result of the match
  • The expected result of the match

The different weights of competitions in descending order are:

The single difference is Elo giving a special treatment for minor tournaments, while FIFA consider them as friendly matches.

These ratings take into account all international "A" matches for which results could be found. Ratings tend to converge on a team's true strength relative to its competitors after about 30 matches. Ratings for teams with fewer than 30 matches should be considered provisional. Match data are primarily from International Football 1872 – present web site.

Basic calculation principles

The basic principle behind the Elo ratings is only in its simplest form similar to that of a league, unlike the FIFA tables who effectively run their table as a normal league table, but with weightings to take into account the other factors, the Elo system has its one formula which takes into account the factors mentioned above. There is no first step as in the FIFA system where a team immediately receives points for the result, there is just one calculation in the Elo system.

The ratings are based on the following formulae:

Rn=Ro+KG(WWe)

or

P=KG(WWe)

Where;

Rn = The new team rating
Ro = The old team rating
K = Weight index regarding the tournament of the match
G = A number from the index of goal differences
W = The result of the match
We = The expected result
P = Points Change

Status of match

The status of the match is incorporated by the use of a weight constant. The weight is a constant regarding the "weight" or importance of a match, defined by which tournament the match is in, they are as follows;

Tournament or Match type Index (K)
World Cup Finals 60
Continental Championship and Intercontinental Tournaments 50
World Cup and Continental qualifiers and major tournaments 40
All other tournaments 30
Friendly Matches 20

Number of goals

The number of goals is taken into account by use of a goal difference index. G is increased by half if a game is won by two goals, and if the game is won by three or more goals by a number decided through the appropriate calculation shown below;

If the game is a draw or is won by one goal

G=1

If the game is won by two goals

G=32

If the game is won by three or more goals

  • Where N is the goal difference
G=11+N8

Table of examples:

Goal Difference Coefficient of K (G)
0 1
+1 1
+2 1.5
+3 1.75
+4 1.875
+5 2
+6 2.125
+7 2.25
+8 2.375
+9 2.5
+10 2.625

Result of match

W is the result of the game (1 for a win, 0.5 for a draw, and 0 for a loss).

Expected result of match

We is the expected result (win expectancy with a draw counting as 0.5) from the following formula:

We=110dr/400+1

where dr equals the difference in ratings plus 100 points for a team playing at home. So dr of 0 gives 0.5, of 120 gives 0.666 to the higher-ranked team and 0.334 to the lower, and of 800 gives 0.99 to the higher-ranked team and 0.01 to the lower.

Examples

The same examples have been used on the FIFA World Rankings for a fair comparison. Some actual examples should help to make the methods of calculation clear. In this instance it is assumed that three teams of different strengths are involved in a small friendly tournament on neutral territory.

Before the tournament the three teams have the following point totals.

Team Points
A 630
B 500
C 480

Thus, team A is by some distance the highest ranked of the three: The following table shows the points allocations based on three possible outcomes of the match between the strongest team A, and the somewhat weaker team B:

Example 1

Team A versus Team B (Team A stronger than Team B)

Team A Team B Team A Team B Team A Team B
Score 3 : 1 1 : 3 2 : 2
K 20 20 20 20 20 20
G 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1 1
W 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.5
We 0.679 0.321 0.679 0.321 0.679 0.321
Total (P) +9.63 -9.63 -20.37 +20.37 -3.58 +3.58

Example 2

Team B versus Team C (both teams approximately the same strength)

When the difference in strength between the two teams is less, so also will be the difference in points allocation. The following table illustrates how the points would be divided following the same results as above, but with two roughly equally ranked teams, B and C, being involved:

Team B Team C Team B Team C Team B Team C
Score 3 : 1 1 : 3 2 : 2
K 20 20 20 20 20 20
G 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1 1
W 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.5
We 0.529 0.471 0.529 0.471 0.529 0.471
Total (P) +14.13 -14.13 -15.87 +15.87 -0.58 +0.58

Note that Team B loses more ranking points by losing to Team C than by losing to Team A.

See also

Notes

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

External links

Hostgator Discount Codes - http://orichinese.com/member/demi0000bscwl/groups/my-groups/. Choosing the right web hosting service is essential. The last thing you wish to do is get a website published with a hosting service (after learning to utilize that hosting service), and afterwards be disappointed with the service and need to mess around with moving your internet site to another hosting service.

I'm a delighted HostGator consumer. I make use of both HostGator and Bluehost. I recommend both. This post is a comprehensive HostGator review.

