|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Infobox encryption method
| | Discover educational titles. It isn't generally plainly showcased listed of primary blockbusters in game stores or electronic portions, however are somewhere around. When you loved this short article and you want to receive more information regarding [http://circuspartypanama.com clash of clans hack free gems] kindly visit our website. Speak to other moms and daddies or question employees for specific suggestions, as details really exist that aide by helping cover that learning languages, [http://Www.google.com/search?q=learning+tool&btnI=lucky learning tool] and [http://Search.huffingtonpost.com/search?q=practicing+mathematics&s_it=header_form_v1 practicing mathematics].<br><br>Lee are able to make full use of those gems to straightaway fortify his army. He tapped 'Yes,'" probably without thinking. Back under a month because of walking around a small number of hours on a just about every basis, he''d spent well-nigh 1000 dollars.<br><br>Always be aware of how multi player works. Should you're investing in the actual game exclusively for unique multiplayer, be sure a have everything required for this. If you really are planning on playing while fighting a person in all your household, you may ascertain that you will want two copies of this clash of clans cheats to game against one another.<br><br>In the event that you are searching with a particular game into buy but want to purchase it at the best price possible, utilize the "shopping" tab available on many search search engines. This will allow you to immediately analyze the prices of our own game at all the major retailers online. You can also read ratings for the insurer in question, helping your site determine who you truly buy the game with.<br><br>If this is true, you've landed in the correct spot! Truly, we have produced after lengthy hrs of research, perform and screening, a solution for thr Clash amongst Clans Cheat totally invisible and operates perfectly. And due to the time and effort of our teams, this never-ending hrs of entertainment in your iPhone, the apple ipad or iPod Touch watching Clash of Clans our own cheat code Clash from Clans produced especially to suit your needs!<br><br>By borer on a boondocks anteroom you possibly can now appearance added advice all about that play, scout, intelligence troops, or attack. Of course, these triumphs will rely on all that appearance of the competition you might be present in.<br><br>You don''t necessarily really need one of the advanced troops to win wins. A mass volume of barbarians, your first-level troop, also can totally destroy an opponent village, and strangely it''s quite enjoyable to look at the virtual carnage. |
| |name = GOST 28147-89
| |
| |image = [[File:GOSTDiagram.png|240px|center]]
| |
| |caption = Diagram of GOST
| |
| |designers = [[USSR]]
| |
| |publish date = 1994-05-23 (declassified)
| |
| |series =
| |
| |derived from =
| |
| |derived to = [[GOST (hash function)|GOST hash function]]
| |
| |related to =
| |
| |certification = [[GOST|GOST standard]]
| |
| |key size = 256 bits
| |
| |security claim =
| |
| |block size = 64 bits
| |
| |structure = [[Feistel network]]
| |
| |rounds = 32
| |
| |cryptanalysis =
| |
| }}
| |
| | |
| The '''GOST block cipher''', defined in the standard '''GOST 28147-89''', is a Soviet and Russian government standard [[symmetric key]] [[block cipher]]. Also based on this block cipher is the [[GOST (hash function)|GOST hash function]].
| |
| | |
| Developed in the 1970s, the standard had been marked "Top Secret" and then downgraded to "Secret" in 1990. Shortly after the dissolution of the [[USSR]], it was declassified and it was released to the public in 1994. GOST 28147 was a Soviet alternative to the [[United States]] standard algorithm, [[Data Encryption Standard|DES]].<ref name=fleischmann2009>
| |
| {{cite journal
| |
| |last=Fleischmann
| |
| |first=Ewan
| |
| |coauthors=Gorski, Michael; Hühne, Jan-Hendrik; Lucks, Stefan
| |
| |title=Key Recovery Attack on Full GOST Block Cipher with Zero Time and Memory
| |
| |journal=Published as ISO/IEC JTC
| |
| |year=2009
| |
| |volume=1}}
| |
| </ref> Thus, the two are very similar in structure.
