Thomas–Fermi screening: Difference between revisions
en>Hess88 |
en>Yobot m →References: WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes / special characters in pagetitle using AWB (9485) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In mathematics, there are many kinds of inequalities connected with matrices and linear operators on [[Hilbert space]]s. This article reviews some of the most important operator inequalities connected with [[Trace (linear algebra)|traces]] of matrices. | |||
Useful references here are,.<ref name="C09">E. Carlen, Trace Inequalities and Quantum Entropy: An Introductory Course, Contemp. Math. 529 (2009).</ref><ref>R. Bhatia, Matrix Analysis, Springer, (1997).</ref><ref name="B05">B. Simon, Trace Ideals and their Applications, Cambridge Univ. Press, (1979); Second edition. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, (2005).</ref><ref>M. Ohya, D. Petz, Quantum Entropy and Its Use, Springer, (1993).</ref> | |||
==Basic definitions== | |||
Let <math>\mathbf{H}_n</math> denote the space of [[Hermitian matrix|Hermitian]] <math>n\times n</math> matrices and <math>\mathbf{H}_n^+</math> denote the set consisting of [[Positive-definite matrix#Negative-definite, semidefinite and indefinite matrices|positive semi-definite]] <math>n\times n</math> Hermitian matrices. For operators on an infinite dimensional Hilbert space we require that they be [[trace class]] and [[self-adjoint operator|self-adjoint]], in which case similar definitions apply, but we discuss only matrices, for simplicity. | |||
For any real-valued function <math>f</math> on an interval <math>I\subset \mathbb{R}</math> one can define a [[matrix function]] <math>f(A)</math> for any operator <math>A\in\mathbf{H}_n</math> with [[eigenvalues and eigenvectors|eigenvalues]] <math>\lambda </math> in <math>I</math> by defining it on the eigenvalues and corresponding [[Projection (linear algebra)|projectors]] <math> P </math> as <math>f(A)=\sum_j f(\lambda_j)P_j,</math> with the [[Spectral theorem|spectral decomposition]] <math>A=\sum_j\lambda_j P_j. </math> | |||
===Operator monotone=== | |||
A function <math>f:I\rightarrow \mathbb{R}</math> defined on an interval <math>I\subset\mathbb{R}</math> is said to be '''operator monotone''' if for all <math>n</math>, and all <math>A,B\in \mathbf{H}_n</math> with eigenvalues in <math>I</math>, the following holds: | |||
:<math> | |||
A \geq B \Rightarrow f(A) \geq f(B), | |||
</math> | |||
where the inequality <math>A\geq B</math> means that the operator <math>A-B\geq 0 </math> is positive semi-definite. | |||
===Operator convex=== | |||
A function <math>f: I \rightarrow \mathbb{R}</math> is said to be '''operator convex''' if for all <math>n</math> and all | |||
<math>A,B\in \mathbf{H}_n</math> with eigenvalues in <math>I</math>, and <math>0 < \lambda < 1</math>, the following holds | |||
:<math> | |||
f(\lambda A + (1-\lambda)B) \leq \lambda f(A) + (1 -\lambda)f(B) . | |||
</math> | |||
Note that the operator <math>\lambda A + (1-\lambda)B </math> has eigenvalues in <math>I</math>, since <math> A</math> and <math>B </math> have eigenvalues in <math>I</math>. | |||
A function <math>f</math> is '''operator concave''' if <math>-f</math> is operator convex, i.e. the inequality above for <math>f</math> is reversed. | |||
===Joint convexity=== | |||
A function <math>g: I\times J \rightarrow \mathbb{R}</math>, defined on intervals <math>I,J\subset \mathbb{R} </math> is said to be ''' jointly convex''' if for all <math>n</math> and all | |||
<math>A_1, A_2\in \mathbf{H}_n</math> with eigenvalues in <math>I</math> and all <math>B_1,B_2\in \mathbf{H}_n</math> with eigenvalues in <math>J</math>, and any <math> 0\leq \lambda\leq 1</math> the following holds | |||
:<math> | |||
