MMH-Badger MAC: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>SchreiberBike
Repairing links to disambiguation pages - You can help! - Products
 
en>Niceguyedc
m WPCleaner v1.27 - Repaired 1 link to disambiguation page - (You can help) - Modulo
Line 1: Line 1:
Anyway I thought that ice chest = ice chest = ice chest as lengthy as you chose a trustworthy maker. Everybody loves re-purposing old points into greater-seeking products. The ice and shrimp must be thoroughly mixed to insure rapid and adequate chilling. As the ice melts, water should really be periodically drained off.  Most freezers run a defrost cycle various occasions a day to lessen frost and ice on the walls and shelves. This is not an effective design to cool your ice chest. If your principal purpose is to cool your ice chest, as opposed to practicing your survivalist expertise, buy a propane gas cylinder.<br><br><br><br>I have a bucket heater that is waiting for a suitable cooler to pair up with. I use a more affordable Coleman cooler with my Anova sous-vide circulator for significant batches.  Igloo also has the high finish rotational molded ice chests (Yukon) like the Yeti and Engle and are also coming out with another version at a slightly decrease price point with their Sportsman version. Their ice chests are nice, but bulky and heavy.<br><br>So far I have reduce holes in the ice chest with a jigsaw and mounted the speakers, and wired every little thing so I can power the method up and test it (every little thing works terrific). The chest powers up and sounds excellent, but I am not performed yet.  I am still waiting on the waterproof  Coolers That Maintain Ice Frozen head-unit cover so I can mount the head-unit on the outdoors of the chest in in between the speakers. I may perhaps addhandful of a lot more speakers to the chest as time goes on, but undoubtedly not anytime soon.<br><br>Before I go further, let me clarify a term called roto-molded, in which is the course of action that all the ice chests under are made by, with every making use of polyethylene plastic.  Personally I'd rather have a slider and lock it down when need to have be. Provided the cost and what I can see, I assume there are better options within this group of new ice chests. I've had a couple of igloo bites more than the years and tossed an ice chest or two overboard.  Retain the ice chest in the shade as a lot as achievable.<br><br>If you are just going out on a day trip, just make certain you have a cooler that is large enough to fit almost everything you want, but not as well big that all ice will melt midday whilst on the beach. It all goes back to keeping your cooler cool, preventing ice from melting, and maintaining fantastic insulation.  One, it really is not sanitary, and two, your ice will melt faster if you enable warm water to sit in the bottom.<br><br>When you loved this article and you want to receive more info concerning [http://www.bestcoolerreviewshq.com/best-coolers-for-keeping-ice/ Bestcoolerreviewshq.Com] assure visit the web-page. Our inventory includes just about every size of the Icey-Tek line, ensuring your cooler will be spacious sufficient for your excursion. Icey-Tek Coolers are the excellent companion when you will need to maintain beverages and food cold on a camping trip, or when you want retain the drinks of your complete group cold though you are tailgating or getting a get together. Other techniques for reducing chest fat will involve specific exercises, although it is not necessarily.
In [[quantum field theory]], and especially in [[quantum electrodynamics]], the interacting theory leads to infinite quantities that have to be absorbed in a [[renormalization]] procedure, in order to be able to predict measurable quantities. The renormalization scheme can depend on the type of particles that are being considered. For particles that can travel asymptotically large distances, or for low energy processes, the '''on-shell scheme''', also known as the physical scheme, is appropriate. If these conditions are not fulfilled, one can turn to other schemes, like the [[Minimal subtraction scheme]].
 
==Fermion propagator in the interacting theory==
 
Knowing the different [[propagator]]s is the basis for being able to calculate [[Feynman diagram]]s which are useful tools to predict, for example, the result of scattering experiments. In a theory where the only field is the [[Fermionic field|Dirac field]], the Feynman propagator reads
 
:<math> \langle 0 | T(\psi(x)\bar{\psi}(0))| 0 \rangle =iS_F(x) = \int \frac{d^4p}{(2\pi)^4}\frac{ie^{-ip\cdot x}}{p\!\!\!/-m+i\epsilon} </math>
 
where <math>T</math> is the [[Time ordered#Time ordering|time-ordering operator]], <math>|0\rangle</math> the vacuum in the non interacting theory, <math>\psi(x)</math> and <math>\bar{\psi}(x)</math> the Dirac field and its Dirac adjoint, and where the left-hand side of the equation is the [[Correlation function (quantum field theory)|two-point correlation function]] of the Dirac field.
 
