Franz Hofmeister: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Jkhoury
See also: Added link to American Chemical Society article
 
en>Monkbot
Line 1: Line 1:
Greetings. The author's name is Phebe and she feels comfortable when people use the complete name. Puerto Rico is where he's always been residing but she requirements to transfer because of her family. To gather badges is what her family and her enjoy. Since she was 18 she's been operating as a meter reader but she's usually wanted her personal business.<br><br>My homepage [https://www.epapyrus.com/xe/Purchase/5258960 std home test]
'''Cauchy's functional equation''' is the [[functional equation]]
:<math> f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y). \ </math>
 
Solutions to this are called [[additive function]]s.
Over the [[rational numbers]], it can be shown using elementary algebra that there is a single family of solutions, namely <math> f(x) = cx \ </math> for any arbitrary rational number <math>c</math>.
Over the [[real number]]s, this is still a family of solutions; however there can exist other solutions that are extremely complicated. Further constraints on ''f'' sometimes preclude other solutions, for example:
* if ''f'' is [[continuous function|continuous]] (proven by [[Cauchy]] in 1821).  This condition was weakened in 1875 by [[Darboux]] who showed that it was only necessary for the function to be continuous at one point.
* if ''f'' is [[monotonic function|monotonic]] on any interval.
* if ''f'' is [[bounded function|bounded]] on any interval.
On the other hand, if no further conditions are imposed on ''f'', then (assuming the [[axiom of choice]]) there are infinitely many other functions that satisfy the equation.  This was proved in 1905 by [[Georg Hamel]] using [[Hamel bases]]. Such functions are sometimes called ''Hamel functions''.<ref>Kuczma (2009), p.130</ref>
 
The [[Hilbert's fifth problem|fifth problem]] on [[Hilbert's problems|Hilbert's list]] is a generalisation of this equation. Functions where there exists a [[real number]] <math>c</math> such that <math> f(cx) \ne cf(x) \ </math> are known as Cauchy-Hamel functions and are used in Dehn-Hadwiger invariants which are used in the extension of [[Hilbert's third problem]] from 3-D to higher dimensions.<ref>V.G. Boltianskii (1978) "Hilbert's third problem", Halsted Press, Washington</ref>
 
== Proof of solution over rationals ==
 
First put <math>y = 0</math>:
 
:Then <math> f(x) = f(x+0) = f(x) + f(0) \ </math>
:Hence <math> f(0) = 0 \ </math>
 
Then put <math>y = -x</math>:
 
:Then <math> 0 = f(0) = f(x-x) = f(x) + f(-x) \ </math>
:Hence <math> f(-x) = -f(x) \ </math>
 
Then by repeated application of the function equation to <math> f(n x) = f(x + x + \cdots + x) </math> we get:
 
:<math> f(nx) = n f(x) \ </math>
 
And by replacing <math> x </math> with <math>\frac{x}{n}</math>:
 
:<math> f(x) = f \left( n \cdot \frac{x}{n} \right) = n f \left( \frac{x}{n} \right) \ </math>
 
Therefore
 
:<math> f \left( \frac{x}{n} \right) = \frac{1}{n} f(x) \ </math>
 
By putting the last three equations together, we get for any rational number <math>\frac{m}{n}</math>:
 
:<math> f \left( \frac{m}{n}x \right) = \frac{m}{n} f(x) \ </math>
 
Putting this all together, we get:
 
:<math> f \left( \alpha q \right) = q f(\alpha) \qquad \forall q \in \mathbb{Q}, \alpha \in \mathbb{R} \ </math>
 
Putting <math>\alpha = 1</math> we get the unique family of solutions over <math>\mathbb{Q}</math>.
 
==Properties of other solutions==
 
We prove below that any other solutions must be highly [[Pathological (mathematics)|pathological]] functions. In particular,
we show that any other solution must have the property that its graph  <math>y = f(x)</math> is
[[dense set|dense]] in <math>\mathbb{R}^2</math>, i.e. that any disk in the plane (however
small) contains a point from the graph. From this it is easy to prove the various conditions
given in the introductory paragraph.
 
