Capitalization-weighted index: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>ShelfSkewed
m Disambiguate AMEX to American Stock Exchange
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The writer's name is Andera and she believes it sounds fairly great. I've always cherished living in Mississippi. To perform lacross is 1 of the things she enjoys most. Credit authorising is exactly where my primary earnings comes from.<br><br>Here is my site - [http://cpacs.org/index.php?document_srl=90091&mid=board_zTGg26 spirit messages]
In [[statistics]], '''familywise error rate (FWER)''' is the [[probability]] of making one or more false discoveries, or [[Type I and type II errors|type I error]]s among all the hypotheses when performing [[multiple comparisons|multiple hypotheses tests]].
 
==Definitions==
 
===Classification of ''m'' hypothesis tests===
Suppose we have ''m'' null hypotheses, denoted by: ''H''<sub>1</sub>,&nbsp;''H''<sub>2</sub>,&nbsp;...,&nbsp;''H''<sub>''m''</sub>.
<br />
Using a [[Statistical hypothesis testing|statistical test]], each hypothesis is declared significant/non-significant.<br />
Summing the test results over ''H<sub>i</sub>''&nbsp; will give us the following table and related random variables:
 
{|class="wikitable"
! |
! Null hypothesis is True
! Alternative hypothesis is True
! | Total
|- align="center"
! | Declared significant
| <math>V</math>
| <math>S</math>
| <math>R</math>
|- align="center"
! | Declared non-significant
| <math>U</math>
| <math>T</math>
| <math>m - R</math>
|- align="center"
! Total
| <math>m_0</math>
| <math>m - m_0</math>
| <math>m</math>
|}
 
* <math>m_0</math> is the number of true [[null hypothesis|null hypotheses]], an unknown parameter
* <math>m - m_0</math> is the number of true [[alternative hypothesis|alternative hypotheses]]
* <math>V</math> is the number of [[Type I and type II errors|false positives (Type I error)]]
* <math>S</math> is the number of [[Type I and type II errors|true positives]]
* <math>T</math> is the number of [[Type I and type II errors|false negatives (Type II error)]]
* <math>U</math> is the number of [[Type I and type II errors|true negatives]]
* <math>R</math> is the number of rejected null hypotheses
 
* <math>R</math> is an observable [[random variable]], while <math>S</math>, <math>T</math>, <math>U</math>, and <math>V</math> are unobservable [[random variable]]s.
 
===The FWER===
The FWER is the probability of making even one [[Type I and type II errors|type I error]] In the family,
 
:<math> \mathrm{FWER} = \Pr(V \ge 1), \,</math>
 
or equivalently,
 
:<math> \mathrm{FWER} = 1 -\Pr(V = 0).</math>
 
Thus, by assuring <math> \mathrm{FWER} \le \alpha\,\! \,</math>, the probability of making even one [[Type I and type II errors|type I error]] in the family is controlled at level <math>\alpha\,\!</math>.
 
A procedure controls the FWER '''in the weak sense''' if the FWER control at level <math>\alpha\,\!</math> is guaranteed '''only''' when all null hypotheses are true (i.e. when <math>m_0</math> = <math>m</math> so the global null hypothesis is true)
 
A procedure controls the FWER '''in the strong sense''' if the FWER control at level <math>\alpha\,\!</math> is guaranteed for '''any''' configuration of true and non-true null hypotheses (including the global null hypothesis)
 
==The concept of a family==
 
Within the statistical framework, there are several definitions for the term "family":
 
* First of all, a distinction must be made between [[exploratory data analysis]] and [[Statistical hypothesis testing|confirmatory data analysis]]: for exploratory analysis – the family constitutes all inferences made and those that potentially could be made, whereas in the case of confirmatory analysis, the family must include only inferences of interest specified prior to the study.
* '''Hochberg & Tamhane (1987)'''<ref>{{Cite book |author=Hochberg Y, Tamhane AC |year=1987 |title=Multiple comparison procedures |location=New York |publisher=Wiley}}</ref> define "family" as "any collection of inferences for which it is meaningful to take into account some combined measure of error".
 
