Prony's method: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Hmainsbot1
m AWB general fixes and delink dates per WP:DATELINK, WP:YEARLINK and MOS:UNLINKYEARS, added orphan tag using AWB (8097)
 
en>Mikhail Ryazanov
Line 1: Line 1:
[http://www.zs-imports.com/blogs/post/70017 over the counter std test] title of the author is Numbers but it's not the most masucline name out there. What I adore doing is doing ceramics but I haven't produced a dime with it. Since she was 18 she's been operating as a meter reader but she's usually wanted her own company. For a whilst she's been in South Dakota.
The '''runoff curve number''' (also called a '''curve number''' or simply '''CN''') is an [[empirical]] parameter used in [[hydrology]] for predicting direct [[Surface runoff|runoff]] or [[Infiltration (hydrology)|infiltration]] from [[rain]]fall excess.<ref name="usda86">{{cite book|author=United States Department of Agriculture |title=Urban hydrology for small watersheds |year=1986 |edition=Second Edition |series=Technical Release 55 (TR-55) |publisher=Natural Resources Conservation Service, Conservation Engineering Division |url=http://www.cpesc.org/reference/tr55.pdf |pages=}}</ref> The curve number method was developed by the [[USDA]] [[Natural Resources Conservation Service]], which was formerly called the ''Soil Conservation Service'' or ''SCS'' — the number is still popularly known as a "SCS runoff curve number" in the literature.  The runoff curve number was developed from an [[empirical method|empirical analysis]] of runoff from small catchments and hillslope plots monitored by the USDA. It is widely used and is an efficient method for determining the approximate amount of direct runoff from a [[Precipitation (meteorology)|rainfall]] event in a particular area.
 
The runoff curve number is based on the area's hydrologic soil group, [[land use]], treatment and hydrologic condition. References, such as from USDA<ref name="usda86"/> indicate the runoff curve numbers for characteristic land cover descriptions and a hydrologic soil group.
 
The runoff equation is:
 
:<math>Q=\begin{cases}
0 & \text{for } P \leq I_a \\
\frac{(P-I_a)^2}{{P-I_a}+S} & \text{for } P>I_a \end{cases}</math>
 
where
 
:<math>Q</math> is [[Surface runoff|runoff]] ([L]; in)
:<math>P</math> is [[rain]]fall ([L]; in)
:<math>S</math> is the potential maximum [[soil moisture]] retention after runoff begins ([L]; in)
:<math>I_a</math> is the initial abstraction ([L]; in), or the amount of water before runoff, such as [[Infiltration (hydrology)|infiltration]], or rainfall interception by vegetation; historically, it has generally been assumed that <math>I_a = 0.2S</math>, although more recent research has found that <math>I_a = 0.05S</math> may be a more appropriate and accurate relationship.<ref name="hawkins2002">{{cite journal |last=Hawkins |first=R.H. |last2=Jiang |first2=R. |last3=Woodward |first3=D.E. |last4=Hjelmfelt |first4=A.T. |last5=Van Mullem |first5=J.A. |year=2002 |title=Runoff Curve Number Method: Examination of the Initial Abstraction Ratio |url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb04481.x/abstract |journal=Proceedings of the Second Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada |publisher=U.S. Geological Survey |accessdate=24 November 2013}}</ref>
 
The runoff curve number, <math>CN</math>, is then related
:<math>S = \frac{1000}{CN} - 10</math>
 
<math>CN</math> has a range from 30 to 100; lower numbers indicate low runoff potential while larger numbers are for increasing runoff potential. The lower the curve number, the more permeable the soil is. As can be seen in the curve number equation, runoff cannot begin until the initial abstraction has been met.
 
==Curve Number Selection==
The NRCS curve number is related to soil type, soil infiltration capability, land use, and the depth of the seasonal high water table. To account for different soils' ability to infiltrate, NRCS has divided soils into four hydrologic soil groups (HSGs). They are defined as follows.<ref name="usda86"/>
 
*'''HSG Group A''' (low runoff potential): Soils with high infiltration rates even when thoroughly wetted. These consist chiefly of deep, well-drained sands and gravels. These soils have a high rate of water transmission (final infiltration rate greater than 0.3 in./h).
*'''HSG Group B''' Soils with moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted. These consist chiefly of soils that are moderately deep to deep, moderately well drained to well drained with moderately fine to moderately course textures. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission (final infiltration rate of 0.15 to 0.30 in./h).
*'''HSG Group C:''' Soils with slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted. These consist chiefly of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water or soils with moderately fine to fine textures. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission (final infiltration rate 0.05 to 0.15 in./h).
*'''HSG Group D''' (high runoff potential): Soils with very slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted. These consist chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious materials. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission (final infiltration rate less than 0.05 in./h).
 
Selection of a hydrologic soil group should be done based on measured infiltration rates, soil survey (such as the [http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/ NRCS Web Soil Survey]), or judgement from a qualified soil science or geotechnical professional. The table below presents curve numbers for antecedent soil moisture condition II (average moisture condition). To alter the curve number based on moisture condition or other parameters, see the [[#Curve Number Adjustments|CN adjustment section]].
 
