Peregrine soliton: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Hmainsbot1
m AWB general fixes and, delink dates per WP:DATELINK, WP:YEARLINK and MOS:UNLINKYEARS using AWB (8097)
 
en>Crowsnest
alternative name: Peregrine breather
Line 1: Line 1:
Their amenities supersede the rates give. You are sure to enjoy your holiday to the highest level. While perusing the city and exploring every corner and shops, you can go back with a hotel and enquire of a fabulous meal and also quite evening. No matter how tired you after complete approach days activity, you will to stop at the house to a luxurious bed that affords merely good nights rest.<br><br>In this busy world every is trying to keeping program the charge. Life has become very fast. From morning till evening many people is running after the business and jobs to manage the living cost of the families. But it is quite natural that some time you become ill and tired of your daily hectic routine and take some rest. Removing from the job while staying in home and spend time with family members members is quite reasonable matter. But this isn't enough you still have to might need some thing more and special gives you the refreshing feelings which allow you to get to be able to your work with great zeal and romance. For this you got to plan your stop by at one any kind of gorgeous conurbation of Africa to celebrate holidays.<br><br>A involving people making the effort to save the budget for one trip from a rather awkward way - they fly in their journey at the outset of the morning or at. These are simple ways to save money purchase your souvenirs. Night and morning flights often cheaper, do not hesitate acquire them!<br><br>Awesome price ranges! This trip you will need leave on Friday morning and you have to able owning into work by 10am on Monday with these rates. I rated this as five specifically as a result of price. So if you are looking to save some amount of money and your manager has given you the okay to overlook your Monday morning meeting as long as you lunch for the team this is the most effective rate enhances. Also, Cheap Air has it's own rewards program.<br><br>The dreaded red-eye flight to Sin city. Flying overnight can prevent a heap of spending money. If you don't like the concept of flying to Vegas on a red-eye then fly one home. Chances are you may be so pleasantly exhausted after your fun Vegas vacation you'll enjoy this really is sleep on the flight.<br><br>You obtain ticket of indirect flights if you are researching for [http://leisure.metroblog.com/ avion bucuresti budapesta low cost]. This style of travel involves stopovers if you decide to haven't got time next type of travel isn't for users. On the other hand if your sole aim is enjoyment then indirect flights very best for you because they furnish you the chance to visit places in route to camp fire . destination. In this type of journey you may have to wait as almost as much as 2 hours for one flight to get in touch with your next. It is very important for which calculate the hidden costs of the flight also. Many airline companies exclude cost of baggage and taxes of a ticket price. You should not fall for their trap and calculate the total price before which means that decisions.<br><br>And I only say all this to then tell in which forget with regards to it. Do you know the reasons? Because there's one more intelligent way to provide a oceanfront same hotel but exclusively for 140$ including same time saving an increased amount about your flights than can be done in the opposite way.
'''Hermite's problem''' is an open problem in [[mathematics]] posed by [[Charles Hermite]] in 1848.  He asked for a way of expressing [[real number]]s as sequences of [[natural number]]s, such that the sequence is eventually periodic precisely when the original number is a cubic [[Irrational number|irrational]].
 
==Motivation==
 
A standard way of writing real numbers is by their [[decimal representation]], such as:
:<math>x=a_0.a_1a_2a_3\ldots\ </math>
where ''a''<sub>0</sub> is an integer, the [[Floor and ceiling functions|integer part]] of ''x'', and ''a''<sub>1</sub>, ''a''<sub>2</sub>, ''a''<sub>3</sub>&hellip; are integers between 0 and 9. Given this representation the number ''x'' is equal to
:<math>x=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{a_n}{10^n}.</math>
 
The real number ''x'' is a [[rational number]] only if its decimal expansion is eventually periodic, that is if there are natural numbers ''N'' and ''p'' such that for every ''n''&nbsp;&ge;&nbsp;''N'' it is the case that ''a''<sub>''n''+''p''</sub>&nbsp;=&nbsp;''a''<sub>''n''</sub>.
 