* According to '''Cox (1982)''', a set of inferences should be regarded a family:
# To take into account the selection effect due to [[data dredging]]
# To ensure simultaneous correctness of a set of inferences as to guarantee a correct overall decision
 
To summarize, a family could best be defined by the potential selective inference that is being faced: A family is the smallest set of items of inference in an analysis, interchangeable about their meaning for the goal of research, from which selection of results for action, presentation or highlighting could be made ([[Yoav Benjamini|Benjamini]]).
 
=== History ===
 
[[John Tukey|Tukey]] first coined the term [[experimentwise error rate]] and '''"per-experiment"''' error rate for the error rate that the researcher should use as a control level in a multiple hypothesis experiment.
 
Since not all tests done in an experiment should constitute a single family (for example: in a multiple-stage experiment, a separate family might be used for each stage), the terminology was changed (by '''Miller''') to "family-wise error-rate" (and was later adopted by Tukey as '''"batchwise"''' or '''"per batch"''').
 
==Simultaneous inference vs. selective inference==
 
Controlling FWER is a form of '''simultaneous inference''', where all inference made in a family are jointly corrected up to a pre-specified error rate. Depending on the definition of the family, the researcher might choose a different form of inference:
 
For example, simultaneous inference may be too conservative for certain large-scale problems that are currently being addressed by science. For such problems, a '''selective inference''' approach might be more suitable, since it assumes that any sub-group of hypotheses from the large scale group can be viewed as a family. Selective inference is usually performed by controlling the [[false discovery rate|FDR (false discovery rate criteria)]]. FDR controlling procedures are more [[Statistical power|powerful]] (i.e. less conservative) procedures than the familywise error rate (FWER) procedures (such as the [[Bonferroni correction]]), at the cost of increasing the likelihood of false positives within the rejected hypothesis.
 
==Controlling procedures==
 
The following is a concise review of some of the "old and trusted" solutions that ensure strong level <math>\alpha</math> FWER control, followed by some newer solutions.  A good review of many of the available methods can be found in the book "Multiple comparison procedures" (Wiley, 1987), by Hochberg and [[Ajit Tamhane|Tamhane]].
 
===  The Bonferroni procedure ===
{{main|Bonferroni correction}}
* Denote by <math>p_{i}</math> the p-value for testing <math>H_{i}</math>
* reject <math>H_{i}</math> if <math> p_{i} \leq \frac{\alpha}{m} </math>
 
===  The Šidák procedure ===
{{main|Šidák correction}}
* If the test statistics are independent then testing each hypothesis at level <math> \alpha_{SID} = 1-(1-\alpha)^\frac{1}{m} </math> is Sidak's multiple testing procedure.
* This test is more powerful than Bonferroni but the gain is small, and the procedure is far less general than Bonferroni's since it requires independence.
 
=== Tukey's procedure ===
{{main|Tukey's range test}}
* Tukey's procedure is only applicable for [[pairwise comparison]]s.
* It assumes independence of the observations being tested, as well as equal variation across observations ([[homoscedasticity]]).
* The procedure calculates for each pair the [[studentized range]] statistic: <math> \frac {Y_{A}-Y_{B}} {SE} </math> where <math>Y_{A}</math> is the larger of the two means being compared, <math>Y_{B}</math> is the smaller, and <math>SE</math> is the standard error of the data in question.
* Tukey's test is essentially a [[Student's t-test]], except that it corrects for '''family-wise error-rate'''.
 
A correction with a similar framework is [[Fisher’s LSD]] (Least Significant Difference).
 
'''some newer solutions for strong level <math>\alpha</math> FWER control:'''
 
=== Holm's  step-down procedure (1979)===
{{main|Holm–Bonferroni method}}
 
* Start by ordering the p-values <math>P_{(1)} \ldots P_{(m)}</math> and let the associated hypotheses be  <math>H_{(1)} \ldots H_{(m)}</math>
 
* Let <math>R</math> be the smallest <math>k</math> such that <math>P_{(k)} > \frac{\alpha}{m+1-k}</math>
 
* Reject the null hypotheses <math>H_{(1)} \ldots H_{(R-1)}</math>. If <math>R = 1</math> then none of the hypotheses are rejected.
 