===Runoff curve numbers===
 
====Fully developed urban areas (vegetation established)====
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|align="center" rowspan="2"  |'''Cover description'''
|align="center" colspan="4"  |'''Curve numbers for hydrologic soil group'''
|-
|align="center" rowspan="2"|'''A'''||align="center" rowspan="2"|'''B'''||align="center" rowspan="2"|'''C'''||align="center" rowspan="2"|'''D'''
|-
 
|-
|align="left"| Open space (lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, etc.)
|
|-
|align="right" | <small>Poor condition (grass cover <50%)</small>
|align="center"|68 ||align="center"|79 ||align="center"|86 ||align="center"|89
|-
|align="right" | <small>Poor condition (grass cover 50 to 75%)</small>
|align="center"|49 ||align="center"|69 ||align="center"|79 ||align="center"|84
|-
|align="right" | <small>Poor condition (grass cover >75%)</small>
|align="center"|39 ||align="center"|61 ||align="center"|74 ||align="center"|80
|-
|align="left"| Impervious areas:
 
|-
|align="right" | <small>Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways, etc. (excluding right of way)</small>
|align="center"|98 ||align="center"|98 ||align="center"|98 ||align="center"|98
|-
|align="left" | ''<small>Streets and roads:</small>''
|-
|align="right" | <small>Paved; curbs and storm sewers (excluding right-of-way)</small>
|align="center"|98 ||align="center"|98 ||align="center"|98 ||align="center"|98
|-
|align="right" | <small>Paved; open ditches (including right-of-way)</small>
|align="center"|83 ||align="center"|89 ||align="center"|92 ||align="center"|93
|-
|align="right" | <small>Gravel (including right of way)</small>
|align="center"|76 ||align="center"|85 ||align="center"|89 ||align="center"|91
|-
|align="right" | <small>Dirt (including right-of-way)</small>
|align="center"|72 ||align="center"|82 ||align="center"|87 ||align="center"|89
|-
|align="left"| Western desert urban areas:
|-
|align="right" | <small>Natural desert landscaping (pervious area only)</small>
|align="center"|63 ||align="center"|77 ||align="center"|85 ||align="center"|88
|-
|align="right" | <small>Artificial desert landscaping (impervious weed barrier, desert shrub with 1- to 2-inch sand or gravel mulch and basin borders)</small>
|align="center"|96 ||align="center"|96 ||align="center"|96 ||align="center"|96
|-
|align="left"| Urban districts:
|-
|align="right" | <small>Commercial and business (85% imp.)</small>
|align="center"|89 ||align="center"|92 ||align="center"|94 ||align="center"|95
|-
|align="right" | <small>Industrial (72% imp.)</small>
|align="center"|81 ||align="center"|88 ||align="center"|91 ||align="center"|93
|-
|align="left"| Residential districts by average lot size:
|-
|align="right" | <small>1/8 acre or less (town houses) (65% imp.)/small>
|align="center"|77 ||align="center"|85 ||align="center"|90 ||align="center"|92
|-
|align="right" | <small>1/4 acre (38% imp.)</small>
|align="center"|61 ||align="center"|75 ||align="center"|83 ||align="center"|87
|-
|align="right" | <small>1/3 acre (30% imp.)</small>
|align="center"|57 ||align="center"|72 ||align="center"|81 ||align="center"|86
|-
|align="right" | <small>1/2 acre (25% imp.)</small>
|align="center"|54 ||align="center"|70 ||align="center"|80 ||align="center"|85
|-
|align="right" | <small>1 acre (20% imp.)</small>
|align="center"|51 ||align="center"|68 ||align="center"|79 ||align="center"|84
|-
|align="right" | <small>2 acres (12% imp.)</small>
|align="center"|46 ||align="center"|65 ||align="center"|77 ||align="center"|82
|-
|}
 
====Developing urban areas====
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|align="center" rowspan="2"  |'''Cover description'''
|align="center" colspan="4"  |'''Curve numbers for hydrologic soil group'''
|-
|align="center" rowspan="1"|'''A'''||align="center" rowspan="1"|'''B'''||align="center" rowspan="1"|'''C'''||align="center" rowspan="1"|'''D'''
|-
|align="left"| Newly graded areas (pervious areas only, no vegetation)
|align="center"|77 ||align="center"|86 ||align="center"|91 ||align="center"|94
|-
|}
 