g(\lambda A_1 + (1-\lambda)A_2,\lambda B_1 + (1-\lambda)B_2 ) \leq \lambda g(A_1, B_1) + (1 -\lambda)g(A_2, B_2). | |||
</math> | |||
A function <math>g</math> is '''jointly concave''' if <math>-g</math> is jointly convex, i.e. the inequality above for <math>g</math> is reversed. | |||
===Trace function=== | |||
Given a function <math>f : \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}</math>, the associated '''trace function''' on <math>\mathbf{H}_n</math> is given by | |||
:<math> A\mapsto {\rm Tr} f(A)=\sum_j f(\lambda_j),</math> | |||
where <math>A</math> has eigenvalues <math>\lambda </math> and <math>{\rm Tr} </math> stands for a [[trace]] of the operator. | |||
==Convexity and monotonicity of the trace function== | |||
Let <math>f : \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}</math> be continuous, and let <math>n</math> be any integer. | |||
Then if <math>t\mapsto f(t)</math> is monotone increasing, so is <math>A \mapsto {\rm Tr} f(A)</math> on <math>\mathbf{H}_n</math>. | |||
Likewise, if <math>t \mapsto f(t)</math> is [[Convex function|convex]], so is <math>A \mapsto {\rm Tr} f(A)</math> on <math>\mathbf{H}_n</math>, and | |||
it is strictly convex if <math>f</math> is strictly convex. | |||
See proof and discussion in,<ref name="C09" /> for example. | |||
==Löwner–Heinz theorem== | |||
For <math>-1\leq p \leq 0</math>, the function <math>f(t) = -t^p</math> is operator monotone and operator concave. | |||
For <math>0 \leq p \leq 1</math>, the function <math>f(t) = t^p</math> is operator monotone and operator concave. | |||
For <math>1 \leq p \leq 2</math>, the function <math>f(t) = t^p</math> and operator convex. | |||
Furthermore, <math>f(t) = \log(t)</math> is operator concave and operator monotone, while <math>f(t) = t \log(t)</math> is operator convex. | |||
The original proof of this theorem is due to K. Löwner,<ref>K. Löwner, "Uber monotone Matrix funktionen", Math. Z. 38, 177–216, (1934).</ref> where he gave a necessary and sufficient condition for | |||
<math>f</math> to be operator monotone. An elementary proof of the theorem is discussed in <ref name="C09" /> and a more general version of it in <ref>W.F. Donoghue, Jr., Monotone Matrix Functions and Analytic Continuation, Springer, (1974).</ref> | |||
==Klein's inequality== | |||
For all Hermitian <math>n\times n</math> matrices <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> and all differentiable [[convex function]]s | |||
<math>f : \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}</math> with [[derivative]] <math>f' </math>, | |||
or for all posotive-definite Hermitian <math>n\times n</math> matrices <math>A</math> and <math>B</math>, and all differentiable | |||
convex functions <math>f:(0,\infty)\rightarrow\mathbb{R}</math> the following inequality holds | |||
:<math> {\rm Tr}[f(A)- f(B)- (A - B)f'(B)] \geq 0.</math> | |||
In either case, if <math>f</math> is strictly convex, there is equality if and only if <math>A = B</math>. | |||
===Proof=== | |||
Let <math>C = A - B</math> so that for <math>0 < t < 1</math>, <math>B + tC = (1 -t)B + tA</math>. Define <math>\phi(t) = {\rm Tr}[f(B + tC)]</math>. By convexity and monotonicity of trace functions, <math>\phi</math> is convex, and so for all <math>0 < t < 1</math>, | |||
:<math> \phi(1) = \phi(0) \geq \frac{\phi(t) - \phi(0)}{t},</math> | |||
and in fact the right hand side is monotone decreasing in <math>t</math>. Taking the limit <math>t \rightarrow 0</math> yields Klein's inequality. | |||
Note that if <math>f</math> is strictly convex and <math>C \neq 0</math>, then <math>\phi</math> is strictly convex. The final assertion follows from this and the fact that <math>\frac{\phi(t) -\phi(0)}{t}</math> is monotone decreasing in <math>t</math>. | |||
==Golden–Thompson inequality== | |||