Suppose without loss of generality that <math>f(q) = q \  \forall q \in \mathbb{Q}</math>,
and <math>f(\alpha) \neq \alpha</math> for some <math>\alpha \in \mathbb{R}</math>.
 
Then put <math>f(\alpha) = \alpha + \delta, \delta \neq 0</math>.
 
We now show how to find a point in an arbitrary circle, centre <math>(x,y)</math>,
radius <math>r</math> where <math>x,y,r \in \mathbb{Q}, r > 0, x \neq y</math>.
 
Put <math>\beta = \frac{y - x}{\delta}</math> and choose a rational number
<math>b\neq 0</math> close to <math>\beta</math> with:
 
:<math>\left|  \beta - b  \right| < \frac{r}{2 \left|\delta\right|}</math>
 
Then choose a rational number <math>a</math> close to <math>\alpha</math> with:
 
:<math>\left|  \alpha - a  \right| < \frac{r}{2\left|b\right|} </math>
 
Now put:
 
:<math>X = x + b (\alpha - a) \ </math>
:<math> Y = f(X)  \ </math>
 
Then using the functional equation, we get:
 
:<math> Y = f(x + b (\alpha - a)) \ </math>
:<math> = x + b f(\alpha) - b f(a) \ </math>
:<math> = y - \delta \beta + b f(\alpha) - b f(a) \ </math>
:<math> = y - \delta \beta + b (\alpha + \delta) - b a \ </math>
:<math> = y + b (\alpha - a) - \delta (\beta - b) \ </math>
 
Because of our choices above, the point <math>(X, Y)</math> is inside the circle.
 
==Proof of the existence of other solutions==
 
The linearity proof given above also applies to any set
<math>\alpha \mathbb{Q}</math>, a scaled copy of the rationals.
We can use this to find all solutions to the equation.
Note that this method is highly non-constructive, relying
as it does on the [[axiom of choice]].
 
If we assume the axiom of choice, there is a basis for the reals over <math>\mathbb{Q}</math>
i.e. a set <math>A \sub \mathbb{R}</math> such that
for every real number <math>z</math> there is a unique finite set
<math>X = \left\{ x_1,\dots x_n \right\} \sub A</math> and sequence
<math>\left( \lambda_i \right)</math> in <math>\mathbb{Q}</math>
such that:
 
:<math> z= \sum_{i=1}^n { \lambda_i x_i }</math>
 
By the argument above, on each copy of the rationals, <math>x \mathbb{Q}, x \in A</math>, <math>f </math> must coincide with a linear map, say with constant of proportionality ''g''(''x''). In other words, ''f''(''y'') = ''g''(''x'')''y'' for every ''y'' which is a rational multiple of ''x''. Then by use of the decomposition above and repeated application of the functional equation, we can obtain the value of the function for any real number:
 
:<math> f(z) = \sum_{i=1}^n { g(x_i) \lambda_i x_i }</math>
 
''f''(''z'') is a solution to the functional equation for any <math>g: A \rightarrow \mathbb{R}</math>, and every solution is of this form. ''f'' is linear if and only if ''g'' is constant.
 
== External links ==
 
* Solution to the Cauchy Equation [http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~useminar/cauchy.pdf Rutgers University]
* [http://cofault.com/2010/01/hunt-for-addictive-monster.html The Hunt for Addi(c)tive Monster]
 
== References ==
{{Reflist}}
 
*{{cite book | last = Kuczma | first=Marek | authorlink=Marek Kuczma| title=An introduction to the theory of functional equations and inequalities. Cauchy's equation and Jensen's inequality | publisher=Birkhäuser | location = Basel | year=2009 | isbn=9783764387495 }}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Cauchy's Functional Equation}}
[[Category:Arithmetic functions]]
[[Category:Functional equations]]

Revision as of 04:49, 19 January 2014

Cauchy's functional equation is the functional equation

f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y).

