Covering groups of the alternating and symmetric groups: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Bubba73
 
en>Rjwilmsi
m References: Journal cites, added 1 DOI using AWB (9887)
Line 1: Line 1:
<br><br>I like how the towel appears. The graphics and his identify are shiny, colourful and nicely executed. My solely grievance can be that the towel is very skinny. I would personally need one thing somewhat thicker for breezy Maine seashores. Ryan loves the picture of Ironman, his identify and says its a gentle towel. He actually likes it. Like most experts, customers merely can not understand why Ka-Bar allowed a poor-quality sheath to come with the knife (The sheath is made in China in case you’re curious.). The author, nonetheless, surmises that Ka-Bar put all the pieces into the knife itself. Replacing the horrible sheath shouldn't be actually a problem. General Rating<br><br>There are 4 12" extensive by 14" lengthy detachable cabinets that can maintain eight brief racks of child backs, 4 whole chickens, 4 pork butts, and so forth. Skip the wood chips and you have an oven that can be utilized as a [http://wiki.Fsairlines.net/index.php?title=Automatic_Pocket_Knife warming] oven, or for baking cookies, rolls or beans. When pegged on low with the water pan in place, it may smoke at a great 225°F easily (most cupboard gassers can not go this low). The top of the smoker will get hot so it may be used to keep a serving platter warm, however it could also burn you if you happen to're not cautious.<br><br>A pocket knife is a folding knife and, for that purpose, you need to have a great lock on the knife if you're planning on utilizing the knife for heavy obligation functions. A lock prevents the blade from closing if you find yourself utilizing it and higher high quality locks give the knife a firmer feel. Low-cost knives use small or flimsy locks that can make the blade wobble after time. EDC Requires a Good Clip The handle lacks a metal liner but, given that it's made of G-10, the deal with just isn't flimsy and compliments the lock very well. The G-10 deal with could be very sticky.<br><br>So how did the sting maintain up? - Leaps and bounds ahead of the original Final Knife's edge. The 9Cr19MoV Stainless has edge-holding that's at the least as good as 440C with a good heat treatment, and possibly better. I used to be very impressed by its efficiency and was honestly a bit stunned, as I did not count on a Chinese stainless to carry an edge this properly. Negatives? Yes - the whistle is just marginally improved. I'm undecided why a more robust whistle wasn't added, as this might have been a golden opportunity for Gerber to improve upon this convenient survival feature. The whistle remains to be efficient, however could possibly be higher.<br><br>The blade is reasonably sharp proper out of the box, and should be fast and easy to sharpen. It’s made out of surgical metal , so it ought to hold up to gentle-to-medium use just fantastic. I did not hone the innovative previous to first using the knife, but it could have been a good idea. Your tactical knife should have a very good blade-locking mechanism. This is a safety feature to prevent the blade from closing on you, causing injury. It is important that this works even when lots of force on the blade could also be present as in widespread prying tasks.<br><br>The general match of this knife is excellent, I would fee it at ninety eight% or higher. The match between the cocobolo scales and the stainless steel liners and SS bolsters is a hundred% with no gaps and completely smooth transitions. There are just a few hairlines between the bolsters and the liners which by no means detracts from the quality [http://www.knife-depot.com best folding knives], as they're solely noticeable when in comparison with other [http://www.danielasandoni.it/content/best-automatic-knife-2013 components] where the match is so tight they appear to be one piece. I like the scale. Having a bit extra blade and a deal with that fills the palm of your hand really makes the knife extra helpful in that "software" means.<br><br>The Kershaw Leek is a complete of 7 inches in length when opened and four inches when closed. The blade is 3 inches and is available in clean and partially serrated choices. It is described as a modified drop level blade, and the form of the blade on the Leek will not impress everybody. The leading edge is great and this knife could be appropriate for most [http://www.thebestpocketknifereviews.com/best-automatic-knife-discover-the-pefect-model/ cheap automatic Knives] basic uses. The blade is produced from 14C28M stainless-steel, which Kershaw worked with Sandvik to provide as an improve to the 13C26 metal (which some customers didn’t like). This metal is designed to carry an edge while being very simple to sharpen.
In mathematics, the '''joint spectral radius''' is a generalization of the classical notion of [[spectral radius]] of a matrix, to sets of matrices. In recent years this notion has found applications in a large number of engineering fields and is still a topic of active research.
 