{{main|Golden–Thompson inequality}} | |||
In 1965, S. Golden <ref>S. Golden, Lower Bounds for Helmholtz Functions, Phys. Rev. 137, B 1127–1128 (1965)</ref> and C.J. Thompson <ref>C.J. Thompson, Inequality with Applications in Statistical Mechanics, J. Math. Phys. 6, 1812–1813, (1965).</ref> independently discovered that | |||
For any matrices <math>A, B\in\mathbf{H}_n</math>, | |||
:<math>{\rm Tr}\, e^{A+B}\leq {\rm Tr}\, e^A e^B.</math> | |||
This inequality can be generalized for three operators:<ref name="L73">E. H. Lieb, Convex Trace Functions and the Wigner–Yanase–Dyson Conjecture, Advances in Math. 11, 267–288 (1973).</ref> for non-negative operators <math>A, B, C\in\mathbf{H}_n^+</math>, | |||
:<math>{\rm Tr} \, e^{\ln A -\ln B+\ln C}\leq \int_0^\infty dt\, {\rm Tr}\, A(B+t)^{-1}C(B+t)^{-1}.</math> | |||
==Peierls–Bogoliubov inequality== | |||
Let <math>R, F\in \mathbf{H}_n</math> be such that <math>{\rm Tr}\, e^R=1</math>. | |||
Define <math>f={\rm Tr}\, Fe^R</math>, then | |||
:<math>{\rm Tr}\, e^{F}e^R \geq {\rm Tr}\, e^{F+R}\geq e^f.</math> | |||
The proof of this inequality follows from [[#Klein's inequality|Klein's inequality]]. Take <math>f(x)=e^x</math>, <math>A=R+F</math> and <math>B=R+fI</math>.<ref name="R69">D. Ruelle, Statistical Mechanics: Rigorous Results, World Scient. (1969).</ref> | |||
==Gibbs variational principle== | |||
Let <math>H</math> be a self-adjoint operator such that <math>e^{-H}</math> is [[trace class]]. Then for any <math>\gamma\geq 0 </math> with <math>{\rm Tr}\,\gamma=1,</math> | |||
:<math>{\rm Tr}\, \gamma H+{\rm Tr}\, \gamma\ln\gamma\geq -\ln {\rm Tr}\, e^{-H},</math> | |||
with equality if and only if <math>\gamma={\rm exp}(-H)/{\rm Tr}\, {\rm exp}(-H)</math>. | |||
==Lieb's concavity theorem== | |||
The following theorem was proved by [[Elliott Lieb|E. H. Lieb]] in.<ref name="L73" /> It proves and generalizes a conjecture of E. P. Wigner, M. M. Yanase and F. J. Dyson.<ref name="WY64">E. P. Wigner, M. M. Yanase, On the Positive Semi-Definite Nature of a Certain Matrix Expression, Can. J. Math. 16, 397–406, (1964).</ref> Six years later other proofs were given by T. Ando <ref name="A79">. Ando, Convexity of Certain Maps on Positive Definite Matrices and Applications to Hadamard Products, Lin. Alg. Appl. 26, 203–241 (1979).</ref> and B. Simon,<ref name="B05" /> and several more have been given since then. | |||
For all <math>m\times n</math> matrices <math>K</math>, and all <math>q </math> and <math>r</math> such that <math>0 \leq q\leq 1</math> and <math>0\leq r \leq 1</math>, with <math>q + r \leq 1</math> the real valued map on <math>\mathbf{H}^+_m \times \mathbf{H}^+_n</math> given by | |||
:<math> | |||
F(A,B,K) = {\rm Tr}(K^*A^qKB^r) | |||
</math> | |||
* is jointly concave in <math>(A,B)</math> | |||
* is convex in <math>K</math>. | |||
Here <math>K^* </math> stands for the [[Hermitian adjoint|adjoint operator]] of <math>K.</math> | |||
==Lieb's theorem== | |||
For a fixed Hermitian matrix <math>L\in\mathbf{H}_n</math>, the function | |||
:<math> f(A)={\rm Tr} \,\exp\{L+\ln A\} </math> | |||
is concave on <math>\mathbf{H}_n^+</math>. | |||
The theorem and proof are due to E. H. Lieb,<ref name="L73" /> Thm 6, where he obtains this theorem as a corollary of Lieb's concavity Theorem. | |||
The most direct proof is due to H. Epstein;<ref name="E73">H. Epstein, Remarks on Two Theorems of E. Lieb, Comm. Math. Phys., 31:317–325, (1973).</ref> see M.B. Ruskai papers,<ref name="R02">M. B. Ruskai, Inequalities for Quantum Entropy: A Review With Conditions for Equality, J. Math. Phys., 43(9):4358–4375, (2002).</ref><ref name="R06">M. B. Ruskai, Another Short and Elementary Proof of Strong Subadditivity of Quantum Entropy, Reports Math. Phys. 60, 1–12 (2007).</ref> for a review of this argument. | |||