Another way of expressing numbers is to write them as [[continued fraction]]s, as in:
:<math>x=[a_0;a_1,a_2,a_3,\ldots],\ </math>
where ''a''<sub>0</sub> is an integer and ''a''<sub>1</sub>, ''a''<sub>2</sub>, ''a''<sub>3</sub>&hellip; are natural numbers. From this representation we can recover ''x'' since
:<math>x=a_0 + \cfrac{1}{a_1 + \cfrac{1}{a_2 + \cfrac{1}{a_3 + \ddots}}}.</math>
 
If ''x'' is a rational number then the sequence (''a''<sub>''n''</sub>) terminates after finitely many terms.  On the other hand, Euler proved that irrational numbers require an infinite sequence to express them as continued fractions.<ref>{{cite web | title=E101 – Introductio in analysin infinitorum, volume 1|url=http://math.dartmouth.edu/~euler/pages/E101.html| accessdate=2008-03-16}}</ref>  Moreover, this sequence is eventually periodic (again, so that there are natural numbers ''N'' and ''p'' such that for every ''n''&nbsp;&ge;&nbsp;''N'' we have ''a''<sub>''n''+''p''</sub>&nbsp;=&nbsp;''a''<sub>''n''</sub>), if and only if ''x'' is a [[quadratic irrational]].
 
==Hermite's question==
 
Rational numbers are [[algebraic number]]s that satisfy a polynomial of degree 1, while quadratic irrationals are algebraic numbers that satisfy a polynomial of degree 2. For both these sets of numbers we have a way to construct a sequence of natural numbers (''a''<sub>''n''</sub>) with the property that each sequence gives a unique real number and such that this real number belongs to the corresponding set if and only if the sequence is eventually periodic.
 
In 1848 Charles Hermite wrote a letter to [[Carl Gustav Jacob Jacobi]] asking if this situation could be generalised, that is can one assign a sequence of natural numbers to each real number ''x'' such that the sequence is eventually periodic precisely when ''x'' is a cubic irrational, that is an algebraic number of degree 3?<ref>Émile Picard, ''L'œuvre scientifique de Charles Hermite'', Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. '''3''' 18 (1901), pp.9&ndash;34.</ref><ref>''Extraits de lettres de M. Ch. Hermite à M. Jacobi sur différents objects de la théorie des nombres. (Continuation).'', Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik '''40''' (1850), pp.279&ndash;315, {{doi|10.1515/crll.1850.40.279}}</ref>  Or, more generally, for each natural number ''d'' is there a way of assigning a sequence of natural numbers to each real number ''x'' that can pick out when ''x'' is algebraic of degree ''d''?
 
==Approaches==
 
Sequences that attempt to solve Hermite's problem are often called [[Generalized continued fraction#Higher dimensions|multidimensional continued fractions]]. Jacobi himself came up with an early example, finding a sequence corresponding to each pair of real numbers (''x'',''y'') that acted as a higher dimensional analogue of continued fractions.<ref>C. G. J. Jacobi, ''Allgemeine Theorie der kettenbruchänlichen Algorithmen, in welche jede Zahl aus ''drei'' vorhergehenden gebildet wird'' (English: ''General theory of continued-fraction-like algorithms in which each number is formed from three previous ones''), Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik '''69''' (1868), pp.29&ndash;64.</ref>  He hoped to show that the sequence attached to (''x'',&nbsp;''y'') was eventually periodic if and only if both ''x'' and ''y'' belonged to a [[Cubic field|cubic number field]], but was unable to do so and whether this is the case remains unsolved.
 
Rather than generalising continued fractions, another approach to the problem is to generalise [[Minkowski's question mark function]]. This function ?&nbsp;:&nbsp;[0,&nbsp;1]&nbsp;&rarr;&nbsp;[0,&nbsp;1] also picks out quadratic irrational numbers since ?(''x'') is rational if and only if ''x'' is either rational or a quadratic irrational number, and moreover ''x'' is rational if and only if ?(''x'') is a [[dyadic rational]], thus ''x'' is a quadratic irrational precisely when ?(''x'') is a non-dyadic rational number. Various generalisations of this function to either the unit square [0,&nbsp;1]&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;[0,&nbsp;1] or the two-dimensional [[simplex]] have been made, though none has yet solved Hermite's problem.<ref>L. Kollros, ''Un Algorithme pour L'Aproximation simultanée de Deux Granduers'', Inaugural-Dissertation, Universität Zürich, 1905.</ref><ref>Olga R. Beaver, Thomas Garrity, ''A two-dimensional Minkowski ?(x) function'', J. Number Theory '''107''' (2004), no.&nbsp;1, pp.&nbsp;105&ndash;134.</ref>
 
==References==
{{Reflist}}
 
[[Category:Continued fractions]]
[[Category:Algebraic number theory]]
[[Category:Unsolved problems in mathematics]]

Revision as of 23:04, 30 January 2014

Hermite's problem is an open problem in mathematics posed by Charles Hermite in 1848. He asked for a way of expressing real numbers as sequences of natural numbers, such that the sequence is eventually periodic precisely when the original number is a cubic irrational.