==General description==
 
The joint spectral radius of a set of matrices is the maximal asymptotic growth rate of products of matrices taken in that set.  For a finite (or more generally compact) set of matrices <math>\mathcal M=\{A_1,\dots, A_m\} \subset \mathbb R^{n \times n},</math> the joint spectral radius is defined as follows:
 
: <math>\rho (\mathcal M)= \lim_{k \to
\infty}\max{\{ \|A_{i_1}\cdots A_{i_k}\|^{1/k}:A_i\in\mathcal M\}}. \, </math>
 
It can be proved that the limit exists and that the quantity actually does not depend on the chosen matrix norm  (this is true for any norm but particularly easy to see if the norm is [[Matrix norm|sub-multiplicative]]).  The joint spectral radius was introduced in 1960 by [[Gian-Carlo Rota|Rota]] and [[Gilbert Strang|Strang]],<ref>G. C. Rota and G. Strang. "A note on the joint spectral radius." Proceedings of the Netherlands Academy, 22:379–381, 1960. [http://books.google.it/books?id=x7zKLGu3g9IC&lpg=RA1-PA40&ots=rxuCbvNTxI&dq=a%20note%20on%20the%20joint%20spectral%20radius%20rota%20strang&lr&pg=PA74#v=onepage&q&f=false]</ref> two mathematicians from [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology|MIT]], but started attracting  attention with the work of [[Ingrid Daubechies]] and [[Jeffrey Lagarias]].<ref>Vincent D. Blondel. The birth of the joint spectral radius: an interview with Gilbert Strang. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 428:10, pp. 2261–2264, 2008.</ref> They showed that the joint spectral radius can be used to describe smoothness properties of certain [[Wavelet#Wavelet function|wavelet functions]].<ref>I. Daubechies and J. C. Lagarias. "Two-scale difference equations. ii. local regularity, infinite products of matrices and fractals." SIAM Journal of Mathematical Analysis, 23, pp. 1031–1079, 1992.</ref>  A wide number of applications have been proposed since then.  It is known  that the joint spectral radius quantity is [[NP-hard]] to compute or to approximate, even when the set <math>\mathcal M</math> consists of only two matrices with all nonzero entries of the two
matrices which are constrained to be equal.<ref>J. N. Tsitsiklis and V. D. Blondel. "Lyapunov Exponents of Pairs of Matrices, a Correction." ''[[Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems]]'', 10, p. 381, 1997.</ref>  Moreover, the question "<math>\rho\leq 1 ?</math>" is an [[undecidable problem]].<ref>Vincent D. Blondel, John N. Tsitsiklis. "The boundedness of all products of a pair of matrices is undecidable." Systems and Control Letters, 41:2, pp. 135&ndash;140, 2000.</ref> Nevertheless, in recent years much progress has been done on its understanding, and it appears that in practice the joint spectral radius can often be computed to satisfactory precision, and that it moreover can bring interesting insight in engineering and mathematical problems.
 
==Computation==
 
===Approximation algorithms===
 
In spite of the negative theoretical results on the joint spectral radius computability, methods have been proposed that perform well in practice. Algorithms are even known, which can reach an arbitrary accuracy in an a priori computable amount of time. These algorithms can be seen as trying to approximate the unit ball of a particular vector norm, called the extremal norm.<ref>N. Barabanov. "Lyapunov indicators of discrete inclusions i&ndash;iii." Automation and Remote Control, 49:152–157, 283–287, 558–565, 1988.</ref> One generally distinguishes between two families of such algorithms: the first family, called '''polytope norm methods''', construct the extremal norm by computing long trajectories of points.<ref>V. Y. Protasov. "The joint spectral radius and invariant sets of linear operators." Fundamentalnaya i prikladnaya matematika, 2(1):205–231, 1996.</ref><ref>N. Guglielmi, F. Wirth, and M. Zennaro. "Complex polytope extremality results for families of matrices." SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 27(3):721–743, 2005.</ref> An advantage of these methods is that in the favorable cases it can find the exact value of the joint spectral radius and provide a certificate that this is the exact value.
 
