Laplace expansion

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, in the field of functional analysis, a Minkowski functional is a function that recovers a notion of distance on a linear space.

Let K be a symmetric convex body in a linear space V. We define a function p on V as

p(x)=inf{λ>0:xλK}

if that infimum is well-defined.[1]

Motivation

Example 1

Consider a normed vector space X, with the norm ||·||. Let K be the unit sphere in X. Define a function p : X → R by

p(x)=inf{r>0:xrK}.

One can see that p(x)=x, i.e. p is just the norm on X. The function p is a special case of a Minkowski functional.

Example 2

Let X be a vector space without topology with underlying scalar field K. Take φ ∈ X' , the algebraic dual of X, i.e. φ : X → K is a linear functional on X. Fix a > 0. Let the set K be given by

K={xX:|ϕ(x)|a}.

Again we define

p(x)=inf{r>0:xrK}.

Then

p(x)=1a|ϕ(x)|.

The function p(x) is another instance of a Minkowski functional. It has the following properties:

  1. It is subadditive: p(x + y) ≤ p(x) + p(y),
  2. It is homogeneous: for all αK, p(α x) = |α| p(x),
  3. It is nonnegative.

Therefore p is a seminorm on X, with an induced topology. This is characteristic of Minkowski functionals defined via "nice" sets. There is a one-to-one correspondence between seminorms and the Minkowski functional given by such sets. What is meant precisely by "nice" is discussed in the section below.

Notice that, in contrast to a stronger requirement for a norm, p(x) = 0 need not imply x = 0. In the above example, one can take a nonzero x from the kernel of φ. Consequently, the resulting topology need not be Hausdorff.

Definition

The above examples suggest that, given a (complex or real) vector space X and a subset K, one can define a corresponding Minkowski functional

pK:X[0,)

by

pK(x)=inf{r>0:xrK},

which is often called the gauge of K.

It is implicitly assumed in this definition that 0 ∈ K and the set {r > 0: xr K} is nonempty. In order for pK to have the properties of a seminorm, additional restrictions must be imposed on K. These conditions are listed below.

  1. The set K being convex implies the subadditivity of pK.
  2. Homogeneity, i.e. pK(α x) = |α| pK(x) for all α, is ensured if K is balanced, meaning α KK for all |α| ≤ 1.

A set K with these properties is said to be absolutely convex.

Convexity of K

A simple geometric argument that shows convexity of K implies subadditivity is as follows. Suppose for the moment that pK(x) = pK(y) = r. Then for all ε > 0, we have x, y ∈ (r + ε) K = K' . The assumption that K is convex means K' is also. Therefore ½ x + ½ y is in K' . By definition of the Minkowski functional pK, one has

pK(12x+12y)r+ϵ=12pK(x)+12pK(y)+ϵ.

But the left hand side is ½ pK(x + y), i.e. the above becomes

pK(x+y)pK(x)+pK(y)+ϵ,for allϵ>0.

This is the desired inequality. The general case pK(x) > pK(y) is obtained after the obvious modification.

Note Convexity of K, together with the initial assumption that the set {r > 0: xr K} is nonempty, implies that K is absorbent.

Balancedness of K

Notice that K being balanced implies that

λxrKif and only ifxr|λ|K.

Therefore

pK(λx)=inf{r>0:λxrK}=inf{r>0:xr|λ|K}=inf{|λ|r|λ|>0:xr|λ|K}=|λ|pK(x).

See also

Notes

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

References

  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  1. Thompson (1996) p.17