* This procedure is uniformly better than Bonferroni's.
 
* It is worth noticing here that the reason why this procedure controls the family-wise error rate for all the m hypotheses at level α in the strong sense, is because it is essentially a [[closed testing procedure]]. As such, each intersection is tested using the simple Bonferroni test.
 
=== Hochberg's step-up procedure (1988)===
Hochberg's step-up procedure (1988) is performed using the following steps:<ref name=Hochberg1988>{{cite journal | last1 = Hochberg | first1= Yosef | year = 1988 | title = A Sharper Bonferroni Procedure for Multiple Tests of Significance | journal = [[Biometrika]] | volume = 75 | issue = 4 | pages = 800–802 | url = http://www-stat.wharton.upenn.edu/~steele/Courses/956/Resource/MultipleComparision/Hochberg88.pdf | doi=10.1093/biomet/75.4.800}}</ref>
 
* Start by ordering the p-values <math>P_{(1)} \ldots P_{(m)}</math> and let the associated hypotheses be  <math>H_{(1)} \ldots H_{(m)}</math>
 
* For a given <math>\alpha</math>, let <math>R</math> be the largest <math>k</math> such that <math>P_{(k)} \leq \frac{\alpha}{m+1-k}</math>
 
* Reject the null hypotheses <math>H_{(1)} \ldots H_{(R)}</math>
 
* Hochberg's procedure is more powerful than Holms'.
 
* Nevertheless, while Holm’s is based on Bonferroni with no restriction on the joint distribution of the test statistics, Hochberg’s is based on the [[False_discovery_rate#"Simes procedure"|Simes test (1987)]] so it holds only under independence (and also under some forms of positive dependence).
 
===Dunnett's correction===
{{main|Dunnett's test}}
[[Charles Dunnett]] (1955, 1966; not to be confused with Dunn) described an alternative alpha error adjustment when ''k'' groups are compared to the same control group. Now known as [[Dunnett's test]], this method is less conservative than the Bonferroni adjustment.
 
===Scheffé's method===
{{main|Scheffé's method}}
{{empty section|date=February 2013}}
 
===Closed testing procedure===
{{main|Closed testing procedure}}
Closed testing procedures control the familywise type I error rate, if in the closed testing procedure all intersection hypotheses are tested using valid local level α tests. Closed testing procedures are a flexible general class of testing procedures that include e.g. the Bonferroni procedure or Holm's  step-down procedure.
 
===Other procedures===
Other advanced procedures that ensure strong level <math>\alpha</math> FWER control include the [[maximum modulus test]].
 
It should also be noted that there are many alternatives to the attempt to control the familywise error rate. Most notably is the [[false discovery rate]] which was invented by [[Yoav Benjamini|Benjamini]] and [[Yosef Hochberg|Hochberg]] in 1995, and address many of the large-scale inferences problems in a more practical way.
 
==Example==
 
Consider a randomized clinical trial for a new antidepressant drug using three groups:
* Existing drug
* New drug
* Placebo
In such a design, the researcher might be interested in whether depressive symptoms (measured, for example, by a [[Beck Depression Inventory]] score) decreased to a greater extent for those using the new drug compared to the old drug. Further, one might be interested in whether any [[side effect]]s (e.g., [[hypersomnia]], decreased sex drive, and [[dry mouth]]) were observed. In such a case, '''two families''' would likely be identified:
# Effect of drug on depressive symptoms
# Occurrence of any side effects.
 
The researcher would assign an acceptable [[Type I and type II errors|Type I error]] rate, <math>\alpha</math>, (usually 0.05) to each family, and control for family-wise error using appropriate multiple comparison procedures:
* For the first family, effect of antidepressant on depressive symptoms, [[pairwise comparison]]s among groups might be jointly controlled using techniques such as [[Tukey's range test]]. [[Bonferroni correction]] might also suffice here since there are only three tests (three comparisons of depressive symptoms).
* In terms of the side effect profile, since we have three comparisons for each side effect, allowing each side effect its own alpha would result in a 37% chance of making at least one [[Type I and type II errors|Type I error]] (i.e.,(1 - (0.95)^9 = 1 - 0.63 = 0.37). Having a total of 9 hypotheses, the [[Bonferroni correction]] might be too conservative in this case; a more powerful tool such as [[Tukey's range test]] or the [[Holm-Bonferroni method]] will probably be more suitable: for example, the researcher may divide <math>\alpha</math> by three (0.05/3 = 0.0167) and allocate .0167 to each side effect multiple comparison procedure. In the case of [[Tukey's range test]], the critical value of q, the studentized range statistic, would thus be based on an <math>\alpha</math> value of 0.0167.
 