The second methods approximate the extremal norm with '''modern optimization techniques''', like ellipsoid norm approximation,<ref>Vincent D. Blondel, Yurii Nesterov and Jacques Theys, On the accuracy of the ellipsoid norm approximation of the joint spectral radius, Linear Algebra and its Applications, 394:1, pp. 91–107, 2005.</ref> [[semidefinite programming]],<ref>T. Ando and M.-H. Shih. "Simultaneous contractibility." SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 19(2):487–498, 1998.</ref><ref>V. D. Blondel and Y. Nesterov. "Computationally efficient approximations of the joint spectral radius." SIAM Journal of Matrix Analysis, 27(1):256–272, 2005.</ref> [[Polynomial SOS|Sum Of Squares]],<ref>P. Parrilo and A. Jadbabaie. "Approximation of the joint spectral radius using sum of squares." Linear Algebra and its Applications, 428(10):2385–2402, 2008.</ref> [[Conic optimization|conic programming]].<ref>V. Protasov, R. M. Jungers, and V. D. Blondel. "Joint spectral characteristics of matrices: a conic programming approach." SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 2008.</ref> The advantage of these methods is that they are easy to implement, and in practice, they provide in general the best bounds on the joint spectral radius.
 
===The finiteness conjecture===
 
Related to the computability of the joint spectral radius is the following conjecture:<ref>J. C. Lagarias and Y. Wang. "The finiteness conjecture for the generalized spectral radius of a set of matrices." Linear Algebra and its Applications, 214:17–42, 1995.</ref>
 
"For any finite set of matrices <math>\mathcal M \subset \mathbb R^{n \times n},</math> there is a product <math> A_1\dots A_t</math> of matrices in this set such that
:<math>\rho(\mathcal M) = \rho(A_1 \dots A_t)^{1/t}.</math>"
In the above equation "<math> \rho(A_1 \dots A_t)</math>" refers to the classical [[spectral radius]] of the matrix <math>A_1 \dots A_t.</math>
 
This conjecture, proposed in 1995, has been proved to be false in 2003,.<ref>T. Bousch and J. Mairesse. "Asymptotic height optimization for topical IFS, Tetris heaps, and the finiteness conjecture." Journal of the Mathematical American Society, 15(1):77–111, 2002.</ref> The counterexample provided in that reference uses advanced measure-theoretical ideas. Subsequently, many other counterexamples have been provided, including an elementary counterexample that uses simple combinatorial properties  matrices <ref>V. D. Blondel, J. Theys and A. A. Vladimirov, An elementary counterexample to the finiteness conjecture, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis, 24:4, pp. 963–970, 2003.</ref> and a counterexample based on dynamical systems properties.<ref>V. Kozyakin
Structure of Extremal Trajectories of Discrete Linear Systems and the Finiteness Conjecture, Automat. Remote Control, 68 (2007), no. 1, 174–209/</ref> Recently an explicit counterexample has been proposed in.<ref>Kevin G. Hare, Ian D. Morris, Nikita Sidorov, Jacques Theys. An explicit counterexample to the Lagarias–Wang finiteness conjecture, Advances in Mathematics, 226, pp. 4667-4701, 2011.</ref> Many questions related to this conjecture are still open, as for instance the question of knowing whether it holds for pairs of [[Binary matrix|binary matrices]].<ref>A. Cicone, N. Guglielmi, S. Serra Capizzano, and M. Zennaro. "Finiteness property of pairs of
2&nbsp;×&nbsp;2 sign-matrices via real extremal polytope norms." Linear Algebra and its Applications, 2010.</ref><ref>R. M. Jungers and V. D. Blondel. "On the finiteness property for rational matrices." Linear Algebra and its Applications, 428(10):2283–2295, 2008.</ref>
 
==Applications==
 
The joint spectral radius was introduced for its interpretation as a stability condition for discrete-time switching [[dynamical system]]s.  Indeed, the system defined by the equations
:<math>x_{t+1}=A_tx_{t}, \quad A_t\in \mathcal M \, \forall t</math>
is [[Lyapunov stability|stable]] if and only if <math>\rho(\mathcal M)<1.</math>
 
The joint spectral radius became popular when [[Ingrid Daubechies]] and [[Jeffrey Lagarias]] showed that it rules the continuity of certain wavelet functions. Since then, it has found many applications, ranging from number theory to information theory, [[autonomous agent]]s consensus, [[combinatorics on words]],...
 
==Related notions==
 
The joint spectral radius is the generalization of the [[spectral radius]] of a matrix for a set of several matrices. However, much more quantities can be defined when considering a set of matrices: The '''joint spectral subradius''' characterizes the minimal rate of growth of products in the semigroup generated by <math>\mathcal M</math>.
The '''p-radius''' characterizes the rate of growth of the <math>L_p</math> average of the norms of the products in the semigroup.
The '''Lyapunov exponent''' of the set of matrices characterizes the rate of growth of the geometric average.
 