==Ando's convexity theorem== | |||
T. Ando's proof <ref name="A79" /> of [[#Lieb's concavity theorem|Lieb's concavity theorem]] led to the following significant complement to it: | |||
For all <math>m \times n</math> matrices <math>K</math>, and all <math>1 \leq q \leq 2</math> and <math>0 \leq r \leq 1</math> with <math>q-r \geq 1</math>, the real valued map on <math>\mathbf{H}^+_m \times \mathbf{H}^+_n</math> given by | |||
:<math> (A,B) \mapsto {\rm Tr}(K^*A^qKB^{-r})</math> | |||
is convex. | |||
==Joint convexity of relative entropy== | |||
For two operators <math>A, B\in\mathbf{H}^+_n </math> define the following map | |||
:<math> R(A\|B):= {\rm Tr}(A\log A) - {\rm Tr}(A\log B).</math> | |||
For [[Density matrix|density matrices]] <math>\rho</math> and <math>\sigma</math>, the map <math>R(\rho\|\sigma)=S(\rho\|\sigma)</math> is the Umegaki's [[quantum relative entropy]]. | |||
Note that the non-negativity of <math>R(A\|B)</math> follows from Klein's inequality with <math>f(x)=x\log x</math>. | |||
===Statement=== | |||
The map <math>R(A\|B): \mathbf{H}^+_n \times \mathbf{H}^+_n \rightarrow \mathbf{R}</math> is jointly convex. | |||
===Proof=== | |||
For all <math>0 < p < 1</math>, <math>(A,B) \mapsto Tr(B^{1-p}A^p)</math> is jointly concave, by [[#Lieb's concavity theorem|Lieb's concavity theorem]], and thus | |||
:<math>(A,B)\mapsto \frac{1}{p-1}({\rm Tr}(B^{1-p}A^p)-{\rm Tr}\, A)</math> | |||
is convex. But | |||
:<math>\lim_{p\rightarrow 1}\frac{1}{p-1}({\rm Tr}(B^{1-p}A^p)-{\rm Tr}\, A)=R(A\|B),</math> | |||
and convexity is preserved in the limit. | |||
The proof is due to G. Lindblad.<ref name="Ldb74">G. Lindblad, Expectations and Entropyy Inequalities, Commun. Math. Phys. 39, 111–119 (1974).</ref> | |||
==Jensen's operator and trace inequalities== | |||
The operator version of [[Jensen's inequality]] is due to C. Davis.<ref name="D57">C. Davis, A Schwarz inequality for convex operator functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 8, 42–44, (1957).</ref> | |||
A continuous, real function <math>f</math> on an interval <math>I</math> satisfies '''Jensen's Operator Inequality''' if the following holds | |||
:<math> f\left(\sum_kA_k^*X_kA_k\right)\leq\sum_k A_k^*f(X_k)A_k, </math> | |||
for operators <math>\{A_k\}_k</math> with <math>\sum_k A^*_kA_k=1</math> and for [[self-adjoint operator]]s <math>\{X_k\}_k</math> with [[Spectrum (functional analysis)|spectrum]] on <math>I</math>. | |||
See,<ref name="D57" /><ref name="HP02">F. Hansen, G. K. Pedersen, Jensen's Operator Inequality, Bull. London Math. Soc. 35 (4): 553–564, (2003).</ref> for the proof of the following two theorems. | |||
===Jensen's trace inequality=== | |||
Let <math>f</math> be a continuous function defined on an interval <math>I</math> and let <math>m</math> and <math>n</math> be natural numbers. If <math>f</math> is convex we then have the inequality | |||
:<math> {\rm Tr}\Bigl(f\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^nA_k^*X_kA_k\Bigr)\Bigr)\leq {\rm Tr}\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^n A_k^*f(X_k)A_k\Bigr),</math> | |||
for all <math>(X_1, \ldots , X_n)</math> self-adjoint <math>m\times m</math> matrices with spectra contained in <math>I</math> and | |||
all <math>(A_1, \ldots , A_n)</math> of <math>m \times m</math> matrices with <math>\sum_{k=1}^nA_k^*A_k=1</math>. | |||
Conversely, if the above inequality is satisfied for some <math>n</math> and <math>m</math>, where <math>n > 1</math>, then <math>f</math> is convex. | |||
===Jensen's operator inequality=== | |||
For a continuous function <math>f</math> defined on an interval <math>I</math> the following conditions are equivalent: | |||
* <math>f</math> is operator convex. | |||