In a new theory, the Dirac field can interact with another field, for example with the electromagnetic field in quantum electrodynamics, and the strength of the interaction is measured by a parameter, in the case of QED it is the bare electron charge, <math>e</math>. The general form of the propagator should remain unchanged, meaning that if <math>|\Omega\rangle</math> now represents the vacuum in the interacting theory, the two-point correlation function would now read
 
:<math> \langle \Omega | T(\psi(x)\bar{\psi}(0))| \Omega \rangle = \int \frac{d^4q}{(2\pi)^4}\frac{i Z_2 e^{-i p\cdot x}}{p\!\!\!/-m_r+i\epsilon} </math>
 
Two new quantities have been introduced. First the renormalized mass <math>m_r</math> has been defined as the pole in the Fourier transform of the Feynman propagator. This is the main prescription of the on-shell renormalization scheme (there is then no need to introduce other mass scales like in the minimal subtraction scheme). The quantity <math>Z_2</math> represents the new strength of the Dirac field. As the interaction is turned down to zero by letting <math>e\rightarrow 0</math>, these new parameters should tend to a value so as to recover the propagator of the free fermion, namely <math>m_r\rightarrow m</math> and <math>Z_2\rightarrow 1</math>.
 
This means that <math>m_r</math> and <math>Z_2</math> can be defined as a series in <math>e</math> if this parameter is small enough (in the unit system where <math>\hbar=c=1</math>, <math>e=\sqrt{4\pi\alpha}\simeq 0.3</math>, where <math>\alpha</math> is the [[fine-structure constant]]). Thus these parameters can be expressed as
 
:<math>Z_2=1+\delta_2</math>
:<math>m = m_r + \delta m</math>
 
On the other hand, the modification to the propagator can be calculated up to a certain order in <math>e</math> using Feynman diagrams. These modifications are summed up in the fermion [[self energy]] <math>\Sigma(p)</math>
 
:<math> \langle \Omega | T(\psi(x)\bar{\psi}(0))| \Omega \rangle = \int \frac{d^4p}{(2\pi)^4}\frac{ie^{-i p\cdot x}}{p\!\!\!/-m - \Sigma(p) +i\epsilon} </math>
 
These corrections are often divergent because they contain [[One-loop Feynman diagram|loops]].
By identifying the two expressions of the correlation function up to a certain order in <math>e</math>, the counterterms can be defined, and they are going to absorb the divergent contributions of the corrections to the fermion propagator. Thus, the renormalized quantities, such as <math>m_r</math>, will remain finite, and will be the quantities measured in experiments.
 
==Photon propagator==
 
Just like what has been done with the fermion propagator, the form of the photon propagator inspired by the free photon field will be compared to the photon propagator calculated up to a certain order in <math>e</math> in the interacting theory. The photon self energy is noted <math>\Pi(q^2)</math> and the [[Minkowski space|metric tensor]] <math>\eta^{\mu\nu}</math> (here taking the +--- convention)
 
:<math> \langle \Omega | T(A^{\mu}(x)A^{\nu}(0))| \Omega \rangle = \int \frac{d^4q}{(2\pi)^4}\frac{-i\eta^{\mu\nu}e^{-i p\cdot x}}{q^2(1 - \Pi(q^2)) +i\epsilon} = \int \frac{d^4q}{(2\pi)^4}\frac{-iZ_3 \eta^{\mu\nu}e^{-i p\cdot x}}{q^2 +i\epsilon} </math>
 
The behaviour of the counterterm <math>\delta_3=Z_3-1</math> is independent of the momentum of the incoming photon <math>q</math>. To fix it, the behaviour of QED at large distances (which should help recover [[classical electrodynamics]]), i.e. when <math>q^2\rightarrow 0</math>, is used :
 
:<math>\frac{-i\eta^{\mu\nu}e^{-i p\cdot x}}{q^2(1 - \Pi(q^2)) +i\epsilon}\sim\frac{-i\eta^{\mu\nu}e^{-i p\cdot x}}{q^2}</math>
 
Thus the counterterm <math>\delta_3</math> is fixed with the value of <math>\Pi(0)</math>.
 