Solutions to this are called additive functions. Over the rational numbers, it can be shown using elementary algebra that there is a single family of solutions, namely f(x)=cx for any arbitrary rational number c. Over the real numbers, this is still a family of solutions; however there can exist other solutions that are extremely complicated. Further constraints on f sometimes preclude other solutions, for example:

  • if f is continuous (proven by Cauchy in 1821). This condition was weakened in 1875 by Darboux who showed that it was only necessary for the function to be continuous at one point.
  • if f is monotonic on any interval.
  • if f is bounded on any interval.

On the other hand, if no further conditions are imposed on f, then (assuming the axiom of choice) there are infinitely many other functions that satisfy the equation. This was proved in 1905 by Georg Hamel using Hamel bases. Such functions are sometimes called Hamel functions.[1]

The fifth problem on Hilbert's list is a generalisation of this equation. Functions where there exists a real number c such that f(cx)cf(x) are known as Cauchy-Hamel functions and are used in Dehn-Hadwiger invariants which are used in the extension of Hilbert's third problem from 3-D to higher dimensions.[2]

Proof of solution over rationals

First put y=0:

Then f(x)=f(x+0)=f(x)+f(0)
Hence f(0)=0

Then put y=x:

Then 0=f(0)=f(xx)=f(x)+f(x)
Hence f(x)=f(x)

Then by repeated application of the function equation to f(nx)=f(x+x++x) we get:

f(nx)=nf(x)

And by replacing x with xn:

f(x)=f(nxn)=nf(xn)

Therefore

f(xn)=1nf(x)

By putting the last three equations together, we get for any rational number mn:

f(mnx)=mnf(x)

Putting this all together, we get:

f(αq)=qf(α)q,α

Putting α=1 we get the unique family of solutions over .

Properties of other solutions

We prove below that any other solutions must be highly pathological functions. In particular, we show that any other solution must have the property that its graph y=f(x) is dense in 2, i.e. that any disk in the plane (however small) contains a point from the graph. From this it is easy to prove the various conditions given in the introductory paragraph.

Suppose without loss of generality that f(q)=qq, and f(α)α for some α.

Then put f(α)=α+δ,δ0.

We now show how to find a point in an arbitrary circle, centre (x,y), radius r where x,y,r,r>0,xy.

Put β=yxδ and choose a rational number b0 close to β with:

|βb|<r2|δ|

Then choose a rational number a close to α with:

|αa|<r2|b|

Now put:

X=x+b(αa)
Y=f(X)

Then using the functional equation, we get:

Y=f(x+b(αa))
=x+bf(α)bf(a)
=yδβ+bf(α)bf(a)
=yδβ+b(α+δ)ba
=y+b(αa)δ(βb)

Because of our choices above, the point (X,Y) is inside the circle.

Proof of the existence of other solutions

The linearity proof given above also applies to any set α, a scaled copy of the rationals. We can use this to find all solutions to the equation. Note that this method is highly non-constructive, relying as it does on the axiom of choice.

If we assume the axiom of choice, there is a basis for the reals over i.e. a set A such that for every real number z there is a unique finite set X={x1,xn}A and sequence (λi) in such that:

z=i=1nλixi

By the argument above, on each copy of the rationals, x,xA, f must coincide with a linear map, say with constant of proportionality g(x). In other words, f(y) = g(x)y for every y which is a rational multiple of x. Then by use of the decomposition above and repeated application of the functional equation, we can obtain the value of the function for any real number:

f(z)=i=1ng(xi)λixi

f(z) is a solution to the functional equation for any g:A, and every solution is of this form. f is linear if and only if g is constant.

External links

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  1. Kuczma (2009), p.130
  2. V.G. Boltianskii (1978) "Hilbert's third problem", Halsted Press, Washington