====Cultivated agricultural lands====
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="3"  |'''Cover description''' || align="center" colspan="4"  |'''Curve numbers for hydrologic soil group'''
|-
|'''Cover type''' || '''Treatment'''{{ref label|residue|A|A}} ||align="center"| '''Hydrologic condition''' ||align="center" |'''A''' ||align="center" |'''B''' ||align="center" |'''C''' ||align="center" |'''D'''
|-
|rowspan="3" |Fallow  || Bare soil ||align="center" |-- 
| align="center" | 77
| align="center" | 86
| align="center" | 91
| align="center" | 94
|-
|rowspan="2" |Crop residue cover (CR) ||align="center" |Poor
| align="center" |76
| align="center" |85
| align="center" |90
| align="center" |93
|-
| align="center" |Good
| align="center" |74
| align="center" |83
| align="center" |88
| align="center" |90
|-
|rowspan="12" |Row crops  || rowspan="2" |Straight row (SR) ||align="center" |Poor 
| align="center" | 72
| align="center" | 81
| align="center" | 88
| align="center" | 91
|-
| align="center" |Good
| align="center" |67
| align="center" |78
| align="center" |85
| align="center" |89
|-
| rowspan="2" | SR + CR ||align="center" |Poor 
| align="center" | 71
| align="center" | 80
| align="center" | 87
| align="center" | 90
|-
|align="center" |Good 
| align="center" | 64
| align="center" | 75
| align="center" | 82
| align="center" | 85
|-
| rowspan="2" | Contoured (C) ||align="center" |Poor 
| align="center" | 70
| align="center" | 79
| align="center" | 84
| align="center" | 88
|-
|align="center" |Good 
| align="center" | 65
| align="center" | 75
| align="center" | 82
| align="center" | 86
|-
| rowspan="2" | C + CR ||align="center" |Poor 
| align="center" | 69
| align="center" | 78
| align="center" | 83
| align="center" | 87
|-
|align="center" |Good 
| align="center" | 64
| align="center" | 74
| align="center" | 81
| align="center" | 85
|-
| rowspan="2" | Contoured & terraced (C&T) ||align="center" |Poor 
| align="center" | 66
| align="center" | 74
| align="center" | 80
| align="center" | 82
|-
|align="center" |Good 
| align="center" | 62
| align="center" | 71
| align="center" | 78
| align="center" | 81
|-
| rowspan="2" | C&T + R ||align="center" |Poor 
| align="center" | 65
| align="center" | 73
| align="center" | 79
| align="center" | 81
|-
|align="center" |Good 
| align="center" | 61
| align="center" | 70
| align="center" | 77
| align="center" | 80
|-
|rowspan="12" |Small grain  || rowspan="2" |SR ||align="center" |Poor 
| align="center" | 65
| align="center" | 76
| align="center" | 84
| align="center" | 88
|-
| align="center" |Good
| align="center" |63
| align="center" |75
| align="center" |83
| align="center" |87
|-
| rowspan="2" | SR + CR ||align="center" |Poor 
| align="center" | 64
| align="center" | 75
| align="center" | 83
| align="center" | 86
|-
|align="center" |Good 
| align="center" | 60
| align="center" | 72
| align="center" | 80
| align="center" | 84
|-
| rowspan="2" | C ||align="center" |Poor 
| align="center" | 63
| align="center" | 74
| align="center" | 82
| align="center" | 85
|-
|align="center" |Good 
| align="center" | 61
| align="center" | 73
| align="center" | 81
| align="center" | 84
|-
| rowspan="2" | C + CR ||align="center" |Poor 
| align="center" | 62
| align="center" | 73
| align="center" | 81
| align="center" | 84
|-
|align="center" |Good 
| align="center" | 60
| align="center" | 72
| align="center" | 80
| align="center" | 83
|-
| rowspan="2" | C&T ||align="center" |Poor 
| align="center" | 61
| align="center" | 72
| align="center" | 79
| align="center" | 82
|-
|align="center" |Good 
| align="center" | 59
| align="center" | 70
| align="center" | 78
| align="center" | 81
|-
| rowspan="2" | C&T + R ||align="center" |Poor 
| align="center" | 60
| align="center" | 71
| align="center" | 78
| align="center" | 81
|-
|align="center" |Good 
| align="center" | 58
| align="center" | 69
| align="center" | 77
| align="center" | 80
|-
|rowspan="6" |Close-seeded or broadcast legumes or rotation meadow  || rowspan="2" |SR ||align="center" |Poor 
| align="center" | 66
| align="center" | 77
| align="center" | 85
| align="center" | 89
|-
| align="center" |Good
| align="center" |58
| align="center" |72
| align="center" |81
| align="center" |85
|-
| rowspan="2" | C ||align="center" |Poor 
| align="center" | 64
| align="center" | 75
| align="center" | 83
| align="center" | 85
|-
|align="center" |Good 
| align="center" | 55
| align="center" | 69
| align="center" | 78
| align="center" | 83
|-
| rowspan="2" | C&T ||align="center" |Poor 
| align="center" | 63
| align="center" | 73
| align="center" | 80
| align="center" | 83
|-
|align="center" |Good 
| align="center" | 51
| align="center" | 67
| align="center" | 76
| align="center" | 80
|-
|}
{|
|{{note label|hydro|A|A}} Crop residue cover applies only if residue is on at least 5% of the surface throughout the year.
|}
 
