Charge (physics)

From formulasearchengine
Revision as of 17:16, 19 August 2013 by en>Headbomb (Undid revision 569239839 by 106.201.186.55 (talk) no)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:No footnotes

In algebraic topology the cap product is a method of adjoining a chain of degree p with a cochain of degree q, such that qp, to form a composite chain of degree pq. It was introduced by Eduard Čech in 1936, and independently by Hassler Whitney in 1938.

Definition

Let X be a topological space and R a coefficient ring. The cap product is a bilinear map on singular homology and cohomology

:Hp(X;R)×Hq(X;R)Hpq(X;R).

defined by contracting a singular chain σ:ΔpX with a singular cochain ψCq(X;R), by the formula :

σψ=ψ(σ|[v0,,vq])σ|[vq,,vp].

Here, the notation σ|[v0,,vq] indicates the restriction of the simplicial map σ to its face spanned by the vectors of the base, see Simplex.

Interpretation

In analogy with the interpretation of the cup product in terms of the Künneth formula, we can explain the existence of the cap product by considering the composition

C(X)C(X)Δ*IdC(X)C(X)C(X)IdεC(X)

in terms of the chain and cochain complexes of X, where we are taking tensor products of chain complexes, Δ:XX×X is the diagonal map which induces the map Δ* on the chain complex, and ε:Cp(X)Cq(X) is the evaluation map (always 0 except for p=q).

This composition then passes to the quotient to define the cap product :H(X)×H(X)H(X), and looking carefully at the above composition shows that it indeed takes the form of maps :Hp(X)×Hq(X)Hpq(X), which is always zero for p<q.

The slant product

The above discussion indicates that the same operation can be defined on cartesian products X×Y yielding a product

:Hp(X;R)Hq(X×Y;R)Hqp(Y;R).

In case X = Y, the two products are related by the diagonal map.

Equations

The boundary of a cap product is given by :

(σψ)=(1)q(σψσδψ).

Given a map f the induced maps satisfy :

f*(σ)ψ=f*(σf*(ψ)).

The cap and cup product are related by :

ψ(σφ)=(φψ)(σ)

where

σ:Δp+qX , ψCq(X;R)and φCp(X;R).

An interesting consequence of the last equation is that it makes H(X;R) into a right H(X;R) module.

See also

References