| |
| | |
| ==The algorithm==
| |
| | |
| GOST has a 64-bit [[block size (cryptography)|block size]] and a [[key length]] of 256 bits. Its [[S-box]]es can be secret, and they contain about 354 (log<sub>2</sub>(16!<sup>8</sup>)) bits of secret information, so the effective key size can be increased to 610 bits; however, a chosen-key attack can recover the contents of the S-Boxes in approximately 2<sup>32</sup> encryptions.<ref>{{
| |
| cite journal
| |
| |last=Saarinen
| |
| |first=Markku-Juhani
| |
| |title=A chosen key attack against the secret S-boxes of GOST
| |
| |year=1998
| |
| |url=http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/rd/96002585%2C277448%2C1%2C0.25%2CDownload/http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/compress/0/papers/cs/13215/http:zSzzSzwww.jyu.fizSz~mjoszSzgost_cka.ps.gz/saarinen98chosen.ps
| |
| |quote=We show that a simple "black box" chosen-key attack against GOST can recover secret S-boxes with approximately 2^32 encryptions}}
| |
| </ref>
| |
| | |
| GOST is a [[Feistel network]] of 32 rounds. Its round function is very simple: add a 32-bit subkey [[modular arithmetic|modulo]] 2<sup>32</sup>, put the result through a layer of S-boxes, and rotate that result left by 11 bits. The result of that is the output of the round function. In the diagram to the right, one line represents 32 bits.
| |
| | |
| The subkeys are chosen in a pre-specified order. The key schedule is very simple: break the 256-bit key into eight 32-bit subkeys, and each subkey is used four times in the algorithm; the first 24 rounds use the key words in order, the last 8 rounds use them in reverse order.
| |
| | |
| The S-boxes accept a four-bit input and produce a four-bit output. The S-box substitution in the round function consists of eight 4 × 4 S-boxes. The S-boxes are implementation-dependent – parties that want to secure their communications using GOST must be using the same S-boxes. For extra security, the S-boxes can be kept secret. In the original standard where GOST was specified, no S-boxes were given, but they were to be supplied somehow. This led to speculation that organizations the government wished to spy on were given weak S-boxes. One GOST chip manufacturer reported that he generated S-boxes himself using a [[pseudorandom number generator]].<ref name=schneier1996>
| |
| {{cite book
| |
| |last=Schneier
| |
| |first=Bruce
| |
| |title=Applied cryptography : protocols, algorithms, and source code in C
| |
| |year=1996
| |
| |publisher=Wiley
| |
| |location=New York [u.a.]
| |
| |isbn=0-471-11709-9
| |
| |edition=2. ed., [Nachdr.]}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| For example, the [[Central Bank of Russia|Central Bank of Russian Federation]] uses the following S-boxes: <!--http://www.intuit.ru/department/security/networksec/3/4.html-->
| |
| | |
| {|class="wikitable"
| |
| !#
| |
| !S-Box
| |
| |-
| |
| !1
| |
| |4 10 9 2 13 8 0 14 6 11 1 12 7 15 5 3
| |
| |-
| |
| !2
| |
| |14 11 4 12 6 13 15 10 2 3 8 1 0 7 5 9
| |
| |-
| |
| !3
| |
| |5 8 1 13 10 3 4 2 14 15 12 7 6 0 9 11
| |
| |-
| |
| !4
| |
| |7 13 10 1 0 8 9 15 14 4 6 12 11 2 5 3
| |
| |-
| |
| !5
| |
| |6 12 7 1 5 15 13 8 4 10 9 14 0 3 11 2
| |
| |-
| |
| !6
| |
| |4 11 10 0 7 2 1 13 3 6 8 5 9 12 15 14
| |
| |-
| |
| !7
| |
| |13 11 4 1 3 15 5 9 0 10 14 7 6 8 2 12
| |
| |-
| |
| !8
| |
| |1 15 13 0 5 7 10 4 9 2 3 14 6 11 8 12
| |
| |}
| |
| | |
| ==Cryptanalysis of GOST==
| |
| | |
| Compared to DES, GOST has a very simple round function. However, the designers of GOST attempted to offset the simplicity of the round function by specifying the algorithm with 32 rounds and secret S-boxes.
| |
| | |
| Another concern is that the [[avalanche effect]] is slower to occur in GOST than in DES. This is because of GOST's lack of an expansion permutation in the round function, as well as its use of a rotation instead of a permutation. Again, this is offset by GOST's increased number of rounds.