====Other agricultural lands====
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="2"  |'''Cover description''' || align="center" colspan="4"  |'''Curve numbers for hydrologic soil group'''
|-
|'''Cover type''' ||align="center"| '''Hydrologic condition''' ||align="center" |'''A''' ||align="center" |'''B''' ||align="center" |'''C''' ||align="center" |'''D'''
|-
|rowspan="3"|Pasture, grassland, or range—continuous forage for grazing.{{ref | label pasture|A|A}}
|align="center" | Poor || align="center"|68 || align="center"|79 || align="center"|86 || align="center"|89
|-
|align="center" | Fair || align="center"|49 || align="center"|69 || align="center"|79 || align="center"|84
|-
|align="center" | Good || align="center"|39 || align="center"|61 || align="center"|74 || align="center"|80
|-
|Meadow—continuous grass, protected from grazing and generally mowed for hay.
|align="center" | --- || align="center"|30 || align="center"|58 || align="center"|71 || align="center"|78
|-
|rowspan="3"|Brush—brush-weed-grass mixture with brush the major element.{{ref | label woods|B|B}}
|align="center" | Poor || align="center"|48 || align="center"|67 || align="center"|77 || align="center"|83
|-
|align="center" | Fair || align="center"|35 || align="center"|56 || align="center"|70 || align="center"|77
|-
|align="center" | Good || align="center"|30{{ref|label CN|C|C}} || align="center"|48 || align="center"|65 || align="center"|73
|-
|rowspan="3"|Woods—grass combination (orchard or tree farm).{{ref |label woods2|D|D}}
|align="center" | Poor || align="center"|57 || align="center"|73 || align="center"|82 || align="center"|86
|-
|align="center" | Fair || align="center"|43 || align="center"|65 || align="center"|76 || align="center"|82
|-
|align="center" | Good || align="center"|32 || align="center"|58 || align="center"|72 || align="center"|79
|-
|rowspan="3"| Woods.{{ref |label woods3|E|E}}
|align="center" | Poor || align="center"|45 || align="center"|66 || align="center"|77 || align="center"|83
|-
|align="center" | Fair || align="center"|36 || align="center"|60 || align="center"|73 || align="center"|79
|-
|align="center" | Good || align="center"|30 || align="center"|55 || align="center"|70 || align="center"|77
|-
|Farmsteads—buildings, lanes, driveways, and surrounding lots.
|align="center" | --- || align="center"|59 || align="center"|74 || align="center"|82 || align="center"|86
|}
{|
|-
|{{note label|pasture|A|A}} Poor: <50% ground cover or heavily grazed with no mulch; Fair: 50-75% ground cover and not heavily grazed; Good: >75% ground cover and light or only occasionally grazed.
|-
|{{note label|woods|B|B}} Poor: <50% ground cover; Fair: 50-75% ground cover; Good: >75% ground cover.
|-
|{{note label|CN|C|C}} Actual curve number is less than 30; use CN = 30 for runoff computation.
|-
|{{note label|woods2|D|D}} CN's shown were computed for areas with 50% woods and 50% grass (pasture) cover. Other combinations of conditions may be computed from the CN's for woods and pasture.
|-
|{{note label|woods3|E|E}} Poor: Forest litter, small trees, and brush are destroyed by heavy grazing or regular burning; Fair: Woods are grazed but not burned, and some forest litter covers the soil; Good: Woods are protected from grazing, and litter and brush adequately cover the soil.
|}
 
====Arid and semiarid rangelands====
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="2"  |'''Cover description''' || align="center" colspan="4"  |'''Curve numbers for hydrologic soil group'''
|-
|'''Cover type''' ||align="center"| '''Hydrologic condition'''{{ref | label hydro|A|A}}  ||align="center" |'''A'''{{ref | label CN|B|B}} ||align="center" |'''B''' ||align="center" |'''C''' ||align="center" |'''D'''
|-
|rowspan="3"|Herbaceuous—mixture of grass, weeds, and low-growing brush, with brush the minor element
|align="center" | Poor || align="center"| || align="center"|80 || align="center"|87 || align="center"|93
|-
|align="center" | Fair || align="center"| || align="center"|71 || align="center"|81 || align="center"|89
|-
|align="center" | Good || align="center"| || align="center"|62 || align="center"|74 || align="center"|85
|-
|rowspan="3"|Oak-aspen—mountain brush mixture of oak brush, aspen, mountain mahogany, bitter brush, maple, and other brush
|align="center" | Poor || align="center"| || align="center"|66 || align="center"|74 || align="center"|79
|-
|align="center" | Fair || align="center"| || align="center"|48 || align="center"|57 || align="center"|63
|-
|align="center" | Good || align="center"| || align="center"|30 || align="center"|41 || align="center"|48
|-
|rowspan="3"|Pinyon-juniper—pinyon, juniper, or both; grass understory
|align="center" | Poor || align="center"| || align="center"|75 || align="center"|85 || align="center"|89
|-
|align="center" | Fair || align="center"| || align="center"|58 || align="center"|73 || align="center"|80
|-
|align="center" | Good || align="center"| || align="center"|41 || align="center"|61 || align="center"|71
|-
|rowspan="3"|Sagebrush with grass understory
|align="center" | Poor || align="center"| || align="center"|67 || align="center"|80 || align="center"|85
|-
|align="center" | Fair || align="center"| || align="center"|51 || align="center"|63 || align="center"|70
|-
|align="center" | Good || align="center"| || align="center"|35 || align="center"|47 || align="center"|55
|-
|rowspan="3"|Desert shrub—major plants include saltbush, geasewood, creosotebush, blackbrush, bursage, palo verde, mesquite, and cactus.
|align="center" | Poor || align="center"| 63 || align="center"|77 || align="center"|85 || align="center"|88
|-
|align="center" | Fair || align="center"| 55 || align="center"|72 || align="center"|81|| align="center"|86
|-
|align="center" | Good || align="center"| 49|| align="center"| 68|| align="center"|79 || align="center"|84
|-
|}
{|
|-
|{{note label |hydro|A|A}} Poor: <30% ground cover (litter, grass, and brush overstory); Fair: 30 to 70% ground cover; Good: >70% ground cover.
|-
|{{note label |CN|B|B}} Curve numbers for group A have been developed only for desert shrub.
|}
 
==Curve Number Adjustments==
Runoff is affected by the [[soil moisture]] before a precipitation event, or the ''antecedent moisture condition'' (AMC). A curve number, as calculated above, may also be termed AMC II or <math>CN_{II}</math>, or average soil moisture. The other moisture conditions are dry, AMC I or <math>CN_{I}</math>, and moist, AMC III or <math>CN_{III}</math>. The curve number can be adjusted by ''factors'' to <math>CN_{II}</math>, where <math>CN_{I}</math> factors are less than 1 (reduce <math>CN</math> and potential runoff), while <math>CN_{III}</math> factor are greater than 1 (increase <math>CN</math> and potential runoff). The AMC factors can be looked up in the reference table below. Find the CN value for AMC II and multiply it by the adjustment factor based on the actual AMC to determine the adjusted curve number.
 