==Vertex function==
 
A similar reasoning using the [[vertex function]] leads to the renormalization of the electric charge <math>e_r</math>. This renormalization, and the fixing of renormalization terms is done using what is known from classical electrodynamics at large space scales. This leads to the value of the counterterm <math>\delta_1</math>, which is, in fact, equal to <math>\delta_2</math> because of the [[Ward-Takahashi identity]]. It is this calculation that account for the [[anomalous magnetic dipole moment]] of fermions.
 
==Rescaling of the QED Lagrangian==
 
We have considered some proportionality factors (like the <math>Z_i</math>) that have been defined from the form of the propagator. However they can also be defined from the QED lagrangian, which will be done in this section, and these definitions are equivalent. The Lagrangian that describes the physics of [[quantum electrodynamics]] is
 
:<math> \mathcal L = -\frac{1}{4} F_{\mu \nu} F^{\mu \nu} + \bar{\psi}(i \partial - m )\psi + e \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu \psi A_{\mu} </math>
 
where <math>F_{\mu \nu}</math> is the [[Electromagnetic tensor|field strength tensor]], <math>\psi</math> is the Dirac spinor (the relativistic equivalent of the [[wavefunction]]), and A the [[electromagnetic four-potential]]. The parameters of the theory are <math>\psi,\; A,\;m</math> and <math>e</math>. These quantities happen to be infinite due to [[Renormalization#A_loop_divergence|loop corrections]] (see below). One can define the renormalized quantities (which will be finite and observable) :
 
:<math>
\psi = \sqrt{Z_2} \psi_r \;\;\;\;\;
A = \sqrt{Z_3} A_r \;\;\;\;\;
m = m_r + \delta m \;\;\;\;\;
e = \frac{Z_1}{Z_2 \sqrt{Z_3}} e_r \;\;\;\;\;
with \;\;\;\;\; Z_i = 1 + \delta_i
</math>
 
The <math>\delta_i</math> are called counterterms (some other definitions of them are possible). They are supposed to be small in the parameter e. The Lagrangian now reads in terms of renormalized quantities (to first order in the counterterms) :
 
:<math> \mathcal L = -\frac{1}{4} Z_3 F_{\mu \nu,r} F^{\mu \nu}_r + Z_2 \bar{\psi}_r(i \partial - m_r )\psi_r - \bar{\psi}_r\delta m \psi_r + Z_1 e_r \bar{\psi}_r \gamma^\mu \psi_r A_{\mu,r} </math>
 
A renormalization prescription is a set of rules that describes what part of the divergences should be in the renormalized quantities and what parts should be in the counterterms. The prescription is often based on the theory of free fields, that is of the behaviour of <math>\psi</math> and A when they do not interact (which corresponds to removing the term <math>e \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu \psi A_{\mu} </math> in the Lagrangian).
 
==References==
 
* M. Peskin and D. Schroeder, ''An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory'' Addison-Weasley, Reading, 1995
* M. Srednicki, ''[http://www.physics.ucsb.edu/~mark/qft.html http://www.physics.ucsb.edu/~mark/qft.html Quantum Field Theory]''
* T. Gehrmann, ''[http://www.theorie.physik.uzh.ch/~pfmonni/QFTI_HS10/QFT_Skript.pdf http://www.theorie.physik.uzh.ch/~pfmonni/QFTI_HS10/QFT_Skript.pdf Quantum Field Theory 1]
 
[[Category:Articles created via the Article Wizard]]
[[Category:Quantum field theory]]
[[Category:Renormalization group]]

Revision as of 07:45, 30 April 2013

In quantum field theory, and especially in quantum electrodynamics, the interacting theory leads to infinite quantities that have to be absorbed in a renormalization procedure, in order to be able to predict measurable quantities. The renormalization scheme can depend on the type of particles that are being considered. For particles that can travel asymptotically large distances, or for low energy processes, the on-shell scheme, also known as the physical scheme, is appropriate. If these conditions are not fulfilled, one can turn to other schemes, like the Minimal subtraction scheme.

Fermion propagator in the interacting theory

Knowing the different propagators is the basis for being able to calculate Feynman diagrams which are useful tools to predict, for example, the result of scattering experiments. In a theory where the only field is the Dirac field, the Feynman propagator reads

0|T(ψ(x)ψ¯(0))|0=iSF(x)=d4p(2π)4ieipxp/m+iϵ

where T is the time-ordering operator, |0 the vacuum in the non interacting theory, ψ(x) and ψ¯(x) the Dirac field and its Dirac adjoint, and where the left-hand side of the equation is the two-point correlation function of the Dirac field.