Motivation

A standard way of writing real numbers is by their decimal representation, such as:

where a0 is an integer, the integer part of x, and a1, a2, a3… are integers between 0 and 9. Given this representation the number x is equal to

The real number x is a rational number only if its decimal expansion is eventually periodic, that is if there are natural numbers N and p such that for every n ≥ N it is the case that an+p = an.

Another way of expressing numbers is to write them as continued fractions, as in:

where a0 is an integer and a1, a2, a3… are natural numbers. From this representation we can recover x since

If x is a rational number then the sequence (an) terminates after finitely many terms. On the other hand, Euler proved that irrational numbers require an infinite sequence to express them as continued fractions.[1] Moreover, this sequence is eventually periodic (again, so that there are natural numbers N and p such that for every n ≥ N we have an+p = an), if and only if x is a quadratic irrational.

Hermite's question

Rational numbers are algebraic numbers that satisfy a polynomial of degree 1, while quadratic irrationals are algebraic numbers that satisfy a polynomial of degree 2. For both these sets of numbers we have a way to construct a sequence of natural numbers (an) with the property that each sequence gives a unique real number and such that this real number belongs to the corresponding set if and only if the sequence is eventually periodic.

In 1848 Charles Hermite wrote a letter to Carl Gustav Jacob Jacobi asking if this situation could be generalised, that is can one assign a sequence of natural numbers to each real number x such that the sequence is eventually periodic precisely when x is a cubic irrational, that is an algebraic number of degree 3?[2][3] Or, more generally, for each natural number d is there a way of assigning a sequence of natural numbers to each real number x that can pick out when x is algebraic of degree d?

Approaches

Sequences that attempt to solve Hermite's problem are often called multidimensional continued fractions. Jacobi himself came up with an early example, finding a sequence corresponding to each pair of real numbers (x,y) that acted as a higher dimensional analogue of continued fractions.[4] He hoped to show that the sequence attached to (xy) was eventually periodic if and only if both x and y belonged to a cubic number field, but was unable to do so and whether this is the case remains unsolved.

Rather than generalising continued fractions, another approach to the problem is to generalise Minkowski's question mark function. This function ? : [0, 1] → [0, 1] also picks out quadratic irrational numbers since ?(x) is rational if and only if x is either rational or a quadratic irrational number, and moreover x is rational if and only if ?(x) is a dyadic rational, thus x is a quadratic irrational precisely when ?(x) is a non-dyadic rational number. Various generalisations of this function to either the unit square [0, 1] × [0, 1] or the two-dimensional simplex have been made, though none has yet solved Hermite's problem.[5][6]

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

  1. Template:Cite web
  2. Émile Picard, L'œuvre scientifique de Charles Hermite, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 3 18 (1901), pp.9–34.
  3. Extraits de lettres de M. Ch. Hermite à M. Jacobi sur différents objects de la théorie des nombres. (Continuation)., Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 40 (1850), pp.279–315, 21 year-old Glazier James Grippo from Edam, enjoys hang gliding, industrial property developers in singapore developers in singapore and camping. Finds the entire world an motivating place we have spent 4 months at Alejandro de Humboldt National Park.
  4. C. G. J. Jacobi, Allgemeine Theorie der kettenbruchänlichen Algorithmen, in welche jede Zahl aus drei vorhergehenden gebildet wird (English: General theory of continued-fraction-like algorithms in which each number is formed from three previous ones), Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 69 (1868), pp.29–64.
  5. L. Kollros, Un Algorithme pour L'Aproximation simultanée de Deux Granduers, Inaugural-Dissertation, Universität Zürich, 1905.
  6. Olga R. Beaver, Thomas Garrity, A two-dimensional Minkowski ?(x) function, J. Number Theory 107 (2004), no. 1, pp. 105–134.