===Adjustments to Select Curve Number for Soil Moisture Conditions<ref name="ward">{{cite book |last=Ward |first=Andy D. |last2=Trimble |first2=Stanley W. |year=2004 |title=Environmental Hydrology |url= |location=Boca Raton, Florida 33431 |publisher=CRC Press LLC |isbn=1-55670-616-5 |accessdate= }}</ref>===
 
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|align="center" rowspan="2" | Curve Number (AMC II) ||align="center" colspan="2"| Factors to Convert Curve Number for AMC II to AMC I or III
|-
|align="center" |AMC I (dry) ||align="center" |AMC III (wet)
|-
|align="center"|10 || align="center"|0.40 || align="center"|2.22
|-
|align="center"|20 || align="center"|0.45 || align="center"|1.85
|-
|align="center"|30 || align="center"|0.50 || align="center"|1.67
|-
|align="center"|40 || align="center"|0.55 || align="center"|1.50
|-
|align="center"|50 || align="center"|0.62 || align="center"|1.40
|-
|align="center"|60 || align="center"|0.67 || align="center"|1.30
|-
|align="center"|70 || align="center"|0.73 || align="center"|1.21
|-
|align="center"|80 || align="center"|0.79 || align="center"|1.14
|-
|align="center"|90 || align="center"|0.87 || align="center"|1.07
|-
|align="center"|100 ||align="center"|1.00 || align="center"|1.00
|-
|}
 
===Initial Abstraction Ratio Adjustment===
 
The relationship <math>I_a = 0.2S</math> was derived from the study of many small, experimental watersheds . Since the history and documentation of this relationship are relatively obscure, more recent analysis used model fitting methods to determine the ratio of <math>I_a</math> to <math>S</math> with hundreds of rainfall-runoff data from numerous U.S. watersheds. In the model fitting done by Hawkins et al. (2002)<ref name="hawkins2002"/> found that the ratio of <math>I_a</math> to <math>S</math> varies from storm to storm and watershed to watershed and that the assumption of <math>I_a/S=0.20</math> is usually high. More than 90 percent of <math>I_a/S</math> ratios were less than 0.2. Based on this study, use of <math>I_a/S</math> ratios of 0.05 rather than the commonly used value of 0.20 would seem more appropriate. Thus, the CN runoff equation becomes:
 
:<math>Q=\begin{cases}
0 & \text{for } P \leq 0.05S \\
\frac{(P-0.05S_{0.05})^2}{P+0.95S_{0.05}} & \text{for } P>0.05S \end{cases}</math>
 
In this equation, note that the values of <math>S_{0.05}</math> are not the same as the one used in estimating direct runoff with an <math>I_a/S</math> ratio of 0.20, because 5 percent of the storage is assumed to be the initial abstraction, not 20 percent. The relationship between <math>S_{0.05}</math> and <math>S_{0.20}</math> was obtained from model fitting results, giving the relationship:
 
:<math> S_{0.05}=1.33{S_{0.20}}^{1.15}</math>
 
The user, then, must do the following to use the adjusted 0.05 initial abstraction ratio:
 
# Use the traditional tables of curve numbers to select the value appropriate for your watershed.
# Calculate <math>S_{0.20}</math> using the traditional equation:
 
:<math>S = \frac{1000}{CN} - 10</math>
 
# Convert this S value to <math>S_{0.05}</math> using the relationship above.
# Calculate the runoff depth using the CN runoff equation above (with 0.05 substituted for the initial abstraction ratio).
 
==See also==
*[[Hydrological modelling]]
*[[Runoff model (reservoir)]]
 
==References==
{{Reflist}}
 
==External links==
*[http://www.lmnoeng.com/Hydrology/hydrology.htm SCS TR-55 Peak Discharge and Runoff Calculator]
*[http://zonums.com/online/hydrology/curve_number.php Curve Number Calculator] Online Free Curve Number Calculator
*[http://www.professorpatel.com/curve-number-introduction.html Introduction to SCS Runoff Curve Number Method]
 
[[Category:Hydrology]]
[[Category:Soil physics]]

Revision as of 07:38, 2 April 2013

The runoff curve number (also called a curve number or simply CN) is an empirical parameter used in hydrology for predicting direct runoff or infiltration from rainfall excess.[1] The curve number method was developed by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, which was formerly called the Soil Conservation Service or SCS — the number is still popularly known as a "SCS runoff curve number" in the literature. The runoff curve number was developed from an empirical analysis of runoff from small catchments and hillslope plots monitored by the USDA. It is widely used and is an efficient method for determining the approximate amount of direct runoff from a rainfall event in a particular area.

The runoff curve number is based on the area's hydrologic soil group, land use, treatment and hydrologic condition. References, such as from USDA[1] indicate the runoff curve numbers for characteristic land cover descriptions and a hydrologic soil group.

The runoff equation is:

Q={0for PIa(PIa)2PIa+Sfor P>Ia

where

Q is runoff ([L]; in)
P is rainfall ([L]; in)
S is the potential maximum soil moisture retention after runoff begins ([L]; in)
Ia is the initial abstraction ([L]; in), or the amount of water before runoff, such as infiltration, or rainfall interception by vegetation; historically, it has generally been assumed that Ia=0.2S, although more recent research has found that Ia=0.05S may be a more appropriate and accurate relationship.[2]

The runoff curve number, CN, is then related

S=1000CN10

CN has a range from 30 to 100; lower numbers indicate low runoff potential while larger numbers are for increasing runoff potential. The lower the curve number, the more permeable the soil is. As can be seen in the curve number equation, runoff cannot begin until the initial abstraction has been met.