In a new theory, the Dirac field can interact with another field, for example with the electromagnetic field in quantum electrodynamics, and the strength of the interaction is measured by a parameter, in the case of QED it is the bare electron charge, e. The general form of the propagator should remain unchanged, meaning that if |Ω now represents the vacuum in the interacting theory, the two-point correlation function would now read

Ω|T(ψ(x)ψ¯(0))|Ω=d4q(2π)4iZ2eipxp/mr+iϵ

Two new quantities have been introduced. First the renormalized mass mr has been defined as the pole in the Fourier transform of the Feynman propagator. This is the main prescription of the on-shell renormalization scheme (there is then no need to introduce other mass scales like in the minimal subtraction scheme). The quantity Z2 represents the new strength of the Dirac field. As the interaction is turned down to zero by letting e0, these new parameters should tend to a value so as to recover the propagator of the free fermion, namely mrm and Z21.

This means that mr and Z2 can be defined as a series in e if this parameter is small enough (in the unit system where =c=1, e=4πα0.3, where α is the fine-structure constant). Thus these parameters can be expressed as

Z2=1+δ2
m=mr+δm

On the other hand, the modification to the propagator can be calculated up to a certain order in e using Feynman diagrams. These modifications are summed up in the fermion self energy Σ(p)

Ω|T(ψ(x)ψ¯(0))|Ω=d4p(2π)4ieipxp/mΣ(p)+iϵ

These corrections are often divergent because they contain loops. By identifying the two expressions of the correlation function up to a certain order in e, the counterterms can be defined, and they are going to absorb the divergent contributions of the corrections to the fermion propagator. Thus, the renormalized quantities, such as mr, will remain finite, and will be the quantities measured in experiments.

Photon propagator

Just like what has been done with the fermion propagator, the form of the photon propagator inspired by the free photon field will be compared to the photon propagator calculated up to a certain order in e in the interacting theory. The photon self energy is noted Π(q2) and the metric tensor ημν (here taking the +--- convention)

Ω|T(Aμ(x)Aν(0))|Ω=d4q(2π)4iημνeipxq2(1Π(q2))+iϵ=d4q(2π)4iZ3ημνeipxq2+iϵ

The behaviour of the counterterm δ3=Z31 is independent of the momentum of the incoming photon q. To fix it, the behaviour of QED at large distances (which should help recover classical electrodynamics), i.e. when q20, is used :

iημνeipxq2(1Π(q2))+iϵiημνeipxq2

Thus the counterterm δ3 is fixed with the value of Π(0).

Vertex function

A similar reasoning using the vertex function leads to the renormalization of the electric charge er. This renormalization, and the fixing of renormalization terms is done using what is known from classical electrodynamics at large space scales. This leads to the value of the counterterm δ1, which is, in fact, equal to δ2 because of the Ward-Takahashi identity. It is this calculation that account for the anomalous magnetic dipole moment of fermions.

Rescaling of the QED Lagrangian

We have considered some proportionality factors (like the Zi) that have been defined from the form of the propagator. However they can also be defined from the QED lagrangian, which will be done in this section, and these definitions are equivalent. The Lagrangian that describes the physics of quantum electrodynamics is

=14FμνFμν+ψ¯(im)ψ+eψ¯γμψAμ

where Fμν is the field strength tensor, ψ is the Dirac spinor (the relativistic equivalent of the wavefunction), and A the electromagnetic four-potential. The parameters of the theory are ψ,A,m and e. These quantities happen to be infinite due to loop corrections (see below). One can define the renormalized quantities (which will be finite and observable) :

ψ=Z2ψrA=Z3Arm=mr+δme=Z1Z2Z3erwithZi=1+δi

The δi are called counterterms (some other definitions of them are possible). They are supposed to be small in the parameter e. The Lagrangian now reads in terms of renormalized quantities (to first order in the counterterms) :

=14Z3Fμν,rFrμν+Z2ψ¯r(imr)ψrψ¯rδmψr+Z1erψ¯rγμψrAμ,r

A renormalization prescription is a set of rules that describes what part of the divergences should be in the renormalized quantities and what parts should be in the counterterms. The prescription is often based on the theory of free fields, that is of the behaviour of ψ and A when they do not interact (which corresponds to removing the term eψ¯γμψAμ in the Lagrangian).

References