| |
| | |
| There is not much published cryptanalysis of GOST, but a cursory glance says that it seems secure.<ref name=schneier1996 /><ref>
| |
| {{cite journal
| |
| |last=Shorin
| |
| |first=Vitaly V.
| |
| |coauthors=Jelezniakov, Vadim V.; Gabidulin, Ernst M.
| |
| |title=Linear and Differential Cryptanalysis of Russian GOST
| |
| |journal=Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics
| |
| |date=April 2001
| |
| |volume=6
| |
| |pages=538–547
| |
| |doi=10.1016/S1571-0653(04)00206-9
| |
| |quote=In this paper the linear cryptanalysis and the differential cryptanalysis of the Russian GOST encryption algorithm are carried out [2]. It is shown that GOST is secure against the linear cryptanalysis after five rounds and against the differential cryptanalysis after seven rounds. The differential analysis algorithm of the three round GOST is given. Also criteria for selection of the substitution boxes with provable security against linear cryptanalysis are given.}}
| |
| </ref> The large number of rounds and secret S-boxes makes both [[linear cryptanalysis|linear]] and [[differential cryptanalysis]] difficult. Its avalanche effect may be slower to occur, but it can propagate over 32 rounds very effectively. | |
| | |
| However, GOST is not fully defined by its standard: It does not specify the S-boxes (replacement tables). On the one hand, this can be additional secure information (in addition to key). On the other hand, the following problems arise:
| |
| * different algorithm implementations can use different replacement tables, and thus, can be incompatible to each other
| |
| * possibility of deliberate weak replacement table usage
| |
| * possibility (standard does not forbid it) to use replacement tables in which nodes are not commutation, that may lead to extreme security downfall
| |
| | |
| Despite its apparently strong construction, GOST is vulnerable to generic attacks based on its short (64-bit) block size, and should therefore never be used in contexts where more than 2<sup>32</sup> blocks could be encrypted with the same key.
| |
| | |
| Since 2007, several attacks were developed against GOST implementations with reduced number of rounds and/or keys with additional special properties.<ref>
| |
| {{cite news
| |
| |url=http://www.iacr.org/archive/fse2007/45930152/45930152.pdf
| |
| |title=Improved Slide Attacks
| |
| |year=2007
| |
| |author=Eli Biham, Orr Dunkelman, Nathan Keller}}
| |
| </ref><ref>
| |
| {{cite news
| |
| |url=http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1484903.1484932
| |
| |title=Reflection Cryptanalysis of Some Ciphers
| |
| |year=2008
| |
| |author=Orhun Kara}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| In 2011 several authors discovered more significant flaws in GOST cipher, being able to attack full 32-round GOST with arbitrary keys for the first time. It has been even called "a deeply flawed cipher" by [[Nicolas Courtois]].<ref>
| |
| {{cite web
| |
| |last=Courtois
| |
| |first=Nicolas T.
| |
| |title=Security Evaluation of GOST 28147-89 In View Of International Standardisation
| |
| |url=http://eprint.iacr.org/2011/211
| |
| |work=Cryptology ePrint Archive
| |
| |publisher=[[International Association for Cryptologic Research|IACR]]
| |
| |date=9 May 2011
| |
| |quote=Until 2011 researchers unanimously agreed that GOST could or should be very secure, which was summarized in 2010 in these words: despite considerable cryptanalytic efforts spent in the past 20 years, GOST is still not broken". Unhappily, it was recently discovered that GOST can be broken and is a deeply flawed cipher}}
| |
| </ref> First attacks were able to reduce time complexity from <math>2^{256}</math> to <math>2^{228}</math> at the cost of huge memory requirements,<ref>
| |
| {{cite news
| |
| |url=http://eprint.iacr.org/2011/312
| |
| |title=Differential Cryptanalysis of GOST
| |
| |year=2011
| |
| |publisher=[[International Association for Cryptologic Research|IACR]]
| |
| |author=Nicolas T. Courtois, Michał Miształ}}
| |
| </ref> and soon they were improved up to <math>2^{178}</math> time complexity (at the cost of <math>2^{70}</math> memory and <math>2^{64}</math> data).<ref>
| |
| {{cite news
| |
| |url=http://eprint.iacr.org/2012/138.pdf
| |
| |title=An Improved Differential Attack on Full GOST
| |
| |year=2012
| |
| |publisher=[[International Association for Cryptologic Research|IACR]]
| |
| |author=Nicolas T. Courtois}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| As of December 2012 the best known attack on GOST (<math>2^{101}</math>) is on par with the best known attack (<math>2^{100}</math>, based on [[XSL attack|another weakness noted by Nicolas Courtois]]) on widely used [[AES-256|Advanced Encryption Standard]].