Curve Number Selection

The NRCS curve number is related to soil type, soil infiltration capability, land use, and the depth of the seasonal high water table. To account for different soils' ability to infiltrate, NRCS has divided soils into four hydrologic soil groups (HSGs). They are defined as follows.[1]

  • HSG Group A (low runoff potential): Soils with high infiltration rates even when thoroughly wetted. These consist chiefly of deep, well-drained sands and gravels. These soils have a high rate of water transmission (final infiltration rate greater than 0.3 in./h).
  • HSG Group B Soils with moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted. These consist chiefly of soils that are moderately deep to deep, moderately well drained to well drained with moderately fine to moderately course textures. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission (final infiltration rate of 0.15 to 0.30 in./h).
  • HSG Group C: Soils with slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted. These consist chiefly of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water or soils with moderately fine to fine textures. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission (final infiltration rate 0.05 to 0.15 in./h).
  • HSG Group D (high runoff potential): Soils with very slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted. These consist chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious materials. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission (final infiltration rate less than 0.05 in./h).

Selection of a hydrologic soil group should be done based on measured infiltration rates, soil survey (such as the NRCS Web Soil Survey), or judgement from a qualified soil science or geotechnical professional. The table below presents curve numbers for antecedent soil moisture condition II (average moisture condition). To alter the curve number based on moisture condition or other parameters, see the CN adjustment section.

Runoff curve numbers

Fully developed urban areas (vegetation established)

Cover description Curve numbers for hydrologic soil group
A B C D
Open space (lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, etc.)
Poor condition (grass cover <50%) 68 79 86 89
Poor condition (grass cover 50 to 75%) 49 69 79 84
Poor condition (grass cover >75%) 39 61 74 80
Impervious areas:
Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways, etc. (excluding right of way) 98 98 98 98
Streets and roads:
Paved; curbs and storm sewers (excluding right-of-way) 98 98 98 98
Paved; open ditches (including right-of-way) 83 89 92 93
Gravel (including right of way) 76 85 89 91
Dirt (including right-of-way) 72 82 87 89
Western desert urban areas:
Natural desert landscaping (pervious area only) 63 77 85 88
Artificial desert landscaping (impervious weed barrier, desert shrub with 1- to 2-inch sand or gravel mulch and basin borders) 96 96 96 96
Urban districts:
Commercial and business (85% imp.) 89 92 94 95
Industrial (72% imp.) 81 88 91 93
Residential districts by average lot size:
1/8 acre or less (town houses) (65% imp.)/small> 77 85 90 92
1/4 acre (38% imp.) 61 75 83 87
1/3 acre (30% imp.) 57 72 81 86
1/2 acre (25% imp.) 54 70 80 85
1 acre (20% imp.) 51 68 79 84
2 acres (12% imp.) 46 65 77 82

Developing urban areas

Cover description Curve numbers for hydrologic soil group
A B C D
Newly graded areas (pervious areas only, no vegetation) 77 86 91 94

Cultivated agricultural lands

Cover description Curve numbers for hydrologic soil group
Cover type TreatmentPlastic and Reconstructive Surgeon Bud from Vernon, loves hang gliding, property developers in singapore and texting. Likes to visit new cities and spots such as Monasteries of Haghpat and Sanahin.

Here is my webpage; http://www.globalmajorproperties.com
Hydrologic condition A B C D
Fallow Bare soil -- 77 86 91 94
Crop residue cover (CR) Poor 76 85 90 93
Good 74 83 88 90
Row crops Straight row (SR) Poor 72 81 88 91
Good 67 78 85 89
SR + CR Poor 71 80 87 90
Good 64 75 82 85
Contoured (C) Poor 70 79 84 88
Good 65 75 82 86
C + CR Poor 69 78 83 87
Good 64 74 81 85
Contoured & terraced (C&T) Poor 66 74 80 82
Good 62 71 78 81
C&T + R Poor 65 73 79 81
Good 61 70 77 80
Small grain SR Poor 65 76 84 88
Good 63 75 83 87
SR + CR Poor 64 75 83 86
Good 60 72 80 84
C Poor 63 74 82 85
Good 61 73 81 84
C + CR Poor 62 73 81 84
Good 60 72 80 83
C&T Poor 61 72 79 82
Good 59 70 78 81
C&T + R Poor 60 71 78 81
Good 58 69 77 80
Close-seeded or broadcast legumes or rotation meadow SR Poor 66 77 85 89
Good 58 72 81 85
C Poor 64 75 83 85
Good 55 69 78 83
C&T Poor 63 73 80 83
Good 51 67 76 80
24 years old Art Manager or Manager Harry Kamm from West Hill, really likes ceramics, property developers in Singapore house for rent and walking. Recently has traveled to . Crop residue cover applies only if residue is on at least 5% of the surface throughout the year.

Other agricultural lands

Cover description Curve numbers for hydrologic soil group
Cover type Hydrologic condition A B C D
Pasture, grassland, or range—continuous forage for grazing.I am Wyatt and was born on 10 June 1973. My hobbies are Vintage car and Yo-yoing.