* For each natural number <math>n</math> we have the inequality | |||
:<math> f\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^nA_k^*X_kA_k\Bigr)\leq\sum_{k=1}^n A_k^*f(X_k)A_k, </math> | |||
for all <math>(X_1, \ldots , X_n)</math> bounded, self-adjoint operators on an arbitrary [[Hilbert space]] <math>\mathcal{H}</math> with | |||
spectra contained in <math>I</math> and all <math>(A_1, \ldots , A_n)</math> on <math>\mathcal{H}</math> with <math>\sum_{k=1}^n A^*_kA_k=1</math>. | |||
* <math>f(V^*XV) \leq V^*f(X)V</math> for each isometry <math>V</math> on an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space <math>\mathcal{H}</math> and | |||
every self-adjoint operator <math>X</math> with spectrum in <math>I</math>. | |||
* <math>Pf(PXP + \lambda(1 -P))P \leq Pf(X)P</math> for each projection <math>P</math> on an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space <math>\mathcal{H}</math>, every self-adjoint operator <math>X</math> with spectrum in <math>I</math> and every <math>\lambda</math> in <math>I</math>. | |||
==Araki-Lieb-Thirring inequality== | |||
E. H. Lieb and W. E. Thirring proved the following inequality in <ref>E. H. Lieb, W. E. Thirring, Inequalities for the Moments of the Eigenvalues of the Schrödinger Hamiltonian and Their Relation to Sobolev Inequalities, in Studies in Mathematical Physics, edited E. Lieb, B. Simon, and A. Wightman, Princeton University Press, 269-303 (1976).</ref> in 1976: For any <math> A\geq 0 </math>, <math>B\geq 0 </math> and <math>r\geq 1, </math> | |||
:<math>{\rm Tr} (B^{1/2}A^{1/2}B^{1/2})^r\leq {\rm Tr} B^{r/2}A^{r/2}B^{r/2}.</math> | |||
In 1990 <ref>H. Araki, On an Inequality of Lieb and Thirring, Lett. Math. Phys. 19, 167-170 (1990).</ref> H. Araki generalized the above inequality to the following one: For any <math>A\geq 0 </math>, <math>B\geq 0 </math> and <math>q\geq 0, </math> | |||
:<math>{\rm Tr}(B^{1/2}AB^{1/2})^{rq}\leq {\rm Tr}(B^{r/2}A^rB^{r/2})^q,</math> for <math>r\geq 1, </math> | |||
and | |||
:<math>{\rm Tr}(B^{r/2}A^rB^{r/2})^q\leq {\rm Tr}(B^{1/2}AB^{1/2})^{rq},</math> for <math>0\leq r\leq 1. </math> | |||
==Effros's theorem== | |||
E. Effros in <ref name="E09">E. Effros, A Matrix Convexity Approach to Some Celebrated Quantum Inequalities, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, n.4, 1006–1008 (2009).</ref> proved the following theorem. | |||
If <math>f(x)</math> is an operator convex function, and <math>L</math> and <math>R</math> are commuting bounded linear operators, i.e. the commutator <math>[L,R]=LR-RL=0</math>, the ''perspective'' | |||
:<math>g(L, R):=f(LR^{-1})R </math> | |||
is jointly convex, i.e. if <math>L=\lambda L_1+(1-\lambda)L_2</math> and <math>R=\lambda R_1+(1-\lambda)R_2</math> with <math>[L_i, R_i]=0</math> (i=1,2), <math>0\leq\lambda\leq 1</math>, | |||
:<math>g(L,R)\leq \lambda g(L_1,R_1)+(1-\lambda)g(L_2,R_2).</math> | |||
== See also == | |||
* [[von Neumann's trace inequality]] | |||
* [[von Neumann entropy]] | |||
==References== | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
<!-- This will add a notice to the bottom of the page and won't blank it! The new template which says that your draft is waiting for a review will appear at the bottom; simply ignore the old (grey) drafted templates and the old (red) decline templates. A bot will update your article submission. Until then, please don't change anything in this text box and press "Save page". --> | |||
[[Category:Operator theory]] | |||
[[Category:Matrix theory]] | |||
[[Category:Inequalities]] |
Latest revision as of 17:35, 17 September 2013
In mathematics, there are many kinds of inequalities connected with matrices and linear operators on Hilbert spaces. This article reviews some of the most important operator inequalities connected with traces of matrices.