== Further reading ==
 
*{{cite book
| author = Raphael M. Jungers
| year = 2009
| title = The joint spectral radius, Theory and applications
| publisher = Springer
| isbn = 978-3-540-95979-3
}}
 
*{{cite book
| editor = Vincent D. Blondel, Michael Karow, Vladimir Protassov, and Fabian R. Wirth
| year = 2008
| journal = Linear Algebra and its Applications
| title = Linear Algebra and its Applications: special issue on the joint spectral radius
| publisher = Elsevier
| volume = 428
| issue = 10
}}
 
*{{cite web
|url=http://www.math.msu.edu/~cicone/papers/AntonioCiconeThesis.pdf
|title=PhD thesis. Spectral Properties of Families of Matrices. Part III
|author=Antonio Cicone
|year=2011
}}
 
*{{cite web
|url=http://www.inma.ucl.ac.be/~blondel/05thesetheys.pdf
|title=PhD thesis. Joint Spectral Radius: Theory and approximations.
|author=Jacques Theys
|year=2005
}}
 
== References ==
{{Reflist}}
 
<!--- Categories --->
 
[[Category:Control theory]]
[[Category:Linear algebra]]

Revision as of 16:55, 25 January 2014

In mathematics, the joint spectral radius is a generalization of the classical notion of spectral radius of a matrix, to sets of matrices. In recent years this notion has found applications in a large number of engineering fields and is still a topic of active research.

General description

The joint spectral radius of a set of matrices is the maximal asymptotic growth rate of products of matrices taken in that set. For a finite (or more generally compact) set of matrices ={A1,,Am}n×n, the joint spectral radius is defined as follows:

ρ()=limkmax{Ai1Aik1/k:Ai}.

It can be proved that the limit exists and that the quantity actually does not depend on the chosen matrix norm (this is true for any norm but particularly easy to see if the norm is sub-multiplicative). The joint spectral radius was introduced in 1960 by Rota and Strang,[1] two mathematicians from MIT, but started attracting attention with the work of Ingrid Daubechies and Jeffrey Lagarias.[2] They showed that the joint spectral radius can be used to describe smoothness properties of certain wavelet functions.[3] A wide number of applications have been proposed since then. It is known that the joint spectral radius quantity is NP-hard to compute or to approximate, even when the set consists of only two matrices with all nonzero entries of the two matrices which are constrained to be equal.[4] Moreover, the question "ρ1?" is an undecidable problem.[5] Nevertheless, in recent years much progress has been done on its understanding, and it appears that in practice the joint spectral radius can often be computed to satisfactory precision, and that it moreover can bring interesting insight in engineering and mathematical problems.

Computation

Approximation algorithms

In spite of the negative theoretical results on the joint spectral radius computability, methods have been proposed that perform well in practice. Algorithms are even known, which can reach an arbitrary accuracy in an a priori computable amount of time. These algorithms can be seen as trying to approximate the unit ball of a particular vector norm, called the extremal norm.[6] One generally distinguishes between two families of such algorithms: the first family, called polytope norm methods, construct the extremal norm by computing long trajectories of points.[7][8] An advantage of these methods is that in the favorable cases it can find the exact value of the joint spectral radius and provide a certificate that this is the exact value.

The second methods approximate the extremal norm with modern optimization techniques, like ellipsoid norm approximation,[9] semidefinite programming,[10][11] Sum Of Squares,[12] conic programming.[13] The advantage of these methods is that they are easy to implement, and in practice, they provide in general the best bounds on the joint spectral radius.

The finiteness conjecture

Related to the computability of the joint spectral radius is the following conjecture:[14]

"For any finite set of matrices n×n, there is a product A1At of matrices in this set such that

ρ()=ρ(A1At)1/t."

In the above equation "ρ(A1At)" refers to the classical spectral radius of the matrix A1At.

This conjecture, proposed in 1995, has been proved to be false in 2003,.[15] The counterexample provided in that reference uses advanced measure-theoretical ideas. Subsequently, many other counterexamples have been provided, including an elementary counterexample that uses simple combinatorial properties matrices [16] and a counterexample based on dynamical systems properties.[17] Recently an explicit counterexample has been proposed in.[18] Many questions related to this conjecture are still open, as for instance the question of knowing whether it holds for pairs of binary matrices.[19][20]

Applications

The joint spectral radius was introduced for its interpretation as a stability condition for discrete-time switching dynamical systems. Indeed, the system defined by the equations

xt+1=Atxt,Att

is stable if and only if ρ()<1.