Feel free to visit my website - Hostgator Voucher
Poor 68 79 86 89
Fair 49 69 79 84
Good 39 61 74 80
Meadow—continuous grass, protected from grazing and generally mowed for hay. --- 30 58 71 78
Brush—brush-weed-grass mixture with brush the major element.I am Wyatt and was born on 10 June 1973. My hobbies are Vintage car and Yo-yoing.

Feel free to visit my website - Hostgator Voucher
Poor 48 67 77 83
Fair 35 56 70 77
Good 30I am Wyatt and was born on 10 June 1973. My hobbies are Vintage car and Yo-yoing.

Feel free to visit my website - Hostgator Voucher
48 65 73
Woods—grass combination (orchard or tree farm).I am Wyatt and was born on 10 June 1973. My hobbies are Vintage car and Yo-yoing.

Feel free to visit my website - Hostgator Voucher
Poor 57 73 82 86
Fair 43 65 76 82
Good 32 58 72 79
Woods.I am Wyatt and was born on 10 June 1973. My hobbies are Vintage car and Yo-yoing.

Feel free to visit my website - Hostgator Voucher
Poor 45 66 77 83
Fair 36 60 73 79
Good 30 55 70 77
Farmsteads—buildings, lanes, driveways, and surrounding lots. --- 59 74 82 86
24 years old Art Manager or Manager Harry Kamm from West Hill, really likes ceramics, property developers in Singapore house for rent and walking. Recently has traveled to . Poor: <50% ground cover or heavily grazed with no mulch; Fair: 50-75% ground cover and not heavily grazed; Good: >75% ground cover and light or only occasionally grazed.
24 years old Art Manager or Manager Harry Kamm from West Hill, really likes ceramics, property developers in Singapore house for rent and walking. Recently has traveled to . Poor: <50% ground cover; Fair: 50-75% ground cover; Good: >75% ground cover.
24 years old Art Manager or Manager Harry Kamm from West Hill, really likes ceramics, property developers in Singapore house for rent and walking. Recently has traveled to . Actual curve number is less than 30; use CN = 30 for runoff computation.
24 years old Art Manager or Manager Harry Kamm from West Hill, really likes ceramics, property developers in Singapore house for rent and walking. Recently has traveled to . CN's shown were computed for areas with 50% woods and 50% grass (pasture) cover. Other combinations of conditions may be computed from the CN's for woods and pasture.
24 years old Art Manager or Manager Harry Kamm from West Hill, really likes ceramics, property developers in Singapore house for rent and walking. Recently has traveled to . Poor: Forest litter, small trees, and brush are destroyed by heavy grazing or regular burning; Fair: Woods are grazed but not burned, and some forest litter covers the soil; Good: Woods are protected from grazing, and litter and brush adequately cover the soil.

Arid and semiarid rangelands

Cover description Curve numbers for hydrologic soil group
Cover type Hydrologic conditionI am Wyatt and was born on 10 June 1973. My hobbies are Vintage car and Yo-yoing.

Feel free to visit my website - Hostgator Voucher
AI am Wyatt and was born on 10 June 1973. My hobbies are Vintage car and Yo-yoing.

Feel free to visit my website - Hostgator Voucher
B C D
Herbaceuous—mixture of grass, weeds, and low-growing brush, with brush the minor element Poor 80 87 93
Fair 71 81 89
Good 62 74 85
Oak-aspen—mountain brush mixture of oak brush, aspen, mountain mahogany, bitter brush, maple, and other brush Poor 66 74 79
Fair 48 57 63
Good 30 41 48
Pinyon-juniper—pinyon, juniper, or both; grass understory Poor 75 85 89
Fair 58 73 80
Good 41 61 71
Sagebrush with grass understory Poor 67 80 85
Fair 51 63 70
Good 35 47 55
Desert shrub—major plants include saltbush, geasewood, creosotebush, blackbrush, bursage, palo verde, mesquite, and cactus. Poor 63 77 85 88
Fair 55 72 81 86
Good 49 68 79 84
24 years old Art Manager or Manager Harry Kamm from West Hill, really likes ceramics, property developers in Singapore house for rent and walking. Recently has traveled to . Poor: <30% ground cover (litter, grass, and brush overstory); Fair: 30 to 70% ground cover; Good: >70% ground cover.
24 years old Art Manager or Manager Harry Kamm from West Hill, really likes ceramics, property developers in Singapore house for rent and walking. Recently has traveled to . Curve numbers for group A have been developed only for desert shrub.

Curve Number Adjustments

Runoff is affected by the soil moisture before a precipitation event, or the antecedent moisture condition (AMC). A curve number, as calculated above, may also be termed AMC II or CNII, or average soil moisture. The other moisture conditions are dry, AMC I or CNI, and moist, AMC III or CNIII. The curve number can be adjusted by factors to CNII, where CNI factors are less than 1 (reduce CN and potential runoff), while CNIII factor are greater than 1 (increase CN and potential runoff). The AMC factors can be looked up in the reference table below. Find the CN value for AMC II and multiply it by the adjustment factor based on the actual AMC to determine the adjusted curve number.