Useful references here are,.[1][2][3][4]
Basic definitions
Let denote the space of Hermitian matrices and denote the set consisting of positive semi-definite Hermitian matrices. For operators on an infinite dimensional Hilbert space we require that they be trace class and self-adjoint, in which case similar definitions apply, but we discuss only matrices, for simplicity.
For any real-valued function on an interval one can define a matrix function for any operator with eigenvalues in by defining it on the eigenvalues and corresponding projectors as with the spectral decomposition
Operator monotone
A function defined on an interval is said to be operator monotone if for all , and all with eigenvalues in , the following holds:
where the inequality means that the operator is positive semi-definite.
Operator convex
A function is said to be operator convex if for all and all with eigenvalues in , and , the following holds
Note that the operator has eigenvalues in , since and have eigenvalues in .
A function is operator concave if is operator convex, i.e. the inequality above for is reversed.
Joint convexity
A function , defined on intervals is said to be jointly convex if for all and all with eigenvalues in and all with eigenvalues in , and any the following holds
A function is jointly concave if is jointly convex, i.e. the inequality above for is reversed.
Trace function
Given a function , the associated trace function on is given by
where has eigenvalues and stands for a trace of the operator.
Convexity and monotonicity of the trace function
Let be continuous, and let be any integer.
Then if is monotone increasing, so is on .
Likewise, if is convex, so is on , and
it is strictly convex if is strictly convex.
See proof and discussion in,[1] for example.
Löwner–Heinz theorem
For , the function is operator monotone and operator concave.
For , the function is operator monotone and operator concave.
For , the function and operator convex.
Furthermore, is operator concave and operator monotone, while is operator convex.
The original proof of this theorem is due to K. Löwner,[5] where he gave a necessary and sufficient condition for to be operator monotone. An elementary proof of the theorem is discussed in [1] and a more general version of it in [6]
Klein's inequality
For all Hermitian matrices and and all differentiable convex functions with derivative , or for all posotive-definite Hermitian matrices and , and all differentiable convex functions the following inequality holds
In either case, if is strictly convex, there is equality if and only if .
Proof
Let so that for , . Define . By convexity and monotonicity of trace functions, is convex, and so for all ,
and in fact the right hand side is monotone decreasing in . Taking the limit yields Klein's inequality.
Note that if is strictly convex and , then is strictly convex. The final assertion follows from this and the fact that is monotone decreasing in .
Golden–Thompson inequality
Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church.
In 1965, S. Golden [7] and C.J. Thompson [8] independently discovered that
This inequality can be generalized for three operators:[9] for non-negative operators ,
Peierls–Bogoliubov inequality
Let be such that . Define , then
The proof of this inequality follows from Klein's inequality. Take , and .[10]
Gibbs variational principle
Let be a self-adjoint operator such that is trace class. Then for any with
with equality if and only if .
Lieb's concavity theorem
The following theorem was proved by E. H. Lieb in.[9] It proves and generalizes a conjecture of E. P. Wigner, M. M. Yanase and F. J. Dyson.[11] Six years later other proofs were given by T. Ando [12] and B. Simon,[3] and several more have been given since then.
For all matrices , and all and such that and , with the real valued map on given by
Here stands for the adjoint operator of
Lieb's theorem
For a fixed Hermitian matrix , the function
The theorem and proof are due to E. H. Lieb,[9] Thm 6, where he obtains this theorem as a corollary of Lieb's concavity Theorem. The most direct proof is due to H. Epstein;[13] see M.B. Ruskai papers,[14][15] for a review of this argument.
Ando's convexity theorem
T. Ando's proof [12] of Lieb's concavity theorem led to the following significant complement to it:
For all matrices , and all and with , the real valued map on given by
is convex.
Joint convexity of relative entropy
For two operators define the following map
For density matrices and , the map is the Umegaki's quantum relative entropy.
Note that the non-negativity of follows from Klein's inequality with .
Statement
Proof
For all , is jointly concave, by Lieb's concavity theorem, and thus
is convex. But
and convexity is preserved in the limit.