The joint spectral radius became popular when Ingrid Daubechies and Jeffrey Lagarias showed that it rules the continuity of certain wavelet functions. Since then, it has found many applications, ranging from number theory to information theory, autonomous agents consensus, combinatorics on words,...

Related notions

The joint spectral radius is the generalization of the spectral radius of a matrix for a set of several matrices. However, much more quantities can be defined when considering a set of matrices: The joint spectral subradius characterizes the minimal rate of growth of products in the semigroup generated by . The p-radius characterizes the rate of growth of the Lp average of the norms of the products in the semigroup. The Lyapunov exponent of the set of matrices characterizes the rate of growth of the geometric average.

Further reading

  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

  1. G. C. Rota and G. Strang. "A note on the joint spectral radius." Proceedings of the Netherlands Academy, 22:379–381, 1960. [1]
  2. Vincent D. Blondel. The birth of the joint spectral radius: an interview with Gilbert Strang. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 428:10, pp. 2261–2264, 2008.
  3. I. Daubechies and J. C. Lagarias. "Two-scale difference equations. ii. local regularity, infinite products of matrices and fractals." SIAM Journal of Mathematical Analysis, 23, pp. 1031–1079, 1992.
  4. J. N. Tsitsiklis and V. D. Blondel. "Lyapunov Exponents of Pairs of Matrices, a Correction." Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems, 10, p. 381, 1997.
  5. Vincent D. Blondel, John N. Tsitsiklis. "The boundedness of all products of a pair of matrices is undecidable." Systems and Control Letters, 41:2, pp. 135–140, 2000.
  6. N. Barabanov. "Lyapunov indicators of discrete inclusions i–iii." Automation and Remote Control, 49:152–157, 283–287, 558–565, 1988.
  7. V. Y. Protasov. "The joint spectral radius and invariant sets of linear operators." Fundamentalnaya i prikladnaya matematika, 2(1):205–231, 1996.
  8. N. Guglielmi, F. Wirth, and M. Zennaro. "Complex polytope extremality results for families of matrices." SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 27(3):721–743, 2005.
  9. Vincent D. Blondel, Yurii Nesterov and Jacques Theys, On the accuracy of the ellipsoid norm approximation of the joint spectral radius, Linear Algebra and its Applications, 394:1, pp. 91–107, 2005.
  10. T. Ando and M.-H. Shih. "Simultaneous contractibility." SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 19(2):487–498, 1998.
  11. V. D. Blondel and Y. Nesterov. "Computationally efficient approximations of the joint spectral radius." SIAM Journal of Matrix Analysis, 27(1):256–272, 2005.
  12. P. Parrilo and A. Jadbabaie. "Approximation of the joint spectral radius using sum of squares." Linear Algebra and its Applications, 428(10):2385–2402, 2008.
  13. V. Protasov, R. M. Jungers, and V. D. Blondel. "Joint spectral characteristics of matrices: a conic programming approach." SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 2008.
  14. J. C. Lagarias and Y. Wang. "The finiteness conjecture for the generalized spectral radius of a set of matrices." Linear Algebra and its Applications, 214:17–42, 1995.
  15. T. Bousch and J. Mairesse. "Asymptotic height optimization for topical IFS, Tetris heaps, and the finiteness conjecture." Journal of the Mathematical American Society, 15(1):77–111, 2002.
  16. V. D. Blondel, J. Theys and A. A. Vladimirov, An elementary counterexample to the finiteness conjecture, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis, 24:4, pp. 963–970, 2003.
  17. V. Kozyakin Structure of Extremal Trajectories of Discrete Linear Systems and the Finiteness Conjecture, Automat. Remote Control, 68 (2007), no. 1, 174–209/
  18. Kevin G. Hare, Ian D. Morris, Nikita Sidorov, Jacques Theys. An explicit counterexample to the Lagarias–Wang finiteness conjecture, Advances in Mathematics, 226, pp. 4667-4701, 2011.
  19. A. Cicone, N. Guglielmi, S. Serra Capizzano, and M. Zennaro. "Finiteness property of pairs of 2 × 2 sign-matrices via real extremal polytope norms." Linear Algebra and its Applications, 2010.
  20. R. M. Jungers and V. D. Blondel. "On the finiteness property for rational matrices." Linear Algebra and its Applications, 428(10):2283–2295, 2008.