==See also==
 
*[[False discovery rate]]
 
==References==
 
<references />
 
==External links==
*[http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~omkar/329/ Large-scale Simultaneous Inference] – Syllabus, notes, and homework from Efron's course at Stanford.  Includes PDFs for each chapter of his book.
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Familywise Error Rate}}
[[Category:Hypothesis testing]]

Revision as of 06:31, 3 February 2014

In statistics, familywise error rate (FWER) is the probability of making one or more false discoveries, or type I errors among all the hypotheses when performing multiple hypotheses tests.

Definitions

Classification of m hypothesis tests

Suppose we have m null hypotheses, denoted by: H1H2, ..., Hm.
Using a statistical test, each hypothesis is declared significant/non-significant.
Summing the test results over Hi  will give us the following table and related random variables:

Null hypothesis is True Alternative hypothesis is True Total
Declared significant V S R
Declared non-significant U T mR
Total m0 mm0 m

The FWER

The FWER is the probability of making even one type I error In the family,

FWER=Pr(V1),

or equivalently,

FWER=1Pr(V=0).

Thus, by assuring FWERα, the probability of making even one type I error in the family is controlled at level α.

A procedure controls the FWER in the weak sense if the FWER control at level α is guaranteed only when all null hypotheses are true (i.e. when m0 = m so the global null hypothesis is true)

A procedure controls the FWER in the strong sense if the FWER control at level α is guaranteed for any configuration of true and non-true null hypotheses (including the global null hypothesis)

The concept of a family

Within the statistical framework, there are several definitions for the term "family":

  • First of all, a distinction must be made between exploratory data analysis and confirmatory data analysis: for exploratory analysis – the family constitutes all inferences made and those that potentially could be made, whereas in the case of confirmatory analysis, the family must include only inferences of interest specified prior to the study.
  • Hochberg & Tamhane (1987)[1] define "family" as "any collection of inferences for which it is meaningful to take into account some combined measure of error".
  • According to Cox (1982), a set of inferences should be regarded a family:
  1. To take into account the selection effect due to data dredging
  2. To ensure simultaneous correctness of a set of inferences as to guarantee a correct overall decision

To summarize, a family could best be defined by the potential selective inference that is being faced: A family is the smallest set of items of inference in an analysis, interchangeable about their meaning for the goal of research, from which selection of results for action, presentation or highlighting could be made (Benjamini).

History

Tukey first coined the term experimentwise error rate and "per-experiment" error rate for the error rate that the researcher should use as a control level in a multiple hypothesis experiment.

Since not all tests done in an experiment should constitute a single family (for example: in a multiple-stage experiment, a separate family might be used for each stage), the terminology was changed (by Miller) to "family-wise error-rate" (and was later adopted by Tukey as "batchwise" or "per batch").

Simultaneous inference vs. selective inference

Controlling FWER is a form of simultaneous inference, where all inference made in a family are jointly corrected up to a pre-specified error rate. Depending on the definition of the family, the researcher might choose a different form of inference:

For example, simultaneous inference may be too conservative for certain large-scale problems that are currently being addressed by science. For such problems, a selective inference approach might be more suitable, since it assumes that any sub-group of hypotheses from the large scale group can be viewed as a family. Selective inference is usually performed by controlling the FDR (false discovery rate criteria). FDR controlling procedures are more powerful (i.e. less conservative) procedures than the familywise error rate (FWER) procedures (such as the Bonferroni correction), at the cost of increasing the likelihood of false positives within the rejected hypothesis.