The proof is due to G. Lindblad.[16]
Jensen's operator and trace inequalities
The operator version of Jensen's inequality is due to C. Davis.[17]
A continuous, real function on an interval satisfies Jensen's Operator Inequality if the following holds
for operators with and for self-adjoint operators with spectrum on .
See,[17][18] for the proof of the following two theorems.
Jensen's trace inequality
Let be a continuous function defined on an interval and let and be natural numbers. If is convex we then have the inequality
for all self-adjoint matrices with spectra contained in and all of matrices with .
Conversely, if the above inequality is satisfied for some and , where , then is convex.
Jensen's operator inequality
For a continuous function defined on an interval the following conditions are equivalent:
for all bounded, self-adjoint operators on an arbitrary Hilbert space with spectra contained in and all on with .
every self-adjoint operator with spectrum in .
- for each projection on an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space , every self-adjoint operator with spectrum in and every in .
Araki-Lieb-Thirring inequality
E. H. Lieb and W. E. Thirring proved the following inequality in [19] in 1976: For any , and
In 1990 [20] H. Araki generalized the above inequality to the following one: For any , and
and
Effros's theorem
E. Effros in [21] proved the following theorem.
If is an operator convex function, and and are commuting bounded linear operators, i.e. the commutator , the perspective
is jointly convex, i.e. if and with (i=1,2), ,
See also
References
43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 E. Carlen, Trace Inequalities and Quantum Entropy: An Introductory Course, Contemp. Math. 529 (2009).
- ↑ R. Bhatia, Matrix Analysis, Springer, (1997).
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 B. Simon, Trace Ideals and their Applications, Cambridge Univ. Press, (1979); Second edition. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, (2005).
- ↑ M. Ohya, D. Petz, Quantum Entropy and Its Use, Springer, (1993).
- ↑ K. Löwner, "Uber monotone Matrix funktionen", Math. Z. 38, 177–216, (1934).
- ↑ W.F. Donoghue, Jr., Monotone Matrix Functions and Analytic Continuation, Springer, (1974).
- ↑ S. Golden, Lower Bounds for Helmholtz Functions, Phys. Rev. 137, B 1127–1128 (1965)
- ↑ C.J. Thompson, Inequality with Applications in Statistical Mechanics, J. Math. Phys. 6, 1812–1813, (1965).
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 E. H. Lieb, Convex Trace Functions and the Wigner–Yanase–Dyson Conjecture, Advances in Math. 11, 267–288 (1973).
- ↑ D. Ruelle, Statistical Mechanics: Rigorous Results, World Scient. (1969).
- ↑ E. P. Wigner, M. M. Yanase, On the Positive Semi-Definite Nature of a Certain Matrix Expression, Can. J. Math. 16, 397–406, (1964).
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 . Ando, Convexity of Certain Maps on Positive Definite Matrices and Applications to Hadamard Products, Lin. Alg. Appl. 26, 203–241 (1979).
- ↑ H. Epstein, Remarks on Two Theorems of E. Lieb, Comm. Math. Phys., 31:317–325, (1973).
- ↑ M. B. Ruskai, Inequalities for Quantum Entropy: A Review With Conditions for Equality, J. Math. Phys., 43(9):4358–4375, (2002).
- ↑ M. B. Ruskai, Another Short and Elementary Proof of Strong Subadditivity of Quantum Entropy, Reports Math. Phys. 60, 1–12 (2007).
- ↑ G. Lindblad, Expectations and Entropyy Inequalities, Commun. Math. Phys. 39, 111–119 (1974).
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 C. Davis, A Schwarz inequality for convex operator functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 8, 42–44, (1957).
- ↑ F. Hansen, G. K. Pedersen, Jensen's Operator Inequality, Bull. London Math. Soc. 35 (4): 553–564, (2003).
- ↑ E. H. Lieb, W. E. Thirring, Inequalities for the Moments of the Eigenvalues of the Schrödinger Hamiltonian and Their Relation to Sobolev Inequalities, in Studies in Mathematical Physics, edited E. Lieb, B. Simon, and A. Wightman, Princeton University Press, 269-303 (1976).
- ↑ H. Araki, On an Inequality of Lieb and Thirring, Lett. Math. Phys. 19, 167-170 (1990).
- ↑ E. Effros, A Matrix Convexity Approach to Some Celebrated Quantum Inequalities, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, n.4, 1006–1008 (2009).