Adjustments to Select Curve Number for Soil Moisture Conditions[3]

Curve Number (AMC II) Factors to Convert Curve Number for AMC II to AMC I or III
AMC I (dry) AMC III (wet)
10 0.40 2.22
20 0.45 1.85
30 0.50 1.67
40 0.55 1.50
50 0.62 1.40
60 0.67 1.30
70 0.73 1.21
80 0.79 1.14
90 0.87 1.07
100 1.00 1.00

Initial Abstraction Ratio Adjustment

The relationship Ia=0.2S was derived from the study of many small, experimental watersheds . Since the history and documentation of this relationship are relatively obscure, more recent analysis used model fitting methods to determine the ratio of Ia to S with hundreds of rainfall-runoff data from numerous U.S. watersheds. In the model fitting done by Hawkins et al. (2002)[2] found that the ratio of Ia to S varies from storm to storm and watershed to watershed and that the assumption of Ia/S=0.20 is usually high. More than 90 percent of Ia/S ratios were less than 0.2. Based on this study, use of Ia/S ratios of 0.05 rather than the commonly used value of 0.20 would seem more appropriate. Thus, the CN runoff equation becomes:

Q={0for P0.05S(P0.05S0.05)2P+0.95S0.05for P>0.05S

In this equation, note that the values of S0.05 are not the same as the one used in estimating direct runoff with an Ia/S ratio of 0.20, because 5 percent of the storage is assumed to be the initial abstraction, not 20 percent. The relationship between S0.05 and S0.20 was obtained from model fitting results, giving the relationship:

S0.05=1.33S0.201.15

The user, then, must do the following to use the adjusted 0.05 initial abstraction ratio:

  1. Use the traditional tables of curve numbers to select the value appropriate for your watershed.
  2. Calculate S0.20 using the traditional equation:
S=1000CN10
  1. Convert this S value to S0.05 using the relationship above.
  2. Calculate the runoff depth using the CN runoff equation above (with 0.05 substituted for the initial abstraction ratio).

See also

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

External links

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  2. 2.0 2.1 One of the biggest reasons investing in a Singapore new launch is an effective things is as a result of it is doable to be lent massive quantities of money at very low interest rates that you should utilize to purchase it. Then, if property values continue to go up, then you'll get a really high return on funding (ROI). Simply make sure you purchase one of the higher properties, reminiscent of the ones at Fernvale the Riverbank or any Singapore landed property Get Earnings by means of Renting

    In its statement, the singapore property listing - website link, government claimed that the majority citizens buying their first residence won't be hurt by the new measures. Some concessions can even be prolonged to chose teams of consumers, similar to married couples with a minimum of one Singaporean partner who are purchasing their second property so long as they intend to promote their first residential property. Lower the LTV limit on housing loans granted by monetary establishments regulated by MAS from 70% to 60% for property purchasers who are individuals with a number of outstanding housing loans on the time of the brand new housing purchase. Singapore Property Measures - 30 August 2010 The most popular seek for the number of bedrooms in Singapore is 4, followed by 2 and three. Lush Acres EC @ Sengkang

    Discover out more about real estate funding in the area, together with info on international funding incentives and property possession. Many Singaporeans have been investing in property across the causeway in recent years, attracted by comparatively low prices. However, those who need to exit their investments quickly are likely to face significant challenges when trying to sell their property – and could finally be stuck with a property they can't sell. Career improvement programmes, in-house valuation, auctions and administrative help, venture advertising and marketing, skilled talks and traisning are continuously planned for the sales associates to help them obtain better outcomes for his or her shoppers while at Knight Frank Singapore. No change Present Rules

    Extending the tax exemption would help. The exemption, which may be as a lot as $2 million per family, covers individuals who negotiate a principal reduction on their existing mortgage, sell their house short (i.e., for lower than the excellent loans), or take part in a foreclosure course of. An extension of theexemption would seem like a common-sense means to assist stabilize the housing market, but the political turmoil around the fiscal-cliff negotiations means widespread sense could not win out. Home Minority Chief Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) believes that the mortgage relief provision will be on the table during the grand-cut price talks, in response to communications director Nadeam Elshami. Buying or promoting of blue mild bulbs is unlawful.

    A vendor's stamp duty has been launched on industrial property for the primary time, at rates ranging from 5 per cent to 15 per cent. The Authorities might be trying to reassure the market that they aren't in opposition to foreigners and PRs investing in Singapore's property market. They imposed these measures because of extenuating components available in the market." The sale of new dual-key EC models will even be restricted to multi-generational households only. The models have two separate entrances, permitting grandparents, for example, to dwell separately. The vendor's stamp obligation takes effect right this moment and applies to industrial property and plots which might be offered inside three years of the date of buy. JLL named Best Performing Property Brand for second year running

    The data offered is for normal info purposes only and isn't supposed to be personalised investment or monetary advice. Motley Fool Singapore contributor Stanley Lim would not personal shares in any corporations talked about. Singapore private home costs increased by 1.eight% within the fourth quarter of 2012, up from 0.6% within the earlier quarter. Resale prices of government-built HDB residences which are usually bought by Singaporeans, elevated by 2.5%, quarter on quarter, the quickest acquire in five quarters. And industrial property, prices are actually double the levels of three years ago. No withholding tax in the event you sell your property. All your local information regarding vital HDB policies, condominium launches, land growth, commercial property and more

    There are various methods to go about discovering the precise property. Some local newspapers (together with the Straits Instances ) have categorised property sections and many local property brokers have websites. Now there are some specifics to consider when buying a 'new launch' rental. Intended use of the unit Every sale begins with 10 p.c low cost for finish of season sale; changes to 20 % discount storewide; follows by additional reduction of fiftyand ends with last discount of 70 % or extra. Typically there is even a warehouse sale or transferring out sale with huge mark-down of costs for stock clearance. Deborah Regulation from Expat Realtor shares her property market update, plus prime rental residences and houses at the moment available to lease Esparina EC @ Sengkang
  3. 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534