I'll start with among the most vital factors to consider: Price

HostGator has several pricing strategies. They are as follows (since the date this article was published):.

Hatchling Plan: as low as $4.95 per month with a 3 year commitment. On this strategy you can host one website.
Infant Plan: as low as $7.95 per month with a 3 year commitment. On this plan you can host an unlimited number of sites.
Company Plan: as reduced as $12.95 per month with 3 year commitment.

You do not need to commit for 3 years. With much shorter term dedications, you'll pay slightly more per month.

You can also get your own specialized server if this is something you such as to have.

Unlimited number of websites.

I wouldn't consider a hosting service that didn't let me host a limitless number of internet sites for one month-to-month rate under $10. I have a number of sites and I like the versatility of being able to construct more websites at no additional expense (other than for signing up the domain name).

If you go with the Infant Strategy (this is the strategy I have) or Business Strategy, you can host as lots of websites on as lots of domain names as you like. This is where making use of a hosting service like HostGator can conserve you a terrific offer of money in the long run versus making use of a website builder or having a website designer host your websites. When you make use of a website contractor or have a website designer host your site, you'll normally pay additional for each added website (or each additional set of sites).

The drawback naturally, is you need to handle your very own hosting. However, thankfully, this isn't difficult with the user friendly CPanel and technical support.

Domain registration.

You can easily register domain names with HostGator. Absolutely nothing could be even worse than developing a terrific site and then to lose it all due to the fact that you forgot to renew your domain name. It's possible then that someone else registers your domain name and you can't get it again.

All HostGator plans offer unlimited bandwidth.

This is excellent and you should require this with any website hosting service. I would not think about utilizing a hosting service that didn't provide unlimited bandwidth.

Simple CPanel Dash panel.

You manage your internet sites with HostGator in a dash panel referred to as a CPanel. The CPanel is a user friendly interface to handle your internet sites and domains.

Easy website setup.

I particularly require with any hosting service that I use can install WordPress with basically a single click or a series of easy clicks. HostGator provides Fantastico De Luxe and QuickInstall choices for quickly setting up WordPress and numerous various other scripts to build your website (i.e. Joomla and others).

Access to 4,500 website design templates.

For any web designer, this is huge. The design templates are great. They are mainly HTML and Flash feature templates. You can pick from over 115 categories. This is a great method to build websites inexpensively for customers. You can examine out these templates for yourself on the HostGator website without having to sign up.

Free website home builders.

With an account, you can quickly construct an internet site with one of 2 website home builders you get access to. The 2 site builders are:.

Trendy Website Contractor, and.
Site Studio website builder.

Note, you can just use the website builders for one internet site on your account. Exactly what this indicates is if you get an account where you can host unlimited domains, you can only develop one website with a website home builder.

E-mail accounts.

You get unrestricted POP3 email accounts with SMTP. Having email accounts on your custom domain is more expert than a gmail or hotmail e-mail account.

45 day money back assure.

You can get your refund if you cancel your account within 45 days if HostGator isn't really for you.

Video tutorials.

HostGator gives you access to numerous video tutorials that step you through lots of procedures.

Consumer support.

The operators for technical support understand a lot about working in HostGator. If you have a question about customizing a WordPress theme, HostGator won't aid you (I found this to be the case with Bluehost.

1 Objection of HostGator.

I had to call HostGator to verify my account upon opening it. This didn't take long, but it was an extra step. I would have chosen just to sign up and start without having to call them for verification.

  1. Template:Cite web
  2. Template:Cite press release
  3. Arpad E. Elo, The Rating of Chessplayers, Past and Present, Arco, 1978. ISBN 0-668-04721-6.
  4. Arpad Elo, Chess Life, 1962.
  5. About the Chessmetrics Rating System, by Jeff Sonas
  6. Representing West Germany from 1949 to 1990
  7. Combined record of the USSR (1970-1992), the CIS (1992), and Russia national football teams (1992-present)
  8. Combined record of Czechoslovakia (1970-1992) and Czech national football teams (1993-present)
  9. Combined record of Yugoslavia (1970-1992), Serbia and Montenegro (1994-2006) and Serbia national football teams (2006-present)
  10. (up to January 1st, 2014)
  11. Combined record of Yugoslavia (1990-1992) and FR of Yugoslavia (1994-1999)
  12. Combined record of Czechoslovakia (1990-1992) and Czech national football teams (1993-1999)
  13. Combined record of the USSR (1990-1992), the CIS (1992), and Russia national football teams (1992-1999)