| |
| | |
| GOST has been submitted to ISO standardization in 2010.
| |
| | |
| == See also ==
| |
| *[[GOST|GOST standards]]
| |
| | |
| ==References==
| |
| {{reflist}}
| |
| | |
| ==Further reading==
| |
| * {{cite web |date=March 2010 |url=http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5830 |title=RFC 5830: GOST 28147-89 encryption, decryption and MAC algorithms |publisher=IETF }}
| |
| * {{cite web |date=January 2006 |url=http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4357 |title=RFC 4357: Additional Cryptographic Algorithms for Use with GOST |publisher=IETF }}
| |
| * Alex Biryukov, David Wagner, [http://now.cs.berkeley.edu/~daw/papers/advslide-ec00.ps Advanced Slide Attacks], EUROCRYPT 2000, LNCS, pp 589–606, 2000.
| |
| | |
| == External links ==
| |
| * [http://vipul.net/gost/ GOST — The Soviet Encryption Algorithm]
| |
| * [http://textop.us/Encryption/GOST Online GOST encrypt and decrypt tool]
| |
| * [http://textop.us/Hashing/Gost Online GOST hashing tool]
| |
| * [http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hopwood/crypto/scan/cs.html#GOST SCAN's entry for GOST]
| |
| * [http://sourceforge.net/p/atoken/ An open source implementation of PKCS#11 software device with Russian GOST cryptography standards capabilities]
| |
| | |
| {{Cryptography navbox | block}}
| |
| | |
| [[Category:Feistel ciphers]]
| |
| [[Category:GOST standards]]
| |
Discover educational titles. It isn't generally plainly showcased listed of primary blockbusters in game stores or electronic portions, however are somewhere around. When you loved this short article and you want to receive more information regarding clash of clans hack free gems kindly visit our website. Speak to other moms and daddies or question employees for specific suggestions, as details really exist that aide by helping cover that learning languages, learning tool and practicing mathematics.
Lee are able to make full use of those gems to straightaway fortify his army. He tapped 'Yes,'" probably without thinking. Back under a month because of walking around a small number of hours on a just about every basis, hed spent well-nigh 1000 dollars.
Always be aware of how multi player works. Should you're investing in the actual game exclusively for unique multiplayer, be sure a have everything required for this. If you really are planning on playing while fighting a person in all your household, you may ascertain that you will want two copies of this clash of clans cheats to game against one another.
In the event that you are searching with a particular game into buy but want to purchase it at the best price possible, utilize the "shopping" tab available on many search search engines. This will allow you to immediately analyze the prices of our own game at all the major retailers online. You can also read ratings for the insurer in question, helping your site determine who you truly buy the game with.
If this is true, you've landed in the correct spot! Truly, we have produced after lengthy hrs of research, perform and screening, a solution for thr Clash amongst Clans Cheat totally invisible and operates perfectly. And due to the time and effort of our teams, this never-ending hrs of entertainment in your iPhone, the apple ipad or iPod Touch watching Clash of Clans our own cheat code Clash from Clans produced especially to suit your needs!
By borer on a boondocks anteroom you possibly can now appearance added advice all about that play, scout, intelligence troops, or attack. Of course, these triumphs will rely on all that appearance of the competition you might be present in.
You dont necessarily really need one of the advanced troops to win wins. A mass volume of barbarians, your first-level troop, also can totally destroy an opponent village, and strangely its quite enjoyable to look at the virtual carnage.