Controlling procedures

The following is a concise review of some of the "old and trusted" solutions that ensure strong level α FWER control, followed by some newer solutions. A good review of many of the available methods can be found in the book "Multiple comparison procedures" (Wiley, 1987), by Hochberg and Tamhane.

The Bonferroni procedure

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church.

The Šidák procedure

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church.

  • If the test statistics are independent then testing each hypothesis at level αSID=1(1α)1m is Sidak's multiple testing procedure.
  • This test is more powerful than Bonferroni but the gain is small, and the procedure is far less general than Bonferroni's since it requires independence.

Tukey's procedure

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church.

  • Tukey's procedure is only applicable for pairwise comparisons.
  • It assumes independence of the observations being tested, as well as equal variation across observations (homoscedasticity).
  • The procedure calculates for each pair the studentized range statistic: YAYBSE where YA is the larger of the two means being compared, YB is the smaller, and SE is the standard error of the data in question.
  • Tukey's test is essentially a Student's t-test, except that it corrects for family-wise error-rate.

A correction with a similar framework is Fisher’s LSD (Least Significant Difference).

some newer solutions for strong level α FWER control:

Holm's step-down procedure (1979)

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church.

  • Reject the null hypotheses H(1)H(R1). If R=1 then none of the hypotheses are rejected.
  • This procedure is uniformly better than Bonferroni's.
  • It is worth noticing here that the reason why this procedure controls the family-wise error rate for all the m hypotheses at level α in the strong sense, is because it is essentially a closed testing procedure. As such, each intersection is tested using the simple Bonferroni test.

Hochberg's step-up procedure (1988)

Hochberg's step-up procedure (1988) is performed using the following steps:[2]

  • Hochberg's procedure is more powerful than Holms'.
  • Nevertheless, while Holm’s is based on Bonferroni with no restriction on the joint distribution of the test statistics, Hochberg’s is based on the Simes test (1987) so it holds only under independence (and also under some forms of positive dependence).

Dunnett's correction

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church. Charles Dunnett (1955, 1966; not to be confused with Dunn) described an alternative alpha error adjustment when k groups are compared to the same control group. Now known as Dunnett's test, this method is less conservative than the Bonferroni adjustment.

Scheffé's method

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church. Template:Empty section

Closed testing procedure

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church. Closed testing procedures control the familywise type I error rate, if in the closed testing procedure all intersection hypotheses are tested using valid local level α tests. Closed testing procedures are a flexible general class of testing procedures that include e.g. the Bonferroni procedure or Holm's step-down procedure.

Other procedures

Other advanced procedures that ensure strong level α FWER control include the maximum modulus test.

It should also be noted that there are many alternatives to the attempt to control the familywise error rate. Most notably is the false discovery rate which was invented by Benjamini and Hochberg in 1995, and address many of the large-scale inferences problems in a more practical way.

Example

Consider a randomized clinical trial for a new antidepressant drug using three groups:

  • Existing drug
  • New drug
  • Placebo

In such a design, the researcher might be interested in whether depressive symptoms (measured, for example, by a Beck Depression Inventory score) decreased to a greater extent for those using the new drug compared to the old drug. Further, one might be interested in whether any side effects (e.g., hypersomnia, decreased sex drive, and dry mouth) were observed. In such a case, two families would likely be identified:

  1. Effect of drug on depressive symptoms
  2. Occurrence of any side effects.

The researcher would assign an acceptable Type I error rate, α, (usually 0.05) to each family, and control for family-wise error using appropriate multiple comparison procedures:

  • For the first family, effect of antidepressant on depressive symptoms, pairwise comparisons among groups might be jointly controlled using techniques such as Tukey's range test. Bonferroni correction might also suffice here since there are only three tests (three comparisons of depressive symptoms).
  • In terms of the side effect profile, since we have three comparisons for each side effect, allowing each side effect its own alpha would result in a 37% chance of making at least one Type I error (i.e.,(1 - (0.95)^9 = 1 - 0.63 = 0.37). Having a total of 9 hypotheses, the Bonferroni correction might be too conservative in this case; a more powerful tool such as Tukey's range test or the Holm-Bonferroni method will probably be more suitable: for example, the researcher may divide α by three (0.05/3 = 0.0167) and allocate .0167 to each side effect multiple comparison procedure. In the case of Tukey's range test, the critical value of q, the studentized range statistic, would thus be based on an α value of 0.0167.

