Charge (physics): Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>RussBot
m Robot: Editing intentional link to disambiguation page in hatnote per WP:INTDABLINK (explanation)
 
en>Headbomb
Undid revision 569239839 by 106.201.186.55 (talk) no
Line 1: Line 1:
{{No footnotes|date=September 2010}}


In [[algebraic topology]] the '''cap product''' is a method of adjoining a [[chain (algebraic topology)|chain]] of degree ''p'' with a [[cochain]] of degree ''q'', such that ''q'' ≤ ''p'', to form a composite chain of degree ''p'' − ''q''.  It was introduced by [[Eduard Čech]] in 1936, and independently by [[Hassler Whitney]] in 1938.
==Definition==
Let ''X'' be a [[topological space]] and ''R'' a coefficient ring. The cap product is a [[bilinear map]] on singular homology and cohomology
:<math>\frown\ : H_p(X;R)\times H^q(X;R) \rightarrow H_{p-q}(X;R).</math>
defined by contracting a [[singular chain]] <math>\sigma : \Delta\ ^p \rightarrow\ X</math> with a singular [[cochain]] <math> \psi \in C^q(X;R), </math> by the formula :
:<math> \sigma \frown \psi = \psi(\sigma|_{[v_0, \ldots, v_q]}) \sigma|_{[v_q, \ldots, v_p]}.</math>
Here, the notation <math>\sigma|_{[v_0, \ldots, v_q]}</math> indicates the restriction of the simplicial map <math>\sigma</math> to its face spanned by the vectors of the base, see [[Simplex]].
==Interpretation==
In analogy with the interpretation of the [[cup product]] in terms of the [[Künneth formula]], we can explain the existence of the cap product by considering the composition
<math> C_\bullet(X) \otimes C^\bullet(X) \overset{\Delta_* \otimes \mathrm{Id}}{\longrightarrow} C_\bullet(X) \otimes C_\bullet(X) \otimes C^\bullet(X) \overset{\mathrm{Id} \otimes \varepsilon}{\longrightarrow} C_\bullet(X) </math>
in terms of the [[chain complex|chain]] and cochain complexes of <math>X</math>, where we are taking [[Künneth theorem|tensor products of chain complexes]], <math> \Delta \colon X \to X \times X</math> is the [[diagonal functor|diagonal map]] which induces the map <math>\Delta_*</math> on the chain complex, and <math>\varepsilon \colon C_p(X) \otimes C^q(X) \to \mathbb{Z}</math> is the [[evaluation map]] (always 0 except for <math>p=q</math>).
This composition then passes to the quotient to define the cap product <math> \frown \colon H_\bullet(X) \times H^\bullet(X) \to H_\bullet(X)</math>, and looking carefully at the above composition shows that it indeed takes the form of maps <math> \frown \colon H_p(X) \times H^q(X) \to H_{p-q}(X)</math>, which is always zero for <math>p < q</math>.
==The slant product==
The above discussion indicates that the same operation can be defined on [[cartesian product]]s <math>X\times Y</math> yielding a product
:<math>\backslash\ : H_p(X;R)\otimes H^q(X\times Y;R) \rightarrow H^{q-p}(Y;R).</math>
In case ''X = Y'', the two products are related by the diagonal map.
==Equations==
The boundary of a cap product is given by :
:<math>\partial(\sigma \frown \psi) = (-1)^q(\partial \sigma \frown \psi - \sigma \frown \delta \psi). </math>
Given a map ''f'' the induced maps satisfy :
:<math> f_*( \sigma ) \frown \psi = f_*(\sigma \frown f^* (\psi)). </math>
The cap and [[cup product]] are related by :
:<math> \psi(\sigma \frown \varphi) = (\varphi \smile \psi)(\sigma)</math>
where
:<math>\sigma : \Delta ^{p+q} \rightarrow X</math> ,  <math> \psi \in C^q(X;R)</math>and <math> \varphi \in C^p(X;R). </math>
An interesting consequence of the last equation is that it makes <math>H_{\ast}(X;R)</math> into a right <math>H^{\ast}(X;R)-</math> [[module (mathematics)|module]].
==See also==
*[[cup product]]
*[[Poincaré duality]]
*[[singular homology]]
*[[homology theory]]
==References==
*[[Allen Hatcher|Hatcher, A.]], ''[http://www.math.cornell.edu/~hatcher/AT/ATchapters.html Algebraic Topology],'' [[Cambridge University Press]] (2002) ISBN 0-521-79540-0. Detailed discussion of homology theories for simplicial complexes and manifolds, singular homology, etc.
*{{nlab|id=slant+product|title=slant product}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Cap Product}}
[[Category:Homology theory]]
[[Category:Algebraic topology]]
[[Category:Binary operations]]

Revision as of 17:16, 19 August 2013

Template:No footnotes

In algebraic topology the cap product is a method of adjoining a chain of degree p with a cochain of degree q, such that qp, to form a composite chain of degree pq. It was introduced by Eduard Čech in 1936, and independently by Hassler Whitney in 1938.

Definition

Let X be a topological space and R a coefficient ring. The cap product is a bilinear map on singular homology and cohomology

:Hp(X;R)×Hq(X;R)Hpq(X;R).

defined by contracting a singular chain σ:ΔpX with a singular cochain ψCq(X;R), by the formula :

σψ=ψ(σ|[v0,,vq])σ|[vq,,vp].

Here, the notation σ|[v0,,vq] indicates the restriction of the simplicial map σ to its face spanned by the vectors of the base, see Simplex.

Interpretation

In analogy with the interpretation of the cup product in terms of the Künneth formula, we can explain the existence of the cap product by considering the composition

C(X)C(X)Δ*IdC(X)C(X)C(X)IdεC(X)

in terms of the chain and cochain complexes of X, where we are taking tensor products of chain complexes, Δ:XX×X is the diagonal map which induces the map Δ* on the chain complex, and ε:Cp(X)Cq(X) is the evaluation map (always 0 except for p=q).

This composition then passes to the quotient to define the cap product :H(X)×H(X)H(X), and looking carefully at the above composition shows that it indeed takes the form of maps :Hp(X)×Hq(X)Hpq(X), which is always zero for p<q.

The slant product

The above discussion indicates that the same operation can be defined on cartesian products X×Y yielding a product

:Hp(X;R)Hq(X×Y;R)Hqp(Y;R).

In case X = Y, the two products are related by the diagonal map.

Equations

The boundary of a cap product is given by :

(σψ)=(1)q(σψσδψ).

Given a map f the induced maps satisfy :

f*(σ)ψ=f*(σf*(ψ)).

The cap and cup product are related by :

ψ(σφ)=(φψ)(σ)

where

σ:Δp+qX , ψCq(X;R)and φCp(X;R).

An interesting consequence of the last equation is that it makes H(X;R) into a right H(X;R) module.

See also

References