See also

References

  1. 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  2. One of the biggest reasons investing in a Singapore new launch is an effective things is as a result of it is doable to be lent massive quantities of money at very low interest rates that you should utilize to purchase it. Then, if property values continue to go up, then you'll get a really high return on funding (ROI). Simply make sure you purchase one of the higher properties, reminiscent of the ones at Fernvale the Riverbank or any Singapore landed property Get Earnings by means of Renting

    In its statement, the singapore property listing - website link, government claimed that the majority citizens buying their first residence won't be hurt by the new measures. Some concessions can even be prolonged to chose teams of consumers, similar to married couples with a minimum of one Singaporean partner who are purchasing their second property so long as they intend to promote their first residential property. Lower the LTV limit on housing loans granted by monetary establishments regulated by MAS from 70% to 60% for property purchasers who are individuals with a number of outstanding housing loans on the time of the brand new housing purchase. Singapore Property Measures - 30 August 2010 The most popular seek for the number of bedrooms in Singapore is 4, followed by 2 and three. Lush Acres EC @ Sengkang

    Discover out more about real estate funding in the area, together with info on international funding incentives and property possession. Many Singaporeans have been investing in property across the causeway in recent years, attracted by comparatively low prices. However, those who need to exit their investments quickly are likely to face significant challenges when trying to sell their property – and could finally be stuck with a property they can't sell. Career improvement programmes, in-house valuation, auctions and administrative help, venture advertising and marketing, skilled talks and traisning are continuously planned for the sales associates to help them obtain better outcomes for his or her shoppers while at Knight Frank Singapore. No change Present Rules

    Extending the tax exemption would help. The exemption, which may be as a lot as $2 million per family, covers individuals who negotiate a principal reduction on their existing mortgage, sell their house short (i.e., for lower than the excellent loans), or take part in a foreclosure course of. An extension of theexemption would seem like a common-sense means to assist stabilize the housing market, but the political turmoil around the fiscal-cliff negotiations means widespread sense could not win out. Home Minority Chief Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) believes that the mortgage relief provision will be on the table during the grand-cut price talks, in response to communications director Nadeam Elshami. Buying or promoting of blue mild bulbs is unlawful.

    A vendor's stamp duty has been launched on industrial property for the primary time, at rates ranging from 5 per cent to 15 per cent. The Authorities might be trying to reassure the market that they aren't in opposition to foreigners and PRs investing in Singapore's property market. They imposed these measures because of extenuating components available in the market." The sale of new dual-key EC models will even be restricted to multi-generational households only. The models have two separate entrances, permitting grandparents, for example, to dwell separately. The vendor's stamp obligation takes effect right this moment and applies to industrial property and plots which might be offered inside three years of the date of buy. JLL named Best Performing Property Brand for second year running

    The data offered is for normal info purposes only and isn't supposed to be personalised investment or monetary advice. Motley Fool Singapore contributor Stanley Lim would not personal shares in any corporations talked about. Singapore private home costs increased by 1.eight% within the fourth quarter of 2012, up from 0.6% within the earlier quarter. Resale prices of government-built HDB residences which are usually bought by Singaporeans, elevated by 2.5%, quarter on quarter, the quickest acquire in five quarters. And industrial property, prices are actually double the levels of three years ago. No withholding tax in the event you sell your property. All your local information regarding vital HDB policies, condominium launches, land growth, commercial property and more

    There are various methods to go about discovering the precise property. Some local newspapers (together with the Straits Instances ) have categorised property sections and many local property brokers have websites. Now there are some specifics to consider when buying a 'new launch' rental. Intended use of the unit Every sale begins with 10 p.c low cost for finish of season sale; changes to 20 % discount storewide; follows by additional reduction of fiftyand ends with last discount of 70 % or extra. Typically there is even a warehouse sale or transferring out sale with huge mark-down of costs for stock clearance. Deborah Regulation from Expat Realtor shares her property market update, plus prime rental residences and houses at the moment available to lease Esparina EC @ Sengkang

External links